Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Language and education Thailand“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Language and education Thailand" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Sukamolson, Suphat. „English Language Education Policy in Thailand“. Asian Englishes 1, Nr. 1 (Juni 1998): 68–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13488678.1998.10800995.
Wongsothorn, Achara, Kulaporn Hiranburana und Supanee Chinnawongs. „English Language Teaching in Thailand Today“. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 22, Nr. 2 (Januar 2002): 107–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220210.
Manomaiviboon, Prapin. „Chinese Language Teaching in Thailand“. MANUSYA 7, Nr. 3 (2004): 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26659077-00703003.
Waree, Chaiwat. „Education Course Syllabus Development, Thai Language Major according to Buddhism Way of Thailand“. International Education Studies 9, Nr. 1 (29.12.2015): 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p123.
JUNG Hwan-Seung. „The Korean Wave and Korean Language Education in Thailand“. 동남아연구 17, Nr. 1 (August 2007): 131–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.21485/hufsea.2007.17.1.006.
Franz, Jens, und Adisa Teo. „‘A2 is Normal’ – Thai Secondary School English Teachers’ Encounters with the CEFR“. RELC Journal 49, Nr. 3 (17.11.2017): 322–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738816.
Isnaniah, Siti, und Islahuddin. „Management of Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers (BIPA) at Islamic Religious Higher Education Institutions (PTKI) in Indonesia and Thailand“. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 9, Nr. 1 (30.09.2020): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.91.1-27.
Schoonmaker, Cristina Penn. „Arts Education in Thailand: Why it Matters“. MANUSYA 17, Nr. 2 (2014): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01702001.
Hayes, David. „Language education policy and practice in state education systems“. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2, Nr. 2 (08.07.2020): 240–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19017.hay.
Foley, Joseph A. „English In…Thailand“. RELC Journal 36, Nr. 2 (August 2005): 223–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688205055578.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Hart-Rawung, Pornpimon, und n/a. „Internationalising English language education in Thailand: English language program for Thai engineers“. RMIT University. Global Studies, Social Science and Planning, 2008. http://adt.lib.rmit.edu.au/adt/public/adt-VIT20090715.100731.
Liando, Nihta V. F. „Foreign language learning in primary schools with special reference to Indonesia, Thailand and Australia /“. Title page, contents and abstract only, 1999. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09ARM/09arml693.pdf.
Khunnawut, Saowakhon. „English as a foreign Language in the Thai higher education context investigations into teaching and learning styles and strategies, and other factors“. Dresden TUDpress, 2009. http://d-nb.info/999730584/04.
Kulsiri, Supanit, und n/a. „A Critical Analysis of the 2001 National Foreign Language Standards-Based Curriculum in the Thai School System“. University of Canberra. Education & Innovation, 2006. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20070813.123324.
Wat-aksorn, Patchara. „Pedagogical factors and considerations that should be included in the decision-making process for delivery of an EFL/ESL program through distance learning in Thailand : a delphi study /“. free to MU campus, to others for purchase, 1999. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/mo/fullcit?p9964008.
Padermprach, Napapach. „The problems of English Language Education at the upper secondary level in Thailand : the perceptions of Thai EFL teachers and students in Bangkok“. Thesis, University of Warwick, 2017. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/99651/.
Pongmussaya, Vittaya. „The development of computer assisted instruction on the world wide web to enhance English learning for Thai non-formal education students“. CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2001. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2024.
Dagoon, Jinky Lunaspe. „Reading fluency instruction in upper elementary international school classrooms“. CSUSB ScholarWorks, 2005. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2624.
Tantiniranat, Sutraphorn. „TESOL purposes and paradigms in an intercultural age : practitioner perspectives from a Thai university“. Thesis, University of Manchester, 2017. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/tesol-purposes-and-paradigms-in-an-intercultural-age-practitioner-perspectives-from-a-thai-university(91d97b31-3147-4c8f-9e42-f98ff75189ca).html.
Tangpijaikul, Montri. „The Thai university student's fine-tuning of discourse in academic essays and electronic bulletin boards performance and competence /“. Phd thesis, Australia : Macquarie University, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/73139.
Bibliography: p. 208-233.
Introduction -- Conceptual frameworks: language competence and the acquisition of modality -- Generic frameworks: speech, writing and electronic communication -- Linguistic frameworks: modality and related concepts -- Research design and methodologies -- FTDs in the ACAD and BB corpora -- Learner's use of FTDs in discoursal context and their individual repertoires -- Conclusions and implications.
While natural interaction is one of the important components that lead to successful language learning (Vygotsky 1978, 1986), communication in classroom practice in Thailand is mostly teacher-centered and not genuinely interactive. Online group communication is different because it allows learners to exercise interpersonal communicative skills through interaction and meaning negotiation, as in reciprocal speech situations. At the same time it gives learners time to think and produce language without having to face the kind of pressure they feel in face-to-face classroom discussion. The language learner's competence is thus likely to be enhanced by opportunities to communicate online, and to be more visible there than in academic contexts, although there is a dearth of experimental research to show this. One way of investigating the pedagogical potential of bulletin board discussions is to focus on the interpersonal linguistic devices used in textual interactions (Biber 1988). -- The purpose of this research is to find out whether students communicating online in bulletin board writing will exercise their repertoires of linguistic fine-tuning devices (hedges, modals, and intensifiers) more extensively than when writing academic essays. This was expected because hedges, modals and intensifiers are likely to be found in interactive discussions (Holmes 1983), while academic tasks do not create such an environment. Though hedges and modal devices are also found in academic genres (Salager-Meyer 1994, Hyland 1998), those used tend to be academic in function rather than communicative. -- In order to compare the frequency and variety of the fine-tuning devices used by learners in the two mediums, data was gathered from 39 Thai students of English at Kasetsart University, from (1) their discussions in online bulletin boards and (2) their academic essays. Tasks were assigned on parallel topics in three text types (narrative, explanatory, argumentative) for both mediums. The amount of writing was normalized to create comparable text lengths. Measures used in the quantitative analysis included tallying of the types and tokens of the experimental linguistic items, with the help of the AntConc 2007 computer concordancer. Samples of written texts from the two mediums were also analyzed qualitatively and compared in terms of their discourse structure (stages, moves and speech acts), to see which functional segments support or prompt particular types of pragmatic devices. -- The findings confirm that in electronic bulletin boards the students exercise their repertoires of fine-tuning devices more frequently, and use a greater variety of pragmatic functions than in academic essays. This is probably because online discussion fosters interactions that are more typical of speech (Crystal 2006), and its structure allows for a series of interpersonal moves which have no place in academic tasks. Text-type also emerged as a significant factor: writing argumentative texts prompted greater use of modals and intensifiers than the narrative and explanatory ones. Thus students' communicative competence showed itself most fully in the argumentative online assignments, and was not so evident in academic and expository essays. Frequent use of modal and intensifying elements was also found to correlate with the students' English proficiency grades, and how regularly they wrote online. This incidentally shows the importance of exposure to L2 in language acquisition, and that lower-proficiency learners need more opportunities to exercise their L2 resources in interactive discourse, in order to develop competence in using them. -- These research findings support Long's (1996) 'Interaction Hypothesis', that learners learn best in situations that cater for interaction; and Swain's (1985) 'Output Hypothesis', that learners need the chance to exercise their language naturally in a variety of contexts -through academic tasks as well as social interactions, which are equally important for language education. Extended performance opportunities undoubtedly feed back into the learner's communicative competence.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
xi, 389 p. ill
Bücher zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Darasawang, Pornapit. Innovation in language learning and teaching: The case of Thailand. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Inglis, Christine. Education in Southeast Asia: A select bibliography of English language materials on education in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand 1945-1983. Aldershot: Gower, 1985.
Inglis, Christine. Education in Southeast Asia: A select bibliography of English language materials on education in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, 1945-1983. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower Pub. Co., 1985.
Matsui, Yoshikazu. Tai ni okeru nihongo kyōiku: Sono kiban to seisei to hatten = Japanese language education in Thailand : its background, situations and a history of its development. Tōkyō: Kinseisha, 1999.
Jennings, Gary. Teaching guide for Asia and beyond: Language games and survival tips for Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and China. Calgary: B.A. Cass Pub., 1997.
Pholsward, Ruja. The testing of reading comprehension in English for academic purposes: A case study of economics students in Thailand. Ottawa: National Library of Canada, 1985.
Fry, Gerald W., Hrsg. Education in Thailand. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6.
Trappes-Lomax, Hugh, und Gibson Ferguson, Hrsg. Language in Language Teacher Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.4.
Halliday, M. A. K. Language and education. London: Continuum, 2007.
Elnashar, Narymane A. Language, culture & education. Cairo: Anglo-Egyptian Bookshop, 1988.
Buchteile zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Draper, John. „Language education policy in Thailand“. In The Routledge International Handbook of Language Education Policy in Asia, 229–42. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019. |: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315666235-16.
Kosonen, Kimmo, und Kirk R. Person. „Languages, Identities and Education in Thailand“. In Language, Education and Nation-building, 200–231. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137455536_11.
Kaur, Amrita, David Young und Robert Kirkpatrick. „English Education Policy in Thailand: Why the Poor Results?“ In Language Policy, 345–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_16.
Premsrirat, Suwilai, und Kirk R. Person. „Education in Thailand’s Ethnic Languages: Reflections on a Decade of Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education Policy and Practice“. In Education in Thailand, 393–408. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6_15.
Kosonen, Kimmo. „The Use of Non-Dominant Languages in Education in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam“. In Language Issues in Comparative Education, 39–58. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-218-1_3.
