Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „De opificio mundi“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "De opificio mundi" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "De opificio mundi"
POWTER, Alejandro. „La creación según el pensamiento de san Agustín y el De opificio mundi de Filón de Alejandría. Similitudes y diferencias / Creation According to St. Augustine’s Thought and Philo of Alexandria’s De opificio mundi. Similarities and Differences“. Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 15 (01.10.2008): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.21071/refime.v15i.6194.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleНакаидзе, Александр Гивиевич. „Arguments in ‘De opificio mundi’ by John Philopon, Testifying to the Probable Belonging to him ‘Corpus Areopagiticum’“. Theological Herald, Nr. 4(39) (15.12.2020): 154–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/gb.2020.39.4.009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGarcía-Lomas Gago, OSB, Fr Luis Javier. „De Atenas a Jerusalén. La creación del mundo en Filón de Alejandría“. Isidorianum 27, Nr. 54 (20.11.2018): 233–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.46543/isid.1827.1033.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleНакаидзе, Александр Гивиевич. „Angelology of John Philopon in the Treatise «On the Creation of the World» («De opificio mundi»): Philosophical and Theological Views“. Theological Herald, Nr. 2(37) (15.06.2020): 154–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/2500-1450-2020-37-2-154-187.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFogielman, Charles-Antoine. „L’exégêse anti-origéniste de Jean Philopon“. Augustinianum 60, Nr. 2 (2020): 479–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/agstm202060225.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleЩукин, Тимур Аркадьевич. „Whom do Angels Serve? The Teaching of John Philoponus on the Angelic World in the Context of the Christological Controversy of the Mid Sixth-century“. Библия и христианская древность, Nr. 4(8) (25.12.2020): 72–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.31802/bca.2020.8.4.004.
Der volle Inhalt der Quellevan Winden, J. C. M., und Clemens Scholten. „Antike Naturphilosophie und christliche Kosmologie in der Schrift "De opificio mundi" des Johannes Philoponos“. Vigiliae Christianae 50, Nr. 4 (1996): 423. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1584321.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDe Luca, Ludovica. „La materia e la creazione del mondo nel De opificio mundi di Filone di Alessandria“. Elenchos 43, Nr. 1 (01.08.2022): 105–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0006.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMacCoull, Leslie S. B. „The historical Context of John Philoponus' De Opificio Mundi in the Culture of Byzantine-Coptic Egypt“. Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 9, Nr. 2 (19.01.2006): 397–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zach.2005.007.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCalabi, Francesca. „Ludovica De Luca: Il Dio architetto in Filone di Alessandria (De opificio mundi 17–20)“. Elenchos 43, Nr. 1 (01.08.2022): 185–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0011.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "De opificio mundi"
OTTOBRINI, TIZIANO. „SOPRA IL "DE OPIFICIO MUNDI" DI GIOVANNI FILOPONO“. Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/11131.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe present essay is meant to illustrate the philosophical and exegetic work intitled "De opificio mundi" (seven books) written by John Philoponus in Alexandria in the middle of the sixth century A.D. about the kosmopoiesis of the first chapter of Genesis. It is argued this treatise is the first evidence of Biblical exegesis led not according to Plato's "Timaeus" but according to Aristotelian corpus, specially "Physics" and "Organon". Philoponus rejects the allegorical method based upon demiurgic "Timaeus" since he thinks it is arbitrary and untrue compared with the Revelation literalism; therefore Philoponus passes the limit of Aristoboulos, of Philo's "De opificio mundi" and also the limit of Christian tradition of Hexaemerons (Fathers of the Church just like Cappadocians). Philoponus replaces allegorism with a new kind of Biblical literalism: not the trivializing one led by the school of Antioch (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Cosmas Indicopleustes) but a scientific and methodic literalism relied on Aristotelian logic and on the (meta)physical concepts derived from Aristotle (kinesis, dynamis, hexis, hypokeimenon, etc.); so "De opificio mundi" has a syllogistic and deductive structure, not a mythic-allegorical one. Last philosopher in Late Antiquity, Philoponus is in-ventor of a striking Christian-Aristotelian scholasticism.
OTTOBRINI, TIZIANO. „SOPRA IL "DE OPIFICIO MUNDI" DI GIOVANNI FILOPONO“. Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/11131.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe present essay is meant to illustrate the philosophical and exegetic work intitled "De opificio mundi" (seven books) written by John Philoponus in Alexandria in the middle of the sixth century A.D. about the kosmopoiesis of the first chapter of Genesis. It is argued this treatise is the first evidence of Biblical exegesis led not according to Plato's "Timaeus" but according to Aristotelian corpus, specially "Physics" and "Organon". Philoponus rejects the allegorical method based upon demiurgic "Timaeus" since he thinks it is arbitrary and untrue compared with the Revelation literalism; therefore Philoponus passes the limit of Aristoboulos, of Philo's "De opificio mundi" and also the limit of Christian tradition of Hexaemerons (Fathers of the Church just like Cappadocians). Philoponus replaces allegorism with a new kind of Biblical literalism: not the trivializing one led by the school of Antioch (Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Cosmas Indicopleustes) but a scientific and methodic literalism relied on Aristotelian logic and on the (meta)physical concepts derived from Aristotle (kinesis, dynamis, hexis, hypokeimenon, etc.); so "De opificio mundi" has a syllogistic and deductive structure, not a mythic-allegorical one. Last philosopher in Late Antiquity, Philoponus is in-ventor of a striking Christian-Aristotelian scholasticism.
Menendez, Guillermo <1993>. „Giovanni Filopono: Cosmologia e il De Opificio Mundi“. Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/13045.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnagnostidou, Christina. „La physique de la création. Le De Opificio Mundi de Jean Philopon“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024UPSLP086.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleJohn Philoponus (c. 490 - 575 CE), an influential commentator on Aristotle and Christian thinker, holds an important place in the history of science and philosophy. Trained at the Neoplatonic school of Ammonius in Alexandria, Philoponus moved away from pagan philosophy to adopt and develop a creationist philosophical framework. This transition from an eternalist thought inherited from the Greek tradition to a Christian creationist perspective constitutes the apparent tension in his work.The main objective of this thesis is to examine how Philoponus integrates the principles of natural philosophy within a Christian theological framework, thus seeking to harmonize his principles with biblical revelation. Through the De Opificio Mundi, a commentary on the creation narrative in Genesis, Philoponus develops a cosmological system where creation ex nihilo and divine providence play a central role. This thesis explores how Philoponus articulates this synthesis.We follow the phases of creation outlined in the De Opificio Mundi, traditionally referred to as days. The thesis highlights the originality of Philoponus's project, which does not merely juxtapose Greek and Christian ideas but creates a truly unified system. The analysis shows that Aristotle's commentator proposes a continuous re-evaluation of Aristotelian principles in light of Christianity. Concepts inherited from the Hellenic tradition, such as the notion of motion, substrate, place, or the composition of celestial bodies, are adapted to fit a creationist framework. In this way, Philoponus resolves the discrepancies between these two traditions by transforming them into a coherent philosophical system.In summary, this thesis argues that Philoponus's work is not divided between a philosophical phase and a Christian phase. On the contrary, it reflects a continuity in his thought, where pagan cosmological doctrines are reinterpreted and integrated into a Christian theological framework
Scholten, Clemens. „Antike Naturphilosophie und christliche Kosmologie in der Schrift "De opificio mundi" des Johannes Philoponos“. Berlin ; New York : W. de Gruyter, 1996. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb35806864b.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "De opificio mundi"
Philoponus, John. De opificio mundi =: Über die Erschaffung der Welt. Freiburg: Herder, 1997.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFladerer, Ludwig. Johannes Philoponos De opificio mundi: Spätantikes Sprachdenken und christliche Exegese. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenOsmański, Marek. Logos i stworzenie: Filozoficzna interpretacja traktatu De opificio mundi Filona z Aleksandrii. Lublin: Red. Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 2001.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenFladerer, Ludwig. Johannes Philoponos: De Opificio Mundi. Vieweg Verlag, Friedr, & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2013.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenAnonyma. Joannis Philiponi de Opificio Mundi Libri VII. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2023.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenAnonyma. Joannis Philiponi de Opificio Mundi Libri VII. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2023.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenDecharneux, Baudouin S. Divine Powers in Philo of Alexandria’s De opificio mundi. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198767206.003.0008.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleJohannes Philoponos. de Opificio Mundi: Spätantikes Sprachdenken und Christliche Exegese. B. G.Teubner, 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenScholten, Clemens. Antike Naturphilosophie und Christliche Kosmologie in der Schrift de Opificio Mundi des Johannes Philoponos. de Gruyter GmbH, Walter, 2015.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenTheologicorum dogmatum tomus tertius. In quo de angelis, ac mundi opificio & ecclesiasticâ hierarchiâ disseritur. Alexandria, VA: Alexander Street Press, 2007.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "De opificio mundi"
Fladerer, Ludwig. „Die Hermeneutik in Philoponos’ de Opificio Mundi“. In Johannes Philoponos, 165–256. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14076-4_4.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMoreau, Jérôme. „Une première théologie de la création. Le De opificio mundi de Philon d’Alexandrie (1-37)“. In Science et exégèse, 65–78. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/m.behe-eb.4.01002.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMueller-Jourdan, Pascal. „Les conditions de l’avènement de la lumière dans le De Opificio mundi de Jean Philopon. Difficultés et solutions“. In Lectio, 271–309. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols Publishers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/m.lectio-eb.5.121509.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOttobrini, Tiziano F. „I Commentarii in Genesim di Procopio di Gaza e il De opificio mundi di Giovanni Filopono“. In Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia, 107–32. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols Publishers, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/m.ipm-eb.5.136516.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLongo, Angela. „Scienza e dimostrazione nel De opificio mundi di Giovanni Filopono“. In La Scienza e i suoi Strumenti nell’Antichità e nel Medioevo, 183–204. Academia – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783985721207-183.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMATUSOVA, EKATERINA. „GENESIS 1–2 IN DE OPIFICIO MUNDI AND ITS EXEGETICAL CONTEXT“. In The Studia Philonica Annual XXXI, 2019, 57–94. SBL Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrs8z2c.6.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBuch-Hansen, Gitte. „Early Conceptions of Original Sin: Reading Galatians through Philo’s De Opificio Mundi“. In Paul and the Greco-Roman Philosophical Tradition. Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567678362.ch-011.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWorthington, Jonathan. „Gendered Exegesis of Creation in Philo (De Opificio Mundi) and Paul (1 Corinthians)“. In Paul and the Greco-Roman Philosophical Tradition. Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567678362.ch-010.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Different Traditions or Emphases? The Image of God in Philo’s De Opificio Mundi“. In New Approaches to the Study of Biblical Interpretation in Judaism of the Second Temple Period and in Early Christianity, 41–56. BRILL, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004245006_004.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle„Philo’s Bridge to Perfection: De opificio mundi and the End of the Self“. In Ontological Aspects of Early Jewish Anthropology, 68–102. BRILL, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004336414_004.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle