Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Government accountability – australia“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Government accountability – australia" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Government accountability – australia"
Game, Chantal S., Lisa M. Cullen und Alistair M. Brown. „Accountability and financial statement presentation of early Western Australian banks, 1837–1880“. Accounting History 23, Nr. 4 (01.04.2018): 555–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1032373218759972.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLau, Katherine A., Torsten Theis, Alexa M. Kaufer, Joanna L. Gray und William D. Rawlinson. „A decade of RCPAQAP Biosecurity improving testing for biological threats in Australia“. Microbiology Australia 41, Nr. 3 (2020): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ma20039.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBarut, Meropy, Jean Raar und Mohammad I. Azim. „Biodiversity and local government: a reporting and accountability perspective“. Managerial Auditing Journal 31, Nr. 2 (01.02.2016): 197–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/maj-08-2014-1082.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAhyaruddin, Muhammad, Mohd Nor Hakimin Bin Yusoff, Siti Afiqah Binti Zainuddin und Agustiawan Agustiawan. „Research trend on accountability and government performance: A bibliometric analysis approach“. Journal of Accounting and Investment 24, Nr. 3 (21.11.2023): 974–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i3.20307.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHolly, Gabrielle. „Challenges to Australia's Offshore Detention Regime and the Limits of Strategic Tort Litigation“. German Law Journal 21, Nr. 3 (April 2020): 549–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.26.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleStuart, Katharine. „Methods, methodology and madness“. Records Management Journal 27, Nr. 2 (17.07.2017): 223–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rmj-05-2017-0012.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBrevini, Benedetta. „Metadata Laws, Journalism and Resistance in Australia“. Media and Communication 5, Nr. 1 (22.03.2017): 76–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.810.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHaque, Shamima, und Muhammad Azizul Islam. „Stakeholder pressures on corporate climate change-related accountability and disclosures: Australian evidence“. Business and Politics 17, Nr. 2 (August 2015): 355–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1369525800001674.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSiriwardhane, Pavithra, und Dennis Taylor. „Perceived accountability for local government infrastructure assets: the influence of stakeholders“. Pacific Accounting Review 29, Nr. 4 (06.11.2017): 551–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/par-11-2016-0110.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLavoie, Josée G., und Judith Dwyer. „Implementing Indigenous community control in health care: lessons from Canada“. Australian Health Review 40, Nr. 4 (2016): 453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ah14101.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Government accountability – australia"
Mucciarone, Maria Anna. „Accountability and performance measurement in Australian and Malaysian government departments“. Thesis, Curtin University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/328.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMucciarone, Maria Anna. „Accountability and performance measurement in Australian and Malaysian government departments“. Curtin University of Technology, School of Accounting, 2008. http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=116043.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe major sources of data for this study comprise firstly, an analysis of the 2003/2004 annual reports of Australian and Malaysian government departments, secondly semi-structured interviews with senior finance officers of selected government departments and thirdly, a questionnaire survey forwarded to senior finance officers of all government departments in Australia and Malaysia. The findings of the content analysis and interviews concerning performance indicator disclosure by Australian Federal government departments show that cost and effectiveness performance indicators are the most disclosed indicator. For Malaysian Federal government departments, results and quantity performance indicators are the most disclosed indicators. For Australia, performance dissemination happens most often on a monthly basis whilst for Malaysia this occurs more regularly on an annual basis. In relation to performance indicator dissemination, Australian government departments are making increased use of the web to disseminate performance indicators whilst the main method of dissemination for Malaysia is their availability upon request. The major questionnaire was prepared using the annual report content analysis and interviews as a base and it was sent to the senior financer officers of all Australian and Malaysian Government Departments. The questionnaire resulted in a 37.1% response rate for Australia and a 21.7% response rate for Malaysian departments. The questionnaire was used as the base to test the influence of agency theory-related variables and institutional theory-related variables and culture on performance indicator disclosure and dissemination.
The results of the agency theory-related variables rejected the hypothesised influence of oversight bodies on performance indicator disclosure and dissemination for both Australian and Malaysian government departments. The relevant size of government departments was also rejected as being an influence on the frequency of performance indicator disclosure by both countries. However, for Australian government departments, a significant influence for frequency of size of government departments of performance indicator dissemination was found to exist. The citizenry was found to have no significant influence on performance indicator disclosure by both countries. However, in the case of Malaysia, the citizenry were found to have an influence on the level of performance indicator dissemination. The results of the institutional theory related variables provided evidence that none of the variables have an influence on the frequency of performance indicator disclosure and dissemination in both countries. Finally, the results for culture showed there is a level of influence of culture on the frequency of performance indicator disclosure and dissemination. Overall the results of this study indicate both some differences and similarities between Australia and Malaysia government departments in the disclosure and dissemination of performance indicators. There is evidence in this study to indicate that in Australia, both efficiency and effectiveness performance indicators are being disclosed more often in the annual reports of government departments. However, the results for Malaysia show a considerably lower level of disclosure of efficiency and effectiveness performance indicators in government departments' annual reports than in Australia.
Therefore the contrasts between the mail survey results and interview results provide for some future research that could expand the interview survey to include a larger sample to see if the Sofas perceptions are the same or different in regards to performance indicator disclosure and dissemination. The dual paradigm (agency and institutional) modeling of the determinants of performance indicator disclosure and dissemination have provided important findings from the perspectives of both the variables and the countries on which this study was based. The important findings of this study are that accountability and managerially have had differing emphases in Australia as compared to Malaysia, and that there are varying levels of disclosure, dissemination and use of performance measurement information between both individual government departments and the countries in which they reside. A range of future research possibilities are generated by this study. These possibilities range from extending the context of the hypotheses to encompass other government entities, other countries and other forms of performance measurement.
Rogalla, Barbara, und com au BarbRog@iprimus. „Framed by Legal Rationalism: Refugees and the Howard Government's Selective Use of Legal Rationality; 1999-2003“. RMIT University. Global Studies, Social Science and Planning, 2007. http://adt.lib.rmit.edu.au/adt/public/adt-VIT20080122.100946.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCroker, Keith L., und n/a. „Factors affecting public policy processes : the experience of the industries assistance commission“. University of Canberra. Administrative Studies, 1986. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20060630.174015.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThomson, Belinda. „A cost effective grassland management strategy to reduce the number of bird strikes at the Brisbane airport“. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2007. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16576/1/Belinda_Thomson_Thesis.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThomson, Belinda. „A cost effective grassland management strategy to reduce the number of bird strikes at the Brisbane airport“. Queensland University of Technology, 2007. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16576/.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKinuthia, Wanyee. „“Accumulation by Dispossession” by the Global Extractive Industry: The Case of Canada“. Thèse, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/30170.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle(9782267), Mark Boulle. „Social sustainability in Australian local government: Commitment and accountability“. Thesis, 2016. https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Social_sustainability_in_Australian_local_government_Commitment_and_accountability/13387307.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleChilds, Fiona. „Government communication in the new millenium : accountability and the government departmental spokesperson in Australia, Britain and America“. Phd thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/150858.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAshe, Stewart. „Accountability and oversight of Australian national security institutions“. Phd thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/151028.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "Government accountability – australia"
Glyn, Davis, Weller Patrick Moray, Lewis Colleen und Griffith University. Centre for Australian Public Sector Management., Hrsg. Corporate management in Australian government: Reconciling accountability and efficiency. South Melbourne: Macmillan of Australia, 1989.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDaniel, Ann. Medicine and the state: Professional autonomy and public accountability. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDowding, Keith. Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government. Canberra: ANU Press, 2012.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenOmbudsman, NSW. Improving service delivery to Aboriginal people with a disability: A review of the implementation of ADHC's Aboriginal Policy Framework and Aboriginal Consultation Strategy. Sydney, N.S.W: NSW Ombudsman, 2010.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenGovernment Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenGovernment Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenGovernment Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenGovernment Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMcDonald, Stephen, Judith Bannister und Anna Olijnyk. Government Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenAppleby, Gabrielle, Judith Bannister, Anna Olijnyk und Joanna Howe. Government Accountability: Australian Administrative Law. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Government accountability – australia"
Ramsay, Ian, und Mihika Upadhyaya. „The Failed Attempt to Enact Benefit Company Legislation in Australia and the Rise of B Corps“. In The International Handbook of Social Enterprise Law, 395–424. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14216-1_19.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIslam, Muhammad Azizul, Ameeta Jain und Shamima Haque. „A Preliminary Analysis of Australian Government’s Indigenous Reform Agenda ‘Closing the Gap’ and Corporate Accountability“. In Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility, 341–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_16.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBycroft, Peter, Catherine Argall und Natalie Wearne. „Market Research, Accountability, Outcome-focus and Service Standards in the Australian Government Public Sector: How Market Research has Significantly Improved the Reformation of the Australian Government Public Sector“. In Market Research Best Practice, 601–22. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119208815.ch29.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRana, Tarek. „New Public Management Reforms and Modernization Changes in Australia“. In Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, 1–17. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3731-1.ch001.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMulgan, Richard. „Assessing Ministerial Responsibility in Australia“. In Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government. ANU Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.22459/mcaacg.09.2012.09.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePacey, Fiona, und Stephanie Short. „Birth of the hydra-headed monster: a unique antipodean model of health workforce governance“. In Professional Health Regulation in the Public Interest, 201–20. Policy Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447332268.003.0011.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWeller, Patrick, Dennis C. Grube und R. A. W. Rhodes. „Understanding Cabinet Government“. In Comparing Cabinets, 1–30. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844945.003.0001.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNeilson, John, und Zhang Qi. „Accountability regimes and financial reporting in government: a comparison of China and Australia“. In Implementing reforms in public sector accounting, 53–70. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-0422-0_2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGriffiths, Mary. „Empowering Citizens“. In Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, 124–41. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4058-0.ch008.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGriffiths, Mary. „Empowering Citizens“. In Public Affairs and Administration, 1443–61. IGI Global, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch071.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle