Einloggen

Thematische Bibliographien / Keynesian economics / Zeitschriftenartikel

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Keynesian economics“

Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Keynesian economics.

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 4. Juni 2021

Zuletzt aktualisiert am 10. März 2023

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Keynesian economics" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.

1

Guizzo, Danielle. „Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics?“ Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment of the history of economic thought. The article concludes by suggesting a new research agenda for Post-Keynesianism, making use of the ‘applied’ turn proposed by the recent history of economic thought as one of the strategies for Post-Keynesians to engage with the economics discipline.

2

Trautwein, Hans-Michael. „Leijonhufvud on New Keynesian Economics and the economics of Keynes“. Oxford Economic Papers 72, Nr. 4 (18.05.2020): 923–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaa013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Abstract The theme that Axel Leijonhufvud has extracted from the economics of Keynes is the potential for failures in the intertemporal coordination of activities in complex market systems. In his path-breaking book of 1968, he attacked standard Keynesian Economics for its view on frictions, which reduces the causes of macroeconomic pathologies to nominal rigidities. With the rise of DSGE-based New Keynesian Economics, Leijonhufvud has pointed out that ‘standard macroeconomics’ is still stuck in the frictions view. Referring to recent financial crises, he considers DSGE modelling to be hopelessly inadequate for dealing with such macroeconomic instability. Yet, the financial frictions literature in New Keynesian Economics claims to have found ways to incorporate financial crises into DSGE frameworks. The article describes continuity and change in Leijonhufvud’s critique of Old and New Keynesians, and assesses contrary claims to progress made in the DSGE world.

3

Tobin, James. „Price Flexibility and Output Stability: An Old Keynesian View“. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, Nr. 1 (01.02.1993): 45–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.45.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

In this symposium I shall play the role in which I was cast, the unreconstructed old Keynesian. Considering the alternatives, I do not mind being billed as a Keynesian, an old Keynesian at that. But old Keynesians come in several varieties, and I speak for no one but myself. Nor do I defend the literal text of The General Theory. Several generations of economists have criticized, amended, and elaborated that seminal work. I shall argue for the validity of the major propositions that distinguish Keynesian macroeconomics from old or new classical macroeconomics.

4

GREENWALD, B., und J. E. STIGLITZ. „KEYNESIAN, NEW KEYNESIAN AND NEW CLASSICAL ECONOMICS“. Oxford Economic Papers 39, Nr. 1 (März 1987): 119–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041773.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

5

Posada Posada, Carlos Esteban. „Expectativas de inflación y tasa de interés: aspectos teóricos“. Lecturas de Economía, Nr. 20 (10.03.2011): 37–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n20a7997.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

• Resumen: ¿Qué efectos tienen los cambios en las expectativas de inflación sobre las tasas de interés, nominales y reales? ¿Cómo se producen esos efectos? Existen dos grandes respuestas teóricas antagónicas a las preguntas anteriores: la clásica y la keynesiana. En este artículo se resumen dichas respuestas y se exponen sus alcances y limitaciones. A partir de este resumen se construye un modelo "cuasi-keynesiano", pero que arroja una conclusión que coincide con la respuesta clásica al respecto: las expectativas de inflación tienden a quedar incorporadas en la tasa nominal de interés sin modificar de manera permanente la tasa real de interés. En países o épocas con alteraciones significativas de las expectativas de inflación esta conclusión puede ser la correcta, no así la keynesiana. • Abstract: This question of just how expectations of inflation influence the real and the nominal rate of interest have been addressed from both a Keynesian and a classical perspective. This paper presents a critical summary of these arguments in the context of a quasi-keynesian model. Its finding is however is essentially classical – that inflationary expectations will be incorporated into the nominal rate of interest without having any permanent effect on the real rate.

6

Dimand, Robert W. „The much-exaggerated death of Keynesian economics“. Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 36–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.04.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

The supposed death of Keynesian economics has long been debated. This paper revisits the four central Keynesian propositions identified by Tobin's 1977 paper, ‘How dead is Keynes?’, to argue, in the light of the global financial crisis and the Great Recession, that Keynesian economics remains alive and relevant as useful economics for understanding the economy in a world of fundamental uncertainty, with particular reference to chapter 19 of Keynes's General Theory concerning economic instability and wage and price flexibility.

7

Harcourt, G. C., und Stephen Rousseas. „Post Keynesian Monetary Economics.“ Economic Journal 97, Nr. 387 (September 1987): 756. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232940.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

8

Niggle, Christopher J., und Stephen Rousseas. „Post Keynesian Monetary Economics“. Southern Economic Journal 54, Nr. 3 (Januar 1988): 807. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059042.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

9

Sesselmeier, Werner, Corrado Benassi, Allesandra Chirco und Caterina Colombo. „The New Keynesian Economics“. Southern Economic Journal 63, Nr. 1 (Juli 1996): 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1061334.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

10

Cottrell, Allin. „Post-Keynesian monetary economics“. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18, Nr. 6 (Dezember 1994): 587–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035292.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

11

Biewener, C. „Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics“. History of Political Economy 20, Nr. 1 (01.03.1988): 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-145.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

12

Gedeon, Shirley J. „Post Keynesian Monetary Economics“. Journal of Economic Issues 21, Nr. 1 (März 1987): 538–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1987.11504642.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

13

Bofinger, Peter. „Reviving Keynesianism: the modelling of the financial system makes the difference“. Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 61–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.06.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Keynesian economics is not dead. Instead, it is in a similar condition to Sleeping Beauty after she pricked her finger on the spindle. A large hedge of thorns has been laid over the original Keynesian building so that it is hardly recognizable today. Keynesian economics has suffered from a failure to sufficiently identify the core of the Keynesian revolution. This paper argues that the core concerns the distinction between real and monetary exchange economies, and that a proper understanding of money's role requires identifying the mechanisms of the financial system. Doing so reveals the fundamental incompatibility between real and monetary analysis.

14

Beltratti, Andrea. „L’economia dell’equilibrio“. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 3, Nr. 2 (01.10.1985): 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/251569298x15668907117101.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Abstract The new classical macroeconomists have widely criticized Keynesian economics during the last fifteen years; most of all, on the basis of a lack of microfoundations to Keynesian models and theories.The rational expectations hypothesis is necessary but not sufficient, by itself, to deny the policy effectiveness results advocated by Keynesian theorists; the most important hypothesis, and the most characteristic feature, of the new classical school is continuous market-clearing on each market. Rational expectations can be used also in disequilibrium models, and can even strengthen policy effectiveness results.This paper considers some interesting points made by the equilibrium theorists, such as the Lucas critique and the equilibrium business cycles, and also tries to show some limits of the models.The debate between Keynesians and New Classical Economists is very useful; both schools are able to benefit from the valuable insights of the last few years, which allow theorists to hope in a substantial improvement of macroeconomics as a science and as a tool to understand the working of today’s economic systems.

15

Caldentey, Esteban Pérez, Nathan Perry und Matías Vernengo. „The return of Keynes and the Phillips curve in Latin America: evidence from four countries“. Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 84–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.07.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Robert Rowthorn, in his Godley–Tobin Lecture, suggests that Keynesian policies have again been incorporated by the mainstream of the profession, and the old Phillips relation is again relevant. In other words, there seems to be a persistent trade-off between inflation, wage inflation in particular, and unemployment rates, properly measured, which would create the space for Keynesian policies. This paper discusses the return of Keynesian economics, in particular in Latin American economies. While it is true that Keynesian economics made a comeback in terms of policy in Latin America, as in other parts of the world, in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008–2009, it is also true that the Keynesian moment was relatively weak and short-lived. The evidence in Latin America for a Phillips curve is relatively weak, and suggests that inflation is often cost-push rather than demand-pull, which could be understood to suggest that there is space for expansionary fiscal policy, at least in the absence of an external constraint. The authors remain skeptical about the return of Keynesian economics at the theoretical level, and the possibilities for Keynesian policies in the region.

16

Lavoie, Marc. „Thoughts on post-keynesian economics and emerging economies“. Cuadernos de Economía 39, Nr. 80 (01.06.2020): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v39n80.85240.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

17

Pressman, Steven. „Economic Power, the State, and Post-Keynesian Economics“. International Journal of Political Economy 35, Nr. 4 (01.12.2006): 67–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/ijp0891-1916350404.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

18

FISUNOGLU, Mahir, und Bilge TAN. „KEYNES'S REVOLUTION AND KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS“. Ekonomik Yaklasim 20, Nr. 70 (2009): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ey.10680.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

19

Snowdon, Brian, und G. K. Shaw. „Keynesian Economics: The Permanent Revolution“. Southern Economic Journal 56, Nr. 1 (Juli 1989): 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059093.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

20

Zannoni, Diane, und Paul Davidson. „Controversies in Post Keynesian Economics“. Southern Economic Journal 59, Nr. 2 (Oktober 1992): 351. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060561.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

21

Arestis, P. „Post-Keynesian economics: towards coherence“. Cambridge Journal of Economics 20, Nr. 1 (01.01.1996): 111–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013604.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

