Thematische Bibliographien / Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Zeitschriftenartikel
Dissertationen
Bücher
Buchteile

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions“

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 18. Mai 2024

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions"

Zgrabljić Rotar, Dora. „OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN CROATIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW“. Pravni vjesnik 37, Nr. 3-4 (Dezember 2021): 81–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/pv/13256.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Overriding mandatory provisions are mandatory provisions that are applicable in situations with an international element. The author analyses overriding mandatory norms in the European private international law and in the Croatian national private international law. The definition of such norms provided in the 2017 Croatian Private International Law Act is almost a verbatim copy of the definition provided in the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations. The 1982 Croatian Private International Law Act did not provide for a definition of overriding mandatory norms but it was uniformly accepted in the scholarly interpretations that those types of mandatory norms were accepted by the Croatian private international law system. Moreover, the 1982 PIL Act included a substantive family law provision, which was, in essence, an overriding mandatory provision. However, Croatian courts and practitioners have been reluctant to refer explicitly to an applied norm as an overriding mandatory one. The reasons behind that might be that that the courts were better acquainted with the public policy exception, since public policy was explicitly mentioned in the 1982 PIL Act, as well as in some other legal acts. In addition, the legislator does not explicitly note that a provision is an overriding mandatory one in the provision itself, which leads to the outcome that the courts and other practitioners are burdened with a complex task of interpretation of a provision they think might be an overriding mandatory one. The author aims at providing guidelines to facilitate that task.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bisping, Christopher. „THE COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW“. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62, Nr. 2 (April 2013): 463–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589313000055.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

AbstractThis article analyses the relationship of the proposed Common European Sales Law (CESL) and the rules on mandatory and overriding provisions in private international law. The author argues that the CESL will not achieve its stated aim of taking precedence over these provisions of national law and therefore not lead to an increase in cross-border trade. It is pointed out how slight changes in drafting can overcome the collision with mandatory provisions. The clash with overriding mandatory provisions, the author argues, should be taken as an opportunity to rethink the definition of these provisions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Lee, Phil-Bok. „International Transaction of Cultural Heritage and Overriding Mandatory Provisions - Focused on the Overriding Mandatory Provisions of lex originis -“. Korea Private International Law Journal 27, Nr. 1 (30.06.2021): 119–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.38131/kpilj.2021.6.27.1.119.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wowerka, Arkadiusz. „Obce przepisy wymuszające swoje zastosowanie. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 18 października 2016 r. w sprawie C-135/15 Republika Grecji przeciwko Grigoriosowi Nikiforidisowi“. Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego 25 (31.12.2019): 91–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.31261/pppm.2019.25.05.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This commentary examines the judgement of the CJEU of 18 October 2016 in case C-135/15 Republik Griechenland v. Grigorios Nikiforidis. The judgement in question concerns the issue of treatment of foreign overriding mandatory provisions under the Article 9(3) of Regulation No 593/2008. This topic is the subject to a great deal of controversy and academic discussion. The ECJ concluded that the mentioned provision must be interpreted as precluding overriding mandatory provisions other than those of the State of the forum or of the State where the obligations arising out of the contract have to be or have been performed from being applied, as legal rules, by the court of the forum, but as not precluding it from taking such other overriding mandatory provisions into account as matters of fact in so far as this is provided for by the national law that is applicable to the contract pursuant to the Regulation. This interpretation is not affected by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down in Article 4(3) TEU. In this respect the judgement of CJEU brings significant clarification on the question, whether a court of the forum can have regard to foreign overriding mandatory provisions, which do not belong to the legal system of the country of performance of the contract on the level of the applicable substantive law. However, there are still questions arising under Article 9(3) of Rome I Regulation, which need to be clarified.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Cordero Álvarez, Clara Isabel. „Incidencia de las normas imperativas en los contratos internacionales: especial referencia a las normas de terceros estados desde una aproximación europea = Overriding mandatory provisions in international contracts: a special reference to foreign overriding mandatory provisions from a European approach“. CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 9, Nr. 2 (05.10.2017): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2017.3870.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Resumen: Este trabajo analiza algunas cuestiones que plantea la aplicación de las leyes de policía en el ámbito del Derecho contractual de la UE. Por cuanto se refiere a las normas de este tipo de terceros Estados su aplicación resulta significativamente más compleja, en especial si analizamos su tratamiento en el Reglamento Roma I, mucho más restrictivo que su predecesor el Convenio de Roma de 1980. En este contexto la reciente sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Nikiforidis) resulta muy relevante, ya que abre la posibilidad a los Estados miembros para tomar en consideración normas de policía de terceros Estados como elemento fáctico en el marco de la lex contractus, sin sujetarla a las restricciones y condicionantes previstos en el art. 9.3.Palabras clave: leyes de policía, normas imperativas, Derecho contractual europeo, Reglamento Roma I, sentencia Nikiforidis.Abstract: This paper addresses some of the issues raised by the application of overriding mandatory provisions, from a European approach. With regard to foreign overriding mandatory provisions, their application is significantly more complex. This approach appears in European Contract Law, particularly regarding the treatment of this issue in the Rome I Regulation, which is much more restrictive than the Rome Convention of 1980. In this context, the recent case law of European Court of Justice (Nikiforidis case) is very significant. Since the judgment gives Member States the possibility to take into account foreign overriding mandatory provisions, as a factual element within the framework of the applicable law to the contract, outside the scope of article 9.3 of the Rome I Regulation.Keywords: overriding mandatory provisions, mandatory rules, European Contract Law, Rome I Regulation, Nikiforidis case.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Migliorini, Sara. „Quest-ce que sont les lois de police? Une querelle franco-allemande après la communautarisation de la Convention de Rome“. European Review of Private Law 19, Issue 2 (01.04.2011): 187–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2011012.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract: Article 7(2) of the 1980 Rome Convention provided that nothing in the Convention shall restrict the application of the rules of the law of the forum in a situation where they are mandatory irrespective of the law otherwise applicable to the contract. The Rome Convention however did not define these 'overriding mandatory provisions'. The absence of a definition gave rise to a controversy between French and German courts. According to the latter, overriding mandatory provisions only protect public interests in a strict sense. However, French courts may consider a provision that exclusively protects the interests of the weaker party as an overriding mandatory provision. The definition of 'overriding mandatory provisions' provided in Article 9(1) Rome I fails to bring any real legal certainty. Since the controversy between the French and German courts essentially relates to the systematic relationship between overriding mandatory provisions and connecting factors protecting a weaker party in the Rome I Regulation, an intervention by the European Court of Justice will be necessary. Resume: L'Article 7(2) de la Convention de Rome sur la loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles laissait au juge la possibilité d'appliquer les lois de police du for, peu importe la loi désignée par la Convention même. Néanmoins, la Convention ne dé. nissait pas la catégorie des lois de police. Chaque juge pouvant appliquer ses propres critères de quail . cation des lois de police, une différence existait entre l'approche française et allemande à cette catégorie. D'une part, la jurisprudence allemande ne quali. ait de lois de police que les dispositions visant à protéger des intérêts strictement publics. D'autre part, la jurisprudence française n'hésitait pas à quali. er les dispositions protectrices des parties faibles comme de lois de police. La dé. nition de 'lois de police' contenue dans l'Article 9(1) du Règlement Rome I ne résout pas cette divergence. En effet, celle-ci découle principalement d'une divergence dans l'interprétation des rapports réciproques entre les lois de police et les critères de rattachement protecteurs des parties faibles. Partant, il revient à la Cour de justice d'intervenir pour trancher cette divergence.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Żarnowiec, Łukasz. „Wpływ przepisów wymuszających swoje zastosowanie na rozstrzyganie spraw spadkowych pod rządami rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) Nr 650/2012“. Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego 25 (31.12.2019): 43–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.31261/pppm.2019.25.03.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Since August 17, 2015 the courts of the Member States of the European Union apply the conflict-of-laws rules adopted in the EU Succession Regulation (EU) in succession matters. From the Polish point of view, this constitutes not only the change of the rules applied for the purposes of determining jurisdiction and the applicable law, but also a new approach to the overriding mandatory provisions. Contrary to other European instruments of private international law, the Succession Regulation neither uses the term “overriding mandatory provisions”, nor defines its meaning. Nevertheless, in Article 30 the Regulation provides for application — irrespective of the law applicable to the succession under its conflict rules — of the special rules of the State, where certain immovable property, enterprises or other special categories of assets are located, and which — for economic, family or social considerations — impose restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets, in so far as, under the law of that State, they are applicable irrespective of the law applicable to the succession. The interpretation of this provision cause difficulties. It is not clear whether the concept of the special provisions embodied in Article 30 refers to the concept of overriding mandatory rules, well known in the European private international law, or whether it constitutes an original solution. Another controversial issue discussed in the paper is the relevance of the mandatory rules of the forum or the third State other than those mentioned in Article 30.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Siehr, Kurt. „Mandatory Rules of Third States From Ole Lando to Contemporary European Private International“. European Review of Private Law 28, Issue 3 (01.09.2020): 509–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020028.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

On 18 October 2016 the European Court of Justice, in the case Greece v. Nikiforidis, decided: ‘Article 9 (3) of the Regulation No. 503/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations must be interpreted as precluding overriding mandatory provisions other than those of the State of the forum or of the State where the obligations arising out of the contract have to be or have been performed from being applied, as legal rules, by the court of the forum, but as not precluding it from taking such other overriding mandatory provisions into account as matters of fact in so far as this is provided for by the national law that is applicable to the contract pursuant to the regulation’. Ole Lando already anticipated this development when he dealt with this problem arising under the Rome Convention of 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations still in force in Denmark. Harmonization, contract law, European private law, restatements

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Aschauer, Christian, und Lukas Klever. „Overriding Mandatory Provisions and Arbitration: A Cadmean Victory for Commercial Agents?“ European Review of Private Law 27, Issue 5 (01.10.2019): 973–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2019053.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

In a recent decision, the Austrian Supreme Court declared an arbitration clause invalid in the light of the European Court of Justice’s Ingmar decision since it was to be expected that the arbitral tribunal would not apply articles 17 and 18 of the Commercial Agents Directive. According to the Supreme Court’s reasoning, that is the case wherever the parties have chosen a lex causae for their main contract which does not contain provisions similar to articles 17 and 18 Commercial Agents Directive. In the view of the authors, such understanding of the commercial agents directive is neither required by the principle of effectiveness of EU law, nor is it justifiable under the regime of the New York Convention.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Berends, André J. „Why Overriding Mandatory Provisions that Protect Financial Stability Deserve Special Treatment“. Netherlands International Law Review 61, Nr. 01 (24.04.2014): 69–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0165070x14001041.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Mehr Quellen

Dissertationen zum Thema "Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions"

Zhao, Yi. „La loi de police en droit international privé français et chinois“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024ASSA0001.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Le mécanisme des lois de police en droit international privé chinois est un produit importé et sa définition législative est influencée par la définition européenne. Bien que la définition française de loi de police et la définition chinoise ne soient pas textuellement identiques, il nous semble que la notion de loi de police ne change pas selon qu’il s’agit de droit français ou de droit chinois. Cependant, n’étant prévu par le droit positif chinois que depuis 2011, le mécanisme des lois de police est relativement jeune, non seulement au regard de ce mécanisme lui-même mais aussi au regard de ses relations avec d’autres mécanismes de droit international privé ayant des liens avec lui, comme l’exception d’ordre public international. Nous chercherons les expériences françaises en la matière et étudierons la notion française et chinoise de loi de police, d’autres mécanismes de droit international privé en lien avec le mécanisme des lois de police et les illustrations des lois de police dans la jurisprudence. Malgré les critiques, l’application immédiate et impérative est toujours le caractère le plus important des lois de police du for dans l’instance directe, mais ce n’est le cas ni pour l’instance indirecte ni pour les lois de police étrangères. Selon la jurisprudence française et chinoise, le non-respect par le juge étranger ou par un tribunal arbitral de la loi de police de l’État requis n’entraîne pas automatiquement le refus de reconnaissance ou d’exécution. Concernant les lois de police étrangères, le texte législatif chinois est muet, mais cela ne signifie pas que l’application ou la prise en considération de la loi de police étrangère est interdite en droit chinois
The overriding mandatory provisions in Chinese private international law is imported and its legislative definition is incorporated by the European one. Although the French definition of overriding mandatory provisions and the Chinese definition are not textually identical, it seems to us that the notion of overriding mandatory provisions does not change depending on whether it is French law or Chinese law. However, having been provided for by Chinese positive law only since 2011, the overriding mandatory provisions mechanism is relatively young, not only with regard to this mechanism itself but also to its relations with other mechanisms of private international law having links with it, such as the international public policy exception. We will seek French experiences in this area and study the French and Chinese notion of overriding mandatory provisions, other mechanisms of private international law in connection with them and their illustrations in case law. Despite the criticisms, the immediate and mandatory application is always the most important character of the overriding mandatory provisions of the forum in the direct instance, but this is not the case for foreign overriding mandatory provisions or for the indirect instance. According to French and Chinese case law, the non-respect by the foreign judge or by an arbitral tribunal of the overriding mandatory provisions of the requested state does not automatically result in the refusal of recognition or enforcement. Regarding the foreign overriding mandatory provisions, the Chinese legislative text is silent, but this does not mean that their application or take into consideration is prohibited in Chinese law

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Adel, Zaher Mina. „L'ordre public dans les relations privées internationales : l'exemple des contrats internationaux devant le juge étatique“. Thesis, Lyon, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LYSE3057.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

L’autonomie de la volonté est un principe relatif à la liberté des parties quant au choix de la loi applicable au contrat international. Cependant, ce principe est limité par les règles d’ordre public, et plus généralement les dispositions impératives, réduisant l’étendue de cette autonomie. Afin de perfectionner la mise en application de ces règles tout en garantissant une certaine prévisibilité, il s’avère important d’étudier en détail l’origine et la nature des règles d’ordre public. Une étude comparée avec le droit international privé égyptien s’avère nécessaire pour perfectionner les mécanismes actuels. Le débat conceptuel actuel met en évidence le rôle de la coopération internationale, outre les intérêts purement étatiques, ce qui suscitera un nouvel ordre public transnational, voire supranational
The freedom of choice is a principle referring to the freedom of the parties concerning the choice of the law ruling the international contract. However, this principle is limited by public policy, which reduce the extent of this freedom. In order to improve the application of these rules with a minimum of predictability, it is important to study in detail the origin and nature of the rules of public policy. A comparative study with Egyptian private international law is needed to take advantage from all current mechanisms. The current conceptual debate highlights the role of international cooperation, in addition to purely State interests, which will tend to create a new transnational, or even supranational, public policy

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Mota, Miguel Afonso do Carmo. „Overriding mandatory provisions in a european context“. Master's thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/27209.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

KUIPERS, Jan-Jaap. „The interrelationship between EU law and private international law in contractual obligations : private autonomy, overriding mandatory provisions and a European justice area“. Doctoral thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/16060.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Defence Date: 17 January 2011
Examining Board: Prof. dr. Marie-Ange Moreau, European University Institute (supervisor); Prof. dr. Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz, European University Institute; Prof. dr. Gerard-René de Groot, Maastricht University; Prof. dr. Jean-Michel Jacquet, Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD theses
The aim of this research is to analyse the interrelationship between Private International Law and European Union law in the area of contractual obligations. The Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations is used to delimit the scope of research. The material rules of Rome I will be discussed in order to demonstrate that the instrument follows the traditional European conflict of laws approach without any specific orientation towards internal market objectives. The influence of Union law upon PIL goes however beyond positive harmonisation, being the codification of conflict of law norms on the European level. In the analysis of the effects of Union law upon the conflict of law process, a distinction will be drawn between international and =European‘ contracts. As regards international contracts Rome I could be used to establish the international scope of application of secondary Union law when the contract involves a link with a third country. However the legislator seems to have given preference to an autonomous approach based upon the object and purpose of the relevant instrument. These directives create nuisance in the conflict of law process and it will be proposed to integrate sector specific scope rules in Rome I. With regard to contracts that exclusively have connections with two or more Member States it will be analysed to what extent rules of contract law are caught by the fundamental freedoms. It will be argued that primary law does not favour ex ante the application of the law of a specific Member State, but may correct the applicable law. Rules that can be set aside by parties by a mere choice of law can however not have the potential effects of hindering the smooth functioning of the internal market. The overall objective of the project is to identify the methodological disharmony between Union law and PIL in the regulation of cross border contracts and to propose suggestions to improve their mutual understanding.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions"

Nigel, Blackaby, Partasides Constantine, Redfern Alan und Hunter Martin. 6 Conduct of the Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714248.003.0006.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter outlines the conduct of the tribunal and the parties during arbitration proceedings. In general, an arbitral tribunal must conduct the arbitration in accordance with the procedure agreed by the parties. If it fails to do so, the award may be set aside, or refused recognition and enforcement. However, the freedom of the parties to dictate the procedure to be followed in an international arbitration is not unrestricted. The procedure must comply with any mandatory rules and public policy requirements of the law of the juridical seat of the arbitration. It must also take into account the provisions of the international rules on arbitration, such as those of the ICC, which aim to ensure that arbitral proceedings are conducted fairly. Accordingly, a balance must be struck between the parties’ wishes concerning the procedure to be followed and any overriding requirements of the legal regime that governs the arbitration.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Buchteile zum Thema "Identification of the overriding mandatory provisions"

Zavadilová, Lucie. „United in Diversity – Regional Unification of the Conflict-of-law Rules in Matters of Matrimonial Property Regimes“. In Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century, 160–78. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9497-2019-8.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The unification of the conflict-of-law rules in matters of matrimonial property regimes at EU level seeks to mitigate differences in substantive law in particular legal systems. The aim of this contribution is to analyse the doctrine of overriding mandatory provisions and consider the applicability of the public policy exception, which limit the application of the law otherwise applicable determined in compliance with the unified conflict-of-law rules. The question author addresses in this paper is whether these institutes of the general part of private international law provide for sufficient safeguards to protect the fundamental values and public interests of the forum law in matters of matrimonial property regimes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Lazaridou, Dimitra, Anastasios Michailidis, Stefanos Nastis, Efstratios Loizou und Aikaterini Paltaki. „How to start or be in a Union or Coperative?“ In Manuali – Scienze Tecnologiche, 34. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-044-3.34.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Cooperatives in the EU Member States are subject to the provisions of the Council Regulation 1435/2003. However, cooperative legislation is different among the EU states and most countries have specific rules applicable to cooperatives. There are some steps for setting up a cooperative, which are summarized in: Identification of a common economic goal for potential members, decision about the number of members recruited, their rights and responsibilities, determination of business feasibility, development of a business plan, preparation of legal papers and implementation of the business plan. In many European countries, cooperatives can have a legal status either as a cooperative society with limited or unlimited liability, as an economic interest grouping or as a joint-stock company. Most EU Member have no mandatory provision regarding the minimum capital stock or the minimum number of members for setting up a cooperative.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„Article 9: Overriding mandatory provisions“. In Rome I Regulation - Commentary, herausgegeben von Ulrich Magnus und Peter Mankowski. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.9785/9783504384814-015.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wilderspin, Michael. „Chapter O.3: Overriding mandatory provisions“. In Encyclopedia of Private International Law, 1330–36. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781782547235.o.3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„Overriding Mandatory Provisions: The National Perspective“. In EU Law and Private International Law, 125–75. Brill | Nijhoff, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004206724_004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Neels, Jan L., und Eesa A. Fredericks. „Covid-19 regulations as overriding mandatory provisions in private international law“. In The Impact of Covid-19 on the Future of Law, 1–25. UJ Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36615/9781776405657-01.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This contribution provides a comparative study of the position of overriding mandatory rules in regional, supranational and international conflicts instruments, in particular the Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (2008) and the proposed African Principles on the Law Applicable to International Commercial Contracts (2020). COVID-19 regulations are referred to as an unequivocal example of overriding mandatory provisions in the context of the disruption of international commerce. The application of the proper law of the contract, the lex fori and the law of the country of performance, as well as the application of the legal systems of other countries are considered. Although strongly influenced by the corresponding provision in the Rome I Regulation, it is suggested that article 11 of the African Principles provides more clarity. The African Principles constitute the sole instrument which explicitly mentions that the overriding mandatory rules of the proper law of the contract are applicable in principle. The African Principles clarify that, for the purposes of the application of the law of the country of performance, any substantial performance under the contract is relevant (that is, both the characteristic and the monetary performance). The African Principles expressly include the country of commencement, continuation and completion of the performance in determining the content of the notion of the law of the country of performance. In respect of the application of the overriding mandatory rules of legal systems other than the lex fori, the proper law and the law of the country of performance, the African Principles reflect a via media between the opposing positions in the Rome I Regulation and its predecessor, the Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (1980): in exceptional circumstances, the overriding mandatory rules of another legal system may be applied, provided that such law has a manifestly close connection to the particular situation. As the doctrine of overriding mandatory rules can be better explained from a unilateralist rather than a Savignian conflicts paradigm, it is argued that American-style comparative interest or impairment analysis could provide valuable ideas in respect of the exercise of the discretion of a court in cases of the cumulation of overriding mandatory rules. Finally, the submission is made that the law applicable to the contract should govern the effect of an overriding mandatory rule on contractual liability, unless the provision itself stipulates the consequences.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Winkler, Matteo M. „Overriding mandatory provisions and choice of court agreements“. In Research Handbook on the Brussels Ibis Regulation, 346–59. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788110792.00020.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Đorđević, Slavko. „ODSTUPANjA OD SPORAZUMNOG IZBORA MERODAVNOG PRAVA ZA UGOVORE U PRIVREDI SA ELEMENTOM INOSTRANOSTI – NEKOLIKO NAPOMENA IZ UGLA MEĐUNARODNOG PRIVATNOG PRAVA SRBIJE“. In XXI vek - vek usluga i uslužnog prava. [Knj. 14], 15–33. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xxiv-14.015dj.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper deals with the exceptions from the parties’ choice of applicable law for commercial contracts, which may occur if: (a) chosen foreign law violates domestic ordre public; (b) parties intentionally create the circumstances which enable them to choose foreign law in order to evade the mandatory provisions of domestic law (fraus legis); (c) the overriding mandatory provisions need to be applied to commercial contracts. After explaining the boundaries of parties’ right to choose the law applicable to commercial contracts, author analyses each of the mentioned exceptions from the point of view of Serbian private international law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„Economic Sanctions as Overriding Mandatory Provisions in EU Private International Law“. In Economic Sanctions in EU Private International Law. Hart Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509933549.ch-005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN THE ROME I REGULATION ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS“. In Yearbook of Private International Law. Berlin, New York: Sellier de Gruyter, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783866538566.2.285.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!