Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Diplomatic history.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Diplomatic history“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Diplomatic history" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.

1

Nurhartanto, Gregorius Sri. „DIPLOMATIC‌ ‌IMMUNITIES‌ ‌FROM‌ ‌THE‌ ‌PERSPECTIVE‌ ‌OF‌ ‌ CRIMINAL,‌ ‌CIVIL,‌ ‌AND‌ ‌ADMINISTRATIVE‌ ‌JURISDICTIONS‌ ‌ OF‌ ‌THE‌ ‌RECEIVING‌ ‌STATE‌“. TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL 5, Nr. 1 (09.04.2021): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v5i1.46220.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractA diplomatic mission is the representative of the sending state in the receiving state to carry out a sacred mission. For supporting the functions, diplomatic missions and diplomatic agents are given privileges and immunities rights. The privileges and immunities rights are not for individual diplomatic agents, but more importantly for the benefit of the mission as a whole. The consequence of having the privileges and immunities rights is the diplomatic missions and diplomatic agents are excluded from the local jurisdiction of the receiving state in the areas of criminal, civil and administrative law. This consequence creates complexity for the receiving country to follow up on diplomatic officials and their families if there is a violation or abuse of diplomatic immunity and privileges. There are some exceptions in world history where diplomatic officials can be followed up by recipient countries which can set a precedent for diplomatic immunity and privileges.AbstrakMisi diplomatik adalah misi resmi negara pengirim di negara penerima yang mengemban misi suci. Guna menunjang kelancaran tugas misi diplomatik maka misi diplomatik dan pejabat diplomatik diberikan hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan. Hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan itu bukan semata-mata untuk diri pejabat diplomatik maupun anggota keluarganya, tetapi yang lebih penting adalah untuk kepentingan misi secara keseluruhan. Konsekuensi dari dimilikinya hak-hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan tersebut adalah misi diplomatik dan pejabat diplomatik beserta anggota keluarganya dikecualikan dari yurisdiksi lokal negara penerima baik di area hukum pidana, perdata maupun acara. Konsekuensi ini mengakibatkan kompleksitas bagi negara penerima untuk menindak lanjuti pejabat diplomatik beserta keluarganya bila terjadi suatu pelanggaran maupun penyalahgunaan kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik tersebut. Terdapat beberapa pengecualian terjadi di dalam sejarah dunia dimana pejabat diplomatik dapat ditindak lanjuti oleh negara penerima yang dapat menjadi preseden terkait kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Sowerby, Tracey A. „Early Modern Diplomatic History“. History Compass 14, Nr. 9 (September 2016): 441–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12329.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Trachtenberg, Marc. „Theory and Diplomatic History“. Historically Speaking 8, Nr. 2 (2006): 11–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsp.2006.0018.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Stephanson, Anders. „War and Diplomatic History“. Diplomatic History 25, Nr. 3 (Juli 2001): 393–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0145-2096.00274.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Thaller, Anja, Gabriele Bartz und Markus Gneiß. „Rezension von: Bartz, Gabriele; Gneiss, Markus (Hrsg.), Illuminierte Urkunden“. Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte 79 (22.06.2022): 647–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.53458/zwlg.v79i.2699.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Illuminierte Urkunden. Beiträge aus Diplomatik, Kunstgeschichte und Digital Humanities. Illuminated Charters. Essays from Diplomatic, Art History and Digital Humanities, hg. von Gabriele Bartz und Markus Gneiss (Archiv für Diplomatik, Beiheft 16), Wien/Köln/Weimar: Böhlau 2018. 544 S. ISBN 978-3-412-51108-1. € 70,–
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Michael L. Carrafiello. „DIPLOMATIC FAILURE:“. Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies 77, Nr. 2 (2010): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/pennhistory.77.2.0145.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

THORNE, CHRISTOPHER. „Diplomatic History: Some Further Reflections“. Diplomatic History 14, Nr. 4 (Oktober 1990): 602–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1990.tb00112.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

NINKOVICH, FRANK. „The End of Diplomatic History?“ Diplomatic History 15, Nr. 3 (Juli 1991): 439–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1991.tb00140.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Edel, Wilbur. „Diplomatic History--State Department Style“. Political Science Quarterly 106, Nr. 4 (1991): 695. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151800.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

Ambrosius, Lloyd E. „Rethinking Diplomatic and Strategic History“. Reviews in American History 31, Nr. 4 (2003): 626–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rah.2003.0062.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
11

Langhorne, Richard, Linda S. Frey und Marsha L. Frey. „The History of Diplomatic Immunity“. American Historical Review 105, Nr. 1 (Februar 2000): 178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2652455.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
12

Gienow-Hecht, J. C. E. „What Bandwagon? Diplomatic History Today“. Journal of American History 95, Nr. 4 (01.03.2009): 1083–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27694563.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
13

M. S., Danyaya, Suwaiba M. B. und Rashida M. „The Nature and Scope of Diplomatic History“. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research 7, Nr. 1 (26.02.2024): 152–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/ajsshr-uqsv4qlj.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Diplomatic history is a subfield of history that focuses on the interactions and relationships between states and their representatives. It is concerned with the nature of diplomacy and the role it plays in shaping international relations. Diplomatic history also encompasses a wide range of areas including the study of treaties, alliances, war and peace, and the role of diplomacy in shaping the modern world. More so, the discipline looks at the influence of non-state actors, such as individuals, corporations, and NGOs, on the course of diplomatic history. In addition, the scope of diplomatic history is vast and covers a range of historical periods and regions. The field also studies the impact of culture, emotions, and identity on diplomatic interactions. However, the discipline is faced by some challenges and limitations. Some historians argue that diplomatic history is too focused on state actors and official sources, and that it fails to account for the experiences of ordinary people. This paper examines the nature and scope of diplomatic history. It explains the meaning of history, diplomacy and how the concept of diplomatic history evolved and the role of diplomacy in history. It also highlighted the impact of diplomacy on world events. The relationship between diplomatic history and other disciplines was also examined. The paper uses a historical research approach in its analysis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
14

DREPHAL, MAXIMILIAN. „Corps diplomatique:The body, British diplomacy, and independent Afghanistan, 1922–47“. Modern Asian Studies 51, Nr. 4 (Juli 2017): 956–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x16000111.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
AbstractThis article studies diplomatic history in its physical dimensions. Its point of departure is the interpretation of the term ‘corps diplomatique’ in a literal sense. The article introduces the concept of the diplomatic body as a diplomat's body and as a body with diplomatic functions and meanings. Based on material relating to the British Legation in Kabul from 1922 until 1947, the body's ubiquity in international relations is revealed through the themes of space, language, and medicine. The article first looks at the impact of Kabul's spatial conditions and the physical reactions it excited in British diplomats. It then considers the bodies of Afghanistan's ruling elite as objects of British attention, whose appearance was documented in diplomatic records. Descriptions of these bodies in diplomatic language expressed intimacy and consensus as well as estrangement in British–Afghan relations. In addition to the metaphorical use of the diplomatic body, the provision of healthcare through the Legation's medical unit addressed the needs of British and Afghan bodies alike. It was also employed to further diplomatic ends by extending colonial medicine to the Afghan population. The study of the Legation's physical practices ultimately reveals the diplomatic mission's colonial origins and character.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
15

McMahon, Robert J. „Diplomatic History and Policy History: Finding Common Ground“. Journal of Policy History 17, Nr. 1 (Januar 2005): 93–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jph.2005.0005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
It is difficult to imagine two fields of scholarly inquiry with so much in common and yet so little interaction as diplomatic and policy history. Policy, policy process, policymakers, policy origins, policy intentions, policy consequences—those terms and ones of a similar stripe roll just as easily off the tongues and word processors of diplomatic historians as of self-described policy historians. Moreover, the questions asked and the methods employed by the two groups of scholars bear a striking resemblance. Both fields focus perforce on the state and state-centered actors, concern themselves with elite-level decision making, interrogate fundamental issues of power within societies, and concentrate overwhelmingly on the twentieth century to the relative neglect of earlier periods. Each field occupies as well an embattled position within the larger historical profession, where social and cultural history have predominated since the 1960s.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
16

D'Agostino, Anthony. „Diplomatic History, World History, and the Great Scramble“. Historically Speaking 13, Nr. 5 (2012): 20–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsp.2012.0057.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
17

Ward, Emily Joan. „Diplomatic Women“. Frühmittelalterliche Studien 55, Nr. 1 (30.11.2021): 399–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/fmst-2021-0016.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
18

Pelz, Stephen E. „A Taxonomy for American Diplomatic History“. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 19, Nr. 2 (1988): 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/204666.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
19

Rich, Norman, und Davud Wetzel. „The Crimean War: A Diplomatic History“. American Historical Review 91, Nr. 4 (Oktober 1986): 909. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1873363.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
20

NINKOVICH, FRANK. „Interests and Discourse in Diplomatic History“. Diplomatic History 13, Nr. 2 (April 1989): 135–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1989.tb00049.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
21

O'Neill, Sean. „Diplomatic History: Fall 1997, Columbus, Ohio“. Foreign Policy, Nr. 109 (1997): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1149478.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
22

Hughes, C. W. „The Diplomatic History of Postwar Japan“. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 12, Nr. 2 (01.05.2012): 349–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcs005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
23

Stephanson, Anders. „Diplomatic History in the Expanded Field“. Diplomatic History 22, Nr. 4 (Oktober 1998): 595–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0145-2096.00140.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
24

Friedman, Hal M. „The History of Diplomatic Immunity (review)“. Journal of World History 12, Nr. 1 (2001): 193–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2001.0014.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
25

Shaffer, R. „Race, Class, Gender, and Diplomatic History“. Radical History Review 1998, Nr. 70 (01.01.1998): 156–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1998-70-156.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
26

Ebben, Maurits, und Louis Sicking. „Nieuwe diplomatieke geschiedenis van de premoderne tijd“. Tijdschrift voor geschiedenis 127, Nr. 4 (01.11.2014): 541–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/tvgesch2014.4.sick.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract New Diplomatic History in the Premodern Age. An IntroductionThe study of medieval and early modern diplomacy has long been considered one of the most conservative subdisciplines in the field of history. During the last three decades, however, diplomatic history has undergone profound changes. This introductory article shows how these changes were triggered by developments in other disciplines and happened under the influence of the cultural turn. Until recently most general histories of diplomacy were based on the conceptions of Donald Queller and, more particularly, of Garrett Mattingly. Scholars working on medieval and early modern history have applied new international relations theories and moved away from analyses that were strictly oriented towards diplomatic relations between sovereign territorial states. The cultural turn gave rise to a range of innovations in diplomatic history, leading historians to focus on the diplomatic process and its cultural dimensions rather than on the results of diplomatic activity. The special issue for which this article serves as an introduction shows that historians working in the Netherlands have also been influenced by these developments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
27

García Cardiel, Jorge. „The Toga as a Diplomatic Tool“. Historia 71, Nr. 3 (2022): 260. http://dx.doi.org/10.25162/historia-2022-0009.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
28

Mori, Jennifer. „The State of the Art. The Way of the Future“. Diplomatica 1, Nr. 1 (10.04.2019): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/25891774-00101002.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
A survey of recent writings in early-modern, largely European, diplomatic history reveals important shifts in the direction of the cultural and sociological emphasis favored by the proponents of New Diplomatic History. In turn, the shifts have brought mainstream diplomatic historians closer to other subfields – gender and class history, in particular. The trend is likely to continue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
29

Wong, Jane Yeang Chui. „Ideologies of Diplomacy“. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 50, Nr. 3 (01.09.2020): 477–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/10829636-8626064.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The publication in 2008 of John Watkins’s special issue for the Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, “Toward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe,” opened up the formal aspects of the ambassador’s office and official channels of diplomatic negotiation to a complex sociocultural landscape underlying the processes of diplomacy-in-the-making. The field of New Diplomatic History has since burgeoned. This current special issue hews closely to the cross-disciplinary nature of newer diplomatic history, and it responds to critical challenges that have recently emerged in scholarship, particularly the need to balance both breadth and depth of historical and cultural analysis. This volume considers how English institutional and sociocultural networks informed diplomatic practice in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, and how diplomatic thought, representation, and the forging of international relations were interpreted within various English communities. The collection takes special interest in how “ideologies of diplomacy” were formed, negotiated, and articulated within and beyond formal diplomatic spheres. Drawing on various elements of international relations theory, the essays address the ambiguous and contradictory elements of diplomatic reciprocity, explicating the tensions between diplomatic ambition and local governance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
30

Amirell, Stefan Eklöf. „New Diplomatic History and the Study of the Global Nineteenth Century“. Global Nineteenth-Century Studies 1, Nr. 1 (01.06.2022): 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/gncs.2022.6.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The cultural turn in diplomatic history and the rise of the field of new diplomatic history since the end of the twentieth century has not, to date, had a great impact on the study of the global nineteenth century. This article argues that bringing the methods and perspectives of new diplomatic history to bear on the study of the global nineteenth century is fruitful in at least five respects. First, it encourages multivocality by including informal diplomatic actors in the study of cross-cultural diplomacy and colonial encounters; second, it calls upon the historian to pay equal attention to the motives, perspectives, and worldviews of Europeans and non-Europeans; third, it pays attention to the conditions and circumstances, including violence, coercion, translation, place, ceremony, and gifts, of cross-cultural diplomacy and imperial expansion; fourth, it highlights the long-term character of imperial and diplomatic relations; and fifth, it broadens the range of available sources to include a wide range of textual and non-textual sources. In all of these respects, new diplomatic history can help historians of the global nineteenth century to overcome the traps of Eurocentrism and teleological and macrohistorical biases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
31

Mansurov, Uktam. „The History Of Trade Relations Of Central Asian Countries With Foreign Countries“. American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 02, Nr. 10 (24.10.2020): 110–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue10-17.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The article describes the history of trade relations of Central Asian countries with foreign countries in ancient and medieval times, the importance of the Great Silk Road, the impact of these relations on political, economic, diplomatic, ethnic and cultural relations. It states that due to diplomatic and trade relations with foreign countries, mutual relations have been established, and the movement of citizens abroad and their entry is based on certain rules. Attention is paid to such factors as the impact of such relations on the socio-political and economic situation in those countries, the specific way of life of the peoples of the region, the way in which diplomatic relations are established. The article focuses on the development of trade relations with foreign countries during the reign of ancient Khorezm, Sogdiana, Parthia and the medieval Hephthalites, the Turkish Khanate, the Arab Caliphate, Amir Temur and the Temurids, the Central Asian khanates, Khiva, Kokand, Bukhara khanates.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
32

Stout, Neil R., Jonathan R. Dull und Edward Countryman. „A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution“. Journal of American History 73, Nr. 3 (Dezember 1986): 733. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1903004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
33

Neu, Charles E., Linda Killen, Howard Jablon, I. M. Destler, Leslie H. Gelb und Anthony Lake. „American Diplomatic History: Toward an Organizational Synthesis“. Reviews in American History 13, Nr. 2 (Juni 1985): 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2702426.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
34

Bowman, Albert H., und Jonathan R. Dull. „A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution.“ Eighteenth-Century Studies 20, Nr. 3 (1987): 356. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2739058.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
35

Varg, Paul A., und Jonathan R. Dull. „A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution“. American Historical Review 91, Nr. 3 (Juni 1986): 729. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1869278.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
36

Rozumjuk, V. „“Younger Brother” Status in Oriental Diplomatic History“. Problems of World History, Nr. 3 (16.05.2017): 52–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2017-3-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The article is devoted to research of “brotherhood” phenomenon in international relations. The meaning of the term “brotherhood” in diplomatic history of the Ancient East and medieval China is analyzed. Some “brotherhood” treaties are given. The author demonstrates with many examples that a family terminology (“father”, “son”, “grandfather”, “grandson”, “uncle”, “nephew”, “brother”) was often used in chronicles of many epochs and civilizations to determine the state status in the system of international relations and for a designation of various nuances of relations of a political dependence, vassalage and hegemony. Extrapolating experience of the history of Eastern diplomacy at the modern system of international relations, the author concludes that traditional slogans of Russian propaganda about “one nation” and “eternal brotherhood” of Russian and Ukrainian nations mean only the assertion of an inequality and dependence of Ukrainian state from the “elder brother”, the second-class status of Ukrainians as a nation, but not a feeling of a mutual affection and family ties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
37

Brown, L. Carl, und Richard B. Parker. „Uncle Sam in Barbary: A Diplomatic History“. Foreign Affairs 83, Nr. 5 (2004): 180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20034116.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
38

Clarfield, Gerard, Jonathan R. Dull, Ronald Hoffman, Peter J. Albert und Prosser Gifford. „A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution“. William and Mary Quarterly 43, Nr. 4 (Oktober 1986): 682. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1923696.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
39

Logevall, F. „Presidential Note * Online Discussion of Diplomatic History“. Diplomatic History 38, Nr. 4 (01.09.2014): iv. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dh/dhu047.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
40

Toepfer, Marcia L. „Reminiscences of Diplomatic History: The First Year“. Diplomatic History 41, Nr. 2 (22.03.2017): 229–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dh/dhw073.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
41

HUNT, MICHAEL H. „Internationalizing US. Diplomatic History: A Practical Agenda“. Diplomatic History 15, Nr. 1 (Januar 1991): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1991.tb00116.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
42

Dichter, Heather L. „Diplomatic and International History: Athletes and Ambassadors“. International Journal of the History of Sport 32, Nr. 15 (13.10.2015): 1741–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2015.1098621.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
43

Schweizer, Karl W., und Matt J. Schumann. „The Revitalization of Diplomatic History: Renewed Reflections“. Diplomacy & Statecraft 19, Nr. 2 (13.06.2008): 149–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592290802096174.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
44

smulyan, susan. „The Cultural Turn in U.S. Diplomatic History“. Diplomatic History 33, Nr. 3 (Juni 2009): 539–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2009.00790.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
45

Egan, Clifford, und Jonathan R. Dull. „A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution.“ Journal of Southern History 52, Nr. 4 (November 1986): 617. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2209156.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
46

D'Agostino, Anthony. „The Revisionist Tradition in European Diplomatic History“. Journal of The Historical Society 4, Nr. 2 (Juni 2004): 255–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-921x.2004.00098.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
47

Ok, Chang-joon. „Making National Narrative of Diplomatic History : Focusing on Shin Ki-suk’s Work on Diplomatic History of Modern Korea“. Journal of Asiatic Studies 67, Nr. 1 (31.03.2024): 231–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.31930/jas.2024.03.67.1.231.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
48

Mazarchuk, D. V. „New diplomatic history: formation, research directions and perspectives“. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series 66, Nr. 3 (05.08.2021): 283–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2021-66-3-283-292.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The paper analyses the main methodological principles of the direction in studying the history of diplomacy – New diplomatic history. The precondition for the formation of this historiographical trend was the transition from a teleological and state-centered perception of history to actor-centrism (as applied to the history of diplomacy).The main stages of development of the New diplomatic history are revealed. The substantive aspects of criticism of the classical approach to the history of European diplomacy and the process of the emergence of a permanent embassies mission are considered. In general, modern scholars are inclined to the problematic nature of identifying precise criteria for the permanent nature of diplomatic representation in the Early Modern period.Examples of studies of various aspects of diplomatic history within the framework of the New diplomatic history are given. The socio-cultural aspects of the activities of a diplomat of the Modern period come to the fore in the research topics of representatives of this direction. In this regard, the attention of scientists is extended to such topics as the symbolic language of diplomacy, the role of art, everyday life in the work of a diplomat, informal channels of diplomacy, reflection of diplomats.The characteristics of new basic sources for the study of the history of diplomacy in the Modern period are given. Modern historians pay great attention to personalized groups of sources, such as personal correspondence and memoirs of diplomats.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
49

Kralli, Ioanna. „Diplomatic Rhetoric“. Classical Review 55, Nr. 1 (März 2005): 304–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clrevj/bni169.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
50

Cairns, Douglas L. „DIPLOMATIC GESTURES“. Classical Review 54, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2004): 476–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cr/54.2.476.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie