Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Collaboration.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Collaboration“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Collaboration" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Irving, Gemma Louise, Oluremi B. Ayoko und Neal M. Ashkanasy. „Collaboration, Physical Proximity and Serendipitous Encounters: Avoiding collaboration in a collaborative building“. Organization Studies 41, Nr. 8 (27.06.2019): 1123–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840619856913.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Despite the adoption of collaborative buildings and office spaces to improve collaboration, the expected benefits of spatial interventions often fail to materialize. In a study of an ostensibly ‘collaborative building’, we identified strategies that employees use to avoid collaborating (i.e. ‘focusing on existing collaborations’, ‘reinforcing group boundaries’, ‘enacting legacy policies’ and ‘minimizing social interactions’). These strategies combined to minimize serendipitous encounters, which led to the avoidance of new collaborations. Our findings address a theoretical tension in the literature as to whether proximity facilitates or inhibits collaboration. We also show that, while it is often difficult to facilitate serendipitous encounters in an ostensibly collaborative building, serendipity nonetheless plays a central role in the development of new collaborative partnerships.
2
Reed, Adam. „Games of Collaboration“. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 48, Nr. 2 (10.05.2024): 27–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.30676/jfas.138367.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper looks at the theme of collaboration through the prism of game design, and especially the example of serious games. At its heart, this is a consideration of two collaborative projects between experts. The first is a current collaboration between computer scientists, game designers, and a theatre company in Scotland, in which the author is also a collaborator and the project’s ethnographer. The second is perhaps the largest and most high-profile collaborative project recently led and documented by anthropologists, Meridian 180, which aims to experiment with the norms of collaboration itself, and which has already been theorised and extensively reflected upon by one of its founders, Annelise Riles. The paper aims to put these two collaborations into some kind of conversation in order to throw each into productive relief and to ask some new questions about how we think about both the exercise of collaboration and the deliberate subversion of its norms. Keywords: collaboration, serious games, co-operation, experts, rules, friendship
3
Perkins, Rachel, und Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore. „Friend or foe: Challenges to collaboration success at different lifecycle stages for regional small tourism firms in Australia“. Tourism and Hospitality Research 20, Nr. 2 (26.03.2019): 184–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1467358419836719.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Small tourism businesses are essential to Australia’s economy and development, particularly in regional and rural areas, where a majority of these firms are located. It is important to understand the operation of regional small tourism business, to create strategies for their sustained success into the future. This research paper explores collaboration as an operation of small tourism businesses, by understanding the extent to which small tourism firms face challenges in collaborating at different stages of their business life cycle, and how these challenges to collaboration can be overcome. Collaboration is the selected concept examined within this study as it exposes businesses to shared knowledge, resources, marketing, and capabilities, which these businesses alone would not typically possess. To understand this further, reponses about collaborative behavior were gathered from 24 small tourism operators/managers from The Granite Belt region in South-East Queensland, Australia. Tourism operators recognized several hindrances to successful collaboration: (1) a limited understanding of what collaboration is and how it can be enacted, (2) the informal nature of current collaborations, (3) unbalanced efforts from stakeholders within the collaborations, (4) competition between stakeholders, (5) differing opinions of collaborating businesses, and (6) perceived failure or misdirected leadership from local governing bodies. Using these challenges, a framework was developed that makes recommendations to tourism scholars, organizations, operators, and local councils on how to overcome these hindrances by improving communication, formalizing selected collaborative efforts, and reporting on collaborations.
4
Lotia, Nuzhat. „Power Dynamics and Learning in Collaborations“. Journal of Management & Organization 10, Nr. 2 (Januar 2004): 56–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s183336720000451x.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ABSTRACTThis paper examines the learning process within collaborations from a political perspective and explores the implications of power for the process of learning. The central argument is that the processes of collaboration and collaborative learning are inherently influenced by dynamics of power that occur at the organisational, collaboration and collaboration-environment levels. These power dynamics develop as a consequence of the interactions among collaborating organisations and their power bases. The paper presents a theoretical basis for considering the nature and impact of power dynamics at the various levels on the collaborative learning process and outcomes and sets forth some propositions that provide an agenda for future research.
5
Lotia, Nuzhat. „Power Dynamics and Learning in Collaborations“. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 10, Nr. 2 (Januar 2004): 56–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2004.10.2.56.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
ABSTRACTThis paper examines the learning process within collaborations from a political perspective and explores the implications of power for the process of learning. The central argument is that the processes of collaboration and collaborative learning are inherently influenced by dynamics of power that occur at the organisational, collaboration and collaboration-environment levels. These power dynamics develop as a consequence of the interactions among collaborating organisations and their power bases. The paper presents a theoretical basis for considering the nature and impact of power dynamics at the various levels on the collaborative learning process and outcomes and sets forth some propositions that provide an agenda for future research.
6
Appleton, Nayantara Sheoran, und Lorena Gibson. „Introduction: Labours of Collaboration“. Commoning Ethnography 2, Nr. 1 (19.12.2019): 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/ce.v2i1.6256.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The four pieces in this section are innovative collaborations at various levels, ranging from anthropologists collaborating with communities to collaborative presentations as a way to subvert hierarchies and Euro-centric modes of being with/in academia. These papers engage with the relationship between collaboration and commoning, some explicitly and others implicitly, as ways to shape knowledge production and practice for a much more egalitarian ethnographic engagement within and beyond the academy. In this Special Section of Volume 2 of Commoning Ethnography, we share four papers that engage with the changing nature of ethnographic collaboration on multiple levels.
7
Huang, Yuan, Weixi Han und Douglas K. Macbeth. „The complexity of collaboration in supply chain networks“. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 25, Nr. 3 (08.01.2020): 393–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/scm-11-2018-0382.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the complexity of collaborations in supply chain networks, particularly the influence of horizontal collaborations (e.g. international joint ventures) on vertical collaborations (e.g. supplier–manufacturer partnering relationships). Design/methodology/approach A multiple case study including four horizontal collaborations and five vertical collaborations within a supply chain network is presented in the context of the Chinese automotive industry. Data interpretation from interviews is structured by key collaborative activities and collaborative behaviors. Findings The analysis highlights a variety of collaborative behaviors under different types of collaboration and their interaction. The complexity of collaboration is revealed in a range of dimensions including culture diversity, drivers/facilitators, competitive/collaborative advantages and the engagement of all. Collaboration evolves as the structure of the supply chain changes; the key is to appreciate the existence of cooperation, competition and culture conflicts and to manage the trade-offs. Research limitations/implications A window of opportunity is presented for future research to investigate the complexity of supply chain collaboration in a wider industrial or geographical context, including statistical validation and comparative analysis. Practical implications A contingent view on supply chain collaboration is promoted to practitioners (e.g. international supply chain managers), where collaborative activities should be aligned with the motive and type of business relationships which may change as collaboration develops. Originality/value A rare empirical study captures the complexity of supply chain collaboration including the interaction between different forms. A dynamic collaboration approach recognizes the changing process, varying cooperation behaviors as well as characteristics of partners which have not been sufficiently reflected in the literature.
8
Olszewski, BS, Corey, und Laura Siebeneck, PhD. „Emergency management collaboration: A review and new collaboration cycle“. Journal of Emergency Management 19, Nr. 1 (01.01.2021): 57–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/jem.0514.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objective: The purpose of this article is to review the nature of collaborations in the field of emergency management and to propose a new cyclical framework that better reflects how collaborations form, function, and evolve throughout the collaboration process. Design: An extensive review of previous literature pertaining to the collaborative process was carried out in order to identify stages through which these collaborative relationships progress in the emergency management arena.Setting: This article focuses on the nature of emergency management collaborations at the local, state, and federal levels in the United States. Results: This article builds upon the previous literature pertaining to collaboration and offers a new framework which visualizes collaboration as a trust-building and outcome cycle which moves through four repeating phases: initiation, inclusion, execution, and evaluation.Conclusions: This cycle supports the continuous, sustained, and safe learning and sharing platform identified in the previous literature and offers an improved visualization that can be used to better prepare for, manage, and reset emergency management collaborations.
9
NoboaU, Carlamarie, Mariela Lugo Picó, Luisa Morales und Vicmag Cabrera. „181 Mapping Translational Research Collaborations: Insights from an IDeA Clinical and Translational Research Center“. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 8, s1 (April 2024): 54–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.172.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Policy makers are interested in understanding scientific collaborations that translate knowledge into population health. The objective of this study is to compare the translational research collaboration of the Hispanic Alliance of Clinical and Translational Research in 2020 and 2023 by using Social Network Analysis (SNA). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a systematic document review of all the Hispanic Alliance Calls for Pilot Projects from 2020 to 2023 including key attributes of the investigators and collaborators such as academic institution, highest degree, and collaborator type. Scientific collaboration was defined as two or more researchers working together in grant proposal for a pilot project application. Study data was recorded and tracked using an Excel spreadsheet. R Statistical software was used to analyze and map the networks resulting from collaboration interactions comparing the 2020 Call and 2023 Call. Network statistics were performed including nodes, isolates, edges, components, density, diameter, average degree, and the size of the main component. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 134 investigators comprised the overall network. The network are predominantly clinician (49.3%) and basic researchers (25.4%). Preliminary results shows that diversity of disciplines and affiliations in the collaborative relationships increased across time. Findings demonstrated that the number of nodes/actors increased from 16 to 65 comparing 2020 to 2023 and the edges/relationships from 12 to 53. The number of translational research cluster increased from 4 to 13 comparing 2020 to 2023. More extensive collaborative cluster occurred across time with over 15 researchers collaborating. A mentor was the key player connecting these research clusters. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides critical data to mapping the IDeA CTR translational research collaboration patterns. Research collaboration increased across time. This innovative approach serves to foster data-driven decision-making to enhance collaboration, diversity, and program outcomes. It offers valuable insights for policy and practice.
10
Shi, Xuan, Lingfei Cai und Junzhi Jia. „The Evolution of International Scientific Collaboration in Fuel Cells during 1998–2017: A Social Network Perspective“. Sustainability 10, Nr. 12 (15.12.2018): 4790. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124790.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
International scientific collaboration has played an important role in the development of fuel cell technology. In this paper, we employ bibliometric methods and social network analysis to explore the patterns and dynamics of scientific collaboration network of fuel cells. A total of 20,358 international collaborative publications in the fuel cell field published during 1998–2017 were collected from Web of Science. We use a series of indicators to address multiple facets of research collaboration and evolution patterns. Results show that international collaboration has been increasing and the characteristics of the scientific network have changed over time. The collaboration network presented a highly uneven distribution, while the sign of decline began to show. The trend of consolidation was presented with one cluster around North America–Asia, one around Europe, and a small emerging collaborating cluster around West Asia. European and North American countries had relatively higher international collaboration rate than Asian countries but lower publishing volume. Two modes of international collaboration exist: Germany, France and UK collaborate with a wide range of countries, while Singapore, Australia, South Korea and Taiwan concentrate on collaborating with few main countries. Microbial fuel cell had developed as a new prominent area in the international collaboration, and the most popular catalysts were nanoparticle and graphene/carbon nanotubes. This study presents a picture of international collaboration from multi-dimension view and provides insights in facilitating more vigorous collaborations in fuel cells.
11
Demeyère, Caroline. „Construire un paradigme d’action publique post-NPM : approche ethnographique d’une collaboration gouvernements-associations“. Gestion et management public Volume 11 / N° 1, Nr. 1 (20.07.2023): 71–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/gmp.111.0071.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Les aspirations à l’émergence d’un modèle d’action publique post-New Public Management (NPM) sont nombreuses et plurielles. Le nouveau paradigme serait fondé sur la promotion d’une logique de réseau collaboratif, qui s’ajoute à la logique hiérarchique associée à l’administration publique traditionnelle et à la logique de marché associé au NPM. Le développement de collaborations entre associations et acteurs gouvernementaux est stratégique pour le dépassement du NPM, mais elles sont difficiles à mettre en œuvre. Les littératures sur la transformation des modèles d’action publique et la collaboration intersecteurs se sont peu intéressées aux acteurs dans la construction de la collaboration et à la mise en lien de ce niveau micro à l’émergence d’un paradigme post-NPM. Cet article propose de comprendre comment les acteurs publics et associatifs se représentent la logique de réseau collaboratif sous-jacente au dépassement du NPM et s’organisent pour la mettre en œuvre. La collaboration gouvernements-associations est envisagée comme un processus en cours conduit par des acteurs impliqués dans un changement institutionnel : la transformation de leurs relations et de l’organisation de l’action publique vers des modalités collaboratives. La méthodologie adoptée est une ethnographie (2018-2020) d’une collaboration en cours entre des acteurs gouvernementaux et des associations. La collaboration étudiée a pour objet la transformation de l’organisation des politiques publiques régionales d’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes vers un fonctionnement en réseau et une participation extensive des associations du territoire. Les résultats montrent que les représentations du réseau collaboratif, de son articulation aux autres logiques de régulation et de la distribution des responsabilités dans sa mise en œuvre diffèrent en fonction de l’appartenance sectorielle des acteurs. Alors que les acteurs gouvernementaux intègrent l’incompatibilité et l’illégitimité de l’exercice de leur autorité hiérarchique dans la collaboration, les associations sont en demande d’une collaboration mandatée hiérarchiquement s’opposant à la logique de marché. La non-reconnaissance dans la structure collaborative de ces visions différentes de la collaboration et l’absence de soutien hiérarchique aux règles de la collaboration empêchent la construction d’une vision commune. Les conflits restent larvés, mais la méfiance des associations envers les partenaires publics croît. La collaboration s’essouffle mais se poursuit grâce à un effet de cliquet collaboratif permis par la hiérarchie. L’article propose une contribution théorique à l’analyse du modèle émergent post-NPM en mettant en lumière les représentations différentes du réseau collaboratif et de sa mise en œuvre. Il souligne la nécessité de déplacer le débat de la légitimité de l’autorité hiérarchique des acteurs publics dans les réseaux collaboratifs aux modalités d’exercice légitimes et éthiques de la hiérarchie dans la collaboration. Il offre une étude empirique sur les transformations des paradigmes du management public via une méthodologie ethnographique originale. Il contribue à soutenir les praticiens souhaitant construire la collaboration en éclairant les représentations et attentes mutuelles des partenaires et en identifiant les conditions d’exercice légitimes de la hiérarchie à des fins collaboratives.
12
Wang, Xiaoguang, Tao Lv und Donald Hamerly. „How do altmetric sources evaluate scientific collaboration? An empirical investigation for Chinese collaboration publications“. Library Hi Tech 38, Nr. 3 (27.11.2019): 563–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2019-0101.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights on the improvement of academic impact and social attention of Chinese collaboration articles from the perspective of altmetrics. Design/methodology/approach The authors retrieved articles which are from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and indexed by Nature Index as sampled articles. With the methods of distribution analysis, comparative analysis and correlation analysis, authors compare the coverage differences of altmetric sources for CAS Chinese articles and CAS international articles, and analyze the correlation between the collaborative information and the altmetric indicators. Findings Results show that the coverage of altmetric sources for CAS international articles is greater than that for CAS Chinese articles. Mendeley and Twitter cover a higher percentage of collaborative articles than other sources studied. Collaborative information, such as number of collaborating countries, number of collaborating institutions, and number of collaborating authors, show moderate or low correlation with altmetric indicator counts. Mendeley readership has a moderate correlation with altmetric indicators like tweets, news outlets and blog posts. Practical implications International scientific collaboration at different levels improves attention, academic impact and social impact of articles. International collaboration and altmetrics indicators supplement each other. The results of this study can help us better understand the relationship between altmetrics indicators of articles and collaborative information of articles. It is of great significance to evaluate the influence of Chinese articles, as well as help to improve the academic impact and social attention of Chinese collaboration articles. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, few studies focus on the use of altmetrics to assess publications produced through Chinese academic collaboration. This study is one of a few attempts that include the number of collaborating countries, number of collaborating institutions, and number of collaborating authors of scientific collaboration into the discussion of altmetric indicators and figured out the relationship among them.
13
Bennett, PhD, CTRS, Jessie L., Jennifer Ann Piatt, PhD, CTRS, Jasmine Townsend, PhD, CTRS und Jenn Taylor, MS, CTRS. „If you don't measure it, you won't improve it: The advancement of recreational therapy through collaborative research“. American Journal of Recreation Therapy 16, Nr. 3 (17.11.2017): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.2017.0136.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The purpose of this article is to describe the impact collaboration between recreational therapy (RT) researchers and practitioners can have on clinical outcomes and evidence-based practice. Although collaboration is not a new concept, few individuals develop partnerships designed to measure the clinical outcomes associated with RT. The primary reason collaborations are not developed is due to misconceptions from both the researcher and the practitioner on how the collaborative research process impacts direct client care. Furthermore, budget cuts, lack of time, and limited resources can make it challenging for successful collaborations to develop. This article will define collaboration, identify how collaborative partnerships advance the development of clinical outcomes, describe common challenges associated with successful collaborations between practitioners and researchers, and provide the seven steps used to accomplish a successful collaboration.
14
Reinke, Amanda. „NGO-Research Collaborations and Conflicts“. Commoning Ethnography 2, Nr. 1 (19.12.2019): 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/ce.v2i1.5359.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Ethnographers collaborating with NGOs and non-profits while simultaneously researching their organizational structure, practices, and beliefs about service, advocacy, and activism face myriad challenges. However, collaboration – as it exists in a dialectical relationship between stakeholders working towards common goals – may also generate ethnographic insights that add to anthropological knowledge of NGOs. According to Lassiter (2005a, 2005b), researchers undertaking collaborative ethnography have four commitments: (1) ethical responsibilities to stakeholders; (2) honesty/transparency about research; (3) accessible writing; and (4) collaborative reading, writing, and interpretation. Collaborations may be interrupted at various points, but especially where bureaucratic structures and operations intervene. For example, agreements and documentation (e.g., memoranda of understanding, or MOUs) often challenge the interests and affect of collaborative work. In this article I draw on five years of collaborative NGOgraphy, Lassiter’s conceptualization of collaborative ethnography, and respond to Hymes’ (1972) call for a personal ethnography, in order to discuss the challenges and opportunities of NGO-researcher collaboration.
15
Schleimer, Stephanie C., und Arthur D. Shulman. „WHEN INTRA-FIRM AND INTER-FIRM COLLABORATIONS CO-OCCUR: COMPARING THEIR IMPACT ACROSS NEW SERVICES VERSUS NEW PRODUCT INNOVATIONS“. International Journal of Innovation Management 15, Nr. 05 (Oktober 2011): 869–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919611003325.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
There is evidence that intra-firm collaboration and inter-firm collaboration are important for new service development (NSD) and new product development (NPD) success. However, evidence of the contributions of each to innovative outcomes is inconsistent. This inconsistency is associated with the tendency of studies to examine the impact of intra-firm collaboration or inter-firm collaborations exclusively. However, most firms involved in NSD or NPD engage simultaneously in intra-firm and inter-firm collaborations. Using a multi-dimensional conception of collaboration we advance a deeper understanding of the relative contributions of these attributes in intra-firm versus inter-firm collaborative environments during NSD versus NPD. Analyses of survey data from 134 innovations confirm that collaboration clearly matters for both NSD and NPD success, but its impact differs depending on (a) whether a new product or service was developed, (b) on the collaborative environment (intra-firm or inter-firm), and (c) on the collaborative attributes examined. Implications for advancing innovation theory and practice are provided.
16
Kourti, Isidora. „Achieving Collaborative Aims through Multiple Identity Construction: Managing a public inter-organizational collaboration“. BORDER CROSSING 5, Nr. 1-2 (08.03.2015): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.33182/bc.v5i1-2.510.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Although public inter-organizational collaborations can offer better public services, their management is a complex endeavour and they often fail. This paper explores identity construction as a key aspect that assists in managing successfully these collaborations. The study draws upon a longitudinal ethnographic study with a Greek public inter-organizational collaboration. The research illustrates that managers should encourage partners to construct collaborative and non-collaborative identities in order to achieve the collaboration aims. It also suggests that managers should seek both stability and change in the collaborative process and offers four collaborative patterns for the effective management of public inter-organizational collaborations.
17
Mills, David E., Iman Izadgoshasb und Steven G. Pudney. „Smart City Collaboration: A Review and an Agenda for Establishing Sustainable Collaboration“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 16 (16.08.2021): 9189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13169189.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Collaboration is problematic in the public sector, yet many smart city theorists advocate relationships fully dependent upon collaboration to address the intense complexity encountered by city governments and achieve city objectives of quality of life, efficiency, effectiveness, and economic and environmental sustainability. Skeptical, we inductively drew together the widely dispersed theoretical tenets of smart city collaboration into a framework of collaborative relationships and tested this framework using secondary evidence as to practice in greater Amsterdam. Mostly authentic collaborative relationships were explicated. Theory is extended by clarifying the roles of actors, especially the role of city government as actor and steward of the collaborative ecosystem. Future research should unpack the factors that impact the sustainability of smart city collaborations.
18
Prentice, Christopher R., Mark T. Imperial und Jeffrey L. Brudney. „Conceptualizing the Collaborative Toolbox: A Dimensional Approach to Collaboration“. American Review of Public Administration 49, Nr. 7 (20.05.2019): 792–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074019849123.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This study explores the circumstances under which certain collaborative tools are adopted, and whether some tools are typically used in combination with others. We share the view of other scholars that collaboration practice is ahead of scholarship. Accordingly, we ground our analysis and conclusions on the observations provided by a sample of public managers who participate actively in collaborations. Findings from interviews with managers about the use of collaborative tools in their jurisdictions demonstrate that certain tools are used together, and that collaborations can be understood along three dimensions—structure of the collaboration, shared governance arrangements, and commitment of both parties to the collaboration. For researchers, this finding provides a foundation to comprehend, compare, and analyze collaborations across myriad policy domains. For practitioners, this result illustrates that collaborative tools are not interchangeable and are typically employed in three coherent groupings. For researchers and practitioners, the findings dispute common assumptions that greater collaboration (i.e., employing more tools) is productive and suggest that the emphasis might be more usefully placed on selecting and using the appropriate and parsimonious combination of tools to generate public value.
19
Macdonald, Stuart. „Is Collaboration Good for Innovation?“ Industry and Higher Education 8, Nr. 3 (September 1994): 141–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095042229400800303.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Collaborative agreements intended to facilitate innovation through the acquisition of technological information may have just the opposite effect. While collaboration may increase the ability of firms to innovate, its impact on competition may reduce the incentive. The considerable and inescapable transactions costs of collaboration may also exact their toll on innovation. This paper expresses even more fundamental reservations. Innovation requires information, and firms in competition receive much of this information through informal networks. If information flow through these networks is disrupted by collaborative agreements, then the ability of both collaborating firms and non-collaborating firms to innovate and to compete may be seriously impaired. While the more obvious costs of collaboration have an immediate impact, costs in terms of reduced rate and degree of innovation will not be apparent for some years.
20
Benstead, Amy V., Linda C. Hendry und Mark Stevenson. „Horizontal collaboration in response to modern slavery legislation“. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38, Nr. 12 (03.12.2018): 2286–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2017-0611.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how horizontal collaboration aids organisations in responding to modern slavery legislation and in gaining a socially sustainable competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach Action research has been conducted in the textiles and fashion industry and a relational perspective adopted to interpret five collaborative initiatives taken to tackle modern slavery (e.g. joint training and supplier audits). The primary engagement has been with a multi-billion pound turnover company and its collaborations with 35 brands/retailers. A non-government organisation and a trade body have also participated. Findings Successful horizontal collaboration is dependent on both relational capital and effective (formal and informal) governance mechanisms. In collaborating, firms have generated relational rents and reduced costs creating a socially sustainable competitive advantage, as suggested by the relational perspective. Yet, limits to horizontal collaboration also exist. Research limitations/implications The focus is on one industry only, hence there is scope to extend the study to other industries or forms of collaboration taking place across industries. Practical implications Successful horizontal collaborative relationships rely on actors having a similar mindset and being able to decouple the commercial and sustainability agendas, especially when direct competitors are involved. Further, working with non-business actors can facilitate collaboration and provide knowledge and resources important for overcoming the uncertainty that is manifest when responding to new legislation. Social implications Social sustainability improvements aim to enhance ethical trade and benefit vulnerable workers. Originality/value Prior literature has focussed on vertical collaboration with few prior studies of horizontal collaboration, particularly in a socially sustainable supply chain context. Moreover, there has been limited research into modern slavery from a supply chain perspective. Both successful and unsuccessful initiatives are studied, providing insights into (in)effective collaboration.
21
Cain, Bruce E., Elisabeth R. Gerber und Iris Hui. „The Challenge of Externally Generated Collaborative Governance: California’s Attempt at Regional Water Management“. American Review of Public Administration 50, Nr. 4-5 (26.02.2020): 428–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0275074020908578.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Creating successful collaborative governance regimes is difficult, but can be especially hard when collaborations are externally generated by higher levels of government as opposed to self-generated by local agencies and stakeholders due to the lack of spontaneity. We analyze this problem as it applies to California’s Integrated Regional Water Governance Program. Public administration theory indicates that a core element in a successful collaboration is empowering local leaders who share the collaboration’s intended goal. However, the political concessions to local autonomy necessary to enact an externally generated collaboration can undermine its success. The tensions between maintaining local autonomy and creating a regional approach are inherently strong in a “layered collaborative governance” approach that acknowledges and accommodates local boundaries. Drawing on the concept of role differentiation, we hypothesize that the roles participants play in layered collaborative governance will frequently derive from their preexisting issue areas, geographic orientations, and power relations, but that program design incentives can influence which groups participate in the effort and how they engage. We test these hypotheses in the context of California’s Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) program. We find evidence of role differentiation on grant leadership both with respect to the initial goal of regional collaboration as well as later efforts to address the water issues of disadvantaged communities.
22
Fatalina, Femy, Sunartini Sunartini, Widyandana Widyandana und Mariyono Sedyowinarso. „Collaborative Practice Bidang Maternitas pada Tenaga Kesehatan“. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 4, Nr. 1 (29.03.2015): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25264.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background: World's current health systems are in a crisis, causing public health needs are not being met. Mother Mortality Rate in Indonesia was still high. It indicated that maternity care was not optimal yet. One of solution is an implementation of interprofessional collaborative practice. Currently, in Indonesian’s hospitals have not seen an equal team collaboration. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions and acceptance of health workers maternity’s interprofessional collaborative practice in Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta’s Hospital. Methods: This study was a qualitative with a phenomenology design. Subjects were nurses, midwives, obstetrics and gynecologist, pharmacists, and nutritionists who had collaboration experience in obstetrics gynecology department in Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta’s Hospital, included 10 respondents. Sampling technique used a purposive sampling, while data collection used a Focus Group Discussion and in-depth interviews. Data’s credibility and reliability obtained by triangulation, debriefing, member checking and rich data. Research ethics included an informed consent and ethics committee’s approval. This study was conducted in February-July 2014. Result: Most respondents had a wrong perception of interprofessional collaboration’s definition. All of respondents accepted if interprofesional collaboration implemented properly. Data analysis resulted in six categories: perception of health workers about interprofessional collaboration, implementation of interprofessional collaboration in hospital, application of collaboration’s elements in interprofessional collaboration, health workers’s expectations for better collaboration, health workers’s motivation in doing interprofessional collaboration and variation of health workers’s acceptance of interprofessional collaboration. Conclusion: Most of health workers have not had a correct perception of interprofessional collaborative practice. All health workers accepted if interprofessional collaborative practice applied properly in maternity area in Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta’s Hospital.
23
Hyatt, David Graham. „Collaborating to Empower Collaboration“. Annual Review of Social Partnerships 2012, Nr. 7 (01.10.2012): 25–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4291.2012.oc.000012.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
24
Baker, Michael J. „Collaboration in collaborative learning“. Coordination, Collaboration and Cooperation 16, Nr. 3 (30.12.2015): 451–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper presents a theorisation of collaborative activity that was developed in the research field known as “collaborative learning”, in order to understand the processes of co-elaboration of meaning and knowledge. Collaboration, as distinguished from cooperation, coordination and collective activity, is defined as a continued and conjoined effort towards elaborating a “joint problem space” of shared representations of the problem to be solved. An approach to analysing the processes of co-construction of a joint problem space is outlined, in terms of inter-discursive operations, together with approaches to defining different forms of cooperative activity. In conclusion, the specificity of this approach to defining collaboration is discussed in relation to other fields of research.
25
Li, Jane, und John Zic. „A Collaboratory for the Distributed Collaborations Within a Biosecurity Laboratory and Across Different Organizations“. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 28, Nr. 02 (Juni 2019): 1950005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218843019500059.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper presents our work in the design and development of collaborative platforms to support distributed scientific collaborations in a national biosecurity laboratory which carries out diagnostics and research work in animal diseases. We have focused on two types of collaboration challenges. One is the “distributed” collaborations between scientists working inside the physical containment areas and scientists working in the general office area within the laboratory. The second is the collaborative diagnosis and decision-making work between this laboratory and other organizations working on the responses of emergency animal diseases. The “biosecurity collaboration platform” which addresses the first challenge has been implemented and used by the scientists in the laboratory. The platform integrates shared digital workspaces and supports the sharing and interaction of scientific data from various resources and laboratory instruments (e.g. microscopes). The “secure collaboration platform” which addresses the second challenge is an extension of the biosecurity collaboration platform and integrates eAuthentication and eAuthorization technologies to support secure communication and information sharing between experts from different organizations. Results from user studies have shown that the collaboration platforms can provide core capabilities of communication, trustworthy information sharing and access to real-time data from scientific instruments in complex collaborations in the biosecurity domain.
26
Livingston, Amy. „Supervision: Essentials of Collaboration“. Perspectives on Administration and Supervision 20, Nr. 1 (März 2010): 35–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/aas20.1.35.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract This article examines collaboration in the workplace, primarily in the educational setting. The article stresses the importance of examining one's own collaborative efforts in order to effectively mentor others. By analyzing the different aspects of collaboration and realizing the importance of working together with other professionals, mentors and supervisors can teach co-laboring or collaborating more successfully to those we mentor.
27
Jafri, Syed Mujtaba, Soumya Malgonde, Rohit Thakare, Bhavika Chuttar und Jakhete Sumitra. „VisCollab: Data Visualization with Provenance“. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 10, Nr. 5 (31.05.2022): 2949–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.43001.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract: Teams across the world are working together remotely today. Can we build a dashboard-style interface that uses some preliminary blockchain concepts to keep track of who did what on the dashboard? This can be used to keep track of user actions as well as for collaborative decision making. Synchronous Collaboration: People collaborating on work at the same time. For example: Google Docs. Asynchronous Collaboration: People collaborating on work, but making changes at different intervals. For example: Software Development (Coding). Some challenges with this include dealing with synchronous or asynchronous collaboration. For both synchronous and asynchronous, we would also need the ability to leave bookmarks/comments for interesting findings in the data for other team members to observe. Keywords: Provenance, Synchronous collaboration, Asynchronous, collaboration, Data visualization.
28
Csomós, György, Zsófia Viktória Vida und Balázs Lengyel. „Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities“. PLOS ONE 15, Nr. 11 (16.11.2020): e0242468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242468.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Science is becoming increasingly international in terms of breaking down walls in its pursuit of high impact. Despite geographical location and distance still being major barriers for scientific collaboration, little is known about whether high-impact collaborations are similarly constrained by geography compared to collaborations of average impact. To address this question, we analyze Web of Science (WoS) data on international collaboration between global leader cities in science production. We report an increasing intensity of international city-city collaboration and find that average distance of collaboration of the strongest connections has slightly increased, but distance decay has remained stable over the last three decades. However, high-impact collaborations span large distances by following similar distance decay. This finding suggests that a larger geographical reach of research collaboration should be aimed for to support high-impact science. The creation of the European Research Area (ERA) represents an effective action that has deepened intracontinental research collaborations and the position of the European Union (EU) in global science. Yet, our results provide new evidence that global scientific leaders are not sufficiently collaborative in carrying out their big science projects.
29
Enakrire, Rexwhite T., Collence T. Chisita und Tella Adeyinka. „Partnership among Librarians: Reflection on Observations, Interviews and Research Reports from Three Universities in Nigeria and Zimbabwe“. International Journal of Higher Education 9, Nr. 5 (17.08.2020): 338. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p338.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Partnership is not a new phenomenon in the university environment. It embraces strategies used by people with common interest to harvest knowledge in terms of sharing or collaboration. However, the case differs with collaborations in Library and Information Science (LIS) research in Africa, especially LIS scholars in African universities in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. Paucity of empirical literature is available on research collaboration among LIS scholars in Nigerian and Zimbabwean universities. The purpose of the study was to examine partnership among librarians, with reflection on observation and interview research reports in three universities in Nigeria and Zimbabwe. The study adopted a qualitative approach using interview to gather data from librarians drawn from three Nigerian and Zimbabwean universities. The qualitative research approach grounded on content analysis of documents/literature, observation and interview method was use for the study. The observation focus on the authors’ exposition in the sampled universities environment, while the interview were key informants from each of the three countries universities sampled. The study consider the collaborative theory through grounded method. The findings of the study revealed lack of trust in the individual or groups collaborator; team members have the feeling that the project they are collaborating on is of little benefit, due to poor relationship. Team members see themselves as contender or challenger; which has affected leadership issue and involvement of long meetings and inability to address the truth. In terms of the influence of collaboration on professional growth of librarians, result demonstrated enhancement of teaching aspect of librarianship, learning and research quality; promote cooperation, coordination, which in turn increased level of intensity, tenacity and interaction among members. Linkage among LIS professional ranges from networking, cooperation, alliances, coordination and partnership, coalition and eventually collaboration. Challenges reported include catastrophic consequent on negative effect of work, culture and stylistic parameters including concept, attitude and professional hindrances. dominance impact of policies and procedures of collaboration, exploitation of the weak members, lack of clarity and rationale behind the collaboration, unwillingness to change by members in collaboration, lack of socialisation, largeness of the group, wrong membership and jettisoning of members ideas which eventually make some members take the decision of quitting the team. The study recommends inter-disciplinary, intra-institutional and inter-institutional collaboration among various stakeholders in LIS education and training.
30
Hudson, Thomas C., Aron T. Helser, Diane H. Sonnenwald und Mary C. Whitton. „Managing Collaboration in the nanoManipulator“. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, Nr. 2 (April 2004): 193–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/1054746041382447.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
We designed, developed, deployed, and evaluated the Collaborative nanoManipulator (CnM), a distributed, collaborative virtual environment system supporting remote scientific collaboration between users of the nanoManipulator interface to atomic force microscopes. This paper describes the entire collaboration system, but focuses on the shared nanoManipulator (nM) application. To be readily accepted by users, the shared nM application had to have the same high level of interactivity as the single-user system and include all the functions of the single-user system. In addition the application had to support a user's ability to interleave working privately and working collaboratively. Based on our experience developing the CnM, we present: a method of analyzing applications to characterize the concurrency requirements for sharing data between collaborating sites, examples of data structures that support distributed collaboration and interleaved private and collaborative work, and guidelines for selecting appropriate synchronization and concurrency control schemes.
31
Siemon, Dominik, Timo Strohmann und Susanne Robra-Bissantz. „The Virtual Collaborator - A Definition and Research Agenda“. International Journal of e-Collaboration 14, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2018): 24–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2018100102.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The interdisciplinary research endeavor of computer-supported collaborative work has already investigated information technology that supports collaboration. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), new forms of collaboration need to be considered that involve AI as an active partner within a collaborative setting. Theories and design guidelines that support collaboration, considering cognitive and social group effects, need to be revised when team members are not solely human anymore. Within this exploratory study, the authors aim to provide insights of team members on their conception of a so-called virtual collaborator. A study with 144 participants was carried out to provide valuable information about collaboration principles, conceptual implementations and requirements. The results indicate that the participants are indecisive about a precise conception but expect an ideal collaborator that rather should not work on relevant tasks or make vital decisions. Based on the results, the authors compose new research questions and possible experiment settings.
32
Vermond, Debbie, Esther de Groot, Valerie A. Sills, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Fiona M. Walter, Niek J. de Wit und Greg Rubin. „The evolution and co-evolution of a primary care cancer research network: From academic social connection to research collaboration“. PLOS ONE 17, Nr. 7 (29.07.2022): e0272255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272255.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Academic networks are expected to enhance scientific collaboration and thereby increase research outputs. However, little is known about whether and how the initial steps of getting to know other researchers translates into effective collaborations. In this paper, we investigate the evolution and co-evolution of an academic social network and a collaborative research network (using co-authorship as a proxy measure of the latter), and simultaneously examine the effect of individual researcher characteristics (e.g. gender, seniority or workplace) on their evolving relationships. We used longitudinal data from an international network in primary care cancer research: the CanTest Collaborative (CanTest). Surveys were distributed amongst CanTest researchers to map who knows who (the ‘academic social network’). Co-authorship relations were derived from Scopus (the ‘collaborative network’). Stochastic actor-oriented models were employed to investigate the evolution and co-evolution of both networks. Visualizing the development of the CanTest network revealed that researchers within CanTest get to know each other quickly and also start collaborating over time (evolution of the academic social network and collaborative network respectively). Results point to a stable and solid academic social network that is particularly encouraging towards more junior researchers; yet differing for male and female researchers (the effect of individual researcher characteristics). Moreover, although the academic social network and the research collaborations do not grow at the same pace, the benefit of creating academic social relationships to stimulate effective research collaboration is clearly demonstrated (co-evolution of both networks).
33
Ofem, Brandon, Bindu Arya und Stephen P. Borgatti. „The Drivers of Collaborative Success Between Rural Economic Development Organizations“. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47, Nr. 6 (22.06.2018): 1113–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764018783084.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The nonprofit literature has directed attention to exploring how features of the broader structure of exchanges within regional collaboration networks impact the dynamics and outcomes of a single partnership. This study examines how partners’ relative positions within a collaboration network impact their interdependence and collaborative success. Our analysis of 298 collaborations between 98 economic development organizations operating in an economically distressed rural region demonstrates that social network properties—structural embeddedness and relative centrality—have substantial effects on exchange partners’ collaborative success. We also investigate whether network effects are mediated by the two dimensions of interdependence, mutual dependence and power imbalance. Together, our theorizing and results speak to the driving factors of collaborative success in a context where collaboration is particularly vital.
34
Scheuregger, Martin, und Litha Efthymiou. „Composer-composer collaboration and the difficulty of intradisciplinarity“. Airea: Arts and Interdisciplinary Research, Nr. 2 (07.10.2020): 23–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/airea.5042.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Research and practice involving parties from different disciplines is of increasing importance in many fields. In the arts, this has manifested itself in both increasing attention on established collaborative partnerships – composers, for example, collaborating with writers, choreographers and directors – and a move towards more overtly cross-, multi-, inter- and/or trans-disciplinary forms of working – a composer working with a physicist, philosopher or psychologist. Composer-composer partnerships are far less common, meaning intradisciplinary collaboration is little explored in relation to practice research in music.
This article takes the collaborative music theatre composition I only know I am (2019) created by the authors – Litha Eftythmiou and Martin Scheuregger – as a case study, outlining the issues and opportunities that arise through combining two compositional practices in an effort to create a single artistic output. Ways in which the composers managed this process are detailed in the context of communication, technology, and the issue of tacit knowledge (of both individual compositional process and the working of intradisciplinary collaboration). In particular, reflections on their experience during a week-long residency, in which they collaborated on a single musical work, is discussed in order to understand to what extent two aesthetic approaches can be reconciled to create work satisfactory to both parties.
Notions of composition as an inherently collaborative process are used to contextualise the means by which composer-composer collaborations might be understood. The authors reflect on an understanding of intradisciplinarity in the context of their practice as composers in order to draw conclusions that will allow them, and others, to approach composer-composer collaboration in an informed manner.
35
Randrup, Nils, Douglas Druckenmiller und Robert Owen Briggs. „Toward a Philosophy of Collaboration“. International Journal of e-Collaboration 14, Nr. 2 (April 2018): 19–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2018040102.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The authors find themselves in the midst of a global social transformation that is shaping the common perception of reality. The development of technology-enabled collaborative networks, virtual collaboration, structured collaboration processes, and digital team collaboration affects every part of society. Research on collaboration and collaboration systems has achieved sufficient maturity and scope that an overall conceptual definition of collaboration is now needed and possible. This article proposes a conceptual approach and terminology as a step towards bridging isolated communities of collaborating researchers in various fields. The authors offer a fundamental philosophical description of what collaboration is (and is not) based on relevant epistemological, metaphysical, and axiological insights derived from a synthesis of existing collaboration research, and the authors outline the most obvious needs for further research toward formalizing a more fully-realized philosophy of collaboration.
36
Hwang, Kyung, Eul Sung und Temitayo Shenkoya. „The Mediating and Combined Effects of Trust and Satisfaction in the Relationship between Collaboration and the Performance of Innovation in Industry—Public Research Institute Partnerships“. Sustainability 14, Nr. 4 (13.02.2022): 2128. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14042128.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The purpose of this study was to analyze the mediating and combined effects of trust and satisfaction in a collaborative activity, while considering the effects of the performance of innovation in an Industry–Public Research Institute (I–PRI) collaboration. Data used in this study was collected through a survey targeting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the INNOPOLIS Daedeok innovation cluster in Korea. PLS-SEM and fsQCA were used for the analysis of data collected. The results of this study show that trust mediates the relationship between collaboration and satisfaction, while satisfaction mediates the relationship between collaboration, and the performance of innovation, as well as the relationship between trust and the performance of innovation. In addition, it was confirmed that collaboration, trust, and satisfaction jointly affect the performance of innovation in I–PRI collaborations. Additionally, it was discovered that in-order to increase the performance of innovation - required to secure and maintain a competitive advantage; through I–PRI collaborations—SMEs need active collaboration with PRIs, and advanced management skills; to build mutual trust, and improve satisfaction. Finally, the theoretical implications of the factors that affect the performance of innovation in I–PRI collaborations were presented.
37
Fjellfeldt, Maria. „Developing Long-Term Sustainable Collaborations between Welfare Providers that Support and Promote Child and Youth Mental Health in Sweden—A Qualitative Interview Study“. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, Nr. 13 (23.06.2022): 7730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137730.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
When addressing child and youth mental health, policy makers around the world call for collaboration between welfare providers. Research shows, however, that cross-sector collaboration is challenging. This article aims to scrutinize the issue of sustainability in the collaborative work undertaken between welfare providers to jointly support and promote child and youth mental health. In a qualitative interview study, 19 key officials involved in collaborative mental health work in three Swedish municipalities were interviewed, 13 individually and 6 in three small groups. Data were analyzed through content analysis and the application of practice-oriented collaboration theories. The results show that informants feel collaboration is beneficial for child and youth mental health. The results also show that five aspects of this collaborative work can affect its sustainability: (1) how the collaborative work was set up: if it was a special project or part of existing organizational structures; (2) what model of funding was used; (3) how many organizational levels were involved; (4) if goals were common, concurrent or contradictive; and (5) if important stakeholders were seen to be ‘missing’. Collaboration members felt their collaborative work had caused them to drift away from important non-participant stakeholders. This article concludes that to develop long-term sustainable collaborations addressing child and youth mental health, key features of collaborative work need to be taken into consideration.
38
Lee, Juhyun, Sangsung Park und Junseok Lee. „Exploring Potential R&D Collaboration Partners Using Embedding of Patent Graph“. Sustainability 15, Nr. 20 (11.10.2023): 14724. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su152014724.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Rapid market change is one of the reasons for accelerating a technology lifecycle. Enterprises have socialized, externalized, combined, and internalized knowledge for their survival. However, the current era requires ambidextrous innovation through the diffusion of knowledge from enterprises. Accordingly, enterprises have discovered sustainable resources and increased market value through collaborations with research institutions and universities. Such collaborative activities effectively improve enterprise innovation, economic growth, and national competence. However, as such collaborations are conducted continuously and iteratively, their effect has gradually weakened. Therefore, we focus on exploring potential R&D collaboration partners through patents co-owned by enterprises, research institutions, and universities. The business pattern of co-applicants is extracted through a patent graph, and potential R&D collaboration partners are unearthed. In this paper, we propose a method of converting a co-applicant-based graph into a vector using representation learning. Our purpose is to explore potential R&D collaboration partners from the similarity between vectors. Compared to other methods, the proposed method contributes to discovering potential R&D collaboration partners based on organizational features. The following questions are considered in order to discover potential R&D partners in collaborative activities: Can information about co-applicants of patents satisfactorily explain R&D collaboration? Conversely, can potential R&D collaboration partners be discovered from co-applicants? To answer these questions, we conducted experiments using autonomous-driving-related patents. We verified that our proposed method can explore potential R&D collaboration partners with high accuracy through experiments.
39
Gong, Jiangtao, Jingjing Sun, Mengdi Chu, Xiaoye Wang, Minghao Luo, Yi Lu, Liuxin Zhang, Yaqiang Wu, Qianying Wang und Can Liu. „Side-by-Side vs Face-to-Face: Evaluating Colocated Collaboration via a Transparent Wall-sized Display“. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (14.04.2023): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3579623.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Traditional wall-sized displays mostly only support side-by-side co-located collaboration, while transparent displays naturally support face-to-face interaction. Many previous works assume transparent displays support collaboration. Yet it is unknown how exactly its afforded face-to-face interaction can support loose or close collaboration, especially compared to the side-by-side configuration offered by traditional large displays. In this paper, we used an established experimental task that operationalizes different collaboration coupling and layout locality, to compare pairs of participants collaborating side-by-side versus face-to-face in each collaborative situation. We compared quantitative measures and collected interview and observation data to further illustrate and explain our observed user behavior patterns. The results showed that the unique face-to-face collaboration brought by transparent display can result in more efficient task performance, different territorial behavior, and both positive and negative collaborative factors. Our findings provided empirical understanding about the collaborative experience supported by wall-sized transparent displays and shed light on its future design.
40
Karsten, Helena. „Collaboration and collaborative information technologies“. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 30, Nr. 2 (März 1999): 44–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/383371.383375.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
41
Barnes-McConnell, Patricia W. „Supporting collaboration in Collaborative Research“. Agriculture and Human Values 13, Nr. 2 (März 1996): 52–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01540694.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
42
Fisher, N. I., und A. J. Peacock. „What Collaborators Want: Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating Research Collaborations“. Journal of Creating Value 3, Nr. 1 (13.04.2017): 93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2394964316684399.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This article describes an approach to planning, monitoring and evaluating research collaborations based on a structured approach to eliciting and measuring the value that each partner seeks to derive from the collaboration. During the phase of formulating the collaborative arrangements, the process can bring clarity to the initial expectations of each partner and so, possibly avoid prospective difficulties from the outset. During the course of the collaboration, it provides a means of assessing where improvements in the relationship might be needed. And at the end of the project, it provides a basis for assessing what has worked well, and what might need to be considered carefully in a future collaboration. The process also provides a basis for benchmarking collaborative ventures, based on ratings associated with the critical drivers of successful partnerships. Part of the process is studied in the context of the formation of a collaboration relating to cyber security research.
43
Brundage, Shelley B., und Ken Graap. „Collaborating With Small Business to Fund Your Research“. Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders 19, Nr. 3 (November 2009): 90–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/ffd19.3.90.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract Merriam-Webster defines collaboration as the ability “to work jointly with others or together, especially in an intellectual endeavor” (Merriam-Webster, 2009). This article describes methods for establishing collaborations and suggests some possible mechanisms to fund collaborative research with small businesses. We briefly describe the processes involved after funding is awarded. The article ends with a list of important variables for successful collaboration.
44
Gillingham, Jacob, Brittany Siontis, Steven Ian Robinson und Scott H. Okuno. „Multi-institutional collaboration in sarcoma and central nervous system tumors.“ Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, Nr. 15_suppl (20.05.2020): e23544-e23544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e23544.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
e23544 Background: Rare diseases are defined as conditions that affect less than 200,000 people annually in the United States. Around 17000 cases of sarcoma will be diagnosed in 2020. Collaboration among institutions is needed to best understand rare diseases such as sarcoma. One measure of collaboration is publications with multiple institutions as authors. We sought to determine if collaboration in sarcoma has increased since 2011 and compared that to another rare disease, CNS tumors based on multi-institution-authored abstracts presented at ASCO. Methods: All sarcoma and CNS oral abstracts, clinical science symposia, poster presentations, poster discussions, and published-only ASCO Annual Meetings from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. Collaboration was determined if the abstract authors were from more than one institution. Results: 2,134 abstracts were reviewed. Collaboration for sarcoma ranged from 0.603 to 0.720 and 0.582 to 0.755 for CNS. From 2011-2019 a positive linear trend in collaboration was found in CNS (P < 0.05), but not in sarcoma (P = NS). There was no significant trend in the incidence of collaboration in Sarcoma based on the type of presentation at ASCO. There was no difference in collaboration between bone or soft tissue sarcoma abstracts or median number of institutions collaborating between sarcoma and CNS. There were more international collaborations and absolute number of institutions in sarcoma vs CNS. Conclusions: Sarcoma collaboration has remained constant from 2011-2019 with greater number of institutions and more international collaborations as compared to CNS. CNS collaboration has increased from 2011-2019. Sarcoma collaboration at ASCO is robust and reflects the need for multi-institutional partnership.
45
Manchana, Ramakrishna. „The Collaborative Commons: Catalyst for Cross-Functional Collaboration and Accelerated Development“. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 9, Nr. 1 (05.01.2020): 1951–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/sr24820051747.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
46
Rye, Sara. „Analysis of the Disparity between Recurring and Temporary Collaborative Performance: A Literature Review between 1994 and 2021“. Logistics 6, Nr. 4 (09.10.2022): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040071.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Performance frameworks are common ways to guarantee the success of a collaboration by assessment/improvement of the organisations. However, collaborative performance in recurring collaborations (RC) and temporary ones (TC) are being measured differently due to their inherent characteristics. A systematic review of 282 existing studies, from 2000 onwards, into collaborative networks divided between RC and TC based on the duration of collaboration and the application of the studies was performed. The result gave rise to the thematic analysis of the textual narratives, as well as a quantitative meta-summary of the synthesis. The review shows two different approaches to guarantee the performance of the collaboration. The first group provide a recipe for success by recognizing the causal relationship between nine collaborative measures, including information and risk sharing, trust, commitment, agility, power balance, leadership, prior-experience, and alignment. The second group ensures the success of collaboration by selecting suitable partners based on their previous performance emerging through synergy, readiness, agility and internal–external factors. The reasoning behind these differences are discussed and the current gaps in research are outlined.
47
Ramli, Mohamad Faizal, und Aslan Amat Senin. „FACTORS AFFECTING EFFECTIVE UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY COLLABORATION DURING THE DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH STAGE“. International Journal of Management Studies 28, Number 2 (15.07.2021): 127–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.32890/ijms2021.28.2.6.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In Malaysia, collaboration between university and industry is still limited. This requires improvement of current practices in developing effective collaborations. However, there are still projects that fail to deliver, and it is quite challenging and difficult to assess the recent successful university-industry collaboration projects. In light of this, background problem, the present research was aimed at identifying the factors which hindered effective collaboration between university and industry, especially during the development research stage. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between the success factors and the effectiveness of collaborative projects during the development, research stage. This study adopted a quantitative research method. Survey questionnaires were distributed among researchers involved in a collaborative project funded by a government grant scheme. The results showed that reward had a positive and significant relationship with both process- and outcome-related criteria. Meanwhile, financial support had a negative and significant relationship with a process-related criterion. The findings can be used as guidelines for collaboration stakeholders to develop an effective collaborative project.
48
Glatter, Ron. „Collaboration, collaboration, collaboration“. Management in Education 17, Nr. 5 (Dezember 2003): 16–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08920206030170050601.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
49
Pinto, Rogério M. „Community Perspectives on Factors That Influence Collaboration in Public Health Research“. Health Education & Behavior 36, Nr. 5 (05.02.2009): 930–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198108328328.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Community collaboration in research may lead to better methods, results, and dissemination of interventions. Little systematic research has examined specific factors that influence community-based organizations (CBOs) to collaborate in public health research. There is an urgent need to advance knowledge on this topic so that together, researchers and CBOs can minimize barriers to collaboration. This study advances a CBOfocused characterization of collaboration in HIV-prevention research. By focusing on the perspectives of 20 key informants in 10 HIV-prevention CBOs, qualitative data revealed factors that influenced their collaborations in four domains: (a) Researchers’ Characteristics (expertise, availability), (b) Collaborative Research Characteristics (ought to improve services and CBO infrastructure); (c) Community Partner—Researcher Relationships (resolving social and professional issues); and (d) Barriers to HIV-Prevention Research Collaboration (cultural and social disconnect between CBO and academia). To reduce barriers, researchers ought to enhance motivators that facilitate collaboration. To use the advantages of community-based research, prevention scientists and policy makers ought to embrace CBOs’ characterization of what makes health research genuinely collaborative.
50
Togher, Leanne. „Improving Communication for People with Brain Injury in the 21st Century: The Value of Collaboration“. Brain Impairment 14, Nr. 1 (12.04.2013): 130–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/brimp.2013.3.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper describes the value of collaboration from two perspectives. The first perspective highlights the benefit of teaching communication partners collaborative communication strategies to facilitate the interactions of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Collaborative strategies encompass the provision of collaborative intent, emotional and cognitive support, positive questioning styles and collaborative turn taking. Translating research outcomes into accessible resources is described with reference to the TBI Express website which has video demonstrations of conversation strategies for communication partners of people with TBI. The broader meaning of collaboration is also discussed, with particular focus on the advantages collaboration can provide in advancing rehabilitation outcomes for people with acquired brain injury, their families and social networks. Collaboration is described in terms of encompassing all relevant contributors to the development of research advances, including people with acquired brain injury, their families and social networks, stakeholders, clinicians, peak bodies, students and researchers. Two examples of large-scale research collaborations occurring within Australia are described, including the NHMRC Clinical Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation and the NHMRC Moving Ahead Centre for Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, also known as Moving Ahead.