Kosonen, Kimmo. „Vernaculars in Literacy and Basic Education in Cambodia, Laos and Thailand“. In Language Planning and Policy: Issues in Language Planning and Literacy, herausgegeben von Anthony J. Liddicoat, 122–42. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781853599781-010.
Waters, Alan. „Innovation in Teacher Education in Thailand: The KMUTT MA Programme“. In Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 29–42. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137449757_3.
Todd, Richard Watson. „National-Level Educational Innovations in Thailand“. In Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137449757_2.
Niyom, Prapapat. „Thai Alternative Education“. In Education in Thailand, 651–76. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6_26.
Siribanpitak, Pruet. „Redesigning Teacher Education“. In Education in Thailand, 461–76. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6_18.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Jehwae, Phaosan, und Mahamatsakree Manyunu. „Problems of Malay Language Education in Patani Southern Thailand“. In Proceedings of The 1st EAI Bukittinggi International Conference on Education, BICED 2019, 17-18 October, 2019, Bukititinggi, West Sumatera, Indonesia. EAI, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-10-2019.2289738.
Wasuntarasophit, Sukhum, Kulthida Tuamsuk und Rattana Chantao. „ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING MANAGEMENT AT THE BASIC EDUCATION LEVEL IN THAILAND“. In International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.0604.
Suryani, Ina, Faharol Zubir, Norlizawati Ghazali, Sharifah Anis Zarith und Nuradila Hakimi. „THE USE OF NATIVE LANGUAGE COMPARED TO THE USE OF ENGLISH IN MALAYSIA – THAILAND SOFTSKILL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES“. In 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.1704.
Kusmiatun, Ari. „BIPA Teachers’ and Learners’ Perspective on Indonesia-Thailand Culture Parities“. In Proceedings of the 2nd Konferensi BIPA Tahunan by Postgraduate Program of Javanese Literature and Language Education in Collaboration with Association of Indonesian Language and Literature Lecturers, KEBIPAAN, 9 November, 2019, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. EAI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-11-2019.2294956.
Vong, Meng. „Southeast Asia: Linguistic Perspectives“. In GLOCAL Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2019. The GLOCAL Unit, SOAS University of London, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47298/cala2019.10-2.
Duan, Zhaoyang. „Study on the Similarities and Differences of Chinese Culture and Thai Culture from the Euphemism of “Death” in China and Thailand“. In 7th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.363.
Tawandorloh, Mr, und Islahuddin Islahuddin. „The Effectiveness of BIPA Learning at Students of Indonesian Concentration Department, Fatoni University, Thailand“. In Proceedings of the 2nd Konferensi BIPA Tahunan by Postgraduate Program of Javanese Literature and Language Education in Collaboration with Association of Indonesian Language and Literature Lecturers, KEBIPAAN, 9 November, 2019, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia. EAI, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-11-2019.2295051.
Pratami, Yustika Rahmawati, und Nurul Kurniati. „Sex Education Strategy for Adolescents: A Scoping Review“. In The 7th International Conference on Public Health 2020. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.02.27.
Duan, Zhaoyang. „The Concrete Embodiment of Hierarchy in Thailand’s Society and Its Analysis“. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.263.
Vibulpatanavong, Kanokporn. „Inclusive Education in Thailand“. In International Conference of Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icece-17.2018.16.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Language and education Thailand":
Hice, Chelsey. English Education In Thailand and Singapore: Differences in English Education, Use and Identity. Portland State University Library, Januar 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/honors.310.
Harrison, George C. Research, Development, Training and Education Using the Ada Programming Language. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, Juli 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada210760.
Tilson, John. Manipulation or education? : symbolic language, belief system and the Truman Doctrine. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5565.
Alrich, Amy A., Claudio C. Biltoc, Ashley-Louise N. Bybee, Lawrence B. Morton, Richard H. White, Robert A. Zirkle, Jessica L. Knight und Joseph F. Adams. The Infusion of Language, Regional, and Cultural Content into Military Education: Status Report. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, Januar 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada562774.
Asakura, Naomi. Language Policy and Bilingual Education for Immigrant Students at Public Schools in Japan. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.2516.
Murray, Nancy. Developing a Language in Education Policy for Post-apartheid South Africa: A Case Study. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.7218.
Schoettler, Sarah. STEM Education in the Foreign Language Classroom with Special Attention to the L2 German Classroom. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.2310.
Yoshii, Ruri. Language Skill Development in Japanese Kokugo Education: Analysis of the Television Program Wakaru Kokugo Yomikaki No Tsubo. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.2073.
DuBois, Elizabeth. The Voices of Special Educators: How Do Special Educators Teach English Language Learners Who are Receiving Special Education Services? Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.5522.
Lin, Shaojuan. Foreign Language Teaching in U.S. Higher Education Classrooms: An Investigation of the Relationship between Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs and Classroom Teaching. Portland State University Library, Januar 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.283.