22

Halevi, Joseph. „Marxism and Post-Keynesian Economics“. History of Economics Review 18, Nr. 1 (Januar 1992): 46–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1992.11733115.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

23

Lavoie, Marc. „Perspectives for Post-Keynesian Economics“. Review of Political Economy 24, Nr. 2 (April 2012): 321–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.664356.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

24

Bateman, B. W. „An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics“. History of Political Economy 31, Nr. 3 (01.09.1999): 601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-601.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

25

Sarı Aksakal, Betül. „World Bank and Keynesian Economics“. Business and Economics Research Journal 10, Nr. 1 (30.01.2020): 77–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.156.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

26

Petri, Fabio. „Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations“. Review of Political Economy 27, Nr. 3 (03.07.2015): 457–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2015.1067031.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

27

Randall Wray, L. „Controversies in Post Keynesian Economics“. Journal of Economic Issues 26, Nr. 3 (September 1992): 929–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1992.11505344.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

28

Yoshida, Masaaki. „Keynesian Economics—An Evolutionist Manifesto“. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 1, Nr. 1 (November 2004): 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14441/eier.1.49.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

29

Hiç, Özlen. „Evolution of New Keynesian Economics“. Procedia Computer Science 158 (2019): 1025–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.144.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

30

Lastrapes, William D. „New Keynesian economics, volume 2“. International Review of Economics & Finance 2, Nr. 4 (Januar 1993): 425–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1059-0560(93)90015-i.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

31

Mankiw, N. Gregory. „Symposium on Keynesian Economics Today“. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, Nr. 1 (01.02.1993): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

32

Mankiw, N. Gregory. „The reincarnation of Keynesian economics“. European Economic Review 36, Nr. 2-3 (April 1992): 559–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90113-b.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

33

Cross, Rod. „Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics“. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15, Nr. 3 (März 1993): 305–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1993.11489945.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

34

McKenna, Edward J., und Diane C. Zannoni. „Post Keynesian Economics and Nihilism“. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, Nr. 2 (Dezember 2000): 331–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2000.11490284.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

35

Fontana, Giuseppe. „Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics“. Eastern Economic Journal 34, Nr. 1 (17.12.2007): 131–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

36

Brown, William S. „Keynesian Economics: The Permanent Revolution“. Journal of Economic Issues 24, Nr. 1 (März 1990): 306–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1990.11505024.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

37

Galí, Jordi. „The State of New Keynesian Economics: A Partial Assessment“. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32, Nr. 3 (01.08.2018): 87–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.87.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

In August 2007, when the first signs emerged of what would come to be the most damaging global financial crisis since the Great Depression, the New Keynesian paradigm was dominant in macroeconomics. Ten years later, tons of ammunition has been fired against modern macroeconomics in general, and against dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models that build on the New Keynesian framework in particular. Those criticisms notwithstanding, the New Keynesian model arguably remains the dominant framework in the classroom, in academic research, and in policy modeling. In fact, one can argue that over the past ten years the scope of New Keynesian economics has kept widening, by encompassing a growing number of phenomena that are analyzed using its basic framework, as well as by addressing some of the criticisms raised against it. The present paper takes stock of the state of New Keynesian economics by reviewing some of its main insights and by providing an overview of some recent developments. In particular, I discuss some recent work on two very active research programs: the implications of the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates and the interaction of monetary policy and household heterogeneity. Finally, I discuss what I view as some of the main shortcomings of the New Keynesian model and possible areas for future research.

38

Backhouse, Roger E. „Economic theory in an imperfect world: Frank Hahn, general equilibrium, and Keynesian economics“. Oxford Economic Papers 72, Nr. 4 (03.05.2020): 1091–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaa005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Abstract Frank Hahn was both a Keynesian economist, active in policy debates, and an economic theorist. Placing his work in the context of attempts to make theoretical sense of Keynesian economics, this article explores the way Hahn used abstract general equilibrium theory to draw conclusions relevant to policy in an ‘imperfect’ world that does not conform to the assumptions made in the theory. Hahn’s rigorous approach to theorizing as the route to understanding is assessed in relation to the different approaches of Robert Lucas, Milton Friedman, Paul Samuelson and Axel Leijonhufvud.

39

Day, Richard H., und Wayne Shafer. „Keynesian chaos“. Journal of Macroeconomics 7, Nr. 2 (März 1985): 277–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0164-0704(85)80012-4.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

40

Day, Richard H., und Wayne Shafer. „Keynesian Chaos“. Journal of Macroeconomics 7, Nr. 3 (Juni 1985): 277–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(85)90072-2.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

41

Fazzari, Steven M. „Was Keynesian economics ever dead? If so, has it been resurrected?“ Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 46–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.05.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

This article reflects on rising interest in Keynesian macroeconomics in the aftermath of the Great Recession. I identify aspects of Keynesian thinking that never were completely banished from the mainstream as well as threads of Keynesian macroeconomics that have become more influential since the crisis. However, the way most mainstream analysis continues to invoke the zero lower bound for short-term interest rates and the concept of the ‘natural’ rate of interest implies that any Keynesian resurrection outside of heterodoxy remains incomplete. The future may bring broader recognition of how demand leads economic growth and of ways in which the demand side leads the supply side beyond the typical textbook ‘short run.’

42

Hannonen, Marko. „Urban Housing Policy Considerations: Perspectives from the Finnish Housing Market“. Journal of Heterodox Economics 1, Nr. 2 (01.12.2014): 114–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jheec-2015-0007.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Abstract It is very difficult to study phenomena in housing markets using conventional so-called neoclassical economics. The core problem stems from the highly unrealistic assumptions of neoclassical economics, such as homogeneous products, equilibrium markets, ceteris paribus clauses, deterministic and linear systems, rationality of economic agents, and the utility maximization principle. New Keynesian economics appears to be a more fruitful approach to housing markets since it presumes that products are differentiated, markets are in disequilibrium state and there exists imperfect competition in a marketplace. Furthermore, new Keynesian economics utilizes the concept of bounded rationality, which is a more realistic description of the actual behavior of economic agents than the theoretical notion of rationality in neoclassical economics.

43

WILSON, MATTHEW. „Institutionalism, critical realism, and the critique of mainstream economics“. Journal of Institutional Economics 1, Nr. 2 (Dezember 2005): 217–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744137405000160.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Critical realists have gained substantial support within post-Keynesian and Marxian research communities, and it is likely that critical realism's influence in institutionalism will grow in coming years. Post-Keynesians and Marxists have had ongoing discussions regarding the strengths and weakness of critical realism. Institutionalists should have a similar discussion. This paper addresses a key feature of the critical realist program: its critique of mainstream economics. In particular, it criticizes the use by critical realists of the concept of closure, and argues that critical realism is misleading in its identification of the ontology of mainstream economics as Humean. The purpose of the paper is to promote critical discussion regarding the role of critical realism in institutionalism.

44

Rowthorn, Robert. „The Godley-Tobin lecture“. Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.01.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

This paper surveys some of the main developments in macroeconomics since the anti-Keynesian counter-revolution 40 years ago. It covers both mainstream and heterodox economics. Amongst the topics discussed are: New Keynesian economics, Modern Monetary Theory, expansionary fiscal contraction, unconventional monetary policy, the Phillips curve, hysteresis, and heterodox theories of growth and distribution. The conclusion is that Keynesian economics is alive and well, and that there has been a degree of convergence between heterodox and mainstream economics.

45

Eichengreen, Barry. „Keynesian economics: can it return if it never died?“ Review of Keynesian Economics 8, Nr. 1 (22.01.2020): 23–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.03.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annotation:

Appreciation of the Keynesian synthesis was enhanced by the events of the last decade. The global financial crisis highlighted the fragility of financial markets and the capriciousness of animal spirits. The depth of the downturn pointed to the value of not just automatic stabilizers but also discretionary fiscal policy as tools of macroeconomic management. Keynesian models and not their New Classical challengers provided the practical analytical framework for policy design. Models of the anti-Keynesian effects of fiscal consolidation received little support from actual consolidation experience. The secular-stagnation debate that followed the crisis lent legitimacy to the view that policy-makers with fiscal space were wise to use it.

46

Dugger, William M., Philip Arestis und Victoria Chick. „Recent Developments in Post-Keynesian Economics“. Southern Economic Journal 60, Nr. 2 (Oktober 1993): 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060102.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

47

Froyen, Richard, und Robin Marris. „Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition“. Southern Economic Journal 60, Nr. 2 (Oktober 1993): 515. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060104.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

48

Fitzgibbons, Athol. „The Logic of Post Keynesian Economics“. History of Economics Review 25, Nr. 1 (Januar 1996): 72–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1996.11733218.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

49

Rochon, Louis-Philippe, und Sergio Rossi. „Central Banking and Post-Keynesian Economics“. Review of Political Economy 19, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2007): 539–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250701622402.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

50

Heap, Shaun Hargreaves. „Towards a post-Keynesian Welfare economics“. Review of Political Economy 1, Nr. 2 (Juli 1989): 144–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen