Thematische Bibliographien / Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia“

Autor: Grafiati
Veröffentlicht am 4. Juni 2021
Zuletzt aktualisiert am 2. Februar 2022

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

  1. Zeitschriftenartikel
  2. Dissertationen
  3. Bücher

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia":

1

Enya, Andrew, Shane Dempsey und Manikam Pillay. „A Study Investigating How the Characteristics of High Reliability Organisations Can Be Measured in the Construction Industry in Australia“. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, Nr. 21 (09.11.2020): 8273. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218273.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Construction activities involve a lot of risk as workers are exposed to a wide range of job hazards, such as working at height, moving vehicles, toxic substances, and confined spaces. The hazards related to a construction project are mostly unpredictable because construction projects move quickly due to project deadlines, and changing work environments. As a result of this, the industry accounts for one of the highest numbers of work-related claims, and the fourth highest incidence rate of serious claims in Australia. This research investigates how key safety management factors can measure the characteristics of high reliability organisations (HROs) in the construction industry in New South Wales Australia. To address the problem, a model is presented that can predict characteristics of HRO in construction (CHC). Using structural equation modeling (SEM), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the model and measurement instruments are tested and validated from data collected from construction workers. The results identified the factors that effectively measure CHC, and the findings can also be used as a safety management strategy and will contribute to the body of knowledge in research.
2

Jackson, Melissa A., Amanda L. Brown, Jennifer Johnston, Richard Clancy, Iain McGregor, Raimondo Bruno, Nick Lintzeris et al. „The use and effects of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists by New South Wales cannabis treatment clients“. Journal of Cannabis Research 3, Nr. 1 (26.07.2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00091-z.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Abstract Introduction Despite decreasing consumption by general populations, use of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) persists in some marginalised groups, including those who use other substances. This article explores SCRA consumption in an Australian cannabis treatment sample, comparing those who report ever using SCRAs with those who have never used SCRAs. Methods A questionnaire orally administered in person to a convenience sample of 154 cannabis treatment service clients from New South Wales, Australia (71% male, median age 35) collected information regarding cannabis and SCRA use including motivations, effects and health-related consequences of use, demographics, other substance use and overall health. Demographic profiles and between-group differences were explored. McNemar tests compared effects of SCRA and cannabis. Logistic regression analysis determined predictors of SCRA use. Results Half (53%) reported lifetime SCRA use; 20% reported previous-month use. The SCRA + cannabis group displayed greater polysubstance use and psychological distress. Reduced dependence on cannabis but higher levels of other substance use may predict SCRA use. Although curiosity motivated initial SCRA consumption, perceived psychoactive strength drove continued use. SCRAs appear to induce more negative side-effects than cannabis. Of the SCRA + cannabis group, 27% sought medical assistance for SCRA use. Most (90%) preferred cannabis to SCRAs, citing superior safety, effects and consistency of cannabis. Conclusions Among clients seeking treatment for cannabis use, SCRA use was relatively common, although not a preferred substance. Hazardous substance use and poor mental health characterised SCRA consumers, highlighting the need for continued monitoring by researchers and treatment providers of SCRA consumption in populations who use substances.

Dissertationen zum Thema "Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia":

1

Akhter, Shahana. „Strategies for managing hazardous substances from industry in South Australia“. Title page, contents and abstract only, 1999. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09ENV/09enva315.pdf.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "Hazardous substances Safety measures South Australia":

1

HMC-South, '91 Conference (1991 Houston Texas). Proceedings of HMC-South '91 Conference and exhibition, April 24-26, 1991, George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas. Greenbelt, Md: Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute, 1991.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

United States. National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report: Derailment of Seaboard System Railroad train no. F-690 with hazardous material release, Jackson, South Carolina, February 23, 1985 and collision of Seaboard System Railroad train no. F-481 with standing cars, Robbins, South Carolina, February 25, 1985. Washington, D.C: The Board, 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

United States. National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report: Derailment of Seaboard System Railroad train no. F-690 with hazardous material release, Jackson, South Carolina, February 23, 1985 and collision of Seaboard System Railroad train no. F-481 with standing cars, Robbins, South Carolina, February 25, 1985. Washington, D.C: The Board, 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

United States. National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report: Head-on collision of Chicago, Shore and South Bend railroad trains nos. 123 and 218, Gary, Indiana, January 21, 1985. Washington, D.C: The Board, 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

United States. National Transportation Safety Board. Railroad accident report: Head-on collision of Chicago, Shore and South Bend railroad trains nos. 123 and 218, Gary, Indiana, January 21, 1985. Washington, D.C: The Board, 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Zur Bibliographie