Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Frogs New Guinea Identification“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Frogs New Guinea Identification" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

BROWN, JASON L., EVAN TWOMEY, ADOLFO AMÉZQUITA, MOISÉS BARBOSA DE SOUZA, JANALEE P. CALDWELL, STEFAN LÖTTERS, RUDOLF VON MAY et al. „A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae)“. Zootaxa 3083, Nr. 1 (28.10.2011): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3083.1.1.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya is revised, resulting in one new genus, one new species, five synonymies and one species classified as nomen dubium. We present an expanded molecular phylogeny that contains 235 terminals, 104 of which are new to this study. Notable additions to this phylogeny include seven of the 12 species in the minuta group, 15 Ranitomeya amazonica, 20 R. lamasi, two R. sirensis, 30 R. ventrimaculata and seven R. uakarii. Previous researchers have long recognized two distinct, reciprocally monophyletic species groups contained within Ranitomeya, sensu Grant et al. 2006: the ventrimaculata group, which is distributed throughout much of the Amazon, and the minuta group of the northern Andes and Central America. We restrict Ranitomeya to the former group and erect a new genus, Andinobates Twomey, Brown, Amézquita & Mejía-Vargas gen. nov., for members of the minuta group. Other major taxonomic results of the current revision include the following: (i) A new species, Ranitomeya toraro Brown, Caldwell, Twomey, Melo-Sampaio & Souza sp. nov., is described from western Brazil. This species has long been referred to as R. ventrimaculata but new morphological and phylogenetic data place it sister to R. defleri. (ii) Examination of the holotype of R. ventrimaculata revealed that this specimen is in fact a member of what is currently referred to as R. duellmani, therefore, Dendrobates duellmani Schulte 1999 is considered herein a junior synonym of D. ventrimaculatus Shreve 1935 (= R. ventrimaculata). (iii) For the frogs that were being called R. ventrimaculata prior to this revision, the oldest available and therefore applicable name is R. variabilis. Whereas previous definitions of R. variabilis were restricted to spotted highland frogs near Tarapoto, Peru, our data suggest that this color morph is conspecific with lowland striped counterparts. Therefore, the definition of R. variabilis is greatly expanded to include most frogs which were (prior to this revision) referred to as R. ventrimaculata. (iv) Phylogenetic and bioacoustic evidence support the retention of R. amazonica as a valid species related to R. variabilis as defined in this paper. Based on phylogenetic data, R. amazonica appears to be distributed throughout much of the lower Amazon, as far east as French Guiana and the Amazon Delta and as far west as Iquitos, Peru. (v) Behavioral and morphological data, as well as phylogenetic data which includes topotypic material of R. sirensis and numerous samples of R. lamasi, suggest that the names sirensis, lamasi and biolat are applicable to a single, widespread species that displays considerable morphological variation throughout its range. The oldest available name for this group is sirensis Aichinger; therefore, we expand the definition of R. sirensis. (vi) Ranitomeya ignea and R. intermedia, elevated to the species status in a previous revision, are placed as junior synonyms of R. reticulata and R. imitator, respectively. (vii) Ranitomeya rubrocephala is designated as nomen dubium. In addition to taxonomic changes, this revision includes the following: (i) Explicit definitions of species groups that are consistent with our proposed taxonomy. (ii) A comprehensive dichotomous key for identification of ‘small’ aposematic poison frogs of South and Central America. (iii) Detailed distribution maps of all Ranitomeya species, including unpublished localities for most species. In some cases, these records result in substantial range extensions (e.g., R. uakarii, R. fantastica). (iv) Tadpole descriptions for R. amazonica, R. flavovittata, R. imitator, R. toraro sp. nov., R. uakarii and R. variabilis; plus a summary of tadpole morphological data for Andinobates and Ranitomeya species. (v) A summary of call data on most members of Andinobates and Ranitomeya, including call data of several species that have not been published before. (vi) A discussion on the continued impacts of the pet trade on poison frogs (vii) A discussion on several cases of potential Müllerian mimicry within the genus Ranitomeya. We also give opinions regarding the current debate on recent taxonomic changes and the use of the name Ranitomeya.
2

Kraus, Fred, und Allen Allison. „New microhylid Frogs from the Muller Range, Papua New Guinea“. ZooKeys 26 (30.10.2009): 53–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.26.258.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Kraus, Fred. „New genus of diminutive microhylid frogs from Papua New Guinea“. ZooKeys 48 (09.06.2010): 39–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.48.446.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Menzies, J. I., und M. J. Tyler. „Litoria gracilenta (Anura : Hylidae) and related species in New Guinea“. Australian Journal of Zoology 52, Nr. 2 (2004): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/zo03008.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
We examined a large collection (n = 132) of tree frogs, hitherto identified as Litoria gracilenta, from various localities in New Guinea and compared them with Litoria gracilenta from Queensland and with the recently described Litoria elkeae from far west New Guinea. We found that the frogs in question were neither L. gracilenta nor L. elkeae but comprised two distinct taxa described herein as new species.We call attention to the problems of performing statistical analysis on measurements of soft-bodied organisms and consider that the conclusions reached in this analysis are both conservative and realistic.
5

Menzies, J. I., Lester Russell, M. J. Tyler und M. J. Mountain. „Fossil frogs from the central highlands of Papua New Guinea“. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 26, Nr. 2 (Januar 2002): 341–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03115510208619262.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Kraus, Fred. „New frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) from the mountains of western Papua New Guinea“. Records of the Australian Museum 63, Nr. 1 (29.06.2011): 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.63.2011.1584.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Kraus, Fred. „Two New Species of Frogs Related toBarygenys exsul(Microhylidae) from New Guinea“. Herpetologica 69, Nr. 3 (September 2013): 314–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1655/herpetologica-d-12-00073.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Green, DM, und MP Simon. „Digital Microstructure in Ecologically Diverse Sympatric Microhylid Frogs, Genera Cophixalus and Sphenophryne (Amphibia, Anura), From Papua-New-Guinea“. Australian Journal of Zoology 34, Nr. 2 (1986): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/zo9860135.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
The extent of development of digital adhesive toe-pads in sympatric species of microhylid frogs, Cophixalus and Sphenophryne, correlates with the degree of arboreality exhibited by the species. The same basic structures and cell types are found in the toe-pads of these microhylid frogs as are found in other arboreal and semi- arboreal frogs of many diverse evolutionary lineages. A variety of types of cell surface, with unknown functional significance but potential systematic use, are found on the feet of these frogs. Allometric increase in adhesive-pad area in larger species is by widening of the toe-pad, as opposed to acquisition of accessory pads as in some hylid tree frogs.
9

Tyler, Michael J. „TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF SOME HYLID FROGS OF AUSTRALIA AND NEW GUINEA“. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 145, Nr. 1 (20.08.2009): 91–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1965.tb02002.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Dahl, Chris, Stephen J. Richards und Vojtech Novotny. „The Sepik River (Papua New Guinea) is not a dispersal barrier for lowland rain-forest frogs“. Journal of Tropical Ecology 29, Nr. 6 (11.09.2013): 477–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266467413000527.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Abstract:Major tropical rivers have been suggested to be important dispersal barriers that increase the beta diversity of animal communities in lowland rain forests. We tested this hypothesis using assemblages of frogs in the floodplains of the Sepik River, a major river system in Papua New Guinea. We surveyed frogs at five sites within a continuous 150 × 500-km area of lowland rain forest bisected by the Sepik, using standardized visual and auditory survey techniques. We documented 769 frogs from 44 species. The similarity in species composition decreased with logarithm of geographical distance between the sites, which ranged from 82 to 465 km. The similarity decay did not depend on whether or not the compared sites were separated by the Sepik River or whether the species were aquatic or terrestrial breeders. Likewise, a DCA ordination of frog assemblages did not show separation of sites by the river as a significant factor explaining their composition. Our results suggest that even major rivers, such as the Sepik, may not act as dispersal barriers. Rivers may not limit the distribution of frogs and therefore have a limited effect on determining frog species abundance and assemblage structure in rain forests.

Dissertationen zum Thema "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Tyler, Michael J. „The biology and systematics of frogs : contributions submitted to The University of Adelaide /“. Title page and summary only, 2002. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09SD/09sdt983.pdf.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Thesis (D.Sc.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Environmental Biology, 2002.
Vol. [2] comprises 6 reprints of published monographs in box folder; but numbered within the publications submitted listing (90 items), and within the 3 categories identified; at the beginning of vol. 1. Includes bibliographical references.
2

Halldin, Cara Nicole. „Disease Vectors of Papua New Guinea, Members of the Anopheles Punctulatus Species Complex (Diptera:Culicidae) – Molecular Diversity, Species Identification and Implications for Integrated Vector Management“. Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1300368816.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Tyler, Michael J. 1937. „The biology and systematics of frogs : contributions submitted to The University of Adelaide / by Michael J. Tyler“. 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38581.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Vol. [2] comprises 6 reprints of published monographs in box folder; but numbered within the publications submitted listing (90 items), and within the 3 categories identified; at the beginning of vol. 1.
Includes bibliographical references.
2 v. (various pagings) :
Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library.
Comprises 90 contributions to the biology and systematics of frogs, with particular emphasis upon those concerning the fauna of Australia and New Guinea. Provides an understanding of the state of knowledge when the author commenced his studies; permitting the extent of his work, an the nature of its significance, to be evaluated.
Thesis (D.Sc.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Environmental Biology, 2002

Bücher zum Thema "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Gill, Brian. New Zealand frogs & reptiles. Auckland, N.Z: D. Bateman, 1996.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Beehler, Bruce McP. Birds of New Guinea. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Flannery, Tim F. Mammals of New Guinea. Carina, Qld., Australia: Robert Brown & Associates, 1990.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Flannery, Tim F. Mammals of New Guinea. Ithaca, N.Y: Comstock/Cornell, 1995.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Menzies, J. I. The frogs of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Sofia: Pensoft, 2006.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Leach, Gregory J. Freshwater plants of Papua New Guinea. [Port Moresby]: University of Papua New Guinea Press, 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Millar, Andreé. Orchids of Papua New Guinea. Portland, Or: Timber Press, 1999.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Hicks, Roger. Checklist of the birds of Papua New Guinea. [Boroko, Papua New Guinea]: Papua New Guinea Bird Society, 1987.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Williamson, Michael A. Snakes, lizards, turtles, frogs, toads, and salamanders of New Mexico. Santa Fe, N.M: Sunstone Press, 1994.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Gill, Brian. Collins handguide to the frogs and reptiles of New Zealand. Auckland: Collins, 1986.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Buchteile zum Thema "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Mörbel, J., T. Wetzel und Gabriele Krczal. „Identification of a Tobamovirus Infecting New Guinea Impatiens“. In Developments in Plant Pathology, 173. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0043-1_35.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

„6 Frogs and 'others'“. In Managing Animals in New Guinea, 87–99. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203633625-16.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Zur Bibliographie