Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Justice of equality“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Justice of equality" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Gordon, John-Stewart. „Justice or Equality?“ Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 7, Nr. 2 (2006): 183–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/1439-880x-2006-2-183.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Miller, David. „Equality and Justice“. Ratio 10, Nr. 3 (Dezember 1997): 222–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00042.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Luzárraga, Ramón. „Justice as Equality“. Political Theology 13, Nr. 6 (Januar 2012): 768–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/poth.v13i6.768.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Quong, Jonathan. „Justice Beyond Equality“. Social Theory and Practice 36, Nr. 2 (2010): 315–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201036215.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Pallikkathayil, Japa. „Rescuing Justice and Equality“. Journal of Philosophy 108, Nr. 10 (2011): 583–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil20111081032.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Meyer, Kirsten. „Relational Equality and Justice“. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 7, Nr. 2 (2006): 202–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/1439-880x-2006-2-202.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Macleod, Alistair M. „Equality, Justice, and Democracy“. Social Philosophy Today 15 (2000): 413–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday2000159.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Simmons, J. Aaron. „Luck, Justice, and Equality“. Southwest Philosophy Review 27, Nr. 2 (2011): 9–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview201127228.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Harris, Ian. „Pluralism, justice and equality“. International Affairs 71, Nr. 4 (Oktober 1995): 848. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2625129.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Wall, Steven. „RESCUING JUSTICE FROM EQUALITY“. Social Philosophy and Policy 29, Nr. 1 (14.12.2011): 180–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052511000136.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractIn the wake of G. A. Cohen's masterful critique of Rawls's work, this paper discusses Rawlsian justice in general and the difference principle in particular. It argues that Rawlsian arguments for the difference principle present a puzzle and that to respond adequately to the puzzle we must engage in rational reconstruction. After explaining the puzzle and considering and rejecting a number of responses to it, the paper begins its reconstructive project. It presents the case for viewing the difference principle as a maximizing prioritarian principle of justice, one that that contains no trace of commitment to equality as a distributive norm. The paper concludes by bringing out some of the implications of viewing Rawlsian justice in this light.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Dissertationen zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Roberts-Thomson, Simon Eric. „Slavery, Equality, and Justice“. Diss., The University of Arizona, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194474.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Slavery is an unjust institution. Indeed, slavery is often seen to be a paradigmatic case of injustice. Despite this, there is little agreement on how to best explain the injustice of slavery. In this dissertation I examine and reject three main explanations of the injustice of slavery: that slavery is unjust because slaves lack freedom, that slavery is unjust because slaves are alienated from their social world, and that slavery is unjust because slaves lack self-respect. Such explanations are unable to explain the injustice of slavery itself because they cannot identify all cases of slavery as unjust. Instead, I argue that slavery is unjust because it makes it impossible for slaves to realise both their interest in self-respect and their interest in being at home in the world. Slavery is not the only institution, however, that places people in this dilemma; any institution that treats some people as inferior to others will be unjust for the same reason, although not necessarily to the same extent. Thus the explanation of the injustice of slavery also provides us with an explanation of the importance of political equality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Ip, Ka-Wai. „Equality and global justice“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2012. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:87b8c848-5cbb-4fbd-85dc-72351a5c91e6.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This dissertation aims to defend an egalitarian conception of global distributive justice. Many hold that the scope of egalitarian justice should be defined by membership of a single political community but my dissertation will challenge this view. I begin by considering three distinctive arguments against the ideal of global equality. They maintain that egalitarian obligations of justice apply only to those people who are subject to the same sovereign authority which coerces them to abide by its rules; or to those who contribute to the preservation of each other’s autonomy through collectively sustaining a state; or to those who belong to the same nation. The first three chapters deal with these arguments respectively. Central to these arguments is the assumption that the domestic and the global contexts are different in some morally relevant way so egalitarian principles of justice apply to the former but not the latter. After rebutting these anti-egalitarian arguments I turn to the more constructive task of developing a form of global egalitarianism that is grounded in the value of equality as a normative ideal of how human relations should be conducted. I argue in Chapter 4 that relational equality—that is, standing in relations of equality to one another (rather than relations characterized by domination or exploitation)—is a demand of justice in the global context. This ideal of relational equality has distributive implications. In Chapter 5 I try to spell out these implications by defending a set of principles of global distributive justice that would follow from our commitment to global relational equality. In the sixth and final chapter, I discuss what responsibilities we have in relation to global injustice, how to distribute the burdens associated with these responsibilities, and whether they are excessively demanding on complying agents.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Dekker, Teun. „Reconciling justice as equality and justice as desert“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2006. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.431021.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Schemmel, Christian. „Social justice as relational equality“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.530072.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Tsang, Sui-ming, und 曾瑞明. „Equality, participatory parity and global justice“. Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2011. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B46076499.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Griffin, Christopher George. „Democratic collective decision making: Equality and justice“. Diss., The University of Arizona, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/284868.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Democratic procedures allow us to decide as a society what to do. We intuitively embrace the ideal of a democratic state. But do we need democracy? Some argue that the social institutions we need to live well legitimately evolve through the spontaneous and decentralized activity of free individuals, thereby making democratic decisions unnecessary. But because unjust inequalities in power inevitably develop through the evolution of property regimes and market systems, there are strong moral reasons for the community to establish democratic procedures to monitor and rehabilitate these historically entrenched institutions. Executing this corrective function is a central reason why we do in fact need democracy. Yet there is considerable disagreement about democracy's precise justification beyond this functional rationale. John Stuart Mill and Richard Arneson both argue for the claim that the justification of popular rule is solely a matter of democracy's ability to generate morally correct outcomes. I reject these views. Democracy is valuable beyond being a means to some other morally desirable ends. Democracy is justified, I argue, because it is an intrinsically just procedure. The challenge is to understand what this means. Joshua Cohen suggests that democracy is intrinsically just because in the process of democratic deliberation reasonable citizens are given reasons to accept exercises of state power. I reject Cohen's deliberative model because it does not adequately appreciate the range of moral disagreement in contemporary democracies. Further, the standard of reasonableness at the heart of his justification for democracy is not consistent with the use of majority rule, an essential element of the democratic process. Instead, I argue that democracy is an intrinsically just procedure because it distributes political power over the decisions regarding the basic rules of social life equally, and thereby satisfies each individual's interest in the public affirmation of his or her basic social standing. Democracy matters because the public declaration of equal moral standing matters.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Fourie, Carina. „Justice and the duties of social equality“. Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2007. http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/777/.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The aim of this thesis is to demonstrate that John Rawls’s conception of social justice should be revised to include duties that will require individuals to uphold social equality. Social equality, as I describe it, is characterised by the values of, at a minimum, respect-for-persons, civility and toleration. Informal social equality occurs when these values are upheld outside of a legal or official institutional context, such as through personal choice and within civil society. Rawls’s conception of justice, which focuses primarily on institutional justice, does not include fair personal choice as a requirement of justice. As choice, I will argue, affects the distribution of primary social goods such as the social basis of self-respect, if we want to describe a fair society, we should include a description of fair choice. If informal social equality is upheld, justice in choice will also be upheld. To correct the neglect of justice in choice, we can thus describe a fair society as one where (1) institutions would be fair and (2) individuals would fulfil duties of social equality. In the context of current debate on the role of individual behaviour in social justice, my thesis can be distinguished from what I refer to as the original ‘personal choice argument’. According to this argument, advocated by G. A. Cohen and Liam B. Murphy, for example, Rawls’s principles of justice for institutions should be applied to individuals so that fair personal choice becomes a requirement of distributive justice. Cohen and Murphy’s arguments are unconvincing, however, because (i) we could apply principles other than the institutional, for example, principles for individuals, to choice and (ii) we have good reason not to apply the institutional principles to choice, for example, because they do not properly address interferences with self-respect. Instead of applying the institutional principles of justice to individuals, I argue that Rawls’s principles for individuals should be revised according to the values of social equality: 1. the duty of mutual respect needs to be revised to include requirements for individuals and associations to comply with the demands of social equality, which are (i) respect-for-persons, (ii) civility and (iii) toleration; and 2. the duty of justice should be adapted to specify that individuals are required to help establish and to uphold informal (not merely formal) justice, thus to uphold justice in personal choice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Armstrong, Chris. „Complex equality and sexual inequality“. Thesis, University of Bristol, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.367936.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Laing, Marie. „20th century women, redefining equality, justice and freedom“. Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape10/PQDD_0032/NQ46867.pdf.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Gill, David Ronald. „Civic equality and social justice in Aristotle's "Politics"“. Diss., The University of Arizona, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186763.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
In the Politics, Aristotle claims that a distinctive feature of civic relations is that citizens are "free and equal". Also in the Politics, Aristotle claims that, as a matter of social justice, political power should be unequally distributed because citizens differ in axia ("worth" or "merit"). The tensions that the conjunction of these two claims introduces for Aristotle's political thought, and the theoretical moves Aristotle makes to overcome these tensions, have (I believe) been insufficiently explored. The following study (1) examines Aristotle's explanation of each of the above claims, (2) considers the problem which their conjunction produces for Aristotle's general account of the nature of the political community, and (3) explains and evaluates Aristotle's efforts to accommodate an aristocratically-rooted principle of distributive justice to a basic equality of status among all citizens. In the end, I argue, these efforts are not completely successful; however, Aristotle's project of reconciliation is itself historically important, and is one of the keys to understanding Aristotle's departure from previous thinkers in political theory, most notably Plato.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Macleod, Colin M. Justice and equality. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2010.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2008.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Equality and partiality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Parfit, Derek. Equality or priority? [Kansas]: University of Kansas, 1995.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Nagel, Thomas. Equality and partiality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Matters of justice. London: Croom Helm, 1986.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Flew, Antony. Equality in liberty and justice. London: Routledge, 1989.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Museums, equality, and social justice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Flew, Antony. Equality in liberty and justice. London: Routledge, 1989.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Culyer, A. J. Need, equality and social justice. York: Centre for Health Economics University of York, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Buchteile zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Sager, Alexander. „Equality“. In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 309–12. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_20.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Bufacchi, Vittorio. „Justice, Equality, Liberty“. In Social Injustice, 111–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230358447_8.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Lee, Win-chiat. „Complex Equality“. In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 176–78. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_232.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Navin, Mark C. „Democratic Equality“. In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 240–42. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_8.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Landesman, Bruce M. „Moral Equality“. In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 719–21. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_97.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Nielsen, Kai. „Capitalism, Socialism, and Justice: Reflections on Rawls’ Theory of Justice“. In Equality and Liberty, 217–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21763-2_13.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Sabbagh, Daniel. „The Corrective Justice Paradigm“. In Equality and Transparency, 13–30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230607392_2.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Merry, Michael S. „Equality and Educational Justice“. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–8. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_549-1.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Smith, Paul. „Equality and Social Justice“. In Moral and Political Philosophy, 113–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59394-7_8.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Kolm, Serge-Christophe. „Rational Justice and Equality“. In Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, 970–92. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_52.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Pereira Cava, Patrícia. „Equality and justice in children’s rights“. In XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Initia Via, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_wg141_01.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Milagros García, Mª Pilar. „“Justice versus Equality: governmental discourse regarding gender”“. In 10th International Conference on Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences. Acavent, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/10th.hps.2020.03.74.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Mohapatra, Shreya. „Law and Gender Justice: The Disjuncture between Formal Equality and Real Equality“. In World Conference on Women's Studies. The International Institute of Knowledge Management (TIIKM), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.17501/wcws.2017.2106.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Gagaev, Andrey, und Pavel Gagaev. „ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE“. In Globalistics-2020: Global issues and the future of humankind. Interregional Social Organization for Assistance of Studying and Promotion the Scientific Heritage of N.D. Kondratieff / ISOASPSH of N.D. Kondratieff, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46865/978-5-901640-33-3-2020-82-88.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Environmental justice is a part of the system of natural, ethnic, geographic-ecological, restorative and international justice and a system of solutions in the field of global issues. Environmental justice includes compatibility, hatchability and sequence, equality, freedom, truth, responsibility of all forms of life on the planet and in space in their habitats, not claiming for the habitats of other living forms. Therefore, for example, the United States are their habitat only and nowhere else in the world, like any other nation, while the exit of ethnic groups beyond their habitats means aggression and violence. The article also presents the subject of environmental justice. It is the world economic systems. Environmental justice includes also procedural principles of fairness, maintaining natural evolution and self-organization of habitats in space and time; common property of mankind; teleology of alignment and perfection of races and ethnic groups, evolutionary diversity; maintaining the natural cyclicity of life forms; a system of non-violence and solutions to global issues.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Kristianti, Dwi Rahayu. „Gender Equality and Justice in the Indonesian Law on Village“. In International Law Conference 2018. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010051602560262.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Bordakova, A. G. „Principles Of Justice And Equality, Their Relation To The Rules-Exceptions“. In 18th International Scientific Conference “Problems of Enterprise Development: Theory and Practice”. European Publisher, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.121.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Mulyukov, Farkhad B., und Alina N. Ibragimova. „Problems of Implementing the Principles of Equality and Social Justice in Education“. In IFTE 2020 - VI International Forum on Teacher Education. Pensoft Publishers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ap.2.e1691.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Azeez, Sardar. „"Violation of the principle of equality when drafting the punitive text Legislation issued by the Parliament of the Kurdistan Region as a model"“. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DEFICIENCIES AND INFLATION ASPECTS IN LEGISLATION. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicdial.pp85-103.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Observing the principle of equality when drafting punitive texts is one of the basic components of successful legislative drafting . And that equality before the law is closely related to justice, because justice requires the formulation of the rules of the law in a general and abstract manner in a way that all those who address the law enjoy its protection and are subject to accountability. Since there are international charters and treaties that Iraq has joined or ratified, most of them contain explicit texts about the equality of individuals before the law. Therefore, the legislative drafting of punitive texts in a manner that achieves equality is an implementation of the international obligations resulting from ratification or accession to these international conventions and treaties. In addition, laws that are legislated in contravention of the principle of equality are considered unconstitutional laws because they are in violation of the Constitution, and the provisions of ordinary law may not contradict the principles of the Constitution.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Li, Dan. „Gender Equality Is the Path to Social Justice--Analysis from the Perspective of Gender“. In 2018 International Conference on Management, Economics, Education and Social Sciences (MEESS 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/meess-18.2018.5.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Mulyaningsih, Asih, Suherna und Gugun Gunawan. „Gender Justice and Equality in Rice Farming Friendly Environment in Realizing Family Food Security“. In 2nd and 3rd International Conference on Food Security Innovation (ICFSI 2018-2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.210304.035.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Justice of equality"

1

Carter, Becky. Women’s and Girls’ Experiences of Security and Justice in Somaliland. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Februar 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2021.077.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This rapid review seeks to provide an overview of the publicly available literature from the academic, donor, and non-government organisation sources on women’s and girls’ experiences of statutory and customary security and justice in Somaliland. In Somaliland women and girls experience poor security, with high rates of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), and significant barriers to gender equality in the pluralistic legal system. The predominant clan-based customary justice system, along with conservative social norms and religious beliefs, discriminates against women and girls, while weak formal state institutions are not able to deliver accessible and effective justice for vulnerable and marginalised groups. Social stigma silences SGBV survivors and their families, with many rape crimes resolved through customary compensation or marriage. National and international organisations have undertaken various activities to promote gender equality in security and justice, with support provided to formal and informal security and justice institutions and actors at national and local levels, as well as initiatives to empower women and girls.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Afsaruddin, Asma. NEGOTIATING VIRTUE AND REALPOLITIK IN ISLAMIC GOOD GOVERNANCE. IIIT, Oktober 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47816/01.002.20.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
These words of John Lewis represent a scathing criticism of the contemporary failures of the United States, the oldest and possibly most vibrant democratic nation-state in the world. The words also express a deep disappointment that the principles of equality and justice enshrined in the US constitution have been honored more in the breach when they pertain to African-Americans, many of whose ancestors arrived on these shores long before those of their Euro-American compatriots.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Gordon, Eleanor, und Briony Jones. Building Success in Development and Peacebuilding by Caring for Carers: A Guide to Research, Policy and Practice to Ensure Effective, Inclusive and Responsive Interventions. University of Warwick Press, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31273/978-1-911675-00-6.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The experiences and marginalisation of international organisation employees with caring responsibilities has a direct negative impact on the type of security and justice being built in conflict-affected environments. This is in large part because international organisations fail to respond to the needs of those with caring responsibilities, which leads to their early departure from the field, and negatively affects their work while in post. In this toolkit we describe this problem, the exacerbating factors, and challenges to overcoming it. We offer a theory of change demonstrating how caring for carers can both improve the working conditions of employees of international organisations as well as the effectiveness, inclusivity and responsiveness of peace and justice interventions. This is important because it raises awareness among employers in the sector of the severity of the problem and its consequences. We also offer a guide for employers for how to take the caring responsibilities of their employees into account when developing human resource policies and practices, designing working conditions and planning interventions. Finally, we underscore the importance of conducting research on the gendered impacts of the marginalisation of employees with caring responsibilities, not least because of the breadth and depth of resultant individual, organisational and sectoral harms. In this regard, we also draw attention to the way in which gender stereotypes and gender biases not only inform and undermine peacebuilding efforts, but also permeate research in this field. Our toolkit is aimed at international organisation employees, employers and human resources personnel, as well as students and scholars of peacebuilding and international development. We see these communities of knowledge and action as overlapping, with insights to be brought to bear as well as challenges to be overcome in this area. The content of the toolkit is equally relevant across these knowledge communities as well as between different specialisms and disciplines. Peacebuilding and development draw in experts from economics, politics, anthropology, sociology and law, to name but a few. The authors of this toolkit have come together from gender studies, political science, and development studies to develop a theory of change informed by interdisciplinary insights. We hope, therefore, that this toolkit will be useful to an inclusive and interdisciplinary set of knowledge communities. Our core argument - that caring for carers benefits the individual, the sectors, and the intended beneficiaries of interventions - is relevant for students, researchers, policy makers and practitioners alike.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Advancing Human Rights: The State of Global Foundation Grantmaking - Access to Justice/Equality Before the Law. New York, NY United States: Foundation Center, Januar 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.15868/socialsector.24916.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie