Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Association for Practitioners in Infection Control“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Association for Practitioners in Infection Control" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Association for Practitioners in Infection Control"
1
White, Mary Castle, and Joseph J. Klimek. "Association for practitioners in infection control and the American Journal of Infection Control after twenty years: A review." American Journal of Infection Control 20, no. 1 (1992): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80116-6.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
2
Horan, Teresa C., Robert P. Gaynes, William J. Martone, William R. Jarvis, and T. Grace Emori. "CDC Definitions of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections, 1992: A Modification of CDC Definitions of Surgical Wound Infections." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 13, no. 10 (1992): 606–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700015241.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In 1988, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published definitions of nosocomial infections However, because of journalistic style and space constraints, these definitions lacked some of the detail provided to National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System hospitals in the NNIS Manual (unpublished). After the NNIS System hospitals had had considerable experience with the definitions and in response to a request for review by The Surgical Wound Infection Task Force, a group composed of members of The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America, the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control, the Surgical Infection Society, and the CDC, we slightly modified the definition of surgical wound infection and changed the name to surgical site infection (SSI).
3
Denton, Andrea, Carole Fry, Helen O’Connor, and Jude Robinson. "Revised Infection Prevention Society (IPS) Competences 2018." Journal of Infection Prevention 20, no. 1 (2019): 18–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177418798908.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Competences for infection prevention and control (IPC) practitioners were first introduced by the Infection Control Nurses Association (ICNA) in 2000. In recent years, they have been revised by the Education and Professional Development Committee of the Infection Prevention Society (IPS). The competences are a multi-purpose tool to support and inform service and workforce development and management at an operational and strategic level. They can assist in designing education programmes, help with staff appraisal, personal development plans and support revalidation alongside developing team structures and requirements. They enable the practitioner to review their own current position of progression and clinical standing from the position of assisted, supervised and independent. These terms are designed to assist the user to express the level of competence at which they work. This may differ depending on the competences that are being explored. This current version of the IPS competences (2018) have been designed to reflect the current structures and practices within the health and social care economy. They have been redeveloped within an electronic interactive framework to encourage usability and assist with manageability and record keeping. The competency framework tool is intended as a guide; the idea is for the practitioner to focus on relevant aspects of the competences and combine with organisational and individual goals and revalidation where applicable.
4
Saguil, Esther, Amiel Nazer Bermudez, Carl Abelardo Antonio, and Kim Cochon. "Consensus Recommendations on the Prevention and Management of Surgical Site Infections (SSI) in the Philippine Setting." Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 72, no. 2 (2017): 70–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.61662/pcs_lpwy9819.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Over the years, strategies in the prevention and management of surgical site infections (SSI) of patients in the Philippines have never been standardized. Several guidelines released by international foreign bodies have been found to be either conflicting or inappropriate for adaptation in the local context. To address these issues, the Philippine College of Surgeons (PCS), in collaboration with the Philippine Hospital Infection Control Society (PHICS), Philippine Hospital Infection Control Nurses Association (PHICNA) and Operating Room Nurses Association of the Philippines, Inc. (ORNAP), initiated the development and adaptation of country-specific SSI guidelines in 2017. The new recommendations are based on the latest clinical practice guidelines released for the past five years and consensus by a panel of experts in the Philippines, through the assistance of a guideline development team engaged by PCS. Thirty-six (36) recommendations on different aspects of care were outlined. Implementation of an SSI surveillance program was also advised for health facilities. The new guidelines are intended to serve as the local benchmark for the prevention and management of SSI for surgeons and practitioners, taking into account their situation and experience in the Philippines. It is expected to improve the standard of care provided by health facilities and contribute to the reduction of the prevalence and incidence of SSI in the country. Key words: Surgical site infection, surgical wound infection, postoperative wound infection, infection control
5
Robb, Kylie. "Utilizing a Risk-Based Criteria Framework to Identify Infection Prevention and Control Risks in Australian Dental Settings." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 41, S1 (2020): s427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1087.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Background: A dental practitioner must comply with the Dental Board of Australia’s guidelines on infection control. In this project, we developed a risk-based criteria framework to assess a practitioner’s infection prevention and control (IPC) systems and processes. This project allowed for the provision of the highest standard of infection control continuing education and advice relevant to the needs of members of the Australian Dental Association (NSW Branch). Methods: A review of 1,050 continuing professional development (CPD) IPC course evaluation forms was conducted to determine the key IPC areas that participants have the most difficulty with. All core IPC documents that practitioners are expected to understand and comply with were determined and any regulator- and profession-led compliance checklists were collated. These data were consolidated to generate a risk-based criteria framework that was then applied to 99 private, office-based, dental practices to determine IPC compliance. Results: After the review of 99 dental practices, the total aggregate compliance score was 78%, and the 15 key IPC areas were ranked from highest to lowest. These data assisted with the development of a full-day IPC course focusing on the top 5 risks in each category. The five areas of opportunity identified were Hand Hygiene (52%), Surgical Procedures and Aseptic Technique (59%), Documentation, Policy and Knowledge (61%), Sharps (72%), Steam Sterilisers (72%). Conclusions: This project identified key IPC risks for office-based dental practices from the capture of performance-based data. This data formed a targeted education framework that prioritized areas of opportunity to improve IPC standards in Australian dental practices.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
6
Azhar, Ramsha, Syed Hammad Ahsan, Salik Rasool, Shahnawaz Jamali, and Bilal Hussain. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Regarding Infection Control Protocol amongst Dental Professionals – A Cross-Sectional Study." Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association 31, no. 01 (2022): 21–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.25301/jpda.311.21.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
OBJECTIVE: The objectives are: (1) to assess and compare the knowledge, attitude and practices regarding infection control protocols and (2) to identify the factor(s) that might influence the implementation of these protocols amongst dental professionals in all three dental campuses of a public sector university, Karachi. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in the three dental campuses of a public sector university, Karachi, for a period of three months from February to April 2019. The study participants consisted of dental and paradental professionals treating patients. A self-administered, structured, validated questionnaire was distributed among 285 participants, out of which 268 participants correctly filled and submitted back the questionnaire. Frequency distribution and Chi square test were performed. RESULTS: Campus A, covering areas of Mehmoodabad town, Karachi comprising 63 participants; Campus B, covering areas of Saddar town, Karachi comprising 68 participants; and Campus C, covering areas of Gulshan and Johar, Karachi comprising 129 participants, respectively. Statistically significant association was found between eyewear utilization among the designation of the practitioner, dental departments and dental campuses. Correspondingly, significant association was observed between awareness regarding needle stick injury protocol implementation with designation of the practitioner and dental campuses. Likewise, a significant association was found between utilization of rubber dams for maintenance of isolation with the age and designation of the practitioner, dental departments and dental campuses. CONCLUSION: The study highlighted the shortcomings of infection control protocol implementation in three dental campuses of a premier healthcare university of Pakistan. The results of this study may be utilized provincially and nationally for the construction and effective implementation of infection control policies. KEYWORDS: AIDS, Disinfection, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Tuberculosis, Needle stick injury.
7
O'Grady, Naomi P., Mary Alexander, E. Patchen Dellinger, et al. "Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections." Clinical Infectious Diseases 35, no. 11 (2002): 1281–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/344188.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device–Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e., education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.
8
Scheckler, William E., and Patty J. Peterson. "Nosocomial Infection Prevalence, Risk and Control in Small Community and Rural Hospitals." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 7, S2 (1986): 144–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700065711.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Between 1972 and 1973, Britt and colleagues conducted 1-day infection prevalence surveys in 18 hospitals each with fewer than 75 beds and all located in the rural intermountain west. The lessons learned from that study were incorporated into a book chapter entitled “Infection Control in Small Hospitals” by Dr. Britt. Since that study no substantial nor systematic review of nosocomial infections in small community or rural hospitals has been reported. A recent editorial in Infection Control posed four questions that still needed to be answered for the smaller (less than 100-bed) hospital:1. Given the statistical realities of small hospitals, what types of surveillance methods—periodic prevalence surveys, general surveillance, focused surveillance, etc.—are the most reliable? Are any of them necessary?2. Which of the many infection control practices recommended by the CDC, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, and others are applicable to small hospitals?3. What resource sharing of existing expertise, from larger hospitals, health departments, groups such as the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control and the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America, and others can be developed for smaller hospitals in cost effective and realistic ways?4. Should smaller hospitals be required to have the same type of multidisciplinary infection control committees required of larger hospitals or can the responsibilities of the committee be delegated to a smaller group such as one nurse and one staff physician?The purpose of this report is to provide detailed infection control information obtained from 15 hospitals located in rural areas of Southwestern Wisconsin. This article will focus on data derived from an initial comprehensive prevalence survey that replicated the Britt study in the Wisconsin sites in 1983. Additional data were derived from ongoing bi-monthly prevalence studies done over 6 consecutive months in each of the 15 rural hospitals. Data from 6 months of ongoing comprehensive surveillance from each of the 15 hospitals and final conclusions from the project will be the subject of a subsequent paper.
9
Kellesarian, Sergio Varela, Michael Yunker, Hans Malmstrom, Khalid Almas, Georgios E. Romanos, and Fawad Javed. "Male Infertility and Dental Health Status: A Systematic Review." American Journal of Men's Health 12, no. 6 (2016): 1976–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988316655529.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
A limited number of studies have reported an association between male factor infertility (MFI) and dental health status (DHS). The aim of the present study was to assess the association between DHS and MFI through a systematic review of indexed literature. To address the focused question—“Is there a relationship between DHS and MFI?”—indexed databases were searched up to March 2016 using various key words “infertility,” “periodontal disease,” “periodontitis,” “dental infection,” “caries,” and “odontogenic infection.” Letters to the editor, case reports, commentaries, historic reviews, and experimental studies were excluded. In total seven studies were included in the present systematic review and processed for data extraction. All the studies reported a positive association between MFI and DHS. The number of study participants ranged between 18 and 360 individuals. Results from six studies showed a positive association between chronic periodontitis and MFI. Three studies reported a positive relationship between MFI and odontogenic infections associated to necrotic pulp, chronic apical osteitis, and radicular cysts. One study reported a relationship between caries index and MFI. From the literature reviewed, there seems to be a positive association between MFI and DHS; however, further longitudinal studies and randomized control trials assessing confounders are needed to establish real correlation. Dentists and general practitioners should be aware that oral diseases can influence the systemic health. Andrological examination should include comprehensive oral evaluation, and physicians detecting oral diseases should refer the patient to a dentist for further evaluation.
10
Dias, Natasha M., Jaime O. Moreno, Flávio RF Alves, Lucio S. Gonçalves, and José C. Provenzano. "Antibiotic indication in endodontics by Colombian dentists with different levels of training: a survey." Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana 35, no. 3 (2022): 198–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/198.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Aim: This study investigated how Colombian dentists with different academic levels indicate antibiotics with therapeutic purposes in endodontics. Materials and method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 559 dentists in the form of an online questionnaire. Results: Three hundred and twenty questionnaires were answered (57.2%). There were significant differences among respondents. For irreversible pulpitis, 140 dentists (43.7%) said they prescribe antibiotics (57.5% of general practitioners, 20.1% of specialists and 38.9% of those with Master’s and/or PhD degrees), while for symptomatic apical periodontitis, 183 (57.2%) did so (74.1% of general practitioners, 28.4% of specialists and 50.0% of those with Master’s and/or PhD degrees) (p < 0.05). Amoxicillin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic, and its association with clavulanic acid was the most often cited for acute periradicular abscess with systemic involvement. Conclusions: The greatest misunderstandings in prescribing antibiotics occurred among general practitioners. Considering all clinical conditions that do not require antibiotics, 60% of general practitioners and 34% of specialists, on average, indicated antibiotics. Keywords: antimicrobial stewardship - dental pulp disease - bacteria - dental infection control - antibacterial drug resistance