Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Hannah Philosophy“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy":
Knauer, James T. „Hannah Arendt“. International Studies in Philosophy 18, Nr. 3 (1986): 116–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil198618349.
Young, James P. „Hannah Arendt“. International Studies in Philosophy 20, Nr. 3 (1988): 125–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil198820392.
Llano, Cristina Hermida Del. „Die Natur des Bösen in der Denkweise von Hannah Arendt“. Archiv fuer Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 104, Nr. 2 (2018): 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2018-0010.
Salikov, A., und A. Zhavoronkov. „Philosophy of Hannah Arendt in Russia“. Voprosy filosofii, Nr. 1 (Januar 2019): 133–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s004287440003628-5.
Rudd, Anthony. „The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt“. Cogito 8, Nr. 3 (1994): 290–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cogito19948318.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. „The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt“. History of European Ideas 21, Nr. 4 (Juli 1995): 595–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(95)90227-9.
Dietz, Mary G. „Perspectives on Plurality: Redhead on Arendt“. Review of Politics 77, Nr. 4 (2015): 661–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670515000649.
Keedus, Liisi. „Hannah Arendt’s “Histories”“. Philosophical Topics 39, Nr. 2 (2011): 53–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20113924.
Knauer, James T. „Hannah Arendt on Judgment, Philosophy and Praxis“. International Studies in Philosophy 21, Nr. 3 (1989): 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil19892134.
Pulkkinen, Tuija. „Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Philosophy“. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 28, Nr. 2 (März 2003): 215–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030437540302800205.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy":
Ermert, Sophia. „Hannah Arendt“. Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2017. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-207750.
Lamboy, Regine. „The real banality of evil“. Diss., Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri-Columbia, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10355/5823.
The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file viewed on (November 20, 2006) Vita. Includes bibliographical references
Ermert, Sophia. „Hannah Arendt“. Universität Leipzig, 2016. https://ul.qucosa.de/id/qucosa%3A14876.
Lim, Felix Beng-Chye. „The philosophy of work of Yves R. Simon and Hannah Arendt“. Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2008. http://www.tren.com/search.cfm?p029-0731.
Breidenthal, Thomas Edward. „The concept of freedom in Hannah Arendt : a Christian assessment“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1991. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.314978.
Brito, Renata Romolo 1980. „Ação Política em Hannah Arendt“. [s.n.], 2007. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/279524.
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T18:35:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Brito_RenataRomolo_M.pdf: 807109 bytes, checksum: c2adfb194380e39d4d3339ae021238e2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007
Resumo: Neste trabalho, pretendemos analisar a premissa arendtiana de que a categoria de meios e fins não é uma categoria política. Pretendemos mostrar que a recusa de Arendt em aceitar essa categoria no âmbito político não significa negar que a ação tenha propósitos e objetivos específicos, mas sim que a independência em relação a propósitos e fins intencionados é constitutiva da ação. Para tanto, pretendemos analisar a crítica arendtiana ao utilitarismo, para em seguida abordar a noção de grandeza da ação no pensamento arendtiano, partindo de uma analogia com a noção de beleza na esfera da arte. Retomaremos, então, duas análises de Arendt de ações propriamente políticas, com a intenção de mostrar a natureza da ação: sua capacidade de transcender motivos e objetivos. Refletiremos ainda sobre algumas críticas dirigidas à sua obra. A idéia central desta dissertação é que a ação, segundo Arendt, baseia-se na pluralidade humana e que a possibilidade de manutenção dessa pluralidade (que só se manifesta através da ação) é a fonte da sua especificidade
Abstract: The present work intends to analyze Arendt¿s claim that politics is not a means to an end. We aim to show that Arendt¿s refusal in accepting the category of ends and means in the political realm does not mean that action has no purpose or specific objectives, but, on the contrary, that action¿s constitution does not depend on its suitability in achieving its purposes or objectives. To achieve this, we intend to analyze Arendt¿s critique of utilitarianism, and then to reflect on Arendt¿s notion of the greatness of action, based on an analogy with the notion of the beauty. We then reflect upon two events examined by Arendt as proper political actions, in order to demonstrate the nature of these said actions and its capacity of transcending motives and objectives. We also examine some critiques directed at her philosophy. The main idea of this dissertation is that action, according to Arendt, is based in human plurality and that the possibility of the continual of this plurality is the source of action¿s constitution
Mestrado
Mestre em Filosofia
Guezengar, Arthur. „Hannah Arendt et la rupture totalitaire“. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020GRALP001.
The Arendtian thought is marked by two strong theses: the idea according to which man is conditioned by the environment in which he finds himself caught and that he contributes to modifying by his words and his acts on the one hand; and on the other the idea that totalitarianism constitutes a break with the world and the political tradition, to the point of appearing as a system ontologically hostile to the human condition. But the coexistence of these two theses is not self-evident. Hannah Arendt makes political activity a mode of being specific to human existence, based on the freedom to act, to finally describe a political system where this dimension has lost all meaning. By putting these two dimensions into perspective, this thesis seeks to resolve this paradox of a political regime capable of breaking with all that constitutes political action. By proceeding with a methodological review of the Arendtian texts, from the most recent to his first works on imperialism, it shows moreover that the conception of totalitarianism as a break with the human condition goes hand in hand with another approach making totalitarianism. the continuity of processes already germinated in the colonial system
Graham, Nicholas. „An analysis of Hannah Arendt's concept of worldlessness /“. Thesis, McGill University, 1990. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=60536.
The thesis analyzes "worldlessness" by way of Arendt's reflections on the sub-themes of "contemporary crisis," the "Western tradition," the "modern age" and the modern phenomenon of "thoughtlessness." These sub-themes are examined in chapters one, two, four and five respectively. Chapter three examines Arendt's conception of politics and "the world."
The analysis proceeds on the basis of Arendt's stated conviction that political thought must take its bearings from "incidents of living experience" if it is to be adequate to its subject matter. More specifically, it investigates the basis and significance of Arendt's contention that the modern condition of "worldlessness" has produced a rupture between thought and experience which has radically altered the character of contemporary understanding. In general terms, the thesis examines the origins of modern worldlessness and the implications of this for contemporary thinking.
Breaugh, Martin. „À la recherche de la liberté perdue : fondation, révolution et modernité chez Hannah Arendt“. Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/4159.
Eloff, Philip Rene. „Kompleksiteit en begronding in die werk van Hannah Arendt en Jaques Derrida“. Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6541.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In this mini-thesis I explore Hannah Arendt’s engagement with the problem of foundation in relation to the work of Derrida and complexity theory. In Arendt the problem of foundation takes shape as the attempt to develop a thinking of foundation that does not repress political freedom. The American Revolution is an important point of reference in Arendt’s attempt to develop such a notion of authority. According to Arendt the American republic could, however, not entirely succeed in realizing this conception of authority. I draw on Derrida and complexity theory in order to show that the shortcomings Arendt points to are structural to institutions as such. Following Derrida and complexity theory, I further that the recognition of this structural limitation is an indispensable step in the attempt to think political authority as something stable, but which nevertheless keeps open the possibility of political change.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In hierdie skripsie ondersoek ek Hannah Arendt se ommegang met die probleem van begronding deur dit in verband te bring met die werk van Jacques Derrida en kompleksiteitsteorie. Die probleem van begronding neem vir Arendt vorm aan in die poging om politieke gesag op so wyse te bedink dat dit nie politieke vryheid onderdruk nie. Die Amerikaanse rewolusie vorm ’n sentrale verwysingspunt in Arendt so poging om gesag op hierdie manier te bedink. Dit slaag volgens haar egter nie heeltemal daarin om hierdie alternatiewe vorm van gesag te verwesenlik nie. Ek steun op Derrida en kompleksiteitsteorie om te wys dat die tekortkominge waarop Arendt wys in ’n sekere sin struktureel is tot enige instelling. Ek argumenteer voorts in navolging van Derrida en kompleksiteitsteorie dat ’n erkenning van hierdie strukturele beperking ’n belangrike moment is in die poging om politieke gesag te bedink as iets wat stabiel kan wees, maar terselftertyd ruimte laat vir politieke verandering.
Bücher zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy":
Courtine-Denamy, Sylvie. Hannah Arendt. Paris: Belfond, 1994.
Nordmann, Ingeborg. Hannah Arendt. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag, 1994.
Øverenget, Einar. Hannah Arendt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2003.
Øverenget, Einar. Hannah Arendt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2001.
Øverenget, Einar. Hannah Arendt. København: Gad, 2002.
Øverenget, Einar. Hannah Arendt. København: Gads, 2003.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. Hannah Arendt's philosophy of natality. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. Hannah Arendt's philosophy of natality. New York, USA: St. Martin's Press, 1989.
Hull, Margaret Betz. The hidden philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge Curzon, 2002.
Buchteile zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy":
Lukkari, Hanna, und Martina Reuter. „Arendt, Hannah“. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 1–6. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_410-1.
Burke, John Francis. „Hannah Arendt“. In An Introduction to Modern European Philosophy, 158–68. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26651-7_13.
Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. „Defending Politics Against Philosophy“. In The Wandering Thought of Hannah Arendt, 11–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48215-0_2.
Lederman, Shmuel. „Philosophy, Politics, and Participatory Democracy in Arendt“. In Hannah Arendt and Participatory Democracy, 69–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11692-7_4.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. „Beginning at the Beginning“. In Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality, 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9_1.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. „Primary Natality: The Supreme Capacity“. In Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality, 21–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9_2.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. „Political Natality: The Rebirth of Beginning“. In Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality, 42–68. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9_3.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. „Tertiary Natality: The Nascent Character of the Life of the Mind“. In Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality, 69–100. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9_4.
Bowen-Moore, Patricia. „The Promise of Natality“. In Hannah Arendt’s Philosophy of Natality, 101–61. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20125-9_5.
Ballacci, Giuseppe. „Politics as Transcendence and Contingency: Hannah Arendt“. In Political Theory between Philosophy and Rhetoric, 149–81. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95293-9_6.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Hannah Philosophy":
Rösener, Ringo. Little Rock Revisited – On the Challenges of Training One’s Imagination to Go Visiting. Association Inter-University Centre Dubrovnik, März 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53099/ntkd4305.