Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Evaluation of innovations.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Evaluation of innovations“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Evaluation of innovations" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Tabas, Jakub, Michaela Beranová und Josef Polák. „Evaluation of innovation processes“. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 60, Nr. 2 (2012): 523–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260020523.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In present, innovations are spoken as an engine of the world economy because the innovations are transforming not only business entities but the whole industries. The innovations have become a necessity for business entities in order to survive on floating challenging markets. This way, innovations are driving force of companies’ performance. The problem which arises here is a question of measurement innovation’s effect on the financial performance of company or selection between two or more possible variants of innovation’s realization. Various authors which are focused on innovations processes are divided into two groups in their attitudes towards the question of influence of innovations on financial performance of companies. One group of the authors present the idea that any reliable measurement is not possible or efficient. The second group of authors present some methods theoretically applicable on this measurement but they base their approaches mostly on the methods of measurement of investments effectiveness or they suggest employment of indicators or ratios which wouldn’t be clearly connected with the outcome of innovation process. The aim of submitted article is to compare different approaches to evaluation of the innovation processes. The authors compare various approaches here and by use of analysis and synthesis, they determine their own method how to measure outcome of innovation process.
2
Gorokhova, A. E. „Evaluation of innovations: the economic content and methodological support“. Izvestiya MGTU MAMI 7, Nr. 1-5 (10.09.2013): 200–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/2074-0530-67888.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article reveals some aspects connected with economic evaluation of the effectiveness of innovations depending on the stage of the life cycle of the innovation process. There are presented indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of innovation at every stage of its life cycle: scientific, research, development, commercial production, implementation of innovation, diffusion of innovation.
3
Chandranand, Dr P. S. „Innovations in Quality Assessment, Evaluation & Measurement Techniques“. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 10, Nr. 1 (31.01.2022): 972–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.39962.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract: When the winds of change blow, some people build walls, others build windmills. Innovation has taken over as the hub of quality improvement and each spoke of life is being driven by continuous improvement of these innovations. In an inexorably serious ecosystem, components such as innovation and quality can continue to prompt an upper hand. A comparative study of various world class consulting organizations, observed that innovation was among the main three vital needs for 95% of organizations, besides evaluation and metrics (1,2,3). This is to a limited extent because of innovations having the option to give extraordinary deliverables and iterations which make more prominent incentives for end users, just as monetary advantages for the organization (4). Further exploration proposes “Quality” is at the forefront of innovations. Quality management applications have likewise been related with functional and monetary execution permitting firms to accomplish objectives on priority at the grass root level first and scale up. (5,6) . Keywords: Innovation, Quality, Metrics, Evaluation, Standards.
4
Chaves, Breitner Gomes, Catherine Briand, Khayreddine Bouabida und Carol Giba Bottger Garcia. „Evaluation in healthcare organizations: a literature review about innovation assessment“. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde 13, Nr. 12 (14.12.2021): e9290. http://dx.doi.org/10.25248/reas.e9290.2021.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objective: This article identifies and provides the reader with the basis for evaluating the innovations proposed in healthcare organizations and highlights determinants to consider when implementing them. Bibliographic review: There is no complete, exhaustive, and absolute definition of health evaluation. Several evaluative approaches and tools were identified. They can be adapted and used according to the evaluator's evaluative objectives, paradigms, and theoretical influences. Moreover, essential concepts regarding the implementation of innovations were considered and synthesized, allowing the reader to understand the complexity of this phase and its impact on the success of innovations. Final considerations: Although the evaluative field is broad and has several distinct concepts, this article presents a synthesis of concepts that would support decision-makers in evaluating their organization's innovation process. Furthermore, the present paper enables a better understanding of the risks of success or failure of interventions (or innovation) from a comprehensive perspective of the critical determinants in the implementation phase.
5
Milley, Peter, Barbara Szijarto, Kate Svensson und J. Bradley Cousins. „The evaluation of social innovation: A review and integration of the current empirical knowledge base“. Evaluation 24, Nr. 2 (April 2018): 237–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389018763242.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Social innovation has gained prominence as a way to address social problems and needs. Evaluators and social innovators are conceptualizing and implementing evaluation approaches for social innovation contexts; however, no systematic effort has yet been made to explore and assess the overlap between evaluation and social innovation based on the empirical knowledge base. We address this gap, drawing on 28 empirical studies of evaluation in social innovation contexts to describe what evaluation practices look like, what drives those practices, and how they affect social innovations. Findings indicate most had developmental purposes, emphasized collaborative approaches, and used multiple methods. Prominent drivers were a complexity perspective, a learning-oriented focus, and the need for responsiveness. Reported influences on social innovations included advancing strategies, improving delivery, balancing aggregate and local information needs, and reducing risk. Conflict resolution, the quality of relationships, and availability of time and capacity mediated these influences. More peer-reviewed empirical studies and a broader range of study designs are needed, including research on how evaluations influence social innovation processes over time, phases, space and scale.
6
Mansel, Clayton, Raffaele Sarnataro und Peter Jianrui Liu. „A critical evaluation of the National Innovation Accelerator programme: comparing eHealth and medical device-based innovations“. British Journal of Healthcare Management 27, Nr. 4 (02.04.2021): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2020.0064.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background/Aims The National Innovation Accelerator was developed in 2014 to increase the uptake of innovation across the NHS by providing strategic funding to candidates. This study aimed to critically evaluate the success of the National Innovation Accelerator in supporting innovation in the NHS. Methods Innovations that were supported by the National Innovation Accelerator were categorised into ‘eHealth’, ‘healthcare centre medical devices’, ‘mobile medical devices’ and ‘other’. Peer-reviewed literature was used to assess all innovation types. For eHealth innovations, organic website traffic and app store reviews were also used to assess patient engagement and popularity. Results The majority of innovations supported by the programme were categorised as eHealth; however, these were also more likely to be unsuccessful in terms of patient engagement. Meanwhile, healthcare centre and mobile medical devices were likely to be supported by peer-reviewed studies and clinical trials. Conclusions The success of the National Innovation Accelerator in supporting healthcare innovation varies depending on the type of innovation, with innovations in medical devices achieving greater success than eHealth innovations.
7
Svensson, Kate, Barbara Szijarto, Peter Milley und J. Bradley Cousins. „Evaluating Social Innovations“. American Journal of Evaluation 39, Nr. 4 (29.04.2018): 459–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214018763553.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Social innovations (SIs) frequently bring previously unrelated actors, ideas, and practices together in new configurations with the goal of addressing social needs. However, the dizzying variety of definitions of SI and their dynamic, exploratory character raise dilemmas for evaluators tasked with their evaluations. This article is based on a systematic review of research on evaluation, specifically an analysis of 28 published peer-reviewed empirical studies, within SI contexts. Given that design considerations are becoming increasingly important to evaluators as the complexity of social interventions grows, our objectives were to identify influences on design of evaluations of SI and clarify, which SI features should be taken into account when designing evaluations. We ultimately developed a conceptual framework to aid evaluators in recognizing some differences between SI and conventional social interventions, and correspondingly, implications for evaluation design. This framework is discussed in terms of its implications for ongoing research and practice.
8
Ivanova, Valentyna, Oleg Ivanov und Olena Ivanova. „Development of approaches to innovation transfer and intellectual property management to ensure enterprise competitiveness“. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 6, Nr. 13 (114) (28.12.2021): 94–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.249165.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The work deals with the problems of innovation transfer and intellectual property management at enterprises. An approach reasoning the choice of innovations and the type of their transfer at an enterprise has been developed, which increases the efficiency of innovation processes. For this purpose, the essence of the category “innovation transfer” regarding the micro-level was clarified and determined according to the sources of innovations. A set-theoretic model of innovation selection based on evaluating the essence of innovations, their generators (suppliers) and implementation conditions has been developed. For such an assessment, a set of criteria has been proposed, a number of the most essential conditions for introducing innovations at an enterprise have been identified, and an optimization model for the efficiency of the innovation development process has been developed. They allow making an informed choice of innovations in accordance with the needs of the enterprise. Evaluation criteria for the innovative potential are proposed and their essence is determined. Testing of the evaluation confirmed the possibility of using the proposed criteria. A model of innovation transfer, which presents the main processes and participants in the transfer of external and internal innovations has been developed, which allows enterprises to ensure a high level of organization and implementation of the transfer. Given the direct relationship between the transfer of innovations and intellectual property, an approach to improving intellectual property management at the enterprise is proposed. A number of principles of intellectual property management have been determined. The stages of intellectual property management at the enterprise are proposed as a set of specific actions determining all processes directly or indirectly related to such management, as well as those responsible for these processes and resource provision.
9
Tabas, Jakub, Josef Polák und Michaela Beranová. „Evaluation of approaches to definition of innovations“. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 58, Nr. 6 (2010): 563–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058060563.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Currently innovations are necessary elements of economic growth and competitiveness of companies as well as they are necessary elements of global sustainable development. Even though it is possible to find a wide rouge of definitions of innovation but every one of them is based on different requirements. The aim of submitted article is to compare different approaches to definition of the content of innovation. The authors compare various definitions here and by use of analysis and synthesis, they determine important common elements which are possible to be found in various forms in a number of existing definitions. Then, these elements are compiled into own definition of the content of the term innovation.
10
Lynch, Amy, Hayley Alderson, Gary Kerridge, Rebecca Johnson, Ruth McGovern, Fiona Newlands, Deborah Smart, Carrie Harrop und Graeme Currie. „An inter-disciplinary perspective on evaluation of innovation to support care leavers’ transition“. Journal of Children's Services 16, Nr. 3 (31.07.2021): 214–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jcs-12-2020-0082.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose Young people who are looked after by the state face challenges as they make the transition from care to adulthood, with variation in support available. In the past decade, funding has been directed towards organisations to pilot innovations to support transition, with accompanying evaluations often conducted with a single disciplinary focus, in a context of short timescales and small budgets. Recognising the value and weight of the challenge involved in evaluation of innovations that aim to support the transitions of young people leaving care, this paper aims to provide a review of evaluation approaches and suggestions regarding how these might be developed. Design/methodology/approach As part of a wider research programme to improve understanding of the innovation process for young people leaving care, the authors conducted a scoping review of grey literature (publications which are not peer reviewed) focusing on evaluation of innovations in the UK over the past 10 years. The authors critiqued the evaluation approaches in each of the 22 reports they identified with an inter-disciplinary perspective, representing social care, public health and organisation science. Findings The authors identified challenges and opportunities for the development of evaluation approaches in three areas. Firstly, informed by social care, the authors suggest increased priority should be granted to participatory approaches to evaluation, within which involvement of young people leaving care should be central. Secondly, drawing on public health, there is potential for developing a common outcomes’ framework, including methods of data collection, analysis and reporting, which aid comparative analysis. Thirdly, application of theoretical frameworks from organisation science regarding the process of innovation can drive transferable lessons from local innovations to aid its spread. Originality/value By adopting the unique perspective of their multiple positions, the authors’ goal is to contribute to the development of evaluation approaches. Further, the authors hope to help identify innovations that work, enhance their spread, leverage resources and influence policy to support care leavers in their transitions to adulthood.
11
Scroggie, Darren L., Daisy Elliott, Sian Cousins, Kerry NL Avery, Jane M. Blazeby und Natalie S. Blencowe. „Understanding stage of innovation of invasive procedures and devices: protocol for a systematic review and thematic analysis“. BMJ Open 12, Nr. 2 (Februar 2022): e057842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057842.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
IntroductionSurgical innovation has generally occurred in an unstandardised manner. This has led to unnecessary exposure of patients to harm, research waste and inadequate evidence. The IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up) Collaboration provided a set of recommendations for evaluating surgical innovations based on their stage of innovation. Despite further refinements and guidance, adoption of the IDEAL recommendations has been slow; an important reason may be that determining the stage of innovation is often difficult. To facilitate evaluation of surgical innovations, there is a need for a detailed insight into what stage of innovation means, and how it can be determined. The aim of this study is to understand the concept of stage of innovation as reported in the literature.Methods and analysisA systematic review is being conducted. Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from their inception until July 2021 using an iteratively developed strategy based on the concepts of stage of innovation, invasive procedures or devices and guidance. Articles were included if they described an approach to evaluating surgical innovations in stages, described a method for determining stage of innovation, described indicators of stage of innovation, defined stages or described potential sources of stage-related information. Conference abstracts and non-English language articles were excluded. Other articles were detected from citations within included articles and suggestions from experts in surgical innovation. Data will be extracted regarding approaches to evaluating surgical innovations, methods for determining stage of innovation, indicators of stage of innovation, definitions of stages and potential sources of stage-related information. A thematic analysis will be conducted, and findings summarised in a narrative report.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required. This systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at appropriate conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021270812.
12
Palčič, Iztok, und Jasna Prester. „Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies on Green Innovation“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 8 (24.04.2020): 3499. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12083499.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The main aim of this paper is to evaluate if manufacturing firms can boost their performance through green innovations. The literature on this topic shows contradictory findings. We have concentrated on the effect of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) on green innovations. To the authors’ best knowledge, this research is the first to examine the impact of a firm’s own AMT on green innovation and the firm’s performance at the same time. Green innovation in our research relates to green product innovation. The data analysis is performed through three-step OLS regression analysis and two evaluation models. One model looks at AMT and how they affect green innovation, and the second model looks at how AMT and green innovations affect performance. Our findings suggest that AMT contribute to both the firm’s performance and green innovation. We found that technology is a moderator for green innovations. While the majority of research emphasizes that firms will not eco-innovate unless they receive subsidies or severe restrictions are imposed, we show that out of all innovations, 66% are green innovations. Restrictions such as having ISO 14000 certification do not contribute to green innovation, but rather the age of the firm does.
13
Vasilieva, T. P., A. V. Melerzanov, A. A. Almazov, M. D. Vasiliev und O. Yu Alexandrova. „Evaluation of innovations for healthcare“. Vrach i informacionnye tehnologii, Nr. 2 (2020): 6–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37690/1811-0193-2020-2-6-20.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
14
Häckel, Björn, Andreas Lindermeir, Florian Moser und Stefan Pfosser. „Evaluating Different IT Innovation Investment Strategies from an Ex Ante and Ex Post Evaluation Perspective“. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 13, Nr. 04 (25.07.2016): 1650015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877016500152.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Contrary to mature IT innovations, fashionable IT innovations are hyped but lack institutionalization. Since an appropriate evaluation of these innovations is rather complex, companies often choose fixed investment strategies that neglect effects of organizational learning through continuous innovating. Hence, we develop a dynamic optimization model that determines the optimal budget allocation to mature and fashionable IT innovations by considering organizational learning. Furthermore, we evaluate various investment strategies both from an ex ante and an ex post perspective. Thereby, we focus on a company’s innovativeness and draw conclusions about the superiority of different investment strategies regarding expected NPV and its volatility.
15
Loucanova, Erika, Jan Parobek und Martina Kalamarova. „The Perception of Respondents of Packaging Innovations in Slovakia“. Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series 26, Nr. 3 (01.09.2016): 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sues-2016-0013.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract The paper deals with the evaluation of the perception of packaging innovations in terms of their functions through the Kano model. It focuses on the evaluation of the perception of innovation of all main seven functions of packaging, in particular on handling, protective, informative, economic, environmental, promotional and ecological packaging functions. The results indicate that the target groups interested in the new innovative packaging are mostly in age between 41 to 60 years. These groups have the highest requirements for new packaging. The innovations of handling functions of packaging have the most significant influence on the older generation. However, almost all ages categories positively recognize ecological innovations of packaging.
16
Meshcheryakova, Tatiana. „Evaluation of innovation activity science-intensive and high-tech of enterprises“. MATEC Web of Conferences 170 (2018): 01048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817001048.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The innovative development of individual enterprises and industries determines the competitiveness of the regional and national economies through modern business technologies for sustainable urban development. The article presents the analysis of categories "science intensive", "high technology", "innovative". The analysis of official data of the Federal Statistical Agency on key indicators of the effectiveness of innovation activities of enterprises is given and their aggregated estimate is given. The dynamics of such indicators as: innovative activity of organizations (specific weight of organizations that carried out technological, organizational, marketing innovations in the reporting year) was revealed; the share of innovative goods, works, services in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services; costs for technological innovation; specific weight of expenses for technological innovations in the total volume of shipped goods, works performed, services, etc. In the course of the research, recommendations were developed to increase the efficiency of innovation activities of enterprises based on assessing innovation activity and identifying innovative capacity, as well as applying the necessary economic and mathematical tools for the assessment and modelling of innovative projects and enterprise programs.
17
Lee, Sangwon. „When is the atypical design not penalized? Moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products“. American Journal of Business 34, Nr. 3/4 (15.11.2019): 169–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ajb-06-2018-0035.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the individual and joint effects of the two design dimensions, form design and functional design, and moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products. Employing theoretical underpinnings from categorization theory, this paper investigates two major research questions. First, what type of form is more advantageous for a radically new product or an incrementally new product? Second, is there an individual difference in consumer evaluations to innovative products with various form designs? Design/methodology/approach One pre-test and three between-subject experiments were performed. In Experiments 1 and 2, a two-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to examine the effect of form and the degree of technological innovation on attitude toward the product using different product categories (car and camera). In Experiment 3, a three-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to explore the impact of form, the degree of technological innovation and consumer technological sophistication on attitude toward the product. Findings The results from the three experiments conducted demonstrate that, first, whereas the form design for incremental innovations must be closer to the incumbent products for favorable evaluations, less typical form is evaluated as good as a more typical form for radical innovations. Second, form design of an innovative product matters more to the technologically more sophisticated consumers (experts). Originality/value This paper extends the previous design literature and fills the gap of under-researched area by demonstrating that individual difference, technological sophistication, moderates the design effect on consumer evaluation of innovation; providing boundary condition of when the atypical form is not penalized in spite of consumer’s perceived learning cost; examining how the form and function interplay in “high-status product”; and demonstrating how to strengthen the reliability and validity by replicating the study. Managerially, this paper demonstrates that innovating firms can influence the perceived value of new products using form and functionality, and marketing managers who launch really new products have strategic freedom of choosing own product design.
18
Bond, John, Senga Bond, Cam Donaldson, Barbara Gregson und Ann Atkinson. „Evaluation of an Innovation in the Continuing Care of Very Frail Elderly People“. Ageing and Society 9, Nr. 4 (Dezember 1989): 347–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x00013994.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ABSTRACTThis paper describes the theoretical and methodological perspectives adopted by a multidisciplinary research group undertaking a government-funded evaluation of a United Kingdom innovation in the continuing care of elderly people. In 1983 three experimental National Health Service (NHS) nursing homes were set up to care for patients usually cared for in NHS geriatric hospitals. Drawing on different approaches to the evaluation of health-care innovations, this paper delineates an evaluation model which identifies four types of variables: structure, process, intermediate outcome and final outcome. The relationship of this model to the design of an evaluation comprising seven complementary research activities is described, emphasising the need for multiple perspectives and multiple methods in policy-oriented health-care evaluations.
19
Degavre, Florence, Suzanne Kieffer, David Bol, Rémi Dekimpe, Charlotte Desterbecq, Thibault Pirson, Georgiana Sandu und Sandy Tubeuf. „Searching for Sustainability in Health Systems: Toward a Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Mobile Health Innovations“. Sustainability 14, Nr. 9 (27.04.2022): 5286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14095286.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Mobile health (mHealth) innovations are considered by governments as game changers toward more sustainable health systems. The existing literature focuses on the clinical aspects of mHealth but lacks an integrated framework on its sustainability. The foundational idea for this paper is to include disciplinary complementarities into a multi-dimensional vision to evaluate the non-clinical aspects of mHealth innovations. We performed a targeted literature review to find how the sustainability of mHealth innovations was appraised in each discipline. We found that each discipline considers a different outcome of interest and adopts different time horizons and perspectives for the evaluation. This article reflects on how the sustainability of mHealth innovation can be assessed at both the level of the device itself as well as the level of the health system. We identify some of the challenges ahead of researchers working on mobile health innovations in contributing to shaping a more sustainable health system.
20
KOVAL, Liubov. „ACCOUNTING OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES“. "EСONOMY. FINANСES. MANAGEMENT: Topical issues of science and practical activity", Nr. 3 (43) (März 2019): 117–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.37128/2411-4413-2019-3-10.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The strategy of economic and social development of Ukraine is aimed at introducing an innovative model of structural construction and economic growth. At the same time, the main source of such growth is innovation products, the creation and use of which is the main driving force of the country's economic development. Currently, there are certain problems in Ukraine that hinder the development of innovation activity. These include: - insufficient level of financing of scientific and technical works and associated derivative threats (loss of scientific personnel and intellectual property, inappropriate structure of scientific and technical potential, reduction of innovation activity, etc.); - insufficient level of informational support of innovation sphere; - unsuccessful tax policy of the state in the innovation sphere; - weak development of technology transfer technology. Innovative products become the subject of accounting since the documentary design of its adoption. Externally, such acceptance may have signs of copyright (certificates, etc.). Identification of objects of accounting of innovation activity involves their assessment. Evaluation of innovation projects and programs should be carried out in three directions: 1) evaluation of innovations with a view to their selection (pre-investment stage); 2) accounting (accounting, cost) assessment of innovations (at the moment of innovation attraction and by the end of their period of operation); 3) assessment of the efficiency of innovations (in parallel with the operation of innovations and after the investment stage). Having analyzed the Ukrainian legislation on the accounting evaluation of such an object of accounting as innovation, one can conclude that the regulatory and legal framework is inadequate and inconsistent. The identified shortcomings therefore require improvements in the methodology and practice of accounting for innovation assessment. The assessment should take into account the factors of influence and the specific situations in which the company is located. In our opinion, the assessment of innovations as an object of accounting and analysis should: - to show the quantitative and value value of a specific type of innovation; - to give an assessment from the moment of introduction and for a certain date up to the release of innovative products and the implementation process; - reflect market value and expert assessment for possible implementation through patenting and licensing; - reflect the recoverable cost of innovative projects to be upgraded, reconstructed and improved during operation; - take into account the liquidation value or the cost of the sale; - serve as the basis for conducting an economic evaluation of the innovation process; - to be an institutional basis for the legal services to perform certain activities related to the negotiation of the conditions for the development of innovations, the protection of property rights and the issuance of results by patents; - to provide information on the requirements of statistical accounting, tax and investment regulation, administrative management, etc. The peculiarity of accounting for innovations is their attribution to a particular type of activity. In this connection, there are some problems and inaccuracies. In our opinion, the innovative activity will be classified as operational in the case when the enterprise is experimental and its operational activities involve the introduction of new varieties of plants, animal breeds, etc. Otherwise, the innovation activity will be expressed through investment. The accounting of innovations should reflect the information on income, expenses and the process of development and implementation of innovations at the enterprise, which determines its purpose. To account for innovations, appropriate accounting records should be assigned. However, the current legislation provides for the identification of information only for the cost of research and development. All other information about the innovative state of the enterprise development is reflected in the general accounts of assets, income, expenses, etc. Using common accounts for innovation is not convenient, because information is sparse. In order to overcome this shortcoming, it is expedient to use the information of the accounting of innovation activity. In addition, the amount of innovation costs should be used. For successful construction of the models of accounting for innovations it is necessary to take into account the needs of internal and external users, in particular by changing the forms of both financial and statistical reporting. The results of the research allow us to formulate the following conclusions and suggestions. First of all, the regulatory framework for innovation assessment needs to be improved. It should take into account the peculiarities of the functioning of enterprises. In addition, the urgent issue is the development of methodological recommendations for the accounting of innovations, which will form the basis for the development of the Order on accounting policies in terms of innovation activities of the enterprise. The issue of reporting information about the entity's innovations will need to be resolved, for which it is proposed to use the Report of sources of financing of innovation-investment activity and the Indicator of the amount of innovative expenses. The use of these proposals will improve the accounting of innovations in the enterprise.
21
Palinkas, Lawrence A., Sapna J. Mendon und Alison B. Hamilton. „Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations“. Annual Review of Public Health 40, Nr. 1 (April 2019): 423–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Mixed methods research—i.e., research that draws on both qualitative and quantitative methods in varying configurations—is well suited to address the increasing complexity of public health problems and their solutions. This review focuses specifically on innovations in mixed methods evaluations of intervention, program or policy (i.e., practice) effectiveness, and implementation. The article begins with an overview of the structure, function, and process of different mixed methods designs and then provides illustrations of their use in effectiveness studies, implementation studies, and combined effectiveness–implementation hybrid studies. The article then examines four specific innovations: procedures for transforming (or “quantitizing”) qualitative data, application of rapid assessment and analysis procedures in the context of mixed methods studies, development of measures to assess implementation outcomes, and strategies for conducting both random and purposive sampling, particularly in implementation-focused evaluation research. The article concludes with an assessment of challenges to integrating qualitative and quantitative data in evaluation research.
22
Liu, Yuqing, Chunxiao Li, Scott McCabe und Hong Xu. „How small things affect the big picture?“ International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 31, Nr. 7 (08.07.2019): 2994–3014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2017-0655.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose By adopting retrospective evaluation theories, this study aims to explain how innovations provided by separate suppliers in the tourism value chain influence tourist’s perceived value of the overall experience and further uncover which innovative product attributes are more effective in improving tourist perceptions of the overall value. Design/methodology/approach A survey yielded 584 valid responses from tourists who had experienced specific tourist product innovations during their travels. Structural equation modelling was used to test the proposed theoretical model. Findings The results reveal that tourists evaluate overall travelling experience value either by recalling an intense, impressive moment (i.e. a heuristic approach) or through an evaluation of the overall utility gained from the whole trip (i.e. a normative approach). Furthermore, innovations that are perceived as increasing convenience and enabling learning contribute to tourists’ overall value perception through both normative and heuristic approaches, while immersion resulting from innovation only contributes to overall perceived value through the heuristic approach. Practical implications Given the complex service ecosystem of tourism destinations, each tourism service provider should consider how innovations contribute to the experience of the whole trip and which attributes of innovations increase tourists’ overall perceived experience value. Originality/value This study complements existing knowledge by revealing the relationship between product innovation in tourism sectors and tourists’ perceived value of the whole trip. Moreover, it offers a theoretical framework for further investigation into service product innovation in hospitality and tourism industry.
23
Horbach, Serge P. J. M., und Willem Halffman. „Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant?“ Minerva 58, Nr. 2 (01.10.2019): 139–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09388-z.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Peer review of journal submissions has become one of the most important pillars of quality management in academic publishing. Because of growing concerns with the quality and effectiveness of the system, a host of enthusiastic innovators has proposed and experimented with new procedures and technologies. However, little is known about whether these innovations manage to convince other journal editors. This paper will address open questions regarding the implementation of new review procedures, the occurrence rate of various peer review procedures and their distribution over scientific disciplines or academic publishers, as well as the motivations for editors or publishers to engage in novel review procedures. It shows that in spite of enthusiastic innovation, the adoption of new peer review procedures is in fact very slow, with the exception of text similarity scanners. For now, peer review innovations appear to be restricted to specific niches in academic publishing. Analysing these niches, the article concludes with a reflection on the circumstances in which innovations might be more widely implemented.
24
Gonzales, Richard DLC. „Innovations in Program Evaluation to Improve School Leadership: How Can We Perform One?“ Asia Pacific Journal on Curriculum Studies 3, Nr. 1 (30.06.2020): 21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.53420/apjcs.2020.3.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper describes a number of innovative approaches in conducting a program evaluation for school leadership. It also discusses the factors driving program evaluation innovations and the factors enabling innovations to occur in program evaluation. Furthermore, the paper defines what qualifies as innovations in program evaluation and the criteria that should be met to be considered innovative. The article ends with a detailed discussion on some of the program evaluation innovations and how to apply program evaluation innovations.
25
Hardashuk, Tetiana. „THE CONSOLIDATION POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIONS“. Almanac of Ukrainian Studies, Nr. 23 (2018): 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2520-2626/2018.23.5.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Innovations are considered as a factor of consolidation of society, taking into account the definition of innovations as a complex phenomenon containing scientific, technical, technological, economic, environmental, social, legal, safety aspects. However, during the longtime scientific, technical, technological aspects of innovations were considered as driving force for the economy economic growth. Innovations directly or indirectly affect all spheres of social life, going far beyond the boundaries of purely market relations. Limitation of purely economic and scientific-technological definition and evaluation of innovations became obvious in 1960s on the wave of economic growth after the World War II and popularization of post-material values, on the one hand, and because of increasing social tensions, environmental crisis, deepening the gap between economically developed and developing countries, as well as between differed groups of the population within society, on the other hand. Social, ethical and environmental aspects of innovation were put on the agenda. Consequently, innovations should be measured not only in figured of benefit, but also in terms of health, education, safety, environmental impacts, saving energy and materials, etc. The study of the economic aspects of innovation were complemented by the following areas: 1) prevention of inequality due to innovative development; 2) combination of innovation with social entrepreneurship; 3) innovation as a factor in achieving sustainability; 4) innovations for environmental protection. This logically follows from the concept of sustainable development grounded on the coherence of social, economic and environmental parameters. Shortly, the complex of updated innovation criteria as a driving force of socio-economic development is formulated by the framework of «3Ps – profit, people, and planet», which accounts economic/financial, social and environmental aspects. The «3P» framework is a basis for development of new business ethics.
26
Leedham-Green, Kathleen, Alec Knight und Gabriel B. Reedy. „Success and limiting factors in health service innovation: a theory-generating mixed methods evaluation of UK projects“. BMJ Open 11, Nr. 5 (Mai 2021): e047943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047943.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ObjectivesTo explore and explain success and limiting factors in UK health service innovation.DesignMixed methods evaluation of a series of health service innovations involving a survey and interviews, with theory-generating analysis.SettingThe research explored innovations supported by one of the UK’s Academic Health Science Networks which provides small grants, awards and structural support to health service innovators including clinical academics, health and social care professionals and third-sector organisations.ParticipantsAll recipients of funding or support 2014–2018 were invited to participate. We analysed survey responses relating to 56 innovation projects.ResultsResponses were used to conceptualise success along two axes: value creation for the intended beneficiaries and expansion beyond its original pilot. An analysis of variance between categories of success indicated that participation, motivation and evaluation were critical to value generation; organisational, educational and administrative support were critical to expansion; and leadership and collaborative expertise were critical to both value creation and expansion. Additional limiting factors derived from qualitative responses included difficulties navigating the boundaries and intersections between organisations, professions, sectors and cultures; a lack of support for innovation beyond the start-up phase; a lack of protected time; and staff burn-out and turnover.ConclusionsA nested hierarchy of innovation needs has been derived via an analysis of these factors, providing targeted suggestions to enhance the success of future innovations.
27
Wagner, John A. „Innovations driving biomarker evaluation and use“. Biomarkers in Medicine 4, Nr. 6 (Dezember 2010): 779–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/bmm.10.114.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
28
Barkun, Jeffrey S., Jeffrey K. Aronson, Liane S. Feldman, Guy J. Maddern und Steven M. Strasberg. „Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations“. Lancet 374, Nr. 9695 (September 2009): 1089–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61083-7.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
29
Wiegmans, Bart W. „Evaluation of Potentially Successful Barge Innovations“. Transport Reviews 25, Nr. 5 (September 2005): 573–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640500092208.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
30
Yu, Tinghui, Qin Li, Gerry Gray und Lilly Q. Yue. „Statistical innovations in diagnostic device evaluation“. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 26, Nr. 6 (19.08.2016): 1067–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2016.1226332.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
31
HEIDENREICH, SVEN, und PATRICK SPIETH. „WHY INNOVATIONS FAIL — THE CASE OF PASSIVE AND ACTIVE INNOVATION RESISTANCE“. International Journal of Innovation Management 17, Nr. 05 (Oktober 2013): 1350021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919613500217.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Innovation literature reports high failure rates for innovations, ranging from 50% to 90%. Hence, most new products fail as they are rejected by consumers due to their resistance to innovation, indicating that innovations remain a critical challenge for managers. In order to expand our current knowledge of consumers' new product adoption behaviour, we propose to consider the concepts of passive and active innovation resistance. Within a large scaled empirical study, we show that passive innovation resistance evolves from an individual's resistance to change disposition and status quo satisfaction, while active innovation resistance is primarily driven by product-specific barriers. Our results indicate that both passive and active innovation resistance represent strong inhibitors within new product evaluation, significantly reducing consumers' intention to adopt new products.
32
Jucha, Peter, und Tatiana Corejova. „STUDENTS 'OPINION OF A SELECTED EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION ON THE USE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN ORDINARY LIFE“. Proceedings of CBU in Natural Sciences and ICT 2 (24.10.2021): 34–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/pns.v2.150.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Technological progress is becoming more significant every year, and people are witnessing a number of innovations that are becoming part of their daily lives. The development of technology is advancing at great speed because the needs and requirements of people are becoming more and more difficult to meet, and so innovations are being developed to help fulfill these needs. However, not all people accept technological progress and innovation positively. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the opinion of people, specifically students of the selected higher education institution, on new technologies and innovations. In particular we wish to evaluate their general attitude towards technological innovation, but also their views on the use of specific technologies such as robots, drones or autonomous vehicles. Students' responses as to whether they would like them and whether they would be satisfied with the aforementioned innovations being widely used in the future vary. Some would benefit from the use of such innovations, others would not. Some students don't like it because people could lose their jobs and others don't really believe in such innovations. The results of the paper provide an evaluation of all the answers given by the students.
33
Hall, Andrew K., Carly Hagel, Teresa M. Chan, Brent Thoma, Aleisha Murnaghan und Farhan Bhanji. „The writer’s guide to education scholarship in emergency medicine: Education innovations (part 3)“. CJEM 20, Nr. 3 (20.06.2017): 463–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cem.2017.28.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
AbstractObjectiveThe scholarly dissemination of innovative medical education practices helps broaden the reach of this type of work, allowing scholarship to have an impact beyond a single institution. There is little guidance in the literature for those seeking to publish program evaluation studies and innovation papers. This study aims to derive a set of evidence-based features of high-quality reports on innovations in emergency medicine (EM) education.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review and thematic analysis to determine quality markers for medical education innovation reports, with a focus on EM. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar was augmented by a hand search of relevant publication guidelines, guidelines for authors, and website submission portals from medical education and EM journals. Study investigators reviewed the selected articles, and a thematic analysis was conducted.ResultsOur search strategy identified 14 relevant articles from which 34 quality markers were extracted. These markers were grouped into seven important themes: goals and need for innovation, preparation, innovation development, innovation implementation, evaluation of innovation, evidence of reflective practice, and reporting and dissemination. In addition, multiple outlets for the publication of EM education innovations were identified and compiled.ConclusionThe publication and dissemination of innovations are critical for the EM education community and the training of health professionals. We anticipate that our list of innovation report quality markers will be used by EM education innovators to support the dissemination of novel educational practices.
34
Pasholikov, Maxim, und Georgy Dudakov. „Technological innovations: application, prospects, development trends“. E3S Web of Conferences 164 (2020): 10003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016410003.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Innovations play a decisive role in the country’s economy, as they allow making scientific discoveries, improving production, and creating a fundamentally new product. The main goal of the research is to study technological innovations for determining prospects and development trends. Evaluation, comparison, analyzation and systematization methods for data were used throughout the research. Road construction was chosen as the object of the study. Themonitoring result of the innovation development strategy is the definition of boundaries of financing the fundamental and applied science sectors.Support for the commercialization of developments and an assessment of the country’s existing innovative potential are also identified. The obtained results allow determining the main application areas of technological innovations.
35
Streatfield, David, Richard Abisla, Violeta Bunescu, Marcel Chiranov, Camila Garroux, Artiom Maister, Luis González Martín, Jeremy Paley und Simon Rae-Scott. „Innovative impact planning and assessment through global libraries“. Performance Measurement and Metrics 20, Nr. 2 (08.07.2019): 74–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/pmm-03-2019-0010.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report a range of innovative approaches, methods and tools for evaluating the impact of public libraries and supporting the development of library leaders drawn from projects supported by the Global Libraries initiative of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Design/methodology/approach A range of approaches, tools and methods are described by specialist staff who were directly involved with these innovations. Findings Some comments are provided on the effectiveness of these innovations. Research limitations/implications All of these innovations have been tried out in public library settings, usually over a period of years. Practical implications All of the selected innovations could be adapted and used by library leaders or impact specialists. Social implications Several of the innovations are specifically designed to engage library staff and users in evaluation processes. Originality/value The impact planning and assessment programme of GL was the largest sustained international public library evaluation programme so far attempted. This paper reports on the more innovative evaluation activities undertaken through this programme.
36
Kalantari, Saleh, und Robin Snell. „Post-Occupancy Evaluation of a Mental Healthcare Facility Based on Staff Perceptions of Design Innovations“. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 10, Nr. 4 (26.01.2017): 121–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1937586716687714.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objectives: This study was a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) to examine the effectiveness of three specific design innovations in a mental healthcare facility. In addition to collecting data about the impact of these specific designs, the study provides a model for the broader implementation of POE approaches in the mental healthcare context. Background: POEs in general healthcare settings have been shown to lead to better work environments and better outcomes for patients. Despite growing evidence of the value provided by POE studies, the industry has been somewhat slow to adopt their regular use, in part due to unfamiliarity with the POE process. This is particularly true in mental healthcare contexts, where POE studies remain virtually nonexistent. Method: In-depth interviews and a widely distributed, anonymous survey were used to collect hospital staff perceptions and feedback regarding the impact of specific design features. Results: The hospital staff were quite enthusiastic about two of the design innovations studied here (a new wayfinding strategy and the use of vibrant colors in specific areas of the facility). The third innovation, open-style communication centers, elicited more mixed evaluations. The results include extensive hypothesis testing about the effects of each innovation as well as narrative discussions of their pros and cons. Conclusions: The study generated new knowledge about three specific mental healthcare design innovations and provides a model for the practical implementation of a POE approach in mental healthcare contexts. The results are particularly relevant for designers who are considering innovative strategies in future mental healthcare facilities.
37
Costa, Priscila Rezende Da, Lucimar da Silva Itelvino und Sonia Francisca Monken. „Modelo descritivo de atuação sustentável para o desenvolvimento de inovações sociais“. Revista de Administração da UFSM 14, Nr. 2 (29.06.2021): 241–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1983465934314.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose: The concept of social innovation as open, collaborative and social transformation process opens room to reinforce the need of legitimizing social impact businesses and of expanding partnerships for social change, as well as the urgency of establishing professional and more sustainable social innovation environments. Accordingly, we tried to answer the following research question: How can social business performance boost the development of social innovations?Design/methodology/approach: Therefore, we adopted the inductive approach of qualitative paradigm, based on the Grounded Theory, to investigate 24 social businesses. In addition, we adopted the Atlas.ti software for data organization and recovery.Aggregate results allowed us to propose a descriptive model of sustainable performance for the development of social innovations in social business, based on the following propositions: sustainable performance in processes and social innovation, the prevalence of a cooperative environment to solve social issues, professional governance as causal factor to social innovation development, the development of actions focused on public interests as influencing conditions for social innovation development, technical and scientific evaluation of social impacts as strategy to measure the outcomes of developed innovations and the expansion of social impacts as the consequence of the self-negotiation of social affairs.Originality/value: A descriptive model of sustainable acting was proposed for the development of social innovations in social businesses.
38
Jankovic, Ana, und Isidora Jaric. „Labor conditions of university teachers on Belgrade University: The problem of evaluation“. Filozofija i drustvo 20, Nr. 3 (2009): 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid0903003j.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Current process of the reform of higher education system in Serbia emphasize the issue of standardization of different aspects of teachers' work. Bologna reform introduces certain innovations in the process of evaluation of teachers work - obligatory self-evaluation and student evaluations. First reactions on these innovations stressing the question of ambiguity in interpretations of the results of this kind of evaluations. The empirical analysis of the collected interviews on five faculties of Belgrade University chart some of the symbolic points of resistance, as well as the points of symbolic identification and acceptance related to the process of evaluation. Careful analysis of the ways in which interviewees construct their narratives about the idea of evaluation of their own teaching skills and practices shows numerous defects of current evaluation procedures, as well as the concrete possibilities for their improvements and adjustments to the changed requirements of teaching process in higher education institutions.
39
Parobek, Ján, Alena Rokonalová, Katarína Slašťanová und Erika Loučanová. „Eco-innovations in V4 countries: Comparison from a Global Perspective“. SHS Web of Conferences 129 (2021): 05009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112905009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Research background: Globalization and the associated growing global competition provide incentives for the adoption of new technologies and innovations. In general, innovations could be considered as a dominant driver of the economic growth. However, current environmental challenges and sustainable development support the diffusion of eco-innovations to foster green growth. In terms of its global position, a country is often compared to its neighbouring countries, which are often the most important trading partners in the international market. Purpose of the article: This paper is focused on the evaluation of eco-innovation performance of the V4 countries with emphasis on the Slovak Republic. Methods: The article applies selected indicators of the Global Innovation Index to provide insightful data on countries' eco-innovation performance from the different V4 countries by applying the correlation analysis. Findings & Value added: The results compare the state of selected indicators of innovation within the V4 countries and describe the current position of the Slovak Republic. The results demonstrate the relative strengths within all selected countries in the sub-pillar Ecological Sustainability and significant eco-innovation potential.
40
Madzík, Peter. „Capture and evaluation of innovative ideas in early stages of product development“. TQM Journal 31, Nr. 6 (29.11.2019): 908–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tqm-02-2019-0050.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a structured procedure for the capture and evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of product development. The procedure is designed to take account of internal and external factors affecting the value of innovative ideas. Design/methodology/approach The proposed procedure is based on divergent and convergent approaches to innovation. Ideas are generated and captured using targeted questions and subsequently evaluated using modifications of the Kano model and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Idea evaluation considers four criteria – delight, originality, market share potential and simplicity – which are used to compute an “idea priority number”. Findings A case study looking at innovations in swimming goggles verified the validity of the proposed procedure. The procedure also supports fact-based decision making and applies a structured perspective to the innovation process that makes it easier to manage. Research limitations/implications The case study made use of a pilot survey in which 32 customers participated. Although the case study was only intended as a demonstration of the method’s use, such a sample size could lead to unreliable results in certain cases. Originality/value Applications of standard or expanded FMEA do not add value to a product because the main purpose of the approach is to prevent failure. The proposed inversion of FMEA logic combined with customer view via the Kano model offers a method for the structured analysis of product innovations. No similar approach to the evaluation of innovations has so far appeared in the literature.
41
Pan, Han, Wu Xin und Yuping Li. „A review on the concept of consumer innovativeness“. E3S Web of Conferences 251 (2021): 01080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101080.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Beginning in the 1970s, academia began to study consumer innovation and used it as an important indicator for predicting consumers’ new product adoption behavior. This article makes a more comprehensive summary and evaluation of the definition of consumer innovation from three aspects (innate innovativeness; special fields innovativeness; actualized innovativeness), summarizes the relationship between the three innovations, and builds a consumer innovation integration model.
42
Schneider, Sandra. „Combining the characteristics of sustainability, frugal innovations and washing machines in the industrial nations – A literature-based analysis of the common features for future sustainable developments“. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 9, Nr. 2 (28.06.2020): 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v9i2.659.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Sustainability is an internationally discussed topic in the development of products and services. Frugal innovations aim to conserve resources in the manufacture and use of such products and services. It can therefore be assumed that the areas of sustainability and frugal innovation overlap. This work is intended to show the connection between sustainability, frugal innovations and household appliances in the form of washing machines in industrialized countries. For the analysis, the characteristics of frugal innovations are compared with the requirements of washing machines in industrial nations and then the parallels to the social development goals (SDG) are determined as characteristics for sustainability. The existing literature will be reviewed for evaluation. The aim of the work is to show the connection and give an indication of the sustainable development of an everyday product as a frugal innovation in the industrialized countries.
43
Xu, Yingjun, Shijiu Yin, Mo Chen und Yang Gao. „Research on Management of Food Enterprise Technological Innovation Based on Overall Unbalanced Multiplicative Linguistic Evaluation Scale“. Journal of Systems Science and Information 2, Nr. 6 (25.12.2014): 561–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jssi-2014-0561.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
AbstractThis paper develops a overall unbalanced multiplicative linguistic evaluation scale. Based on the developed linguistic evaluation scale and linguistic weighted averaging (LWA) operator, the technological innovation management ability of five food enterprises is evaluated. Numerical results verified the validity and utility of the scale. Meanwhile, it indicates that to improve the level of technological innovation, an enterprise should make more efforts to stimulate innovations by using the enterprises distribution system, to cultivate the leader and the staff’s positive attitude to an innovation failure, to thoroughly analyze the reason of the termination of an innovation project and to strengthen the leader and the staff’s innovation awareness. The overall unbalanced multiplicative linguistic evaluation scale can also be extensively applied to other fields such as project evaluation, engineering management, medical diagnosis and personnel appraisal.
44
León Guerrero, Mª José, und Mª del Carmen López López. „Evaluation Criteria for University Teaching Innovations Projects“. Estudios sobre Educación 26 (2014): 79–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/004.26.79-101.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
45
Hu, Jia-hao. „Evaluation on Samaranch’s Innovations for Olympic Development“. Advances in Physical Education 01, Nr. 02 (2011): 23–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ape.2011.12005.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
46
Proctor, R. A. „Innovations in new product screening and evaluation“. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 1, Nr. 3 (Januar 1989): 313–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537328908523977.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
47
No authorship indicated. „Review of International Innovations in Evaluation Methodology.“ Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 35, Nr. 8 (August 1990): 822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/028988.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
48
Lancaster, Nina Karen. „Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Program Evaluation“. Theory Into Practice 57, Nr. 3 (03.07.2018): 250–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484034.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
49
Reiss-Brennan, Brenda, Pascal Briot, Gail Daumit und Daniel Ford. „Evaluation of “Depression in Primary Care” Innovations“. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 33, Nr. 1 (07.10.2005): 86–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-4239-x.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
50
Khizhnyak, R. S. „Entrepreneurial approach to the business incubator: a business models based of «Shared Value Canvas» and «Diversified Markets Canvas»“. Business Strategies, Nr. 7 (09.08.2018): 18–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.17747/2311-7184-2018-7-18-22.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Innovations is the key driver for the developed countries intense economic growth. Small innovative ventures play a major role in the creation and development of the innovations. Any innovation implementation entails high risks. To reduce the risks the state has to come up with innovations support and incentives system which incorporates business-incubators as one of its elements. The most effective business incubators performance analysis results were used for development of business incubators successful operations basics. One of them is as follows: “A business incubator should be treated as business”. This statement is the cornerstone of the present article covering the particulars of technological business incubators business models development to be used as business planning and evaluation basics.