Thematische Bibliographien / British Annexation

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „British Annexation“

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 25. Juli 2024

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Zeitschriftenartikel
Dissertationen
Bücher
Buchteile

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "British Annexation" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "British Annexation"

Mengal, Saeeda. „Imperialist Annexation of Balochistan“. Al-Burz 8, Nr. 1 (20.12.2016): 37–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.54781/abz.v8i1.137.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

History testifies that the weaker States have always served as a buffer zone among formidable confronting States. The weaker States have been exploited to fulfil the vested interests of powerful nations. This Article investigates how & why Balochistan territory was used by the colonial power to halt the advancing Russia into the heart of Sub-continent. The colonial power the British used various tactics to hold its sway in Balochistan. The colonial power adopted policy of non-interference in Balochistan. However, the circumstances compelled the great British to annex Balochistan. Moreover, throughout this era the big power neglected the human rights of the common people. The people of Balochistan suffered hardships due to the international rivalry. Furthermore, the incapable Sardars of Balochistan served the colonial masters at the expense of common people.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Scoular, Spencer. „State-Sponsored Abduction to Enforce British Law for Aotearoa New Zealand Pre-Annexation“. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 54, Nr. 3 (06.12.2023): 739–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v54i3.8789.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Prior to the annexation of Aotearoa New Zealand in 1840, British authorities sponsored and practised the abduction of suspects from the islands of New Zealand to New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land, where they could be charged and tried before British courts for infringing laws for New Zealand passed by the British Parliament, as well as orders for New Zealand issued by governors of New South Wales. The sponsorship and practice of state-sponsored abduction occurred in two distinct periods: between 1814 and 1823, governors of New South Wales sponsored "magistrates" to practise abduction; and, between 1833 and 1840, the British Government sponsored British Residents to practise abduction. Specific cases are examined where the sponsorship of abduction was put into practice. The unlawful, expensive and impractical nature of state-sponsored abduction contributed to the ineffectiveness of the British system of law and order for New Zealand pre-annexation, which ultimately influenced Britain's decision to annex New Zealand after first signing a treaty with Māori. With the arrival of Hobson, the signing of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and Britain's annexation of New Zealand in 1840, state-sponsored abduction became unnecessary and was quietly discontinued.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Candier, Aurore. „Mapping ethnicity in nineteenth-century Burma: When ‘categories of people’ (lumyo) became ‘nations’“. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 50, Nr. 3 (September 2019): 347–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022463419000419.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Successive wars and the establishment of a border between the kingdom of Burma and British India in the nineteenth century challenged Burmese conceptions of sovereignty and political space. This essay investigates how European, and more specifically Anglo-American, notions of race, nation, and consular protection to nationals, progressively informed the Burmese concepts of ‘categories of people’ (lumyo) and ‘subject’ (kyun). First, I present the semantic evolution of these concepts in the 1820s–1830s, following the annexation of the western Burmese province of Arakan by British India in 1824. Then, I argue that the Burmese concept of lumyo was progressively associated with the European concept of ‘nations’ in the 1850s–1860s, following the annexation of Lower Burma in 1852. Finally, I uncover developments in the 1870s, when British consular protection extended to several freshly categorised ‘nations’, such as Shan, Karenni, and Kachin.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Sang, Nguyen Van, Le Thanh Nam und Luu Trang. „Independent or Annexation: The Texas Issue in the British-American Relations (1836 - 1846)“. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 10, Nr. 5 (05.09.2021): 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0134.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This article presents the annexation of Texas in the relations between Great Britain and the United States from 1836 to 1846. The first part presents an overview of the territory, history of exploration and development of Texas from the early stages of history until the formation of the republic in 1836. The next section of the article refers to the interests of Great Britain and the United States in Texas. The final section provides the British-American diplomacy from 1836 to 1846 on the annexation of Texas. On the basis of the exploitation of correspondences, treaties and other material sources, the article contributes to clarifying the Anglo-American relations relating to the annexation of Texas and the expansion history of the United States during the first half of the XIX century. Received: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 5 September 2021

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Leśniewski, Michał. „The Annexation of the Transvaal in 1877: The First Boer Reactions“. Werkwinkel 12, Nr. 1 (27.06.2017): 35–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/werk-2017-0003.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract In April 1877 The South African Republic was annexed by the British Empire. This was a part of a wider scheme to unify the sub-continent under the British rule. The story is well known. Many works deals with the motives of Lord Carnarvon and other British decision-makers. Much less deals with the question of immediate Boer reaction, or to be exact, the reasons behind their inaction. This article deals with this problem. Tries to evaluate the attitudes of both, the British and the Boers, and to show why the Transvaal Boers mostly ignored the annexation declaration? This text is just an excursion into field which demands much wider and more detailed studies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wong, J. Y. „British Annexation of Sind in 1843: An Economic Perspective“. Modern Asian Studies 31, Nr. 2 (Mai 1997): 225–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x00014293.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Generally speaking, there are two dominant schools of thought with regard to the British annexation of Sind in the Indian sub-continent in 1843. One takes the view that individuals on the spot make history. It was a harsh, bitter and frustrated soldier by the name of General Sir Charles Napier who was determined to seek glory and wealth for himself by annexing Sind. In this respect, the eminent historian and former Special Commissioner for Sind (1943–46), H. T. Lambrick, has put his case extremely well. The other school interprets the annexation in strategic terms, as part of a search for a defence system which would safeguard British India from the dangers of attack from the northwest. In about 600 pages, the distinguished historian M. E. Yapp has achieved his goal with remarkable success. Furthermore, Yapp has done so without discounting the first school of thought. Indeed, the two are not mutually exclusive. In this paper I wish to suggest that there is a third dimension, an economic one; and that the three are not mutually exclusive either. Indeed, all three appear to have different weights at different levels of the policy-making process.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Cross, Wallace. „The Politics of the British Annexation of India, 1757–1857“. History: Reviews of New Books 23, Nr. 3 (April 1995): 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612759.1995.9951133.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Roeckell, Lelia M. „Bonds over Bondage: British Opposition to the Annexation of Texas“. Journal of the Early Republic 19, Nr. 2 (1999): 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3124954.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Rugemer, Edward B. „Robert Monroe Harrison, British Abolition, Southern Anglophobia and Texas Annexation“. Slavery & Abolition 28, Nr. 2 (August 2007): 169–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01440390701428006.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Callahan, Michael D. „NOMANSLAND: The British Colonial Office and the League of Nations Mandate for German East Africa, 1916–1920“. Albion 25, Nr. 3 (1993): 443–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4050877.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

One of the many problems facing the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 was the future of the conquered German and Turkish territories in Africa, the Pacific, and the Middle East. Widespread anti-imperialist sentiment in Europe and the United States opposed direct annexation of the possessions, but wartime agreements and the security interests of the Allies prevented returning the conquered areas to their former rulers. In particular, many British leaders wanted to ensure that Germany could never again attempt world domination and were convinced that the restoration to Germany of its overseas possessions would pose a “grave political and military menace” to Britain's vital maritime connections with South Africa and India. After a long, often acrimonious debate, the Conference agreed on a compromise that placed the former German colonies and Ottoman provinces under the supervision of the League of Nations. This solution gave the Allies control of their acquisitions as “mandates” within a framework of international accountability. Great Britain received the most mandates, including Germany's largest colony of German East Africa. For the British leaders who had always advocated transforming German East Africa into a British colony, the new system seemed to make little practical difference. For the colonial officials in London and at the highest levels of colonial administration within the conquered possession, however, the mandates system presented serious problems and was not simply a disguise for annexation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Mehr Quellen

Dissertationen zum Thema "British Annexation"

Holloway, Brent. „"Without Conquest or Purchase": The Annexation Moment in British Columbia, 1866-1871“. Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/34473.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

While the annexation movement in British Columbia appears to have been short-lived and disorganized, it was nevertheless understood as a serious threat to British rule. This study seeks to reconcile this contradiction through an examination of newspapers, debates, despatches, and correspondence drawn from British Columbia, Britain, Canada, and the United States. In examining the movement, this study reveals both the peculiar capacity of the minor agitation to present an exaggerated image of its popularity, and the key geopolitical assumptions which led observers to overestimate its importance. As the narrative spectre of annexationism outpaced the actual strength of the movement, confederationist leaders and British and American authorities were led to embark on misguided political strategies. The British Columbian annexation movement’s disproportionate impact reveals the complex interaction between local politics and global forces in British North American history, and demonstrates the role of ideology and rumour-making in shaping global political narratives.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Bücher zum Thema "British Annexation"

Kumāra, Braja Bihārī. Trends of British annexation of North-East India. New Delhi: Omsons Publications, 1994.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Khera, P. N. British policy towards Sindh, up to the annexation, 1843. Karachi: Sindh Archives, 2009.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Khera, P. N. British policy towards Sindh, up to the annexation, 1843. Karachi: Sindh Archives, 2009.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

1950-, Fisher Michael Herbert, Hrsg. The Politics of the British annexation of India, 1757-1857. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Sinclair, Henry W., und Joo Phoi Tan. British Borneo: Annexations & cessions, 1575-2012 : the formation of Brunei, Felicia, Labuan, Sarawak. Ellena, Elopura, Sabah and Malaysia & claims by the Sultanate of Sulu. Sabah, Malaysia]: Henry W. Sinclair, 2013.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Monro, Alexander. Annexation, or union with the United States, is the manifest destiny of British North America. [Saint John, N.B.?: s.n.], 1985.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Roberts, Christopher. British Extraterritoriality in Korea 1884 – 1910. GB Folkestone: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9781912961276.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Filling an important gap in extraterritoriality studies and in the history of Anglo-Korean relations, this benchmark study examines Britain’s exercise of extraterritorial rights in Korea from 1884 until Korea’s formal annexation by Japan in 1910. It shows how the treaty provisions—which provided for Britain’s ideal extra-territorial regime—were influenced by Britain’s considerably greater experience in Japan beginning in 1859. The caseload proved miniscule in the absence of any large British commercial or maritime presence. Nevertheless, it provides an insight into extra-territoriality’s operation outside major commercial centres and ports. Britain’s protection of Chinese interests in Korea in the aftermath of the Sino-Japanese War, 1894–1895 is also covered.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Annexation and the unhappy valley: The historical anthropology of Sindh's colonization. Leiden: Brill, 2016.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Douglas, James. Canadian Independence, Annexation and British Imperial Federation. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Douglas, James. Canadian Independence, Annexation and British Imperial Federation. Franklin Classics, 2018.

Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Mehr Quellen

Buchteile zum Thema "British Annexation"

„The Annexation and Its Repercussions“. In British Relations with Sind 1799 - 1843, 90–112. University of California Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.2430700.9.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Adams, Peter. „The Annexation of New Zealand“. In Fatal Necessity: British Intervention in New Zealand, 1830–1847. Bridget Williams Books, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.7810/9781927277195_5.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Singh, Khushwant. „British Annexation of Malwa: Treaty of Lahore, 1809“. In A History of the Sikhs, 211–23. Oxford University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195673081.003.0013.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„ANNEXATION OF THE SETTLEMENTS ON THE GOLD COAST“. In The Rise of British West Africa, 331–50. Routledge, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315032764-33.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Lloyd, T. O. „Monarchs and their Colonies 1649-1714“. In The British Empire 1558-1995, 30–61. Oxford University PressOxford, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198731344.003.0002.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract The new government set out in 1649 to establish its position with a degree of success which must have surprised everyone who knew about its problems and had not realized the great energy that religious faith gave to its leaders. It transformed the way that the English dealt with the world outside Europe; even though Charles’s son came back to the throne as Charles II in 1660, the Republic changed the direction of English imperial policy and set a pattern followed at least until the death in 1714 of the last direct descendant of Charles I to sit on the throne. Queen Anne died a year after the signing of the Treaty of Utrecht, which had brought to an end a cycle of wars which, while primarily concerned with the balance of power in Europe, had given English governments an opportunity to take colonies away from other European countries and increase their empire by annexation as well as by settlement. Annexation showed that the English government had much more power to take action outside Europe than it had possessed in the first half of the century.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

