We are proudly a Ukrainian website. Our country was attacked by Russian Armed Forces on Feb. 24, 2022.
You can support the Ukrainian Army by following the link: https://u24.gov.ua/.
Even the smallest donation is hugely appreciated!
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation":
1
Sh. Mansor, M., und Nayef Mohamed Hashem. „Laboratory and Field Evaluation of some Bio and Chemical Insecticides Against Nymphs and Adults of Ceroplasts Rusci L. (Coccidae: Hemiptera)“. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, Nr. 4.37 (13.12.2018): 224. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.37.25373.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The present work including laboratory and field experimental test to evaluate the efficiency of different insecticides (systemic and biocides). Laboratory works including different concentrations for Mitrixin, Levo, Evisect, Polo and Actara for Ceroplasts rusci L. insect in leaf. Mortality percentage reading after two days. Field works were including the best concentration of insecticides achieved the highest mortality percentage for nymphs and adults of Ceroplasts rusci in the tree. The Mortality percentage reading after one, two, seven, fourteen days.Laboratory results showed that the efficiency of insecticides significantly variant is depending to concentration and type of insecticides. The corrected Mortality percentage was increased by increasing the concentration and type of insecticides. The Mortality percentage (59.23, 53.94, 52.25) insect/leaf increase for insecticides (Mitrixin, Levo, Evisect) respectively. In a field study, the effect of insecticide toxicity for nymphs and adults of C. rusci L. (Coccidae: Hemiptera) was tested. The Results showed that the insecticides Mitrixin distinction in the after two weeks treatment and levo insecticide in after a day treatment and after two weeks treatment while the lethal rate is (64.32, 63.49, 58.73) insect/leaf in (Matrixin, Levo, Evisect), respectively.
2
Chyen, David, Michael E. Wetzstein, Robert M. McPherson und William D. Givan. „An Economic Evaluation of Soybean Stink Bug Control Alternatives for the Southeastern United States“. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 24, Nr. 2 (Dezember 1992): 83–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0081305200018409.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
AbstractMethyl parathion or Penncap M (an encapsulated methyl parathion) are used extensively throughout the United States for controlling stink bug pests in soybeans, Glycine Max (L.) Merrill. However, this insecticide is highly toxic to mammals, birds, and non-target arthropods, and thus is less environmentally sound than other insecticides. For environmental and human health considerations, investigating alternative insecticides for control is desired. For this investigation, research based on field experimental data from Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana during the 1988 and 1989 growing seasons were employed. Results indicate that alternative, currently available, and less toxic insecticides may reduce producer costs, increase yield, and improve soybean quality. These alternative insecticides include Scout (tralomethrin), Karate (lambda-cyhalothrin), Orthene (acephate), and Baythroid (cyfluthrin). In terms of improved profits these alternative insecticides may dominate methyl parathion or encapsulated methyl parathion.
3
Hernández Ramos, Amparo Gabriela. „Evaluation of the resistance to insecticides in Aedes aegypti, transmitter of dengue, in Latin America“. Mexican Journal of Medical Research ICSA 8, Nr. 15 (05.01.2020): 23–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.29057/mjmr.v8i15.3912.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Dengue is an infectious disease with high rates of morbidity and mortality, transmitted by the bite of the female mosquito of the genus Aedes aegypti, vector distributed in tropical and subtropical areas throughout the world. America is one of the most affected regions. This vector is controlled through insecticides that due to its constant use in populations, a resistance phenomenon has been produced. The objective of this review is to identify the situation of insecticide resistance in populations of Aedes aegypti in Latin American countries. In this region, several insecticides have been used for vector control; in the last 10 years insecticides of the pyrethroid and organophosphorus group have been used as adulticides for the control of the mosquito, conditioning resistance. Some insecticides such as organophosphates and deltamethrin, despite of not being intensively used in Latin American countries, also show resistance. Improvements in vector control are required, including the rotation of the insecticides during the different seasons, as well as innovating techniques and forms of vector control
4
Hall, David G., Tim R. Gottwald, Ed Stover und G. Andrew C. Beattie. „Evaluation of Management Programs for Protecting Young Citrus Plantings from Huanglongbing“. HortScience 48, Nr. 3 (März 2013): 330–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.48.3.330.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Asiatic huanglongbing (HLB) is a devastating disease of citrus associated in North America with the bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (LAS) vectored by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. ACP management is considered a vital component of a program aimed at reducing the incidence and spread of HLB. Considerable research has been published comparing the efficacy of different insecticides for ACP control as well as on seasonal strategies for applying ACP insecticides. However, published information was largely lacking for even the most intense insecticide programs on their effectiveness for keeping HLB out of a new citrus planting in Florida citrus. We therefore conducted two replicated (individual plots 0.2 to 0.4 ha in size) experiments on protecting young citrus from HLB using different ACP management programs. An intensive insecticide program was evaluated in each experiment: eight annual calendar applications of traditional insecticides (hereafter referred to as the “complete” program). In one experiment, citrus was either planted alone and subjected to the complete program or citrus was interplanted with orange jasmine, Murraya exotica L. (a favored ACP host plant) and subjected to a reduced insecticide program (four calendar sprays of traditional insecticides). There was one set of plots in which both jasmine and citrus were treated with insecticides and one set in which jasmine was not treated at all. In the second experiment, citrus was either subjected to the complete program or to one of two other programs: a reduced insecticide program consisting of five calendar applications of traditional insecticides or a mineral oil program (oil applications every 3 weeks plus one dormant insecticide spray). The results of the two experiments were similar. Relatively good ACP control was achieved under each ACP management program during the first year but, as the experiments progressed and trees increased in size, ACP outbreaks occurred regardless of the psyllid management program. Little HLB developed under any ACP management program during the first year, but thereafter HLB increased and large percentages of the trees in each experiment became LAS-infected in less than two to three years. The combined results of the experiments indicated that up to eight monthly pesticide treatments per year applied on a calendar schedule were ineffective for preventing young citrus from becoming diseased. Of important significance is that the orchard within which the two experiments were conducted was subjected to a minimal psyllid management program and contained many older trees known to be infected by the HLB pathogen, a challenging situation for getting young trees into production without contracting the disease. Thus, the ACP management programs we evaluated might have been more effective if ACP in the surrounding areas had been more aggressively controlled and diseased trees in the surrounding areas removed to reduce inoculum loads. Also, the programs might have been more effective for slowing the spread of HLB if our research plots had been larger.
5
Guerreiro, J. C., G. B. Silva, A. P. Azevedo, R. R. Espessato, A. T. Padovan, F. Leite und P. J. Ferreira Filho. „Control of Dichelops melacanthus with insecticides associated with sulphur applied in different times in corn“. Scientific Electronic Archives 10, Nr. 1 (19.02.2017): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.36560/1012017360.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The stink bug Dichelops melacanthus has become an important pest for corn crop and it has been causing several losses even in the initial phase of the crop. The objective of the experiment was the evaluation of effectiveness of the insecticides on the control of D. melacanthus in corn by adding of sulfur or not, in different control times. In order to evaluate the effect of the insecticide by adding or not sulfur on the control of D. melacanthus, 17 treatments with 4 different insecticides (with and without sulfur, in two different control times plus control) were used to get the results. The experimental design used was the randomized blocks, with four repetitions. The evaluation of effectiveness on stink bugs control was gotten by visual evaluation of the symptoms at 6, 13 and 20 days after emergence (DAE). Analysis of variance by F test (Anova) was done and the averages compared through Scott-knott test (p≤0,05). The pulverization of insecticides was more effective when it was done 4 (DAE), reducing the symptoms and injuries occasioned by the stink bug D. melacanthus and the mortality of damaged plants. The insecticide bifentrina+carbosulfano showed the higher effectiveness on stink bug control. To conclude, the use of sulfur associated to insecticides did not present a significant effect.
6
Hua, Xuewen, Wutao Mao, Zhijin Fan, Xiaotian Ji, Fengyun Li, Guangning Zong, Haibin Song et al. „Novel Anthranilic Diamide Insecticides: Design, Synthesis, and Insecticidal Evaluation“. Australian Journal of Chemistry 67, Nr. 10 (2014): 1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ch13701.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Three series of new anthranilic diamide derivatives containing sulfide, N-cyanomethylsulfilimine, and N-cyanomethylsulfoximine groups were designed and synthesized by coupling the active substructures of anthranilic diamides and sulfoxaflor. The structures of the synthesized compounds were confirmed by infrared spectroscopy, 1H and 13C NMR, and elemental analysis. Several unique structural characteristics were revealed via the crystal structure analysis of compound N-(2-(2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propylcarbamoyl)-4-chloro-6-methylphenyl)-3-bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide 16e. Bioassay results indicated that most of the synthesized compounds showed superior insecticidal activities against Mythimna separata and Plutella xylostella when compared with the positive control cyantraniliprole. In particular, N-(2-(2-methyl-2-(N-cyanomethylsulfideimino)propylcarbamoyl)-4-chloro-6-methylphenyl)-3-bromo-1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide 17e showed excellent insecticidal activity against Mythimna separata, with a mortality rate of 100 % at a concentration of 1 µg mL–1. These results indicated that sulfide, N-cyanomethylsulfilimine, and N-cyanomethylsulfoximine moieties, as important active substructures, could improve or maintain the activity of the anthranilic diamide and promote novel pesticide development.
7
Munir, A., S. Ali, M. A. Zeshan, M. U. Ghani und A. A. Khan. „EVALUATION OF ORGANIC AMENDMENTS AND INSECTICIDES AGAINST OKRA YELLOW VEIN MOSAIC VIRUS AND ITS VECTOR“. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences 36, Nr. 1 (12.10.2020): 13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.47432/2020.36.1.3.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) is susceptible to number of diseases like Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus disease, Damping Off, Fusarium wilt, Powdery Mildew and Enation Leaf Curl. The Okra is favorite host of whitefly which transmits the okra Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus (OYVMV). OYVMV disease causes considerable yield losses in Okra. Experiment was conducted to check the efficacy of organic matter (poultry manure, leaves) and insecticides (Acetamiprid, Diafenthiuron, Pyridine Carboxamide) against OYVMV and its whitefly vector. In this experiment, ten okra varieties were sown in randomized complete block design (RCBD). Organic matter and insecticides were applied at recommended doses (@5ml/L) on weekly intervals. Among insecticides, Acetamiprid showed the best result to manage whitefly infestation with 60.01% mortality and OYVMV disease severity with 53.98% efficiency. Polo (Diafenthiuron) also showed good results to manage whitefly (56.36%) and OYVMVD (46.34%), but Ulala (Pyridine Carboxamide) insecticide was least effective to control whitefly population (47.27%) and to manage the infection of OYVMV disease (43.91%). Leaf manure was more effective with 61.16% efficiency as compared to poultry manure (56.01%) against OYVMV disease severity. New chemistry insecticide (acetamiprid) gave the most effective control of whitefly and transmission of OYVMV and could be used in place of conventional insecticides. Leaf manure proved significant defense activator in okra plants with effective control of disease and could be used as eco-friendly management approach.
8
Anderson, R. M., und G. L. Teetes. „Evaluation of Insecticides for Suppression of Sorghum Midge on Sorghum, 1994“. Arthropod Management Tests 20, Nr. 1 (01.01.1995): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/amt/20.1.231.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Abstract Selected insecticides were evaluated for sorghum midge control at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Farm near College Station, TX. Hybrid grain sorghum (ATx399 × RTx430) was planted 20 May in rows spaced 30 inches apart. Insecticide treatments were compared in plots, 8 rows × 40 ft long, arranged in a RCB design with 4 replications. Insecticides were applied to the middle 2 rows of plots. Insecticides were applied between 0800 and 0900 hours CDT by using a hand-held backpack sprayer with TX-3 hollow cone nozzles at 35 psi, producing a finished spray volume of 5.6 gpa. Application began when 10-30% of the panicles were flowering; insecticides were applied 10, 13, and 16 Jul. Adult sorghum midge abundance was determined just prior to each application by counting the number of sorghum midges on 10 individual sorghum panicles enclosed in clear plastic bags. The panicles were cut from the plant and returned to the laboratory for examination and sorghum midge counts. Grain yield data were collected from the 2 middle rows per plot. Panicles were hand harvested from selected 8.75 ft sections of row/plot and mechanically threshed. Data were statistically analyzed by using ANOVA and LSD.
9
Yang, Guan-Zhou, Xiao-Fei Shang, Pi-Le Cheng, Xiao-Dan Yin, Jia-Kai Zhu, Ying-Qian Liu, Jing Zhang und Zhi-Jun Zhang. „Facile Three-Component Synthesis, Insecticidal and Antifungal Evaluation of Novel Dihydropyridine Derivatives“. Molecules 23, Nr. 10 (21.09.2018): 2422. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102422.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
In an attempt to find the neonicotinoid insecticides, twenty novel dihydropyridine derivatives were designed, “green” synthesized via one pot facile three-component reaction and evaluated for their bioactivities against Tetranychus cinnabarinus, Myzus persicae, Brevicoryne brassicae, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, Magnaporthe oryzae, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinereal. All of the tested compounds showed potent insecticidal activity, and some were much better in comparison with imidacloprid (IMI). Especially, compounds 3d (LC50: 0.011 mM) and 5c (LC50: 0.025 mM) were 12.2- and 5.4-fold more active than IMI (LC50: 0.135 mM) against T. cinnabarinus, respectively. Moreover, out of all the derivatives, compound 3d (LC50: 0.0015 mM) exhibited the strongest insecticidal activity against B. brassicae and compound 3i (LC50: 0.0007 mM) displayed the strongest insecticidal activity against M. persicae. Surprisingly, when the concentration of compound 4 was 50 mg/L, the inhibition rate against F. oxysporum and S. sclerotiorum reached 45.00% and 65.83%, respectively. The present work indicated that novel dihydropyridine derivatives could be used as potential lead compounds for developing neonicotinoid insecticides and agricultural fungicides.
10
Huang, Jun, Juan Zhang, Yan Li, Jun Li und Xiao-Hua Shi. „Evaluation of the effectiveness of insecticide trunk injections for control ofLatoia lepida(Cramer) in the sweet olive treeOsmanthus fragrans“. PeerJ 4 (21.09.2016): e2480. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2480.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The screening of suitable insecticides is a key factor in successfully applying trunk injection technology to ornamental plants. In this study, six chemical pesticides were selected and injected into the trunks ofOsmanthus fragransto control the nettle caterpillar,Latoia lepida(Lepidoptera: Limacodidae), using a no-pressure injection system. The absorption rate of the insecticides, the leaf loss due to insect damage, and the mortality and frass amount ofL. lepidalarvae were evaluated after 77 and 429 days. The results showed that 4% imidacloprid + carbosulfan and 21% abamectin + imidacloprid + omethoate had the fastest conductivity and were completely absorbed into the trunkswithin14 days; however, the efficiencies of these insecticides in controllingL. lepidawere extremely low. Additionally, the treatment 10% emamectin benzoate + clothianidin and 2.5% emamectin benzoate was almost completely absorbed within 30 days and exhibited a longer duration of insecticide efficiency (>80% mortality) in the upper and lower leaves of the canopy. Treatment with these insecticides also resulted in significantly lower leaf loss and frass amounts. We conclude that emamectin benzoate and emamectin benzoate + clothianidin have a rapid uptake intoO. fragrans, and are effective as insecticides over long durations. Hence, they may be a suitable control option forL. lepidainO. fragransplants.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation":
1
Malima, Robert Chikoja Munyu. „Evaluation of long lasting insecticidal materials and treatment kits and control of pyrethroid insecticide resistant mosquitoes using alternative insecticides on nets“. Thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (University of London), 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.536834.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2
Umeda, Kai, und Chris Fredman. „Evaluation of Insecticides for Aphid Control in Cabbage“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214743.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Experimental insecticides CGA-215944 (Ciba), pyriproxyfen (S-71639, Valent), and RH-7988 (Rohm and Haas) demonstrated very good efficacy in reducing the aphid population in cabbage. Fipronil (Rhone-Poulenc) was not as effective in controlling the aphids relative to the other treatments. Acephate (Orthene®), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban™), and naled (Dibrom®) were highly effective relative to the untreated check.
3
Umeda, Kai, und Gabriel Towers. „Evaluation of Insecticides for Efficacy on Turfgrass Pests“. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/216634.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
No masked chafer larvae were observed for treatments of imidacloprid, imidacloprid plus bifenthrin, clothianidin, and the two higher rates of DPX-E2Y45. The inconsistent and low populations of masked chafer larvae and billbugs in the turfgrass did not provide for conclusive results. Clothianidin and the two higher rates of DPX-E2Y45 had no billbug larvae. An early rating date showed that more billbug adults were in turf treated with imidacloprid and DPX-E2Y45. Later rating dates showed a decline in adults for all treatments.
4
Umeda, Kai. „Evaluation of Foliar Insecticides for Whiteflies in Cantaloupes“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219967.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
A single application of buprofezin (Applaud7) at 0.38 lb AI/A had the fewest number of adult whiteflies (WF) on rating dates at 13, 21, and 27 days after treatment (DAT). The number of immature WF at 21 DAT of a single Applaud application ranged from 0.8 to 5.2 nymphs/leaf, significantly less than the untreated. Applaud treatments were effective in minimizing the immatures for 21 DAT of a single application and then numbers began to increase before 27 DAT. Applaud plus two subsequent weekly applications of bifenthrin (Capture7) plus endosulfan (Thiodan7, Phaser7) was almost similar to single applications of Applaud alone and adult numbers were also low. Weekly applications of the pyrethroids plus endosulfan reduced the adult WF relative to the untreated at 1 week after treatment (WAT). At 2 WAT of the third application, fenpropathrin (Danitol7) and Capture continued to show reduced numbers of adults and esfenvalerate (Asana7) was similar to the untreated. Danitol treatments had numerically fewer adults than Capture which was lower than Asana. The lowest adult and immature WF populations were observed season-long in the CGA-293343 (Novartis) treated cantaloupes. Both rates, 0.067 and 0.09 lb AI/A performed similarly and numerically slightly fewer nymphs were observed for the higher rate. CGA-293343 plus CGA-215944 (pymetrozine, Fulfill7) performed similar to the two rates of CGA-293343 alone.
5
Palumbo, John C. „Evaluation of Neonicotinoid Insecticides for Whitefly Management in Melons“. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214926.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Several studies were conducted in the spring and fall 2001 to evaluate a number of neonicotinoid compounds (Admire, Calypso, Actara, Platinum and dinotefuron) for whitefly control in spring and fall melons. The results of these studies demonstrate that several insecticide products are being developed that offer melon growers management alternatives for controlling whiteflies. The new foliar neonicotinoid Calypso (thiacloprid), shows excellent promise as a foliar, post-planting spray with 14-21 day residual. Further, no consistent negative interaction was detected between Platinum and fertilizer, 10-34-0 and UN 32, applied together as at-planting or side dress soil treatments. These treatments provided good whitefly control, but further research is needed to replicate these effects as Platinum has been labeled at lower rates than the manufacturer initially anticipated. At planting applications of Platinum at 8 oz (current labeled rate) did however provide acceptable residual control of whiteflies on fall melons under heavy population pressure.
6
Umeda, K., D. MacNeil, D. Roberts und N. Lund. „Evaluation of Foliar Insecticides for Whitefly Control in Cantaloupes“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219996.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The pyrethroid insecticides esfenvalerate (Asana®), bifenthrin (Capture®), or fenpropathrin (Danitol®) combined with endosulfan effectively reduced whitefly (WF, Bemisia argentifolii) counts at 1 week after treatment (WAT) following each of five applications. Asana, Capture, or Danitol combined with endosulfan effectively reduced WF counts at 1 WAT following each of five applications. Danitol treated melons exhibited fewer adult WF compared to Asana or Capture at most of the rating dates at 6 days after treatment (DAT) of each of the applications and also at 11 DAT of the last application. A single application of buprofezin (Applaud®) treatments or pymetrozine (Fulfill®) effectively reduced WF nymphs for 18 to 24 DAT and adults were reduced for 18 DAT. Fulfill exhibited a rate response where the higher rate reduced WF counts more than the lower rate.
7
Umeda, Kai, und Chris Fredman. „Evaluation of Insecticides for Lepidopterous Insect Pest Control in Cabbage“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214747.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Experimental insecticides MK-244 (Merck), Alert (AC 303630, Cyanamid), and Confirm (RH-5992, Rohm and Haas) demonstrated very good efficacy in reducing the lepidopterous pests including plutell4 xylostella (diamondback moth, DBM) and Tricoplusia at (cabbage looper, CL) in cabbage. The total number of small, medium, and large DBM larvae for all treatments was lower than the untreated at most rating dates. The experimental insecticides compared favorably with commercially available products Lannate®, Larvin®, and Kryocide®.
8
Arias, Gladys Antonieta Rojas de. „Evaluation of Chagas control techniques in Paraguay“. Thesis, Bangor University, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.318078.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9
Hundley, Christopher Alan. „Evaluation of organophosphate insecticides on performance of transgenic and conventional cotton“. Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2189.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) acreage has increased dramatically over the last six years. Reports of variable results in fiber quality and yield have arisen in these cultivars. Some changes in production practices have occurred coincident with the introduction of transgenic technology, such as reduced use of broad-spectrum insecticides, including organophosphates (OP) that could potentially influence the growth and yield of cotton. One factor that might affect these parameters is the difference in the amount of foliarly-applied phosphorus (P) between an OP and non-phosphate (NP) insecticide regime. Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate selected growth characteristics, yield, and fiber quality of genetically modified and conventional cotton as influenced by OP and foliar phosphorus (FP) applications. A four replication strip-plot experimental design was utilized with cultivar serving as the whole plot and insecticide regime as the sub-plot. Three cultivars of the same recurrent parent (ST4892BR, ST4793R, and ST474) were planted in 2001 and 2002 under irrigated conditions in Burleson County, TX on a Weswood silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Fluventic Ustochrept). The insecticide regime consisted of NP, NP+FP, and OP treatments. The FP was applied at P2O5 weight equivalent to the P component in the concurrent OP application. ST4892BR had greater lint yield than ST4793R and ST474. The yield increase can be explained through plant mapping analysis which showed ST4892BR producing larger bolls and greater boll numbers. In addition, evaluation of fruiting distribution showed ST4892BR contained more lint on sympodial branches 6 through 10. The insecticide regime effect on lint yield resulted in higher yield (P=0.08) for the NP+FP regime. Examination of yield components revealed NP+FP increased second position bolls, predominantly at sympodial branches 6 through 10. Leaf tissue analysis revealed increased levels of P for the OP and NP+FP over that of the NP insecticide regime, which indicates a potential for plants to acquire P from OP insecticides. Furthermore, the considerable yield response to small amounts of FP is not clearly understood. While conclusive evidence exists regarding cultivar yield differences, this study does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that OP insecticides influence growth, yield, or fiber quality characteristics of these cotton cultivars.
10
Rethwisch, Michael D. „Evaluation of Insecticides and Oils for Jojoba Scirtothrips ewarti bailey Control“. College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/215721.
(India), Malaria Research Centre. Protocols for uniform evaluation of insecticides for use in vector control. New Delhi: Malaria Research Centre, 2005.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2
Kuivila, Kathryn M. Laboratory study of the response of select insecticides to toxicity identification evaluation procedures. Sacramento, Calif: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 1999.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3
Macatula, R. F. Evaluation of 12 insecticides against green leafhopper for preventing rice tungro virus disease. Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 1987.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4
Dosdall, Lloyd Max. Production and evaluation of two strains of the bacterium, Bacillus Thuringiensis Berliner, as biological insecticides for bertha armyworm, Mamestra Configurata (Walker). Vegreville, Alta: Alberta Environmental Centre, 1994.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Cooperative Extension Service. Illinois insecticide evaluations: Field and forage crops : 1986. Urbana, Ill.]: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [and] Illinois Natural History Survey, Dept. of Energy and Natural Resources, 1988.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6
Joy, Joe. A suspended sediment and DDT total maximum daily load evaluation report for the Yakima River. Olympia, Wash: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Environmental Investigations and Laboratory Services Program, 1997.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7
Grove, Robert Allan. Evaluation of current agricultural practices and organophosphorus insecticide use in relation to ring-necked pheasant numbers at Klamath Basin Refuges, California. 1995.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Buchteile zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation":
1
Perry, A. S., I. Yamamoto, I. Ishaaya und R. Perry. „Evaluation of Toxicity in Insects“. In Insecticides in Agriculture and Environment, 14–15. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03656-3_6.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2
Perry, A. S., I. Yamamoto, I. Ishaaya und R. Perry. „Evaluation of Toxicity in Higher Animals“. In Insecticides in Agriculture and Environment, 16–22. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03656-3_7.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3
Mayo, Z. B. „Field Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Larvae of Corn Rootworms“. In Springer Series in Experimental Entomology, 183–203. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4868-2_10.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4
Felsot, A. S., und J. J. Tollefson. „Evaluation of Some Methods for Coping with Enhanced Biodegradation of Soil Insecticides“. In ACS Symposium Series, 192–213. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1990-0426.ch015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5
Oke, O. A., A. A. Oladigbolu und H. S. Hamisu. „Evaluation of Resistance and Toxicity of Different Insecticides on Tuta absoluta Meyrick Populations in Major Tomato Growing States of Nigeria“. In Sustainable Management of Invasive Pests in Africa, 45–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41083-4_4.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6
Steinkraus, D. C., S. Y. Young, D. H. Gouge und J. E. Leland. „Microbial insecticide application and evaluation: Cotton“. In Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology, 427–55. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5933-9_20.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7
Service, M. W. „Experimental Hut Techniques for Evaluating Insecticides“. In Mosquito Ecology, 637–51. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1868-2_8.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8
Service, M. W. „Experimental Hut Techniques for Evaluating Insecticides“. In Mosquito Ecology, 637–51. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8113-4_8.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9
Dowling, Kathryn C., und Ann T. Lemley. „Evaluation of Organophosphorus Insecticide Hydrolysis by Conventional Means and Reactive Ion Exchange“. In ACS Symposium Series, 177–94. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1992-0510.ch015.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10
Popham, Holly J. R., Mark R. Ellersieck, Huarong Li und Bryony C. Bonning. „Evaluation of the Insecticidal Efficacy of Wild Type and Recombinant Baculoviruses“. In Methods in Molecular Biology, 407–44. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3043-2_21.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation":
1
Gautam, Bal K. „Evaluation of insecticides and horticultural oils against scale insects in blueberries“. In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.115364.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2
R. F. Cullum, S. Smith und Jr. „Evaluation of Insecticides in Runoff from BT and non-Bt Cotton Fields“. In 2001 Sacramento, CA July 29-August 1,2001. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.3832.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3
Ghimire, Mukti Nath. „Evaluation of novel insecticides for control of khapra beetle,Trogoderma granariumEverts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae)“. In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.95471.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4
Metzger, Michael S., Tim Kenyon, Neil Boedekker, Tom Hermann, Chris Motteberg, Lynn Dusek, Curtis Funk und Allan Cattanach. „Field strip trial evaluation of seed treatment insecticides in the Red River Valley“. In American Society of Sugarbeet Technologist. ASSBT, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5274/assbt.2011.111.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5
Volchkevich, I. G., und O. I. Kosykhina. „White head cabbage protection against cabbage moth in Belarus“. In CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRARIAN SCIENCE. Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Research Institute of Agriculture of Crimea”, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.33952/2542-0720-2020-5-9-10-8.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Cabbage moth is one of the main white head cabbage pests in Belarus. The evaluation of the existing insecticides assortment has shown that their application at the initial pest number from 0.72 to 4.0 caterpillars per inspected plant has allowed reducing cabbage moth harmfulness and number by 84.0–100.0 % and increasing heads yield up to 35.5 %.
6
Suliman, Elnayer H. „Evaluation of some insecticides for the control of the African bollworm,Helicoverpa armigeraHübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on sorghum in the rain-fed and irrigated areas in the Sudan“. In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.107695.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7
Cattanach, Allan, Jeff Daniels, Mark A. Boetel und Robert J. Dregseth. „Strip trial evaluation of Poncho Beta insecticide in the RRV.“ In American Society of Sugarbeet Technologist. ASSBT, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.5274/assbt.2009.39.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8
Morey, Rashmi AASHAY. „Evaluation of insecticidal properties of plant essential oils againstMusca domesticaL.“ In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.112427.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9
Nowatzki, Tim, Jim Oleson und Jon Tollefson. „Evaluating Insecticides for Corn Rootworm Larval Control Using a New Rating Scale“. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-683.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10
Chakraborty, Gautam. „Evaluation of a novel insecticide, sulfoxaflor 12%, for management of mustard aphid,Lipaphis erysimi“. In 2016 International Congress of Entomology. Entomological Society of America, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.110891.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Insecticides Evaluation":
1
Robertson, Alison E., Daren S. Mueller, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybean. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1198.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2
Mueller, Daren S., Alison E. Robertson, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-2174.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3
Mueller, Daren S., Alison E. Robertson, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-641.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4
Mueller, Daren S., Alison E. Robertson, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-2466.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5
Mueller, Daren S., Alison E. Robertson, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-2712.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6
Mueller, Daren S., Alison E. Robertson, Stith N. Wiggs, Matthew E. O'Neal und Erin W. Hodgson. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1775.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7
Mueller, Daren S., und Stith N. Wiggs. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeansin SouthwestIowa. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-878.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8
Mueller, Daren S., und Stith N. Wiggs. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeansin CentralIowa. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1866.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9
Mueller, Daren S., und Stith N. Wiggs. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeansin Northern Iowa. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1054.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10
Mueller, Daren S., Warren L. Pierson und Stith N. Wiggs. Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides and Insecticides on Soybeans in Southwest Iowa. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-854.
