Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Beech (Fagus sylvatica)“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)"
Lang, Christa, Alexandra Dolynska, Reiner Finkeldey und Andrea Polle. „Are beech (Fagus sylvatica) roots territorial?“ Forest Ecology and Management 260, Nr. 7 (August 2010): 1212–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.014.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMüller, Markus, Precious Annie Lopez, Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou, Ioannis Tsiripidis und Oliver Gailing. „Indications of Genetic Admixture in the Transition Zone between Fagus sylvatica L. and Fagus sylvatica ssp. orientalis Greut. & Burd“. Diversity 11, Nr. 6 (10.06.2019): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d11060090.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBijarpasi, Mahboobeh Mohebi, Markus Müller und Oliver Gailing. „Genetic diversity and structure of Oriental and European beech populations from Iran and Europe“. Silvae Genetica 69, Nr. 1 (01.01.2020): 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sg-2020-0008.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGryc, V., H. Vavrčík und Š. Gomola. „Selected properties of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Journal of Forest Science 54, No. 9 (24.09.2008): 418–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/59/2008-jfs.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWang, K. S. „Gene Flow in European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Genetica 122, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2004): 105–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:gene.0000040999.07339.d4.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMartin, F., und M. Ben Driss Amraoui. „Partitioning of assimilated nitrogen in beech (Fagus sylvatica)“. Annales des Sciences Forestières 46, Supplement (1989): 660s—662s. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:198905art0145.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThiébaut, B., J. Cuguen und S. Dupré. „Architecture des jeunes hêtres Fagus sylvatica“. Canadian Journal of Botany 63, Nr. 12 (01.12.1985): 2100–2110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b85-296.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBarbacci, Adelin, Thiéry Constant, Etienne Farré, Maryline Harroué und Gérard Nepveu. „Shiny Beech Wood is Confirmed as an Indicator of Tension Wood“. IAWA Journal 29, Nr. 1 (2008): 35–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000168.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKoch, Jennifer L., D. W. Carey und M. E. Mason. „Use of Microsatellite Markers in an American Beech (Fagus grandifolia) Population and Paternity Testing“. Silvae Genetica 59, Nr. 1-6 (01.12.2010): 62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sg-2010-0008.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMüller-Starck, G., und R. Starke. „Inheritance of Isoenzymes in European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Journal of Heredity 84, Nr. 4 (Juli 1993): 291–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111341.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)"
Winwood, Joanna Louise. „Cytokinins and oxidative stress in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.612053.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleCeschia, Eric. „Environmental effects on spatial and seasonal variations of stem respiration in European beech and Norway spruce /“. Uppsala : Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences (Sveriges lantbruksuniv.), 2001. http://epsilon.slu.se/avh/2001/91-576-6303-3.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleChapela, Mendoza I. H. „Structure and development of fungal communities in attached beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) branches“. Thesis, Cardiff University, 1987. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.378393.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBienz, Penelope. „Genetic variation of growth, form and wood properties of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Thesis, Bangor University, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.285466.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHacket, Pain Andrew John. „Investigations into the response of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to climatic variability using dendrochronology“. Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2014. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.648706.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleLukošius, Tomas. „Paprastojo buko (Fagus sylvatica L.) paplitimas, medynų sudėtis ir struktūra Norkaičių girininkijoje“. Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2013. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2013~D_20130621_144240-76293.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleFinal work searching simplex beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) spreading, trees composition and structure in Norkaiciai district. The object of the study – simplex beech trees in Norkaičiai district. Method of the study: trees with beech Norkaičiai district was choose in two blocks - 66 (3;4 plots) and 67 (1;2 plots) because there was a lot of simplex beech. Choose these: pure beech (1 plot Bu1-1); pine trees with beech (4 plots Bu3-1, Bu3-2, Bu4-1 Bu4-2); oak with beech (two plots Bu2-1-; Bu2-2). Was arrange circle analysis plots, there was establish trees structure, diferences layer characteristic, glade and forest kind speading and adbundance of plants. Results of the study. Maxima simplex beech stat in area esset in 1991 - 38,4 ha hospitiis et spontanea lignum plantationis herba. Beech stet aperta mediocris aetatis - 75, diametrum - 25,1 cm 25,8 cm altum, basalibus area - 25,1 m2/ ha, Volume - 295 m3/ha. Pure beech (10800 vnt/ha) and maple (200 vnt/ha) trees. Pinus with second beech layer 70 years, diametrum – 28,2 cm, fagus quatit mediocris altitudo - 28,1 m, coronam basalibus area - 23,2 m2/ha, Volume -291 m3/ha. In these area was most maple trees (46000 vnt/ha), beech (200 vnt.ha). Oak with second beech layer 70 years old, altitudo diametrum - 16,7 cm, in mediocris altitudo fagus - 23,9 m corona basalibus area - 17,1 m2/ha, Volume 194 m3/ha.
Hendry, Steven John. „Strip-cankering in relation to the ecology of Xylariaceae and Diatrypaceae in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. Thesis, Cardiff University, 1993. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.432954.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWeidig, Johannes. „Qualitätsentwicklung von Buchenvoranbauten (Fagus sylvatica L.) nach unplanmäßigem, sturmbedingtem Verlust des Fichtenschirms“. Doctoral thesis, Saechsische Landesbibliothek- Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Dresden, 2016. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-206721.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBackround and Objectives In the course of forest conversion European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is introduced in spruce monocultures by advanced planting. Management of beech stands aims mostly on production the of high quality timber. In this context, the shelterwood of spruce officiates as an instrument for controlling resource availability and thus to qualify advanced planted beech. But because of low-thinning treatment in past, most spruce stands do not provide suitable conditions for long-term shelterwood with regard to their missing stability. The situation of forest damage due to periodic windthrow events illustrate this impressively and show need for action. Therefore, the present study analyzed the consequences of an unplanned, storm-related loss of canopy for growth and quality of advanced planted beech. In this context, the influence of stand density and developmental stage of advanced regeneration will be examined as well. Material and Methods In two model regions "Thuringian Forest” (middle of Germany) and "Saxon Oremountains” (East of Germany) quality investigations (cf. BÖRNER ET AL. 2003) were carried out on a total of 29 advanced planted beech stands. In 17 of these stands the spruce canopy was mostly completely thrown by hurricane KYRILL in January of 2007. Thus, the beech trees have grown without shelter since then. The other advanced regeneration stands are still under spruce canopy and serve as a reference for growth and quality. A developmental stage (before or after thicket-stage) was designated to each advanced planting site in reference to the time of overhead canopy release. For representative and objective definition of experimental plots a grid-based plotdesign was used. The square grid with distance of 20 m was calibrated by GPS in the field. The grid inter-sections built the centers of 19.95 m² circular sample areas (plot radius 2.52 m). Data was collected on a total of 204 representative plots. On each plot, the number of beech plants was collected and extrapolated to hectare values. In addition, the canopy closure was also estimated for reference plots within the sample plots. For data collection only plots with moderate canopy closure were included (maximum area of canopy gaps: one crown projection). Data collection was carried out at maximum of six highest trees per plot. Thus it is concentrated on (pre-) dominant and therefore most vital individuals. This resulted in a sample size of 895 trees. The data collection was started after growing season in 2012, six years after canopy release. Mathematical and statistical analysis Due to spatially nested plot design Mixed Models have been applied preferably. Depending on scale level of the response variable and given distribution type, Linear Mixed Models (LMM) or Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) were used. Multinomial data with fixed order of response categories was analyzed with an extended logistic regression model, the Proportional Odds Logistic Regression (POLR). These calculations were implemented by statistical software R (version 3.0.1). Results • Growth and reaction of annual increment: Six years after the storm event there is no significant difference in height between beech trees on storm areas and such under shelterwood. However the annual increment of terminal shoot rose from the second year after release, so the trend of increment deviates significantly from beech trees under shelterwood. High stand density in advanced planting promotes height growth. Diameter growth benefits significantly more from release compared to height growth. So released beech trees showed significantly larger root collar diameters. Reaction of radial increment, which began immediately after release, was appropriately intensive. The thickest living branch shows synchronous trend of increment, but on a lower level. Regardless of canopy cover high stand densities delimitate diameter growth. The H/D-ratio demonstrated that beech trees under shelterwood and in high density stands showed more slender forms. There was no difference between the two developmental stages. • Branchiness and natural pruning: Six years after the loss of spruce canopy significantly greater branch diameters in combination with steeper branch angles were found on released beech trees. With increasing stand density in advanced planting the beeches showed finer branches while branch angles remain unaffected. ASIX and the density of living branches decreases appreciably for released trees only, so reached lower values than trees under shelterwood by stand densities off 8.500 pcs/ha and 6.000 pcs/ha, respectively. There was no difference of release effect between the developmental stages. Number of dead branches and bole-length without living branches however, were not affected by loss of canopy. However more dead branches were found on beeches in the opening. With increasing stand density in advanced planting, the number and diameter of dead branches and bole-length without living branches increased significantly. This was most distinct for beech stands that reached thicket-stage before release. • Stem- and crown shape, number of crop tree candidates: Six years after canopy-loss, released beeches showed significantly more steep branches and especially forks. Released stands before thicket-stage showed two to three times as likely deep-forks in relation to stands under spruce canopy. With increasing stand density in advanced planting the number of forks per trees decreased moderately, the proportion of deep-forks even rapidly. In consequence, regardless of the canopy cover, deep-forks only occurred marginally in beech stands after thicket-stage with at least 9.000 pcs./ha. The expert quality estimation confirms that on average about 60–70 % of beeches on KYRILL sites belong to a “fork type”, while under spruce shelterwood (very) good shapes dominate with about 90 %. With increasing stand density, the proportion of good shapes tends to increase, however not significantly. The estimated quality class showed a very high correlation with the modeled one, based on ASIX, branch angle and fork number per beech. The density of crop tree candidates under spruce canopy is basically six times as high as in released stands. However, regardless of shelterwood it increases significantly with stand density. Conclusion and silvicultural implication: Spruce canopy is of outstanding importance for quality and differentiation of advance planted beech. A moderate shelterwood is the appropriate compromise between vital growth and good quality development. Regardless of any other factors, a sudden and unplanned loss of canopy effects a loss of quality of shade adapted beech trees. Very good qualities, that means straight to top trees with fine, horizontally oriented branches and timely self-pruning, can only be achieved by combining of long-term shelterwood and stand densities in advanced planting of at least 6.000–8.000 pcs./ha. Compensation of the release effect through high stand density in advanced planting is only possible to a very limited extent. High intraspecific competition cannot replace the lack of shelterwood. Beech shapes were far worse than under shelterwood, even at the highest stand density. This applies regardless of the developmental stage of a beech stand. So closing of advanced planted beech stand (thicket-stage) does not prevent release related quality losses. However, plant densities from 8.000–9.000 pcs./ha ensure that deep fork formation in closed beech thickets is largely suppressed and a sufficient number of crop tree candidates is available, even after abrupt release. Once an abrupt loss of canopy above advanced planted beech has occurred, there are hardly any opportunities to actively engage in favor of beech quality. The only chance is maintenance of existing crop tree candidates and their consistent care. Therefore, for future forest conversion with beech, a site- and risk-differentiated approach is recommended for advanced planting. This should be based firstly on the stability of shelterwood. Only with high stand stability, the target of high-grade beech-timber is realistic, so costly beech plantings with high stand density mentioned above should be applied. For spruce stand with an obvious (very) high risk towards bark beetles and / or storms, an extensive advanced planting with reduced stand density is preferable. In terms of “Sustainability-conversion” this aims primarily on stabilizing forest ecosystems and increasing flexibility for future forest management (WAGNER 2007, 2008)
Maringer, Janet [Verfasser], und Giselher [Akademischer Betreuer] Kaule. „Resistance and resilience of European beech forests (Fagus sylvatica L.) after forest fire / Janet Maringer ; Betreuer: Giselher Kaule“. Stuttgart : Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Stuttgart, 2016. http://d-nb.info/1124465898/34.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleHeath, James E. R. „Growth and water relations of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.) in elevated atmospheric COâ†2“. Thesis, Lancaster University, 1997. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.360650.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleBücher zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)"
Art, Queens Museum of, Coracle Press, Granary Books (Firm) und Press Collection (Library of Congress), Hrsg. The purification of Fagus sylvatica var pendula. [Tipperary (Ireland)]: Coracle, 2005.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenMund, Martina. Carbon pools of European beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) under different silvicultural management. Göttingen: FZW, 2004.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenTarasiuk, Stefan. Buk zwyczajny (Fagus sylvatica L.) na obrzeżach zasięgu w Polsce: Warunki wzrostu i problemy hodowlane. Warszawa: Fundacja "Rozwój SGGW", 1999.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenSagheb-Talebi, Khosro. Quantitative und qualitative Merkmale von Buchenjungwüchsen (Fagus sylvatica L.) unter dem Einfluss des Lichtes und anderer Standortsfaktoren. Zürich: Schweizerischer Forstverein, 1996.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBonosi, Lorenzo. The influence of light and size on photosynthetic performance, light interception, biomass partitioning and tree architecture in open grown Acer pseudoplatanus, Fraxinus excelsior and Fagus sylvatica seedlings. [Freiburg im Breisgau: Fakultät für Forst- und Umweltwissenschaften, Universität Freiburg, 2006.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBonosi, Lorenzo. The influence of light and size on photosynthetic performance, light interception, biomass partitioning and tree architecture in open grown Acer pseudoplatanus, Fraxinus excelsior and Fagus sylvatica seedlings. [Freiburg im Breisgau: Fakultät für Forst- und Umweltwissenschaften, Universität Freiburg, 2006.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenStefan, Białobok, und Instytut Dendrologii (Polska Akademia Nauk), Hrsg. Buk zwyczajny, Fagus sylvatica L. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawn. Nauk., 1990.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle findenBuchteile zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)"
Sastry, K. Subramanya, Bikash Mandal, John Hammond, S. W. Scott und R. W. Briddon. „Fagus sylvatica (European beech)“. In Encyclopedia of Plant Viruses and Viroids, 999–1000. New Delhi: Springer India, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3912-3_381.
Der volle Inhalt der QuellePhillips, D. H., und D. A. Burdekin. „Diseases of beech (Fagus sylvatica)“. In Diseases of Forest and Ornamental Trees, 259–72. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10953-1_11.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleChalupa, V. „Fagus sylvatica L. (European Beech)“. In Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, 138–54. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10617-4_8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWittig, Rüdiger. „Acidification Phenomena in Beech (Fagus Sylvatica) Forests of Europe“. In Acidic Precipitation, 1371–77. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3385-9_139.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNeirynck, J., und P. Roskams. „Relationships between Crown Condition of Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Throughfall Chemistry“. In Forest Growth Responses to the Pollution Climate of the 21st Century, 389–94. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1578-2_35.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWittig, Rüdiger. „Patterns and Dynamics: The Example of the European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) Forests“. In Responses of Forest Ecosystems to Environmental Changes, 103–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2866-7_11.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKahle, H., und S. W. Breckle. „Critical Concentrations of Lead and Cadmium for Young Beech Trees (Fagus Sylvatica L.)“. In Responses of Forest Ecosystems to Environmental Changes, 659–61. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2866-7_104.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThiebaut, B., J. Cuguen, B. Comps und D. Merzeau. „Genetic differentiation in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) during periods of invasion and regeneration“. In Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, 379–90. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1876-4_24.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWang, K., und H. H. Hattemer. „Dispersal of seed and effective pollen in small stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)“. In Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions, 259–69. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9839-2_21.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleZiehe, M., und H. H. Hattemer. „Target-diameter felling and consequences for genetic structures in a beech stand (Fagus Sylvatica L.)“. In Continuous Cover Forestry, 91–105. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9886-6_8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKonferenzberichte zum Thema "Beech (Fagus sylvatica)"
Hampe, Arndt, Adib Ouayjan, Marion Walbott, Didier Bert, Emmanuel Corcket, Alexis Ducousso und Rémy Petit. „Performance and conservation of a refugial beech (Fagus sylvatica) stand in SW France“. In 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. Jyväskylä: Jyvaskyla University Open Science Centre, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17011/conference/eccb2018/107366.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSpeckert, T. C., F. Petibon und G. L. B. Wiesenberg. „Wax-Turnover in Sun-Exposed and Shaded Leaves of Mature Beech Tree (Fagus Sylvatica)“. In 29th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902697.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKomitov, B., und V. Kaftan. „THE ANNUAL BEECH THREE RINGS (FAGUS SYLVATICA) AND SOLAR MODULATED CLIMATE OSCILLATIONS IN CENTRAL AND WEST BALKAN MOUNTAIN BELT DURING THE 18TH –21ST CENTURIES“. In All-Russia Conference on Solar and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. The Central Astronomical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences at Pulkovo, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31725/0552-5829-2018-231-234.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleParzentny, Henry. „DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CONTENT OF SELECTED ECOTOXIC ELEMENTS IN FEED COAL, COMBUSTION RESIDUES, SOILS AND COMMON BEECH (FAGUS SYLVATICA L.) IN THE SURROUNDED OF THE POWER PLANT IN POLAND“. In 19th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/5.2/s20.034.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle