Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Bioeconomía circular.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Bioeconomía circular“

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Bioeconomía circular" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.

1

Zúñiga Zapata, Ana Cristina, Eduardo Arturo Cabezas Aguilar und Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez. „La Bioeconomía en el Mundo Moderno: una revisión de literatura desde los 5 continentes“. Pensamiento Americano 11, Nr. 22 (23.08.2019): 230–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v11i21-1.278.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
El artículo hace un recorrido por los países del mundo que han documentado y puesto a circular información acerca de la Bioeconomía y han hecho definiciones explicitas de políticas o estrategias, y además han establecido lineamientos para su desarrollo. Se entiende la Bioeconomía como la gestión eficiente y sostenible de la biodiversidad para generar nuevos productos, procesos y servicios con valor agregado, evitando el uso de los recursos naturales no renovables con el fin de promover la innovación tecnológica, desarrollar empleos cualificados y mejorar la calidad de vida de las comunidades en cada una de las localidades y de los países en general. Para este recorrido se hizo una revisión de literatura en bases de datos. Como resultado se presenta a la comunidad académica un panorama de la orientación que se está dando a la bioeconomía en los diferentes países del mundo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
2

Chafla-Martínez, Pablo, und Max Lascano-Vaca. „Entendiendo la economía circular desde una visión ecuatoriana y latinoamericana“. CIENCIA UNEMI 14, Nr. 36 (05.05.2021): 73–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol14iss36.2021pp73-86p.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Esta investigación pretende entender a la Economía Circular (EC) dentro del contexto y visión de Ecuador, así como otros países latinoamericanos que tienen estructuras económicas y culturales singulares, intentando reforzar con elementos propios un proceso de desarrollo sostenible de largo plazo que podría venir de la mano de una aplicación real de los principios de la EC. La ausencia en la mayoría de las definiciones propuestas de una vinculación clara entre el concepto de EC, con el desarrollo sostenible y la también reducida articulación de las propuestas de la EC con modelos económicos que analicen la conducta de los consumidores y las firmas, hacen aún más necesario el reforzamiento y consolidación del entendimiento de la EC con los aportes que en temas de sostenibilidad y modelación económica se puede dar desde una visión ecuatoriana y Latinoamericana. La incorporación de los principios de la bioeconomía circular y la economía del comportamiento pueden aportar luces al mejor entendimiento de la EC en estos países, dando mayor cuerpo a la idea de sostenibilidad. La metodología de investigación utilizada en este trabajo es de tipo cualitativa con la aplicación de un método exploratorio descriptivo con un enfoque deductivo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
3

Fedyna, Svitlana M., Bohdan L. Kjvalov und Vitaliy M. Ignatenko. „Bioeconomics: the Essence of the Concept, Strategies, Status and Prospects of Development of Entrepreneurial Forms in Ukraine“. Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, Nr. 3 (2019): 16–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mer.2019.85.02.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The paper analyzes various approaches to defining the definition of "bioeconomy", clarifying its essence, spheres of influence (field of application), its technological basis (biotechnology). It was determined that the bioeconomy is closely related to the circular economy, the nature of the circular economy, its main differences from the linear economy and the economics of processing have been clarified. It also paid attention to bioeconomic strategies adopted in different countries, identified the main directions of development of bioeconomies of these countries, reviewed the European Union program documents on bioeconomic issues, as well as major funds, international associations, forums operating in the bioeconomic sphere and unite stakeholders. The total volume of bioeconomy in Europe is analyzed (the share of bioeconomy and its percentage in individual sectors of economy is broken down by the share of bioeconomic income for each of the considered sectors and the share of employment in the bioeconomy sector), the main tasks of bioeconomic growth in Europe are determined. The Sustainable Development Goals have been identified and their achievements are related to bioeconomy in one way or another. The bioeconomy development rating based on the Global Biotechnology and Innovation Index, based on performance indicators, intellectual property rights, intensity, enterprise support, education and training, research and development funding, and policy, and policy, Ukraine is ranked in this rating by each indicator. The main economic sectors in Ukraine that use biotechnology are identified. Ukraine's bioeconomic strategy has not yet been formulated, in view of this it has identified the main obstacles to the development of the bioeconomy in Ukraine and directions that need to be developed Key words: bioeconomics, biotechnology, circular economy, “biologization” of the economy, sustainable development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
4

Yaremova, Maryna I. „Terminological Framework for the Study of Circular Bioeconomy“. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series «Economics» 8, Nr. 2 (24.06.2021): 108–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ.8(2).2021.108-116.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
In the context of increasing global environmental challenges associated with anthropogenic destructive impact on the environment, the bioeconomic direction of sustainable development in combination with a closed production cycle becomes relevant, the development of which would help to overcome the imbalance of the ecological and economic system and minimise the burden on the environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to comprehensively consider the prerequisites for the establishment of a framework of categories for combining green concepts of sustainable development, in particular, to substantiate the theoretical and methodological foundations for interpreting the fundamental features of circular bioeconomy to form a specific vision of the issue. The methodological basis of the study is general scientific and special theoretical and empirical methods, in particular inductive and deductive, heuristic method, graphic, analysis and synthesis, etc. At the empirical level, descriptive, comparative, and observational approaches are used. The theoretical level covers the historical, abstract-logical, hypothetical, formalisation method as a manifestation of logical thinking and theoretical generalisation for formulating the results of the study. This study systematises the ideas of leading scientists on the positioning of circular economy and bioeconomy, highlights similarities and differences in the process of combining concepts, identifies fundamental generic and specific features, establishes complementary relationships to generate the author's position and formulate a fundamental vision of the problems of circular bioeconomy. The practical significance of the study is conditioned by scientific substantiation of the terminological platform of the problems of circular bioeconomy. Further research is aimed at developing criteria for regulating the bioeconomic system with subsequent evaluation of results
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
5

Feleke, Shiferaw, Steven Michael Cole, Haruna Sekabira, Rousseau Djouaka und Victor Manyong. „Circular Bioeconomy Research for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Innovations, Gaps, and Actions“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 4 (11.02.2021): 1926. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041926.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has applied the concept of ‘circular bioeconomy’ to design solutions to address the degradation of natural resources, nutrient-depleted farming systems, hunger, and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Over the past decade, IITA has implemented ten circular bioeconomy focused research for development (R4D) interventions in several countries in the region. This article aims to assess the contributions of IITA’s circular bioeconomy focused innovations towards economic, social, and environmental outcomes using the outcome tracking approach, and identify areas for strengthening existing circular bioeconomy R4D interventions using the gap analysis method. Data used for the study came from secondary sources available in the public domain. Results indicate that IITA’s circular bioeconomy interventions led to ten technological innovations (bio-products) that translated into five economic, social, and environmental outcomes, including crop productivity, food security, resource use efficiency, job creation, and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Our gap analysis identified eight gaps leading to a portfolio of five actions needed to enhance the role of circular bioeconomy in SSA. The results showcase the utility of integrating a circular bioeconomy approach in R4D work, especially how using such an approach can lead to significant economic, social, and environmental outcomes. The evidence presented can help inform the development of a framework to guide circular bioeconomy R4D at IITA and other research institutes working in SSA. Generating a body of evidence on what works, including the institutional factors that create enabling environments for circular bioeconomy approaches to thrive, is necessary for governments and donors to support circular bioeconomy research that will help solve some of the most pressing challenges in SSA as populations grow and generate more waste, thus exacerbating a changing climate using the linear economy model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
6

Kardung, Maximilian, Kutay Cingiz, Ortwin Costenoble, Roel Delahaye, Wim Heijman, Marko Lovrić, Myrna van Leeuwen et al. „Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 1 (05.01.2021): 413. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13010413.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The EU’s 2018 Bioeconomy Strategy Update and the European Green Deal recently confirmed that the bioeconomy is high on the political agenda in Europe. Here, we propose a conceptual analysis framework for quantifying and analyzing the development of the EU bioeconomy. The bioeconomy has several related concepts (e.g., bio-based economy, green economy, and circular economy) and there are clear synergies between these concepts, especially between the bioeconomy and circular economy concepts. Analyzing the driving factors provides important information for monitoring activities. We first derive the scope of the bioeconomy framework in terms of bioeconomy sectors and products to be involved, the needed geographical coverage and resolution, and time period. Furthermore, we outline a set of indicators linked to the objectives of the EU’s bioeconomy strategy. In our framework, measuring developments will, in particular, focus on the bio-based sectors within the bioeconomy as biomass and food production is already monitored. The selected indicators commit to the EU Bioeconomy Strategy objectives and conform with findings from previous studies and stakeholder consultation. Additionally, several new indicators have been suggested and they are related to measuring the impact of changes in supply, demand drivers, resource availability, and policies on sustainability goals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
7

Duque-Acevedo, Mónica, Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, Natalia Yakovleva und Francisco Camacho-Ferre. „Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management“. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, Nr. 24 (20.12.2020): 9549. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249549.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
As of now, circular economic production models of the circular economy (CEPMs), which include circular economy, bioeconomy, and circular bioeconomy, are among the main tools characterizing development policies in different countries. During the last five years, policies and strategies regarding CEPMs have promoted and contributed to the development of research on this topic. The evolution and most relevant aspects of the three CEPMs previously mentioned have been analyzed from a sample of 2190 scientific publications obtained from the Scopus database. Bibliometric analysis has been used to evaluate the approach of these models in agriculture and to introduce the ways in which they address the management of agricultural waste biomass (AWB). Results show that the circular economy is the most studied and prioritized model in China and most European countries, with the UK leading the way. Germany leads in topics related to the bioeconomy. The management policies and strategies of the circular bioeconomy are key to promoting research focused on AWB valorization since bioenergy and/or biofuel production continue to be a priority.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
8

Yaremova, Maryna, Liudmyla Tarasovych, Nataliia Kravchuk und Olena Kilnitska. „The evolution of Сircular Bioeconomy: a bibliometric review“. E3S Web of Conferences 255 (2021): 01051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125501051.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The aim of the article is a theoretical and methodological substantiation of the evolutionary preconditions for the formation and development of a circular bioeconomy on the basis of a bibliometric analysis of literature sources. Global problems of humanity regarding fossil fuels scarcity, environmental pollution and rapid climate change have initiated emerging a bioeconomy approach of society development focused on producing food and non-food goods based on renewable biological resources. Scientists and experts’ intensification during the last decades contributed to increase in scientific works dedicated to modelling circular bioeconomy, which promoted bibliometric analysis of literature sources in several areas, including type of publication, leading journals, field of study, author, country of origin. Special attention is paid to establishing keywords complementary interconnections of circular and bioeconomy concepts and their role towards integrative paradigm. The given study allowed to identify main periods of circular bioeconomy evolution in scientific field, in particular, its emergence, transformation and advanced evolution. Recently, the conception has been prospering, which is indicated by scientific publications proliferating, profound research and introduction of innovative developments in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
9

Venkata Mohan, S., Sunita Varjani, Deepak Pant, Michael Sauer und Jo-Shu Chang. „Circular bioeconomy approaches for sustainability“. Bioresource Technology 318 (Dezember 2020): 124084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124084.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
10

De Oliveira Faria, Emília, und Armando De Azevedo Caldeira Pires. „ECONOMIA CIRCULAR E BIOECONOMIA: UM NOVO CAMINHO PARA A SUSTENTABILIDADE?“ SINERGIA - Revista do Instituto de Ciências Econômicas, Administrativas e Contábeis 25, Nr. 1 (09.12.2020): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.17648/2236-7608-v25n1-11530.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Diante do consenso sobre a urgência das questões ambientais e a crescente preocupação sobre a escassez dos recursos naturais, novos modelos de desenvolvimento têm sido propostos. Considerando a contribuição potencial das abordagens de Economia Circular (EC) e Bioeconomia para esse contexto, este estudo buscou responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa: como os modelos de EC e Bioeconomia se relacionam na literatura? A partir dessa indagação foi desenvolvida uma revisão sistemática da literatura com o objetivo de analisar: (i) como as pesquisas abordam essa relação; (ii) quais são as características desses estudos; (iii) quais os aspectos metodológicos mais recorrentes; (iv) quais são as principais iniciativas e programas existentes; e (v) quais são os principais atores. Este estudo permitiu avançar no conhecimento sobre a EC e a Bioeconomia na medida em que os principais resultados demonstraram o aumento do interesse dos pesquisadores na temática, apontaram para a complementaridade das abordagens a partir da rede de palavras-chave gerada, elencaram as principais iniciativas de EC e Bioeconomia que tem sido norteadoras das ações de diversos países e apontaram para a necessidade de maior cooperação entre a comunidade científica, as empresas privadas, o governo e a sociedade para que se estabeleça uma política ambiental eficaz.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
11

Gatto, Fabiana, und Ilaria Re. „Circular Bioeconomy Business Models to Overcome the Valley of Death. A Systematic Statistical Analysis of Studies and Projects in Emerging Bio-Based Technologies and Trends Linked to the SME Instrument Support“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 4 (10.02.2021): 1899. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041899.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Reducing the environmental pressure along the products life cycle, increasing efficiency in the consumption of resources and use of renewable raw materials, and shifting the economic system toward a circular and a climate-neutral model represent the heart of the current macro-trends of the European Union (EU) policy agendas. The circular economy and bioeconomy concepts introduced in the EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan and the Bioeconomy Strategy support innovation in rethinking economic systems focusing on market uptaking of greener solutions based on less-intensive resource consumption. In recent decades, industrial research has devoted enormous investments to demonstrate sustainable circular bio-based business models capable of overcoming the “Valley of Death” through alternative strategic orientations of “technological-push” and “market-pull”. The study highlights industrial research’s evolution on bio-based circular business model validation, trends, and topics with particular attention to the empowering capacity of start-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to close the loops in renewable biological use and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The research methodology involves a bibliographic search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach and the European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator Data Hub investigation to understand SMEs’ key success factors and start-ups of the circular bioeconomy sector. Eco and bio-based materials, nutraceuticals, and microalgae represent the most sustainable industry applications, leading to circular bioeconomy business models’ future perspective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
12

Galit, Indira, Nicoleta Radu, Ana Aurelia Chirvase, Mihai Dan Caramihai, Montserrat Sarrà, Paqui Blánquez, Tom Kuppens, Charlotte Adriaensens und Narcisa Babeanu. „Developments of Tertiary Level Studies in Biotechnologies and Their Applications in Environmental Bioengineering“. Proceedings 57, Nr. 1 (09.11.2020): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057014.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
13

Achillas, Charisios, und Dionysis Bochtis. „Toward a Green, Closed-Loop, Circular Bioeconomy: Boosting the Performance Efficiency of Circular Business Models“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 23 (04.12.2020): 10142. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su122310142.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
14

Walker, Larry. „Building an Integrative and Circular Bioeconomy“. Industrial Biotechnology 14, Nr. 2 (April 2018): 63–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ind.2018.29128.lpw.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
15

Jung, Sungyup, Jechan Lee, Young-Kwon Park und Eilhann E. Kwon. „Bioelectrochemical systems for a circular bioeconomy“. Bioresource Technology 300 (März 2020): 122748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122748.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
16

Kakadellis, Sarah, und Gloria Rosetto. „Achieving a circular bioeconomy for plastics“. Science 373, Nr. 6550 (01.07.2021): 49–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abj3476.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
17

Stegmann, Paul, Marc Londo und Martin Junginger. „The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters“. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X 6 (Mai 2020): 100029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
18

Muizniece, Indra, Lauma Zihare, Jelena Pubule und Dagnija Blumberga. „Circular Economy and Bioeconomy Interaction Development as Future for Rural Regions. Case Study of Aizkraukle Region in Latvia“. Environmental and Climate Technologies 23, Nr. 3 (01.12.2019): 129–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0084.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract In order to enforce the concepts of bioeconomy and the circular economy, the use of a bottom-up approach at the national level has been proposed: to start at the level of a small region, encourage its development, considering its specific capacities and resources, rather than applying generalized assumptions at a national or international level. Therefore, this study has been carried out with an aim to develop a methodology for the assessment of small rural areas in the context of the circular economy and bioeconomy, in order to advance the development of these regions in an effective way, using the existing bioresources comprehensively. The methodology is based on the identification of existing and potential bioeconomy flows (land and its use, bioresources, human resources, employment and business), the identification of the strengths of their interaction and compare these with the situation at the regional and national levels in order to identify the specific region’s current situation in the bioeconomy and identify more forward-looking directions for development. Several methods are integrated and interlinked in the methodology – indicator analysis, correlation and regression analysis, and heat map tables. The methodology is approbated on one case study – Aizkraukle region – a small rural region in Latvia. During the research recommendations for the development of the circular economy and bioeconomy for the case study have been elaborated.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
19

Constantinescu-Aruxandei und Oancea. „Process Intensification on Circular Bioeconomy—A Practical Approach“. Proceedings 29, Nr. 1 (17.10.2019): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019029090.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
20

Chisika, Sylvester Ngome, Joon Park und Chunho Yeom. „Paradox of Deadwood Circular Bioeconomy in Kenya’s Public Forests“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 13 (23.06.2021): 7051. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13137051.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
With the rising demand for energy, the forest-based circular bioeconomy is gaining recognition as a strategy for sustainable production and consumption of forest resources. However, the forest-based bioeconomy remains underexplored from the perspective of deadwood conservation in public forests. While conducting a literature review and examining the case of Kenya, this study fills a gap in the literature to provide policy suggestions for sustainable forest resource utilization. The results from global literature indicate that deadwood performs essential social, economic, and environmental functions in the circular bioeconomy and sustainable development. Similarly, in Kenya, deadwood resources provide many socially beneficial bioproducts and services. However, the absence of scientific research and detailed guidelines for deadwood conservation may lead to the distortion of the ecological balance in public forests because of the legally sanctioned removal of deadwood, particularly firewood. Moreover, if the status quo remains, with approximately 70% of the growing population consuming deadwood for domestic use and the demand increasing, as shown by the current wood deficit in the country, there will be a major dilemma concerning whether to conserve deadwood for biodiversity or energy. Therefore, averting crisis and providing maximum deadwood value to society requires guidelines and comprehensive research in addition to a cultural and behavioral shift in energy consumption in a manner that embraces the forest-based circular bioeconomy of deadwood.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
21

Vea, Eldbjørg Blikra, Daina Romeo und Marianne Thomsen. „Biowaste Valorisation in a Future Circular Bioeconomy“. Procedia CIRP 69 (2018): 591–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.062.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
22

Carus, Michael, und Lara Dammer. „The Circular Bioeconomy—Concepts, Opportunities, and Limitations“. Industrial Biotechnology 14, Nr. 2 (April 2018): 83–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ind.2018.29121.mca.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
23

Ubando, Aristotle T., Charles B. Felix und Wei-Hsin Chen. „Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review“. Bioresource Technology 299 (März 2020): 122585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
24

Tsegaye, Bahiru, Swarna Jaiswal und Amit K. Jaiswal. „Food Waste Biorefinery: Pathway towards Circular Bioeconomy“. Foods 10, Nr. 6 (24.05.2021): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10061174.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Food waste biorefineries for the production of biofuels, platform chemicals and other bio-based materials can significantly reduce a huge environmental burden and provide sustainable resources for the production of chemicals and materials. This will significantly contribute to the transition of the linear based economy to a more circular economy. A variety of chemicals, biofuels and materials can be produced from food waste by the integrated biorefinery approach. This enhances the bioeconomy and helps toward the design of more green, ecofriendly, and sustainable methods of material productions that contribute to sustainable development goals. The waste biorefinery is a tool to achieve a value-added product that can provide a better utilization of materials and resources while minimizing and/or eliminating environmental impacts. Recently, food waste biorefineries have gained momentum for the production of biofuels, chemicals, and bio-based materials due to the shifting of regulations and policies towards sustainable development. This review attempts to explore the state of the art of food waste biorefinery and the products associated with it.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
25

Baldwin, Richard F. „Forest Products Utilization Within a Circular Bioeconomy“. Forest Products Journal 70, Nr. 1 (01.01.2020): 4–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473.70.1.4.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Abstract The advent of tall wood structures in North America is heightening a public awareness that forest products, designed for higher and better uses, will lead to enhanced environmental benefits within the Circular Bioeconomy. The application of these newer wood-based processing technologies and their resulting products, in place of completive products such as concrete, steel and other non-wood construction materials, will redefine and expand the advantages that wood has as a construction material. Further, the growing capability to use small logs, and diverse species, as raw material for the newer generation of forest products will magnify the carbon sequestration benefits from the working forest. A recipe of getting more benefits and improved utilization from the working forest is identified and described, while focusing on the means and methods of obtaining these benefits.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
26

Ross, Ian L., Sarah Shah, Ben Hankamer und Nasim Amiralian. „Microalgal nanocellulose – opportunities for a circular bioeconomy“. Trends in Plant Science 26, Nr. 9 (September 2021): 924–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.05.004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
27

Gottinger, Alexandra, Luana Ladu und Rainer Quitzow. „Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 21 (29.10.2020): 8990. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218990.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The European Commission’s strategic long-term vision for 2050, “A Clean Planet for All”, identifies the bioeconomy and the circular economy as key strategic areas for achieving a climate-neutral economy. Focus is given to the sustainability of biomass and the circularity of materials. However, in order to facilitate the transition toward a sustainable bio-based circular economy and to unlock its potential, strong accompanying measures are required. These should be designed based on a systematic understanding of transition drivers and barriers. This paper, after providing a systematic review of transition research on the circular bioeconomy, focuses on the identification and classification of transition barriers, clustering them into relevant categories. Moreover, it provides a comparison of the barriers identified by various frameworks.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
28

Corrêa, Rúbia C. G., Lillian Barros, Ângela Fernandes, Marina Sokovic, Adelar Bracht, Rosane M. Peralta und Isabel C. F. R. Ferreira. „A natural food ingredient based on ergosterol: optimization of the extraction fromAgaricus blazei, evaluation of bioactive properties and incorporation in yogurts“. Food & Function 9, Nr. 3 (2018): 1465–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7fo02007d.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
29

Karan, Hakan, Christiane Funk, Martin Grabert, Melanie Oey und Ben Hankamer. „Green Bioplastics as Part of a Circular Bioeconomy“. Trends in Plant Science 24, Nr. 3 (März 2019): 237–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.11.010.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
30

Yarnold, Jennifer, Hakan Karan, Melanie Oey und Ben Hankamer. „Microalgal Aquafeeds As Part of a Circular Bioeconomy“. Trends in Plant Science 24, Nr. 10 (Oktober 2019): 959–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
31

Castro, Eulogio. „Biorefineries: a step forward to a circular bioeconomy“. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 14, Nr. 1 (Januar 2020): 5–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2082.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
32

Dahiya, Shikha, A. Naresh Kumar, J. Shanthi Sravan, Sulogna Chatterjee, Omprakash Sarkar und S. Venkata Mohan. „Food waste biorefinery: Sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy“. Bioresource Technology 248 (Januar 2018): 2–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
33

Muscat, Abigail, Evelien M. de Olde, Raimon Ripoll-Bosch, Hannah H. E. Van Zanten, Tamara A. P. Metze, Catrien J. A. M. Termeer, Martin K. van Ittersum und Imke J. M. de Boer. „Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy“. Nature Food 2, Nr. 8 (August 2021): 561–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
34

Marcinek, Paulina, und Marzena Smol. „Bioeconomy as One of the Key Areas of Implementing a Circular Economy (CE) in Poland“. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 76, Nr. 4 (18.12.2020): 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.4.27536.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Transformation toward a circular economy (CE) model is one of the main priorities of the European Commission (EC). In the previous years, most of the European countries prepared national documents presenting their possibilities and plans for implementing CE in the country. In Poland, in 2019, the CE roadmap was approved by the government. Bioeconomy was indicated in this document as one of the key areas of CE implementation in Poland. This paper presents a detailed review of the actions needed for the transformation toward the CE model in Poland, and the units responsible for their implementation in the bioeconomy sector. The most important actions include creating conditions for the development of bioeconomy and building local value chains and a raw material base. Moreover, actions in the energy sector and transformation of industry is also indicated. Poland places great emphasis on strengthening cooperation between industry and the science sector, which should contribute to the implementation of innovative solutions in the whole economy, including bioeconomy. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate all activities taken by various stakeholders and the government at the central, regional and local level. A great opportunity to further development of bioeconomy in Poland is large resources of biomass in country. An increase in the biomass usage can positively accelerate the transformation process towards CE. Further efforts are required and planned in this area, based on the directions indicated in the Polish CE roadmap.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
35

Istudor, Laura-Gabriela, und Marta-Christina Suciu. „Bioeconomy and Circular Economy in the European Food Retail Sector“. European Journal of Sustainable Development 9, Nr. 2 (01.06.2020): 501–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n2p501.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The paper highlights the importance of analysing corporations’ activities and their policies addressing non-financial indicators, in line with the current global concerns regarding sustainability and bioeconomy. It aims at contributing to a better understanding of the concepts of circular economy and bioeconomy, while analysing corporations’ behaviours regarding these topics. As Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) standards have become frameworks for illustrating socially and environmentally responsible behaviours, the number of companies that adopt such standards for the elaboration of sustainability reports has increased. Since the publication of sustainability reports became mandatory as of 2018, we consider that their documentation is in an incipient phase. This paper uses an empirical content-based analysis of sustainability reports released by corporations in the food retail sector inside the European Union. The selected retailers report non-financial performance following the guidelines of international social responsibility codes elaborated by the non-profit organization Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The results of the analysis show different levels of involvement in sustainable practices across the corporations considered. Furthermore, the paper provides the main challenges regarding the implementation of sustainable methods of doing business, as well as the main impacts of adopting CSR standards for the supply chain. Keywords: Bioeconomy, circular economy, sustainability, CSR, corporations
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
36

Beltran, Macarena, Benny Tjahjono, Anna Bogush, Jorge Julião und Evandro L. S. Teixeira. „Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 7 (01.04.2021): 3896. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13073896.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Advancement in packaging technology has played an essential role in reducing food waste and losses; however, most of this technology relies mostly on the use of plastics. Thus, there is an imminent need to think seriously about the transition towards a circular bioeconomy of innovative biobased materials with biodegradability potentials. This paper examines the driving forces behind the changes in food plastic packaging regimes and specifically seeks to understand how socio-technical configurations may influence niches to transition to a circular bioeconomy, particularly biobased biodegradable plastic materials. By employing a systematic review of the literature, we find that coordination with other back-end socio-technical systems that provide valorization of packaging waste is crucial to enable the transition. The literature indicates that one possible transition path is that the biobased biodegradable materials serve as “carriers of food waste”. The paper contributes to the discussion on the dynamics of food packaging in the transition to a bioeconomy viewed through the lenses of a socio-technical system (niche–regime–landscape), which continues to reinforce future actions, leading to better management of packaging end-of-life.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
37

Maia, Vitória dos Santos Fontanezi, Antônio Emílio Shibata und Ediene Monteiro Romão. „Revisão dos novos modelos de produção: Economia Circular, Bioeconomia e Biossociedade“. Research, Society and Development 10, Nr. 9 (03.08.2021): e59610918539. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18539.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
O aumento populacional e a forma convencional de produção linear fazem com que seja necessário analisar conceitos referentes a economia circular, bioeconomia e biossociedade, teorias já existentes e que já são aplicáveis em muitos setores da sociedade. Nesse sentido, a preocupação com a qualidade de vida e do meio ambiente são precursores para o desenvolvimento de uma sociedade com um maior engajamento de novos modos de produção, mais limpos e otimizados. Diante disso, o presente artigo traz uma revisão bibliográfica sobre os novos modelos de produção, envolvendo a economia circular, a bioeconomia e a biossociedade. Tem como objetivo introduzir o conceito como uma alternativa tecnológica sustentável, que torna os processos mais limpos e econômicos, como a otimização de processos e aproveitamento de biomassa e outros resíduos. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida ao se construir uma revisão a respeito do tema, passando, então, por uma abordagem geral, apresentando a origem, aplicabilidade e características tecnológicas sobre a temática. Conclui-se, com ênfase, a importância de se estudar novos modelos de produção para promover e melhorar a capacidade de produção mais limpa e sustentável, além de potencializar a divulgação desses conceitos em meio a pesquisas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
38

Linser, Stefanie, und Markus Lier. „The Contribution of Sustainable Development Goals and Forest-Related Indicators to National Bioeconomy Progress Monitoring“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 7 (05.04.2020): 2898. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072898.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
A sustainable and circular bioeconomy is a pathway to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 because the bioeconomy relates to a number of SDGs. We therefore focused on whether and how these SDGs are considered in national bioeconomy strategies, and on their indicator-based progress monitoring and assessment. This paper is based on eight countries that already have elaborated indicators in their national bioeconomy strategies. We analyzed the coverage of SDG issues in national bioeconomy strategies and the indicators used. We focused on how the different national indicators used to monitor the progress of the bioeconomy are related to the SDGs indicators and the already well established and widely applied intergovernmental regional or international forest-related indicators, as the forest sector is one of the key sectors for the development of a bioeconomy. Our material and methods are based on a document review and qualitative analysis of national bioeconomy strategies and their inherent indicator sets for progress monitoring. Based on our findings on the coverage of SDG-related issues of up to 14 out of the 17 SDGs in the bioeconomy strategies and of the high share of forest-related indicators within the bioeconomy indicators used, we derive recommendations for the further development of bioeconomy indicators. Our paper does not contribute to proposing the most suitable indicators, but it does encourage national and regional actors to carefully and holistically develop their bioeconomy monitoring systems using synergies from the already existing SDGs and forest monitoring processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
39

Coma, Marta, und Afroditi Chatzifragkou. „Chemicals from Food Supply Chain By-Products and Waste Streams“. Molecules 24, Nr. 5 (11.03.2019): 978. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050978.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Circular economy and bioeconomy concepts have been introduced within an EU framework to sustainably overcome the dominant development model of “take, make, and dispose”, which has contributed to current economic, environmental, and societal burdens [...]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
40

Santos, Mario Roberto dos, Fabio Ytoshi Shibao und Flavia Cristina da Silva. „Economia circular: conceitos e aplicação“. Revista Eletrônica Gestão e Serviços 10, Nr. 2 (11.02.2020): 2808. http://dx.doi.org/10.15603/2177-7284/regs.v10n2p2808-2826.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
O objetivo deste artigo foi verificar, nas edições do Journal of Cleaner Production, as pesquisas publicadas sobre economia circular e quais foram os objetivos e os principais achados dessas publicações. Foram encontrados 427 artigos e selecionados 40 artigos que mencionavam as palavras “circular economy” no título. Verificou-se a grande variedade de assuntos abordados, tais como modos de adoção; redução do uso de energia; uso na indústria da construção civil, da água, de gesso, de serviços; avaliação de processos; comparação com os conceitos economia verde, bioeconomia, sustentabilidade; influência no design de produtos; indicadores de desempenho; origens; evolução; práticas empresariais; matriz orientativa para desmontagem de produtos; novas capacidades individuais; recuperação de valor; reutilização/reciclagem de equipamentos eletroeletrônicos; uso de cinzas de lodo de esgoto etc. É um tema vasto, com pesquisas em evolução, o que sugere que haverá muitas implicações nos modelos econômicos existentes e nos processos industriais atuais.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
41

Jimenez-Lopez, C., M. Fraga-Corral, M. Carpena, P. García-Oliveira, J. Echave, A. G. Pereira, C. Lourenço-Lopes, M. A. Prieto und J. Simal-Gandara. „Agriculture waste valorisation as a source of antioxidant phenolic compounds within a circular and sustainable bioeconomy“. Food & Function 11, Nr. 6 (2020): 4853–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0fo00937g.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
Agro-food industrial waste is currently being accumulated, pushing scientists to find recovery strategies to obtain bioactive compounds within a circular bioeconomy. Target phenolic compounds have shown market potential by means of optimization extraction techniques.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
42

Gawel, Erik, Nadine Pannicke und Nina Hagemann. „A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability“. Sustainability 11, Nr. 11 (28.05.2019): 3005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11113005.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, we analyze current bioeconomy strategies and trends to point out potential sustainability conflicts and transition challenges. Our analysis shows that the bioeconomy is not sustainable per se, as mere input substitution may entail welfare losses. Instead, it requires further debates and actions to avoid exacerbation of ecological and social strains. Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy and predominantly requires (1) sustainability of the resource base and (2) sustainability of processes and products, especially by (3) circular processes of material fluxes, not least to gain consumer acceptance for bio-based products. Otherwise, the bioeconomy would only entail the substitution of fossil resources for bio-based resources potentially lacking the generation of additional societal and ecological benefits and contribution to climate mitigation. As markets alone will not suffice to fulfil this path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy, we argue that innovative governance is necessary to reduce competitive drawbacks compared to fossil resources (enabling function) and to secure ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements (limiting function).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
43

Šostko, Alfred, und Artūras Jakubavičius. „GAMYBOS LOGISTIKOS TOBULINIMAS BIOEKONOMIKOS IŠŠŪKIŲ KONTEKSTE / IMPROVEMENT OF PRODUCTION LOGISTICS IN THE CONTEXT OF BIOECONOMIC CHALLENGES“. Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis 10 (05.07.2018): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/mla.2018.2864.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
In the context of globalization, with a rapid drop in natural resources and an increase in the amount of waste an effective tool for boosting business competitiveness is the bioeconomy. The purpose of the article is to review the standpoint of scientists and different institutions towards the concept of bioeconomy and evaluate the use of circular economy in industry. The study proposed a production logistics model that is based on the use of the circular economy and the 3Rs principle. Based on the results of the research, the potential benefits of using the circular economy have been identified, which will encourage resource conservation and waste reduction. Santrauka Globalizacijos kontekste sparčiai senkant gamtiniams ištekliams ir didėjant atliekų kiekiui, efektyvi priemonė verslo konkurencingumui didinti yra bioekonomika. Straipsnio tikslas – apžvelgti mokslininkų ir skirtingų institucijų požiūrį į bioekonomikos sampratą ir įvertinti žiedinės ekonomikos naudojimą pramonėje. Tyrimo metu buvo pasiūlytas gamybos logistikos modelis, grindžiamas žiedinės ekonomikos ir 3Rs principo taikymu. Remiantis tyrimų rezultatais buvo nustatyti žiedinės ekonomikos naudojimo pranašumai, kurie skatins tausoti išteklius ir mažinti atliekas.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
44

Lopes, Sofia Lewis, Elizabeth Duarte und Rita Fragoso. „Integrated Renewable Energy Systems in Fruit and Vegetable Processing Industries: A Systematic Review“. European Journal of Energy Research 1, Nr. 3 (21.08.2021): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejenergy.2021.1.3.13.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The exponential population growth will put great pressure on natural resources, agriculture, energy systems and waste production. New business models and innovative technological approaches are necessary to tackle these challenges and achieve the energy transition targets set by the European Commission. Renewable energy technologies and processes such as solar photovoltaic, solar thermal and anaerobic co-digestion have become a subject of interest and research as a solution that could be fully implemented in industries and solve several environmental and economic problems. This paper discusses the possibility of integrating and complement these technologies to maximize renewable energy production and circularity. The review was performed with a funnel approach aiming to analyze broad to specific subjects. Beginning with a literature review on the various definitions of circular economy, bioeconomy, and circular bioeconomy, ultimately proposing a single definition according to an industrial and academic scope combination, followed by a systematization and assessment of data and literature regarding energy systems present state and projections. The next phase was to assess data and literature of the fruit and vegetable processing industry from an energy consumption and biowaste production perspective to consequently discussing technologies that could help manage problems identified throughout this review. This paper culminates in propounding an Integrated Renewable Energy System conceptual model that promotes energy and waste circularity, envisioning how industries could be designed or redesigned in the future, coupled with a circular bioeconomy business model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
45

Mehta, Nidhi, Kinjal J. Shah, Yu-I. Lin, Yongjun Sun und Shu-Yuan Pan. „Advances in Circular Bioeconomy Technologies: From Agricultural Wastewater to Value-Added Resources“. Environments 8, Nr. 3 (01.03.2021): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environments8030020.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
This review systematically outlines the recent advances in the application of circular bioeconomy technologies for converting agricultural wastewater to value-added resources. The properties and applications of the value-added products from agricultural wastewater are first summarized. Various types of agricultural wastewater, such as piggery wastewater and digestate from anaerobic digestion, are focused on. Next, different types of circular technologies for recovery of humic substances (e.g., humin, humic acids and fulvic acids) and nutrients (e.g., nitrogen and phosphorus) from agricultural wastewater are reviewed and discussed. Advanced technologies, such as chemical precipitation, membrane separation and electrokinetic separation, are evaluated. The environmental benefits of the circular technologies compared to conventional wastewater treatment processes are also addressed. Lastly, the perspectives and prospects of the circular technologies for agricultural wastewater are provided.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
46

Sheridan, Kathryn. „Making the Bioeconomy Circular: The Biobased Industries' Next Goal?“ Industrial Biotechnology 12, Nr. 6 (Dezember 2016): 339–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ind.2016.29057.ksh.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
47

Patrício Silva, Ana L. „Future-proofing plastic waste management for a circular bioeconomy“. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 22 (August 2021): 100263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100263.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
48

Pan, Shu-Yuan, Cheng-Yen Tsai, Chen-Wuing Liu, Sheng-Wei Wang, Hyunook Kim und Chihhao Fan. „Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural wastes toward circular bioeconomy“. iScience 24, Nr. 7 (Juli 2021): 102704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102704.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
49

Barañano, Leire, Naroa Garbisu, Itziar Alkorta, Andrés Araujo und Carlos Garbisu. „Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 14 (12.07.2021): 7746. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147746.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The concept of bioeconomy is a topic of debate, confusion, skepticism, and criticism. Paradoxically, this is not necessarily a negative thing as it is encouraging a fruitful exchange of information, ideas, knowledge, and values, with concomitant beneficial effects on the definition and evolution of the bioeconomy paradigm. At the core of the debate, three points of view coexist: (i) those who support a broad interpretation of the term bioeconomy, through the incorporation of all economic activities based on the production and conversion of renewable biological resources (and organic wastes) into products, including agriculture, livestock, fishing, forestry and similar economic activities that have accompanied humankind for millennia; (ii) those who embrace a much narrower interpretation, reserving the use of the term bioeconomy for new, innovative, and technologically-advanced economic initiatives that result in the generation of high-added-value products and services from the conversion of biological resources; and (iii) those who stand between these two viewpoints. Here, to shed light on this debate, a contextualization of the bioeconomy concept through its links with related concepts (biotechnology, bio-based economy, circular economy, green economy, ecological economics, environmental economics, etc.) and challenges facing humanity today is presented.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
50

Sevigné-Itoiz, Eva, Onesmus Mwabonje, Calliope Panoutsou und Jeremy Woods. „Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?“ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 379, Nr. 2206 (02.08.2021): 20200352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0352.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
Annotation:
The role of life cycle assessment (LCA) in informing the development of a sustainable and circular bioeconomy is discussed. We analyse the critical challenges remaining in using LCA and propose improvements needed to resolve future development challenges. Biobased systems are often complex combinations of technologies and practices that are geographically dispersed over long distances and with heterogeneous and uncertain sets of indicators and impacts. Recent studies have provided methodological suggestions on how LCA can be improved for evaluating the sustainability of biobased systems with a new focus on emerging systems, helping to identify environmental and social opportunities prior to large R&D investments. However, accessing economies of scale and improved conversion efficiencies while maintaining compatibility across broad ranges of sustainability indicators and public acceptability remain key challenges for the bioeconomy. LCA can inform, but not by itself resolve this complex dimension of sustainability. Future policy interventions that aim to promote the bioeconomy and support strategic value chains will benefit from the systematic use of LCA. However, the LCA community needs to develop the mechanisms and tools needed to generate agreement and coordinate the standards and incentives that will underpin a successful biobased transition. Systematic stakeholder engagement and the use of multidisciplinary analysis in combination with LCA are essential components of emergent LCA methods. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bio-derived and bioinspired sustainable advanced materials for emerging technologies (part 1)’.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen
Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!

Zur Bibliographie