Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Loukik chara“

Este ensaio apresenta um estudo do espetáculo Ça Ira (1) Fin de Louis, escrito e dirigido por Joël Pommerat. Inicialmente, busca-se estabelecer um diálogo entre Ça Ira e a histórica montagem de 1789, com direção de Ariane Mnouchkine. Em seguida, o espetáculo é examinado por meio de procedimentos recorrentes no trabalho de Pommerat, como, por exemplo, a neutralização do seu ponto de vista que expõe na peça situações, ideias e personagens sob diversas perspectivas. Por fim, este estudo baseia-se teoricamente no que Jean-Pierre Sarrazac chama de “teatros do íntimo” para observar a articulação entre o íntimo e o político em Ça Ira (1) Fin de Louis.

Louis Rosenhead was Professor and Head of the Department of Applied Mathematics at the University of Liverpool for a period of 40 years from 1933 to 1973, a record not easily equalled. Rosenhead’s father, Abram Haim Rozenkopf, was born on 23 September 1879 in Poland, did his national service in the Russian Army as a young man, and came to England as an immigrant in 1903. He became a British citizen by naturalization in 1925. Louis Rosenhead’s mother, Chaja Nogacz (or Ellen Nelson in the anglicized form that she later adopted) was born on 15 April 1884, and came to England as an immigrant in 1902. In fact, the father and mother came from neighbouring villages in Poland, and were married on 4 January 1905 in the Beth-Hamedrash Hagodel Synagogue in Hope Street, Leeds. The anglicized surname, Rosenhead, was presumably taken up at some stage after arrival in England; and after their marriage they were known as Abraham and Ellen Rosenhead. Abraham and Ellen had three children, Louis (1 January 1906), Michael (14 June 1912) and Esther Leah (26 May 1923). Louis was born at 4 Friendly Terrace, Mabgate, Leeds. His father died on 24 August 1935 in Leeds, and his mother on 23 February 1976.

René Char a officiellement adhéré au surréalisme de 1930 à 1934. Sa poésie a-t-elle pour autant été profondément marquée par le mouvement ? C’est par l’affirmative que se propose de répondre cette thèse, en réévaluant la place du surréalisme dans l’ensemble du corpus publié par Char de 1928 à 1988, et à la lumière de correspondances ou de manuscrits inédits. Dans la première partie, une étude chronologique des recueils d’avant-guerre montre combien l’étape surréaliste a permis à Char, par attraction puis par répulsion, de forger ses propres orientations esthétiques et intellectuelles. La seconde partie envisage l’ensemble des textes d’après-guerre sous différentes perspectives afin de révéler la persistance de l’héritage surréaliste, Char ne cessant en effet de se confronter au mouvement pour mieux définir le sens de son œuvre, de sa poétique, de ses positions politiques, de ses réflexions éthiques ou de ses choix d’écriture. L’évolution de Char offre ainsi un exemple singulier de la dissémination du surréalisme dans la poésie française du XXe siècle
René Char officially belonged to the surrealist movement from 1930 to 1934. For all that, did the movement have a profound impact on his poetry ? This thesis sets out to answer in the affirmative by reconsidering the place of surrealism in the whole corpus published by Char from 1928 to 1988, in the light of unpublished correspondences or manuscripts. In the first part, it is a chronological study of the pre-war books which shows how the surrealist stage enabled Char, by attraction or repulsion, to form his own aesthetic and intellectual positions. The second part examines all of the post-war texts from different angles so as to reveal the persistence of the surrealist heritage, since Char constantly goes back to surrealism to define the meaning of his works, poetics, political tendencies, ethical thoughts or stylistic choices. Thus Char’s evolution provides a remarkable example of the dissemination of surrealism in the twentieth century French poetry

Cette thèse a pour objet l’invention de soi chez Patrick Modiano. Le syntagme invention de soi peut s’interpréter de trois manières différentes selon que l’on met l’accent sur la recherche de l’identité pour répondre à la question qui suis-je ?, ou que l’on interroge la rhétorique pour y chercher les idées et arguments pour composer son discours ou encore que l’on ne fasse appel qu’à sa mémoire puisque rien de nouveau n’a été inventé. De ses trois approches, la première guide en majorité les travaux de cette thèse, menée à l’aide des outils traditionnels de l’analyse littéraire et en excluant toute approche psychanalytique que Patrick Modiano récuse pour lui-même. La démarche suivie l’est en trois points. Dans un premier temps, il s’agit de rechercher ce qui alimente l’œuvre romanesque de Patrick Modiano, entre l’Histoire et plus particulièrement l’histoire de la Collaboration en France entre 1940 et 1944 ou de la fin de la guerre d’Algérie, très présente dans plusieurs de ses romans, ses sources littéraires et plus spécialement des auteurs antisémites de l’entre-deux guerres qu’il cite souvent et sa vie partagée, c'est-à-dire partagée avec ses lecteurs. Ensuite il s’agit de se demander chez cet auteur qui pratique quasiment exclusivement le Je-narrateur, quel est le genre de ses récits entre roman, autobiographie et autofiction. Enfin la question de son identité est posée : qu’est ce pour lui être né en 1945, être le fils d’un collaborateur ou présumé tel, être fils d’un Juif ou encore être écrivain ? Ces analyses nous permettent de répondre à la question posée par cette thèse et de déterminer de quelle manière Patrick Modiano s’invente soi-même dans ses récits. Est-ce en s’inventant de fausses dates de naissance, une fausse date de mariage de ses parents, une fausse sœur ou un faux oncle ou ne serait-ce pas plutôt en s’inventant à chaque récit une identité imaginaire comme si elle était la sienne, pour l’abandonner au récit suivant et en reprendre alors une nouvelle ?
This dissertation addresses the question of the invention of oneself by Patrick Modiano. The terms invention of oneself can be interpreted on three ways, depending on the manner the accent is made on the definition of identity, answering the question : “Who am I?”, or finding the ideas and arguments to prepare a discourse as it is done in the rhetoric or questioning one’s memory as nothing new can be invented. Amongst these three approaches, the first one about the question of identity is mainly studied with the literary tools, excluding the psychoanalytical view which is rejected by Patrick Modiano himself. A three steps approach is followed. At first we analyze how the Patrick Modiano’s romanesque art is influenced by History, mainly the history of the French collaboration during World War II but also by the history of the Algeria war at the beginning of the sixties, his literary sources mainly among French anti-Semite authors who published their books just before World War II, and of course his shared life, that is to say the life he is sharing with the readers. The following question concerns the literary genre of the novels written by an author using the I narrator. Is he writing novels, autobiographies or autofictions? The last issue is about the question of identity: what does it mean for Patrick Modiano to be born in 1945, to be the son of a supposed collaborator, or the son of a Jew, or to be a writer? Answering these different questions should help to approach the definition of the invention of oneself. Is it related to the invention of several birth dates, a false date for the wedding of his parents or imaginary family members for himself or on the opposite is it related to the invention of a new imaginary identity at each novel till the previous identity is abandoned and a new imaginary identity is created in the following novel?

Abstract The essential idea of the novel was to represent the nobility of a lateeighteenth-century African civilization and chart the ensuing conflict between it and Islam. Acknowledging a commercial component in Segu’s origin, Conde indicated that a former editor at Laffont had pointed out to her the lack of a great historical novel (“grand roman historique”) on Africa.I The sequel, The Children of Segu (Segou: La terre en miette), plots the French incursion from St. Louis Island down the Senegal River and depicts the fall of a powerless, decadent Segu to the better-armed French colonial forces.

Abstract This chapter analyzes the development of the Catholic Church’s position on interreligious dialogue following the Second Vatican Council and its impact on dialogue initiatives in the Middle East and North Africa. It examines the work of several key figures of dialogue engaged in the case studies presented in the book, including Piero Coda, Fadi Daou, and Chiara Lubich, as well as Louis Massignon and Christian de Chergé. The chapter explores the themes of human dignity, religious freedom, spiritual solidarity, and religious pluralism as taken up by these thinkers and analyzes how they understood their experiences in relation to the authority of the Catholic Church as well as the historical shifts introduced by liberal modernity.