Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Interpretive methods“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Interpretive methods" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
Dörner, Andreas. „Interpretive Methods for Political Science“. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 2, Nr. 1 (01.01.1998): 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/r.2.1.15.
Oerther, Sarah. „Analysis methods in hermeneutic phenomenological research: interpretive profiles“. Frontiers of Nursing 7, Nr. 4 (01.12.2020): 293–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fon-2020-0038.
Archer, Kenneth J. „Early Pentecostal Biblical Interpretation“. Journal of Pentecostal Theology 9, Nr. 1 (2001): 32–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/17455251-00901003.
Crist, Janice D., und Christine A. Tanner. „Interpretation/Analysis Methods in Hermeneutic Interpretive Phenomenology“. Nursing Research 52, Nr. 3 (Mai 2003): 202–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200305000-00011.
Babones, Salvatore. „Interpretive Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences“. Sociology 50, Nr. 3 (20.05.2015): 453–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038515583637.
Dutta, Mohan J., Satveer Kaur und Phoebe Elers. „Validity in interpretive methods: frameworks and innovations“. Annals of the International Communication Association 44, Nr. 3 (02.07.2020): 185–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795.
Tolman, Deborah L., und Mary Brydon-Miller. „Transforming Psychology: Interpretive and Participatory Research Methods“. Journal of Social Issues 53, Nr. 4 (Januar 1997): 597–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02450.x.
Darby, Jessica L., Brian S. Fugate und Jeff B. Murray. „Interpretive research“. International Journal of Logistics Management 30, Nr. 2 (13.05.2019): 395–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-07-2018-0187.
Dodge, Jennifer, Richard Holtzman, Merlijn van Hulst und Dvora Yanow. „What does it mean to teach ‘interpretively’?“ Learning and Teaching 9, Nr. 1 (01.03.2016): 73–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2016.090105.
Sharp, Ryan L., Lincoln R. Larson, Gary T. Green und Sara Tomek. „Comparing Interpretive Methods Targeting Invasive Species Management at Cumberland Island National Seashore“. Journal of Interpretation Research 17, Nr. 2 (November 2012): 23–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109258721201700203.
Miller, L. S., und M. Rohling. „Statistical interpretive methods for difficult neuropsychological test data“. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 14, Nr. 1 (01.01.1999): 86–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/14.1.86b.
BERNTSON, GARY G., J. THOMAS BIGGER, DWAIN L. ECKBERG, PAUL GROSSMAN, PETER G. KAUFMANN, MAREK MALIK, HAIKADY N. NAGARAJA et al. „Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats“. Psychophysiology 34, Nr. 6 (November 1997): 623–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x.
Shcholokova, Olha, Natalia Mozgalova und Iryna Baranovska. „Interpretation of musical composition: a methodical aspect“. Scientific bulletin of South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky, Nr. 3 (128) (31.10.2019): 151–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.24195/2617-6688-2019-3-21.
Nordqvist, Mattias, Annika Hall und Leif Melin. „Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach“. Journal of Management & Organization 15, Nr. 3 (Juli 2009): 294–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200002637.
Nordqvist, Mattias, Annika Hall und Leif Melin. „Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach“. Journal of Management & Organization 15, Nr. 3 (Juli 2009): 294–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2009.15.3.294.
Nurhayati, Nurhayati. „MELUKISKAN AKUNTANSI DENGAN KUAS INTERPRETIF“. BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam 3, Nr. 1 (16.08.2016): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1481.
Gorozhankina, Oksana. „METHODS OF DEVELOPING THE INTERPRETIVE COMPETENCY OF FUTURE MUSICAL ART TEACHERS IN THE PROCESS OF PIANO PLAY TEACHING“. Modern Tendencies in Pedagogical Education and Science of Ukraine and Israel: the Way to Integration, Nr. 9 (20.09.2018): 66–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24195/2218-8584-2018-9-66-71.
TABER, TOM D. „TRIANGULATING JOB ATTITUDES WITH INTERPRETIVE AND POSITIVIST MEASUREMENT METHODS“. Personnel Psychology 44, Nr. 3 (07.12.2006): 577–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb02404.x.
Calvey, David. „Book Review: Interpretive Interactionism (APPLIED SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODS SERIES)“. Sociological Research Online 9, Nr. 3 (August 2004): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136078040400900303.
Mu’ammar, Moh Nadhir. „STUDY OF APPROACHES, METHODS, SOURCES AND INTERPRETATION INSTRUMENTS OF MULLA SADRA“. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah 9, Nr. 1 (14.07.2020): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v9i1.9015.
Harrington, Christine B., und Barbara Yngveson. „Interpretive Sociolegal Research“. Law & Social Inquiry 15, Nr. 01 (1990): 135–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1990.tb00277.x.
Brooks, Brian L., Esther Strauss, Elisabeth M. S. Sherman, Grant L. Iverson und Daniel J. Slick. „Developments in neuropsychological assessment: Refining psychometric and clinical interpretive methods.“ Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 50, Nr. 3 (August 2009): 196–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016066.
Hafidz, Abdul, Khoirul Ulum, Muhammad Ridlwan Nasir, Idri Idri und Mohammad Arif. „The Uniqueness of ‘Ali Al-Shabuni’s Methodology in the Book of Shafwah Al-Tafasir: Study to the Interpretation of Surah Al-Rahman“. Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU) 3, Nr. 5 (31.05.2021): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.33846/aijmu30501.
Moodley, Jinesa, Phillip Williams, Gabriela Gohla, Pierre Major und Michael Bonert. „Variation in breast cancer grading in 1,636 resections assessed using control charts and in silico kappa“. PLOS ONE 15, Nr. 12 (28.12.2020): e0242656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242656.
Escobar Varela, Miguel. „The Essay/ontology Workflow, Challenges in Combining Formal and Interpretive Methods“. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31, Nr. 1 (08.12.2014): 84–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu071.
Thomas, William. „Strategies of Detection: Interpretive Methods in Experimental Particle Physics, 19301950“. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 42, Nr. 5 (01.11.2012): 389–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2012.42.5.389.
Ugan, Andrew. „Does Size Matter? Body Size, Mass Collecting, and Their Implications for Understanding Prehistoric Foraging Behavior“. American Antiquity 70, Nr. 1 (Januar 2005): 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40035269.
Leiter, Brian. „Legal Indeterminacy“. Legal Theory 1, Nr. 4 (Dezember 1995): 481–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1352325200000227.
Chalip, Laurence. „Policy Analysis in Sport Management“. Journal of Sport Management 9, Nr. 1 (Januar 1995): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsm.9.1.1.
Funk, Kevin. „Making Interpretivism Visible: Reflections after a Decade of the Methods Café“. PS: Political Science & Politics 52, Nr. 03 (25.03.2019): 465–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096519000179.
Inbar, Or, Omri Inbar, Ronen Reuveny, Michael J. Segel, Hayit Greenspan und Mickey Scheinowitz. „A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation“. Pulmonary Medicine 2021 (31.05.2021): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516248.
Yilmaz, Ö. „Interpretive evaluation of migrated data“. Exploration Geophysics 20, Nr. 2 (1989): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/eg989017.
Kreps, Gary L. „A therapeutic model of organizational communication consultation: Application of interpretive field methods“. Southern Communication Journal 55, Nr. 1 (Dezember 1989): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948909372774.
Westerman, Michael A., und Stephen C. Yanchar. „Changing the terms of the debate: Quantitative methods in explicitly interpretive research“. Theory & Psychology 21, Nr. 2 (April 2011): 139–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354310393565.
Chamlee-Wright, Emily. „Operationalizing the interpretive turn: Deploying qualitative methods toward an economics of meaning“. Review of Austrian Economics 24, Nr. 2 (22.01.2011): 157–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0140-x.
Owens, Janine. „Liberating voices through narrative methods: the case for an interpretive research approach“. Disability & Society 22, Nr. 3 (Mai 2007): 299–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687590701259617.
RIZZO, T. „Ethnographic methods and interpretive analysis: Expanding the methodological options of psychologists*1“. Developmental Review 12, Nr. 2 (Juni 1992): 101–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90005-m.
Barrett, Austin, und Andrew J. Mowen. „Assessing the Effectiveness of Artistic Place-Based Climate Change Interpretation“. Journal of Interpretation Research 19, Nr. 2 (November 2014): 7–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109258721401900202.
Barmeyer, Christoph, Madeleine Bausch und Daniel Moncayo. „Cross-cultural management research: Topics, paradigms, and methods—A journal-based longitudinal analysis between 2001 and 2018“. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 19, Nr. 2 (Juli 2019): 218–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470595819859603.
Asgharpour, Hassan, Ali Safari und Robab Emamian. „Methodology of the Commentary Makhzan Al-‘Irfān by Lady Amin (Regarding the Interpretation of the Verses Related to “Women” in the Qur'an)“. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8, Nr. 7 (08.08.2021): 699. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2948.
Benton, Gregory M., und Bitapi C. Sinha. „Interpretive effectiveness at Kanha Tiger Reserve, India“. Journal of Interpretation Research 16, Nr. 1 (April 2011): 73–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109258721101600106.
Haring, Ute, und Reesa Sorin. „The CID Lens: Looking at Children’s Drawings Using Content, Interpretive, and Developmental Methods“. International Journal of Arts Education 8, Nr. 3 (2014): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/2326-9944/cgp/v08i03/36125.
Shryock, Thomas R. „Internationally Recognized Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Interpretive Criteria: The Case for Conformity“. Journal of Infectious Diseases 192, Nr. 11 (Dezember 2005): 2027–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/497609.
Lincoln, Yvonna S. „From Understanding to Action: New Imperatives, New Criteria, New Methods for Interpretive Researchers“. Theory & Research in Social Education 26, Nr. 1 (Januar 1998): 12–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1998.10505832.
Yanow, Dvora. „Spotlight: Grain of Sand Award of 2009 Presented to Professors Lloyd I. Rudolph and Susanne Hoeber Rudolph“. PS: Political Science & Politics 43, Nr. 02 (April 2010): 369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s104909651000051x.
Osatuke, Katerine, und William B. Stiles. „Numbers in assimilation research“. Theory & Psychology 21, Nr. 2 (April 2011): 200–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354310391352.
Karvatska, Svitlana, und Tetyana Gnatuyk. „INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AS SUBJECTS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW RULES INTERPRETATION“. Scientific Journal of Polonia University 43, Nr. 6 (18.06.2021): 189–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/4324.
Samier, Eugenie. „The Weberian Legacy of Thom Greenfield“. Educational Administration Quarterly 32, Nr. 1_suppl (Dezember 1996): 686–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161x960321006.
Westerman, Michael A. „Conversation analysis and interpretive quantitative research on psychotherapy process and problematic interpersonal behavior“. Theory & Psychology 21, Nr. 2 (April 2011): 155–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354310394719.
Marecek, Jeanne. „Numbers and interpretations: What is at stake in our ways of knowing?“ Theory & Psychology 21, Nr. 2 (April 2011): 220–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354310391353.