„Formal Colonization: British Annexation, French Conquest, and Slave Revolts“. In Centring the Periphery, 57–78. McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780773564398-006.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Smith, Andrew. „Confederation as a Hemispheric Anomaly“. In Remaking North American Sovereignty, 36–60. Fordham University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823288458.003.0003.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter focuses on the decision of several of Britain’s North American colonies to develop a political confederation for domestic self-governance in the 1860s while eschewing external sovereignty. Bringing insights from U.S. historiography to bear on recent studies of British identity, Smith finds an additional motive for Confederation not often addressed: defending Britishness against “an ethnic-nationalist definition of U.S. citizenship.” The use of British “as both an ethnic label and a more inclusive legal concept that corresponded to the category of British nationality” gave important protections to nonwhite and non-Protestant Canadians that they worried might be lost after annexation to the bellicose United States, which had shown its hand in anti-Catholic attitudes in its conquest of Mexico.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Sonevytsky, Maria. „Overhearing Indigenous Silence“. In Hearing the Crimean War, 88–102. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190916749.003.0004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Sonevytsky’s chapter considers the noteworthy lack of historical sources pertaining to Crimean Tatar experiences of the War. It attempts, through analysis of what remains in sonic form, to recover experiences that have largely disappeared from cultural archives through a method of “overhearing” Crimean Tatars in outsider accounts. The chapter examines one British account of the Crimean War, and one Crimean Tatar “émigré song” anthologized by Soviet ethnographers. A closing section discusses Russia’s present-day annexation of Crimea and contemporary efforts to use musical memory as a means of political resilience.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Hadfield, Brigid. „Seeing it Through? The Multifaceted Implementation of the Belfast Agreement“. In Aspects of the Belfast Agreement, 84–106. Oxford University PressOxford, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199242627.003.0005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract The document, commonly referred to as the Belfast Agreement, actually consists of a novel form of double annexation of two Agreements, the one to the other. There is, first, the multi-party Agreement which, beginning with a Declaration of Support, deals with constitutional issues, specifically the constitutional status of Northern Ireland, the three-stranded political structures, rights, safeguards and equality of opportunity, decommissioning, security, policing and justice, and prisoners. An annex to the multi-party Agreement is the Agreement between the British and Irish Governments, dealing with the elements of the former agree ment which have interstate dimensions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Sell, Zach. „Slavery, Empire, Free Trade“. In Trouble of the World, 26–36. University of North Carolina Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469661346.003.0003.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This chapter considers the convergence between U.S. territorial conquest and the British imperial pursuit of free trade through a focus upon tariff policies, particularly following the annexation of Texas. Free trade policies were important for colonial territorial expansion across empires. In Britain, the repeal of the Corn Laws, tariffs on imported grains, established a free trade policy that also secured the United States’ role as an important market for British manufactured goods and as a supplier of agricultural commodities. The repeal of the Corn Laws eliminated tariffs that would enable the importation of cheap grain from the western United States. For U.S. slaveholders, the aggressive pursuit of free trade policies ensured continued access to British markets commodities produced through slavery. Free trade policies shared between the United States and Britain made possible the breaking down of barriers to the movement of commodities produced through slavery. Cheap food for factory workers and cheap raw materials for factories meant reduced wages and production costs for British manufacturers and expanded markets for U.S. slaveholders.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!