Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Labour surplus villages“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Labour surplus villages" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Labour surplus villages"
Singh Rajput, Arjun, Latika Sharma, P. S. Shekhawat und Vikash Pawariya. „Estimation of seasonal surplus labour in agriculture in different agro-climatic regions of Rajasthan“. Environment Conservation Journal 23, Nr. 1&2 (01.02.2022): 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.36953/ecj.021873-2142.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleXolmuminov, Sh. „FUNDAMENTALS OF HR MARKETING RESEARCH OF THE RURAL LABOUR MARKET IN LABOUR-SURPLUS REGIONS“. Journal of Science and Innovative Development 4, Nr. 3 (30.06.2021): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.36522/2181-9637-2021-3-1.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLopez-Alonso, Rocío Hiraldo. „Value is Still Labour: Exploitation and the Production of Environmental Rent and Commodities for Nature Tourists in Rural Senegal“. Human Geography 10, Nr. 2 (Juli 2017): 54–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194277861701000204.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSINGH, K. M., R. K. P. SINGH, ANJANI KUMAR, ABHAY KUMAR, M. S. MEENA und V. P. CHAHAL. „Implications of labour migration for rice production and household economy: Evidences from eastern India“. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85, Nr. 6 (05.06.2015): 768–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i6.49191.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDipankar De. „Surplus Crop Residues for Energy Generation in Selected Districts of Madhya Pradesh - An Assessment“. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 45, Nr. 4 (31.12.2008): 50–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.52151/jae2008454.1351.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSHUKLA, ADITYA, und Ramchandra Ramchandra. „A Study on Economics of Marketing and Production of Aonla in District Pratapgarh (U.P.)“. International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 8, Nr. 9 (30.09.2021): 142–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.47856/ijaast.2021.v08i9.016.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSelden, Mark. „Jack Gray, Mao Zedong and the Political Economy of Chinese Development“. China Quarterly 187 (September 2006): 680–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305741006000300.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYi, Pan, Li Xin und Sheng Yu Guo. „Thinking of Village Construction in Central Region under the Context of Labor Migration“. Applied Mechanics and Materials 507 (Januar 2014): 666–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.507.666.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYang, Yang, Hua Li, Zhen Liu, Long Cheng, Assem Abu Hatab und Jing Lan. „Effect of Forestland Property Rights and Village Off-Farm Environment on Off-Farm Employment in Southern China“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 7 (25.03.2020): 2605. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072605.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleYdyrys, S. S., R. K. Niyazbekova und S. A. Ilasheva. „State regulation of labor market in labor-surplus rural regions of Kazakhstan“. Problems of AgriMarket, Nr. 4 (15.12.2022): 179–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.46666/2022-4.2708-9991.19.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Labour surplus villages"
Datta, Pradip Kumar. „Mobilising the basic resources in a set of labour surplus villages“. Thesis, University of North Bengal, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/214.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "Labour surplus villages"
Toulmin, Camilla. Cattle, Women, and Wells. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198853046.001.0001.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBuchteile zum Thema "Labour surplus villages"
Edwards, Jeanette. „In-Migration and Out-Migration“. In Born and Bred, 76–104. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233947.003.0004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBrødsgaard, Kjeld Erik, und Kamal Sheel. „Informalization and Growth: the Political Economy of Local Enterprises“. In State Capacity in East Asia, 203–35. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297635.003.0010.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLander, Brian. „The Nature of Political Power“. In The King's Harvest, 14–31. Yale University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300255089.003.0002.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePallot, Judith, und Tat'yana Nefedova. „Household Food Production—What Next?“ In Russia's Unknown Agriculture. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227419.003.0015.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„subsistence production (where in the colonial period mainly extra-economic factors such as forced cultivation or forced labour caused the integration of the peasantry in the market exchange). Socialist development was there-fore strongly identified with modernising through the rapid expansion of the state sector, that is, nationalisation and mechanisation on an ever-increasing scale. The peasantry would be gradually absorbed within this expanding sector, and hence, at first, the role of the peasantry was seen as essentially passive with its transformation mainly centring on social aspects. As such, the policy of communal villages became virtually a habitational concept (and was in actual fact the responsibility of the national directorate of housing): a question of social infrastructures (water supplies, schools, etc.) within a concept of communal life without concerning production and its transformation. This view conflicted heavily with the objective conditions in the rural areas characterised by a deep involvement of the peasantry in market relationships and their dependence on it either as suppliers of labour power or as cash crop producers. This contradiction became more obvious, when the balance of payments became a real constraint (in 1979) and, hence, the question of financing accumulation cropped up more strongly in practice. The peasantry as suppliers of cash crops, of food and of labour power to the state sectors occupied a crucial position in production and accumulation. However, the crucial question then becomes whether the peasantry only performs the role of supplying part of the accumulation fund or whether the peasantry itself is part and parcel of the process of transformation and hence that accumulation embraces as an integral part the transformation of peasant agriculture into more socialised forms of production. In other words, it poses the question whether the strategy is based on a primitive socialist accumulation on the basis of the peasantry (transferring the agrarian surplus to the develop-ment of the state sector), or whether accumulation includes the transformation of peasant agriculture. Clearly, the way this question is posed in practice will influence heavily the nature of the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. The proposition that the state sector can develop under its own steam (with or without the aid of external borrowing) cannot bypass this crucial question since, on the one hand, a considerable part of foreign exchange earnings and of the food supply to the towns depended on peasant production and, on the other, the very conditions of productivity and profitability in the agrarian state sector depended heavily on the organic link that existed.between labour supply and family agriculture. The monetary disequilibrium originating from the state sector has a severe impact on the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. First, the imbalance between the demand for and the supply of consumer commodities affected rural areas differently from urban areas. The reason was that in urban areas the rationing system guaranteed to each family a minimum quantity of basic consumer necessities at official prices. In the rural areas the principal form of rationing remained the queue! Hence, forced savings were distributed differently over urban and rural areas. Furthermore, the concentration of resources on the state sector also implied that the peasants'“. In The Agrarian Question in Socialist Transitions, 205. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203043493-29.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle