Bücher zum Thema „Employer preferences“

1968-, Raphael Steven, und Stoll Michael A, Hrsg. Will employers hire ex-offenders?: Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. Madison, Wis.]: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2002.

Freedland, Marjorie. Third national engineering student employer preference survey. New York, NY (1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York 10020): Available from Graduating Engineer, 1986.

Freedland, Marjorie. Fourth national engineering student employer preference survey. New York, NY (1221 Ave. of the Americas, New York 10020): Available from Graduating Engineer, 1988.

Pamela, Meadows, Great Britain. Department for Work and Pensions und Great Britain. Department of Trade and Industry, Hrsg. Survey of employers' policies, practices and preferences relating to age. Leeds: Corporated Document Services, 2006.

Kühn, Peter. Employers' preferences for gender, age, height and beauty: Direct evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009.

Sparrow, Paul R. Does national culture really matter?: Predicting HRM preferences of Taiwanese employers. Sheffield: Sheffield University Management School, 1997.

Tijdens, Kea. The driving forces behind working time reduction: Explaining employers' and employees' preferences concerning the 36 hours working week in the Dutch banking sector. Colchester: University of Essex, 1998.

Barr, Abigail. Revealed preference and self insurance: Can we learn from the self employed in Chile? Washington, D.C: World Bank, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Social Protection Unit, 2002.

Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service, Hrsg. Constitutionality of local hiring preference requirements in public contracts. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1985.

Pérez-López, Jorge F. Worker rights and U.S. trade law. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1987.

United States. Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Hrsg. Worker rights and U.S. trade law. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1987.

United States. Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Hrsg. Worker rights and U.S. trade law. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1987.

United States. Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Hrsg. Worker rights and U.S. trade law. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1987.

Pérez-López, Jorge F. Worker rights and U.S. trade law. [Washington, D.C.?]: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1987.

1960-, Messenger Jon C., Hrsg. Working time and workers' preferences in industrialized countries: Finding the balance. London: Routledge, 2004.

Koerdt, Willy. Das Anspruchsniveau von Urlaubsreisenden: Ein empirischer Beitrag zur Konsumentenforschung. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 1988.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits. Benefits available to federal employees called to active military duty: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, first session, May 15, 1991. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1991.

W, Howe Charles, Hrsg. Urban water supply reliability: Preferences of managers, elected officials, and water users in Boulder, Colorado. Fort Collins, Colo: Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State University, 1990.

Zander, Lena. The licence to lead: An 18 country study of the relationship between employees' preferences regarding interpersonal leadership and national culture. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute of International Business--IIB, Stockholm School of Economics, 1997.

Peter, Dorman. Worker rights and U.S. trade policy: An evaluation of worker rights conditionality under the General System of Preferences. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1989.

Peter, Dorman. Worker rights and U.S. trade policy: An evaluation of worker rights conditionality under the general system of preferences. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1989.

Munasinghe, Lalith. Why do dancers smoke?: Time preference, occupational choice, and wage growth. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.

United, States Congress Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management the Federal Workforce and the District of Columbia. Fulfilling the promise?: A review of veterans' preference in the federal government : hearing before the Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia Subcommittee of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 30, 2006. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2006.

V, Sekher T., und Institute for Social and Economic Change., Hrsg. Can career-minded young women reverse gender discrimination? Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change, 2007.

North Carolina. General Assembly. Legislative Research Commission. State personnel system, wellness program for state employees, and veterans preference in state employment: Report to the 1989 General Assembly of North Carolina, 1989 session. [Raleigh]: The Commission, 1988.

North Carolina. General Assembly. Legislative Research Commission. State personnel system, wellness program for state employees, and veterans preference in state employment: Report to the 1989 General Assembly of North Carolina, 1989 session. [Raleigh, N.C.]: The Commission, 1988.

Federal Employees News Digest, Inc., Hrsg. Civil service handbook for ex-military personnel: Expand your benefits, advance your career. Reston, Va: Federal Employees News Digest, 2002.

Board, United States Merit Systems Protection. Veteran's employment redress laws in the federal civil service: A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 2014.

United States. Merit Systems Protection Board. The rule of three in federal hiring: Boon or bane? : a report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, D.C. (1120 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington 20419): The Board, 1995.

Office, General Accounting. International trade: Assessment of the Generalized System of Preferences Program : report to Congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

Office, General Accounting. Federal hiring: Reconciling managerial flexibility with veterans' preference : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Civil Service, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.

Office, General Accounting. Federal hiring: Testing for entry-level administrative positions falls short of expectations : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on the Civil Service, Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

New Jersey. Legislature. General Assembly. Veterans and Military Affairs Committee. Public hearing before Assembly Veterans and Military Affairs Committee: New Jersey public employees and veterans' preference : July 11, 1991, 10:20 A.M., State House Annex, Room 373, Trenton, New Jersey. Trenton, N.J: The Committee, 1991.

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Affirmative action, preferences, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1995: Hearing of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, on S. 1085 ... April 30, 1996. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1996.

New Jersey. Legislature. General Assembly. Veterans and Military Affairs Committee. Public hearing before Assembly Veterans and Military Affairs Committee: The concerns and needs of the dependents of military personnel from New Jersey serving in the Persian Gulf War : March 5, 1991, Room 2131, Essex County Community College, Newark, New Jersey. Trenton, N.J: The Committee, 1991.

New Jersey. Legislature. General Assembly. Veterans and Military Affairs Committee. Public hearing before Assembly Veterans and Military Affairs Committee: Concerns and needs of the dependents of military personnel from New Jersey serving in the Persian Gulf War : February 13, 1991, FAA Technical Center, Atlantic City International Airport, Atlantic City, New Jersey. Trenton, N.J. (State House Annex, CN-068, Trenton 08625-0068): The Committee, 1991.

New Jersey. Legislature. General Assembly. Veterans and Military Affairs Committee. Public hearing before Assembly Veterans and Military Affairs Committee: Assembly concurrent resolution no. 82 (memorializes Congress to propose a constitutional amendment prohibiting the physical desecration of the American flag : Legislative Office Building, Room 11, Trenton, New Jersey, May 6, 1993, 10:00 a.m. Trenton, N.J: Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, 1993.

Office, United States Government Accountability. Military personnel: Survivor benefits for servicemembers and federal, state, and city government employees : report to congressional committees. [Washington, D.C.]: GAO, 2004.

Resources, United States Congress Senate Committee on Labor and Human. Affirmative action, preferences, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1995: Hearing of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, on S. 1085, to prohibit discrimination and preferential treatment on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex with respect to federal employment, contracts, and programs, and for other purposes, April 30, 1996. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1996.

Office, General Accounting. International trade: Comparison of U.S. and European Union preference programs : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Trade, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 2001.

Office, United States Government Accountability, und United States Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: Financial costs and loss of critical skills due to DOD's homosexual conduct policy cannot be completely estimated : report to Congressional requesters. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Government Acccountability Office, 2005.

Office, United States Government Accountability. Military personnel: Improved quality controls needed over servicemembers' employment rights claims at DOL : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C: United States Government Accountability Office, 2007.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: DOD needs an oversight framework and standards to improve management of its casualty assistance programs : report to Congressional Committees. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Accountability Office (441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548), 2006.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: DOD lacks reliable personnel tempo data and needs quality controls to improve data accuracy : report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate and Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: GAO, 2007.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: DOD and the Services need to take additional steps to improve mobilization data for the reserve components : report to Congressional Committees. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Government Accountability Office (441 G. St. NW, Room LM, Washington 20548), 2006.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: Reporting additional servicemember demographics could enhance congressional oversight : report to congressional requesters. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2005.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Military personnel: Federal management of servicemember employment rights can be further improved : report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2005.

Office, General Accounting. International trade: Strategy needed to better monitor and enforce trade agreements : report to the chairman, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): The Office, 2000.

Office, General Accounting. International trade: U.S. firms' views on Customs' protection of intellectual property rights : report to selected Congressional subcommittees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1986.

Office, General Accounting. International trade: Strategy needed to better monitor and enforce trade agreements : report to the Chairman, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 2000.