Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste"
Ségur, Marie. „CRÉDOC (Centre de recherche pour l’étude et l’observation des conditions de vie). Baromètre du numérique. Édition 2021, Enquête sur la diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la société française , Paris : Arcep (Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques, des postes et de la distribution de la presse), juillet 2021, 348 p.“ Futuribles N° 445, Nr. 6 (14.10.2021): IV. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/futur.445.0117d.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste"
Moutou, Albert. „Les apports des modèles factoriels dans la problématique de tarification de l'ARCEP : l'exemple de France Télécom“. Rennes 1, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011REN1G031.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleTo reach its objectives regarding regulation, the ARCEP has of a set of various means of action. The tariff regulation is one of them, and it allows to control the costs and to fix statutory price lists of the operators considered as "dominant" on certain "market segments", at the same time. The realized tests confirm the relevance of the market bêta, but also the necessity of to add new explanatory variables, mainly corporate, such as ROE, PER or book-to-market ratio. The factorial structure then identified seems different from that suggested by Fama and French ( 1993 ), both by the number of the identified risk factors and by their respective identy. But especially, it seems fundamentally unstable according to the studied samples, methods and applied statistical approaches, considered risk factors, or examined sectors
Delzangles, Hubert. „L'indépendance des autorités de régulation sectorielles : communications électroniques, énergie et postes“. Bordeaux 4, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008BOR40016.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe independent regulatory authorities are now part of the institutional lanscape of the Member States, but their independence is the subject of permanent questioning. Why are they independent ? Are they really ? Will they remain so in an environment of interdependence ? The domains of electronic communications, energy and the post provide specific answers to these questions. The independence of the sector-based regulatory authorities is justified by the principle of impartiality of the regulator imposed in Community law. The Member States which intervene in these sectors through their incumbent local exchange carriers must entrust the regulatory functions to independence authorities. But Community law does not sufficiently specify the means of organizing their independence. As a consequence, the regulatory authorities created in Germany, Spain, France, Italy and the United Kingdom have only a relative independence. A greater organic independence and the reorganization of their functional independence are proposed to correct this. The independent nature of regulatory authorities must also be evaluated vis-à-vis the context of Europeanization of these public utilities in the competitive environment. The interpenetration of the markets has led the Community institutions to impose means of co-operation, even network coordination of the independent regulatory authorities. The resulting interdependence is not without generating new violations of the initial requirement of independence
Aoun, Charbel. „L'indépendance de l'autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes (ARCEP)“. Cergy-Pontoise, 2006. http://biblioweb.u-cergy.fr/theses/06CERG0285.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIn France, it is the law of 26 July 1996 which opened the sector of telecommunications to a total competitiveness planned on 1 January 1998 and which created the ART. Another period started in June 2004 with the transposition to the French law of the ‘telecom package’ which is a new range of directives adopted after a revision process at the beginning of 2002. The legislative process of transposition of directives of 2002 was achieved in France on 3 June 2004 with the establishment of the law related to the electronic communications by the Parlement. By the beginning of 2004, the ART started preparing itself to take in charge the function of postal regulator. The legislator has, with the law of 20 May 2005, given the regulation of postal activities to the ART which is now the Arcep (regulation authority of electronic communications and posts). The essential argument given to justify the creation of the Arcep is that the leader operators- France Telecom and La Poste- on the market still controlled by the Government cannot be both “judge and party”. It is necessary to separate the two roles, in order to insure the “credibility” of the regulation function and to gain the trust of the investors. The aim of our study is to evaluate the independence of the regulation authority of the electronic communications and posts compared to the private sector, and the independence of the operators which mostly belong to the government- France Telecom and La Poste- compared to the government itself, in order to discover weither there is a problem of means and guaranties granted by the legislator or an impartiality affecting its members. So we will be studying in a first part the independence of the Arcep according to the texts. The question of independence constitutes a problem of means and guaranties to us. It is the good adequation between a pursued target and the sufficient means that suit its ambitions. But the will to create an independent authority that has all the necessary means and guaranties is not enough. It is by the practice that we can measure the degree of independence of an institution. That is how we will be studying in a second part the independence of the Arcep in the practice of missions. However, because of the anteriority of the reform of the postal sector, the study of the independence of the Arcep in the practice of missions will mostly be focusing on the sector of electronic communications, telecommunications and audiovisual. Finally, this study of independence will make us realize that the Arcep has enough means and guaranties to be practicing an independent activity. But its big freedom of action has destabilized the institution. In fact, if the authority has shown an independence and a certain efficacity in its relations with the government and the private operators, it has not done it in relation to the historical operator France Telecom by exercising its power of sanction putting that way into consideration its impartiality and independence. The only real and perenne issue will then consist of giving back the power of sanction to the judge who is its real and legitimate possessor
Bücher zum Thema "Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste"
Benin. Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et de la poste. Plan stratégique 2018-2021. [Cotonou]: ARCEP Bénin, 2017.
Den vollen Inhalt der Quelle finden