Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Cotesia rubecula Physiology“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Cotesia rubecula Physiology" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Cotesia rubecula Physiology":

1

Godin, Claude, und Guy Boivin. „OCCURRENCE OF COTESIA RUBECULA (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) IN QUEBEC, 30 YEARS AFTER ITS INTRODUCTION IN NORTH AMERICA“. Canadian Entomologist 130, Nr. 5 (Oktober 1998): 733–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/ent130733-5.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
During a study on the parasitoids of the imported cabbageworm, Artogeia rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), undertaken in 1993 and 1994, we recovered Cotesia rubecula (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for the first time in Quebec, Canada. Samples were taken from pesticide-free plots of cabbage, broccoli, and Brussels sprouts located at Ste-Clotilde (45°09′N, 73°41′W) and L'Acadie, Quebec (45°18′N, 73°21′W), as described by Godin and Boivin (1998). In addition, survival of diapausing C. rubecula was evaluated after a 5-month incubation at 4°C (Godin 1997). Both A. rapae and C. rubecula are introduced species and originate most likely from Europe (Richards 1940). Artogeia rapae was discovered in 1860 in Quebec (Harcourt 1963), and C. rubecula was first reported in 1963 in British Columbia (Wilkinson 1966).
2

Asgari, Sassan, und Otto Schmidt. „Passive protection of eggs from the parasitoid, Cotesia rubecula, in the host, Pieris rapae“. Journal of Insect Physiology 40, Nr. 9 (September 1994): 789–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(94)90008-6.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Nealis, Vincent. „DIAPAUSE AND THE SEASONAL ECOLOGY OF THE INTRODUCED PARASITE, COTESIA (APANTELES) RUBECULA (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE)“. Canadian Entomologist 117, Nr. 3 (März 1985): 333–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/ent117333-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
AbstractThe insect parasite Cotesia rubecula (Marshall) shows a long-day, photoperiodic response that results in diapause in the eonymph. Within the region of the critical photoperiod, the diapause response is modified by temperature and by the duration of the developmental period of the larval parasite, but in field populations in Vancouver, diapause is predominantly a response to short photoperiods. There is evidence that the parasite's response is largely independent of the host's response. Once diapause is induced, there is an obligatory dormant period of at least 2 months after which diapause terminates when specific-heat requirements are fulfilled. The estimated heat requirements are used to predict the date of diapause termination and the emergence of parasite adults in the field. Parasite activity begins almost 6 weeks after that of its host.The critical photoperiod for populations in Vancouver, Canada, lies between 15- and 16-h photophase but in Canberra, Australia, the critical photoperiod is less than 13 h. The significance of this difference in the diapause response of the 2 introduced populations is discussed and recommendations are made for further biocontrol efforts.
4

Wäckers, F. L. „The effect of food deprivation on the innate visual and olfactory preferences in the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula“. Journal of Insect Physiology 40, Nr. 8 (August 1994): 641–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(94)90091-4.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Asgari, Sassan, und Otto Schmidt. „Isolation of an imaginal disc growth factor homologue from Pieris rapae and its expression following parasitization by Cotesia rubecula“. Journal of Insect Physiology 50, Nr. 8 (August 2004): 687–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.05.003.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Harvey, Jeffrey A., Mark A. Jervis, Rieta Gols, Nanqing Jiang und Louise E. M. Vet. „Development of the parasitoid, Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Pieris rapae and Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): evidence for host regulation“. Journal of Insect Physiology 45, Nr. 2 (Februar 1999): 173–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(98)00113-9.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

KAISER, L., und R. T. CARDE. „In-flight orientation to volatiles from the plant-host complex in Cotesia rubecula (Hym.: Braconidae): increased sensitivity through olfactory experience“. Physiological Entomology 17, Nr. 1 (März 1992): 62–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1992.tb00990.x.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Van Oosten, Vivian R., Natacha Bodenhausen, Philippe Reymond, Johan A. Van Pelt, L. C. Van Loon, Marcel Dicke und Corné M. J. Pieterse. „Differential Effectiveness of Microbially Induced Resistance Against Herbivorous Insects in Arabidopsis“. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® 21, Nr. 7 (Juli 2008): 919–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-21-7-0919.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Rhizobacteria–induced systemic resistance (ISR) and pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR) have a broad, yet partly distinct, range of effectiveness against pathogenic microorganisms. Here, we investigated the effectiveness of ISR and SAR in Arabidopsis against the tissue-chewing insects Pieris rapae and Spodoptera exigua. Resistance against insects consists of direct defense, such as the production of toxins and feeding deterrents and indirect defense such as the production of plant volatiles that attract carnivorous enemies of the herbivores. Wind-tunnel experiments revealed that ISR and SAR did not affect herbivore-induced attraction of the parasitic wasp Cotesia rubecula (indirect defense). By contrast, ISR and SAR significantly reduced growth and development of the generalist herbivore S. exigua, although not that of the specialist P. rapae. This enhanced direct defense against S. exigua was associated with potentiated expression of the defense-related genes PDF1.2 and HEL. Expression profiling using a dedicated cDNA microarray revealed four additional, differentially primed genes in microbially induced S. exigua-challenged plants, three of which encode a lipid-transfer protein. Together, these results indicate that microbially induced plants are differentially primed for enhanced insect-responsive gene expression that is associated with increased direct defense against the generalist S. exigua but not against the specialist P. rapae.

Dissertationen zum Thema "Cotesia rubecula Physiology":

1

Siekmann, Gitta. „Food foraging in adult parasitoid Cotesia rubecula : how sugar sources contribute to survival and reproduction“. Title page, contents and abstract only, 2002. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phs5715.pdf.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Bibliography: leaves 133-148. Examines sugar foraging in the field by adult female parasitoid wasp, Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), to determine its effect on fecundity and lifespan. In the field, the area in which wasps search for sugar is likely to depend on the degree of association of hosts with nectar or honeydew, supporting the hypothesis that sugar encounters in the field happen opportunistically during host foraging activities. The survival gained by sugar feeding my often be severely limited by quality and quantity of sugary food and extrinsic mortality factors such as adverse weather conditions and predation, so the need for food must be studied in relation to a species' adaptation to its environment. Concentrations of sugar sources may distract wasps from host-foraging when the density of hosts is low. This has implications for flower propagation in agro-ecosystems with a view to supporting natural enemies of insect pests.
2

Siekmann, Gitta. „Food foraging in adult parasitoid Cotesia rubecula : how sugar sources contribute to survival and reproduction / by Gitta Siekmann“. Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/21760.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Annotation:
Bibliography: leaves 133-148.
xii, 148 leaves : ill. ; 30 cm.
Examines sugar foraging in the field by adult female parasitoid wasp, Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), to determine its effect on fecundity and lifespan. In the field, the area in which wasps search for sugar is likely to depend on the degree of association of hosts with nectar or honeydew, supporting the hypothesis that sugar encounters in the field happen opportunistically during host foraging activities. The survival gained by sugar feeding my often be severely limited by quality and quantity of sugary food and extrinsic mortality factors such as adverse weather conditions and predation, so the need for food must be studied in relation to a species' adaptation to its environment. Concentrations of sugar sources may distract wasps from host-foraging when the density of hosts is low. This has implications for flower propagation in agro-ecosystems with a view to supporting natural enemies of insect pests.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Applied & Molecular Ecology, 2002

Zur Bibliographie