Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Confusion de patrimoine“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Confusion de patrimoine" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Confusion de patrimoine"
Vlad, Petra. „Du lien ambigu entre Monument et Patrimoine“. CaieteARA. Arhitectură. Restaurare. Arheologie, Nr. 9 (2018): 209–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.47950/caieteara.2018.9.12.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePoulot, Dominique. „Le sens du patrimoine : hier et aujourd'hui (note critique)“. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 48, Nr. 6 (Dezember 1993): 1601–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1993.279233.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleRubio Díaz, Alfredo. „Más allá de los contenidos: pensar el patrimonio. Hipótesis e ideas“. Boletín de Arte, Nr. 17 (09.06.2022): 107–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/bolarte.1996.vi17.14858.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNavarro Halanocca, René. „Incidencia de la relación tradición-modernidad en la protección y conservación del Centro Histórico de la ciudad de Cusco“. Devenir - Revista de estudios sobre patrimonio edificado 1, Nr. 1 (13.08.2018): 11–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.21754/devenir.v1i1.235.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAguilar Meza, Trinidad. „Uso de materiales en la conservación y restauración arqueológica del Cusicancha - Cusco“. Devenir - Revista de estudios sobre patrimonio edificado 1, Nr. 1 (13.08.2018): 69–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.21754/devenir.v1i1.238.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTorsello, Paolo B. „Restauración e Historia: ¿Conflicto de intereses?“ Loggia, Arquitectura & Restauración, Nr. 19 (17.12.2006): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/loggia.2006.3391.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFernández Salinas, Víctor. „Hacia un reconocimiento territorial conjunto de las listas representativas patrimoniales de la Unesco.“ erph_ Revista electrónica de Patrimonio Histórico, Nr. 32 (05.10.2023): 1–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/erph.32.2023.28830.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSánchez Navarro, Ángel J. „Pluralismo e inmersión lingüística: el caso francés. (Anotaciones sobre la decisión del Consejo Constitucional Francés-Décision n.º 2021-818 DC, de 21 de mayo de 2021)“. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, Nr. 49 (13.05.2022): 365–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/trc.49.2022.33854.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePaez Gutierrez, Mirta Citlali, Luz Lilian Beltran Gomez, José Francisco Haro Beas und Alejandro Toledo Ortega. „Problemas que enfrentan las empresas familiares en el proceso de sucesión en el Estado de Nayarit“. EDUCATECONCIENCIA 17, Nr. 18 (31.03.2018): 131–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.58299/edu.v17i18.125.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleUlla Lorenzo, Alejandra, und Paula Casariego Castiñeira. „Sobre falsas atribuciones y duplicidad de títulos en el teatro calderoniano: "Haz bien y guárdate" o "La confusión de un jardín"“. Studia Aurea 16 (31.12.2022): 229–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/studiaaurea.508.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Confusion de patrimoine"
Gulotta, Isabelle. „La confusion des patrimoines en droit commercial“. Paris 13, 1989. http://www.theses.fr/1989PA131015.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleConfusion of estates is the interpenetration between several estates, of which at least one is attached to a natural person doing business or to a company. The first part of this thesis deals with how confusion of estates is characterized and which facts are considered by french magistrates to establish confusion between the estates of companies or between estates of which one at least is attached to a natural person. Its second part deals with the action for confusion of estates, i. E. With the rules of case law permitting for instance that proceedings for reorganization ("redressement judiciaire") or bankruptcy ("liquidation judiciaire") filed against one debtor be extended to such other person who deliberately created confusion between his own estate and that of the said debtor
Bézert, Adrien. „Les effets de l'extension de la procédure collective pour confusion des patrimoines“. Thesis, Montpellier, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017MONTD051.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleExtending a collective insolvency procedure in the case of estate compels a number of debtors to comply with a unique collective procedure. Recent reforms have deeply modified the nature of this mechanism: for a long time perceived as a sanction, it is now used as a simple tool for restructuring, and to an extent a tool for protection. Its consequences were once dreaded, whereas now they are coveted. This thesis enhances the complementarity that exists between the latter when dealing with situations of estate confusion and offers several solutions enabling foreseeability. Furthermore, it opens up to several lines of thoughts that can correlate cases when resorting to this mechanism to the particularly original effects generated by the latter
Kouassi, Koffi Samir Rehmann. „L'extension d 'une procédure collective“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOUL0130.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe extension of a collective procedure is a jurisprudential creation enshrined in the law on the protection of companies of 26 July 2005. Its objective is to artificially reconstitute the debtor's prepared assets. Thus, it will consist in extending the initial collective procedure to one or more natural or legal persons. The extension of collective proceedings is of considerable benefit to the debtor insofar as it will offer him more possibilities and means to solve his difficulties as well as possible. The same applies to the creditor who will see the debtor's assets combined with those of a third party.Its legal basis is Article L. 621-2 of the French Commercial Code. It provides that the court must characterize the existence of a Confusion of patrimony or fictitious nature before pronouncing a judgment extending collective proceedings. Case law contributes significantly to the legislative evolution of the extension of collective proceedings. Despite the codification of this procedure, case law is omnipresent. This role is explained by the fact that the legislator gives the judge the power to interpret and assess the extension of collective proceedings, on the basis of its two causes, namely confusion of assets and fictitious acts. What is the discretion left to the judge? This is the latter's interpretation of the existence of fictitious or confusing assets. Thus, therefore, in order to pronounce an extension of collective proceedings on the basis of the Confusion of Assets, the judge must necessarily characterise the existence of abnormal financial relations or the inextricable interweaving of assets, namely that of the principal debtor and that of the person or persons to whom he would like to extend the collective proceedings.The assessment of the fictitious nature of the legal person is the least frequent case but remains the most complex to determine. Judges have a heavy responsibility to detect the fictitious nature of a legal person and most often encounter the various financial arrangements established within corporate groups.The need not to look for whether the confusion of assets between two natural or legal persons has caused prejudice to the principal debtor in order to extend his collective proceedings. This legislative framework shows that judges are free to extend collective proceedings, taking into account the fact that their decision is rigorously reviewed by the Court of Cassation. In addition, in view of the divergent interests of the debtor and the creditor, but also because of the impact of decisions to extend collective proceedings on the economic life of these two categories of persons, decisions ordering the extension of collective proceedings are subject to rigorous control by the Court of Cassation.However, while there are many advantages to this procedure, the fact remains that, in terms of its practice, some reforms could improve it
Cambier, Anne-Bénédicte. „La confusion des patrimoines et les sociétés civiles immobilières“. Lille 2, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005LIL20002.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIt is not uncommon for a commercial company to operate from premises rented from an SCI which has the same executives as itself and financial ties. The creditors of a commercial company undergoing liquidation proceedings may therefore try to lay their hands on an SCI's assets in order to be paid. They will thus invoke in court the indistinctness of the two companies' assets and call for the legal action taken against the commercial company to be extended to the SCI, in order for both companies''assets to be answerable for liabilities. The courts however fiercely defend the legal autonomy of companies. They maintain that as long as companies have had independent activities, and their own assets and liabilities, the existence of a single economic unit does not suffice to prove combined assets. Judges are also very reluctant to pronounce as fictive an SCI whose aim is to acquire premises for the company it belongs to. The merging of several companies' assets is only accepted in extremely restrictive conditions. As far as the courts are concerned, there are two revealing criteria : joint accounts and unusual financial dealings between companies. In the first instance, it cannot be clearly indentified to which company a specific asset or debt belongs. The second instance is characterised by the transfer of funds from one company to another without countepart entries. In the case of an SCI / commercial company partnership, unusual financial dealings are mainly taken into account
Reille, Florence. „La notion de confusion des patrimoines, cause d'extension des procédures collectives“. Montpellier 1, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005MON10051.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleN'Takpé, Adjoua Marie-Hortense. „La société anonyme unipersonnelle en droit OHADA : étude critique“. Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0097.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe one-person limited company under the OHADA LAW has seen itslegal regime being defined with reference to the regime of the multi-persons limited company,with minimum adaptations. In fact the one-person character of the Limited company gives it a certain peculiarity that renders inappropriate the pure and simple transportation of rules of the multi-person limited company model. Besides the difficulty of implementation that it oftenentails, the technique of referring leaves unresolved many questions raised by the one-personlimited company model. The legal regime of the one-person limited company as a whole thatarises is insufficiently adapted to the unique shareholder.An adaptation of the one-person limited company legal regime of the OHADA LAWto the particularity of the one-person thus becomes necessary. It has to be undertaken underthe simplification of rules, on the one hand with regards to the company, through rules relatedto its constitution and its evolution, on the other hand, with respect to the actors that are thesole shareholders, administrative and control bodies
Ossouma-Efame, Everick. „Le rôle de la cessation des paiements dans la prévention et le traitement des difficultés des entreprises“. Thesis, Toulon, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015TOUL0090.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCessation of payments is certainly one of the key concepts in the law on collective insolvency proceedings. This can be seen by checking the litigation, which is very abundant in this matter. Legally defined in the first paragraph of Article L. 631-1 of the Commercial Code as the inability of a debtor to meet its accrued liabilities with its quick assets, this definition originated in a decision of the Court of Cassation issued on February 14, 1978. Under the provisions prior to the insolvency act, cessation of payments is a "cursor" which serves as a line of demarcation between amicable proceedings and judicial proceedings. Such a system has been criticized for being sorely lacking in flexibility and effectiveness in preventing business failures. The law of July 26, 2005, with the objective of anticipating treatment of company difficulties, put an end to the "cessation-cursor" by instituting the amicable conciliation proceeding and the collective insolvency proceeding. However, when the "barriers" formed by the anticipation tools have not been able to halt the risk of cessation of payments, the company director in such a situation must, within a period of forty-five days, request the initiation of a receivership or court-supervised liquidation proceeding. When either of these proceedings is initiated, the court must fix a date of cessation of payments. This date will be final for the determination of the suspect period. Moreover, the initiation of collective insolvency proceedings will have an effect on the enterprise fighting for survival, on the creditors whose ability to collect their debt is threatened, on the suppliers worried about their contractual relations with the debtor, on the guarantors who fear being called upon and on the debtor itself. Prior management of the enterprise will be probed and if faults more or less closely connected to the cessation of payments are revealed, sanctions or tort actions may result
Ossouma-Efame, Everick. „Le rôle de la cessation des paiements dans la prévention et le traitement des difficultés des entreprises“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015TOUL0090.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCessation of payments is certainly one of the key concepts in the law on collective insolvency proceedings. This can be seen by checking the litigation, which is very abundant in this matter. Legally defined in the first paragraph of Article L. 631-1 of the Commercial Code as the inability of a debtor to meet its accrued liabilities with its quick assets, this definition originated in a decision of the Court of Cassation issued on February 14, 1978. Under the provisions prior to the insolvency act, cessation of payments is a "cursor" which serves as a line of demarcation between amicable proceedings and judicial proceedings. Such a system has been criticized for being sorely lacking in flexibility and effectiveness in preventing business failures. The law of July 26, 2005, with the objective of anticipating treatment of company difficulties, put an end to the "cessation-cursor" by instituting the amicable conciliation proceeding and the collective insolvency proceeding. However, when the "barriers" formed by the anticipation tools have not been able to halt the risk of cessation of payments, the company director in such a situation must, within a period of forty-five days, request the initiation of a receivership or court-supervised liquidation proceeding. When either of these proceedings is initiated, the court must fix a date of cessation of payments. This date will be final for the determination of the suspect period. Moreover, the initiation of collective insolvency proceedings will have an effect on the enterprise fighting for survival, on the creditors whose ability to collect their debt is threatened, on the suppliers worried about their contractual relations with the debtor, on the guarantors who fear being called upon and on the debtor itself. Prior management of the enterprise will be probed and if faults more or less closely connected to the cessation of payments are revealed, sanctions or tort actions may result
Truong, Thuong. „La responsabilité des associés des sociétés commerciales“. Thesis, Paris 2, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020051.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe liability of shareholders is a notion not often referred to in coursebook. In in bonis companies, and in the case of external relationships, the shareholder personal liability could be engaged for ‘ fault detachable’. However, the principle of a commitment to personal liability on the part of shareholders in relations with third parties is contested, due to the essentially internal nature of their activity In a collective procedure, the non-liability of the parent company for the acts of their subsidiary is challenged. The development of this challenge is facilitated by powerful weapons of the repressive arsenal, weapons to be used in a highly derogatory environment of collective procedures. There is an aggravating trend in the parent company responsibility, particularly in regard to social and environmental domains. The search for a better protection of the victims pushes the legislator to legislate on isolated problematic issues, distilling the irreversible character of partial and specific solutions, and thus forcing the passage towards the establishment of a presumption of liability of the parent company for the acts of their subsidiary. However, there is a large and effective repressive arsenal, and there are avenues to limit the parent company’s liability while involving them in their subsidiary problems
Bücher zum Thema "Confusion de patrimoine"
Reille, Florence. La notion de confusion des patrimoines, cause d'extension des procédures collectives. Paris: Litec, 2007.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Confusion de patrimoine"
Fayard, Dominique, und Anne-Line Brosse. „La multiplicité des démarches de labellisation dans un même territoire : opportunité ou confusion patrimoniale ?“ In Les labels dans le domaine du patrimoine culturel et naturel, 401–10. Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/pur.priet.2020.01.0401.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMalumian, Nicolas. „Colombia“. In Trusts in Latin America, 167–80. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195388213.003.0011.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle