Thematische Bibliographien / ASME BPVC VIII

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Zeitschriftenartikel
Dissertationen
Konferenzberichte

Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „ASME BPVC VIII“

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 28. Juni 2021

Zuletzt aktualisiert am 1. Februar 2022

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "ASME BPVC VIII" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "ASME BPVC VIII"

Jha, Amit K. „An Optimum Design of Pressure Vessel using ASME (BPVC) Sec-VIII Div-I, II and ASME (BPVC) Sec-II Part-A“. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 8, Nr. 5 (31.05.2020): 1670–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.5272.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Rogalski, Grzegorz, Michał Landowski, Aleksandra Świerczyńska, Jerzy Łabanowski und Jacek Tomków. „Qualification of brazing procedure for furnace brazing of austenitic steel according to requirements of the ASME BPVC section IX“. Welding Technology Review 91, Nr. 9 (01.11.2019): 13–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.26628/wtr.v91i9.1070.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The article presents the procedure for qualifying brazing technology in a vacuum furnace on the example of stainless steel elements joined with copper filler material from the F-No group. 105, in accordance with the ASME Sec. IX, part QB (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Qualification Standard for Welding, Brazing and Fusing; Procedures; Welders; Brazers; and Welding, Brazing and Fusing Operators). The essential variables of the furnace brazing process are discussed in relation to the requirements of the protocol of qualified PQR (Procedure Qualification Record) and BPS (Brazing Procedure Specification) in accordance with the ASME Sec. IX. The requirements for joints by the calculation code ASME Sec. VIII div.1 (Rules of Construction of Pressure Vessels), related to the working temperature of the designed device have also been taken into account. The paper presents examples of brazed joints made and their properties (strength, fill level of the clearance) obtained on the basis of the carried out tests. Attention was paid to the technological aspects during the performance of brazed joints using vacuum furnaces.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Ridha, Fadhlika. „ANALISA STIFFENER RING DAN KONSTRUKSI VESSEL HP FLARE KO DRUM PADA PROYEK PUPUK KALTIM-5 MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE COMPRESS 6258“. Jurnal Teknik Mesin 4, Nr. 1 (06.02.2015): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jtm.v4i1.1017.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Pada proses pembuatan pupuk di PKT-5, berbagai gas limbah berbahaya dimusnahkan dengan cara membakarnya melalui Flare, sebelum terbakar di Flare gas-gas tersebut dialirkan dan ditampung pada sebuah Vessel bertekanan atau biasa disebut Vessel High Pressure Flare Knock Out Drum. Dalam perancangan konstruksinya perlu dilakukan analisis sehingga desain dari vessel tersebut sesuai dengan yang diharapkan dan aman untuk dioperasikan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mensimulasikan desain dari Vessel KO Drum menggunakan perhitungan manual sesuai 2007 ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 1 dan Software Compress 6258. Perhitungan dilakukan pada desain head, shell, saddle, nozzle, stiffener ring secara manual dan menggunakan software untuk mengetahui tegangan-tegangan yang terjadi. Selanjutnya dari kedua metode tersebut akan dibandingan hasil perhitungan manual & software.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Kadarno, P., D. S. Park, N. Mahardika, I. D. Irianto und A. Nugroho. „Fatigue Evaluation of Pressure Vessel using Finite Element Analysis based on ASME BPVC Sec. VIII Division 2“. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1198, Nr. 4 (April 2019): 042015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1198/4/042015.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Song, Ming, Tong Xu, Jing Xiang, Xue Tao Zhang, Han Kui Wang und Bin An Shou. „Permeability Test Method of the Material for Graphite Pressure Vessel“. Materials Science Forum 898 (Juni 2017): 1732–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.898.1732.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

In 2009, ASME incorporated the construction specifications of graphite pressure vessels (GPV) in BPV construction codes (BPV VIII-1 part UIG). It is the first time that the non-metallic pressure vessel was incorporated. For the raw materials of GPV, a special property was specified in the codes, i.e. the permeability. As the porous microstructure of impregnated graphite, the permeability becomes a key property for the construction of the GPV especially in the high toxicity applications. In this paper, the whole test technique about the permeability of graphite was discussed, including the computational derivations, design of the test equipment, the test procedure and the result data processing.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Oikawa, T., und T. Oka. „A New Technique for Approximating the Stress in Pad-Type Nozzles Attached to a Spherical Shell“. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 109, Nr. 2 (01.05.1987): 188–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3264894.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The generally applicable approximate analysis for pad-type nozzles was shown statistically to be reliable through the use of the design of experiments. The focus was on membrane stresses due to an internal pressure in discontinuous portions of the pad-type nozzle attached to a spherical shell designed in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code, Section VIII, Division 1. Although Division 1 does not require stress evaluations in discontinuous portions, the results given in this paper show that the maximum membrane stress can be above the yield stress for some generally used materials. This evidence will be reviewed in future work.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Zhou, Mingjue, Artik Patel, BoPing Wang, Weiya Jin und Yuebing Li. „Design Optimization of Pressure Vessel in Compliance With Elastic Stress Analysis Criteria for Plastic Collapse Using an Integrated Approach“. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 143, Nr. 1 (11.08.2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4047713.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract The design and verification of pressure vessels is governed by the design codes specified by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC). Convention design satisfying the ASME BPVC code requirements would lead to a conservative design. This situation will to be solvable by modern structural optimization methods. The size optimization of pressure vessel complying with design-by-analysis requirements within the ASME Sec. VIII Division 2 specification is discussed in this paper. This is accomplished by an integrated approach in which the stress analysis is carried out by ANSYS. These results are used by an optimization code in matlab to perform design optimization. The integrated approach is fully automated and applied to the optimal design of a real pressure vessel. The results show that the material used by the pressure vessel can be minimized while satisfying the maximum stress specified in the BPVC.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Sotoodeh, Karan. „Pipeline Valves Technology, Material Selection, Welding, and Stress Analysis (A Case Study of a 30 in Class 1500 Pipeline Ball Valve)“. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 140, Nr. 4 (28.05.2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4040139.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Pipeline valves are the largest, heaviest, and most important valves on an offshore platform with long delivery time. A pipeline valve is either a ball type or through conduit gate valve type with a top entry design. The top entry design provides advantages such as a lower risk of leakage, greater mechanical strength against pipeline loads, and ease of maintenance (online maintenance) compared to the side entry design. A 30 in pipeline ball valve in class 1500 and carbon steel body material was chosen for stress analysis in this paper. The valve was connected to the pipeline through pup pieces from both sides. The pup pieces were connected to the body of the valve through transition pieces. The large 30 in valve has an emergency shut down safety function and is equipped with a hydraulic actuator. The valve is designed based on the American Petroleum Institute (API) 6D Specification for Pipeline and Piping valves. The proposed formula of wall thickness calculation in this paper is based on the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section VIII, Division 2, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) instead of the ASME B16.34 standard. The wall thickness values given in the ASME B16.34 standard of “Valves Flanged, Threaded and Welding End” are very conservative and thick, which makes pipeline valves heavier and more expensive. Noticeably, ASME B16.34 requires an even higher thickness due to assembly loads, actuation (opening and closing) loads, and shapers other than circular that are applicable for pipeline valves. These valves should withstand loads from pipeline systems such as axial, torsion, and bending moments. ASME B16.34 does not specify the body wall thickness of the pipeline valves under the pipeline loads and moments. This paper aims to create a model to prove that the 30 in Class1500 pipeline valve will withstand the loads and moments with the thickness of the valve calculated using ASME Section VIII, Division 2 methods. The criteria and the model used to prove the suitability of the valve against the loads and moments are based on ASME Section VIII, Division 2.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Blackman, Martin. „Estimation of Maximum Pressure Stress Intensity in a Welding Tee“. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 140, Nr. 2 (25.01.2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4038721.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The required thickness of welding tees is neither specified in ASME (2012, “Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. B16.9-2012) nor is a clear calculation method provided in codes such as ASME (2016, “Process Piping,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. B31.3-2016). This can lead to uncertainty regarding the pressure capacity of a tee fitting, particularly one that has suffered from erosion or corrosion. Code methods including area replacement (ASME, 2016, “Process Piping,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. B31.3-2016) or pressure-area (ASME, 2015, “Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 2,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. BPVC-VIII-2-2015; BSI, 2014, “Unfired Pressure Vessels Part 3: Design,” BSI, London, UK, Standard No. BS EN 13445-3) do not directly account for the effect which the curvature of the crotch region may have on the stress state in the tee. The approach adopted in this work is to liken the geometry of the tee crotch to the intrados of a torus or pipe bend. The shell theory applicable to the torus is adapted for the tee in order to derive a relationship for circumferential membrane stress. An equivalent tube radius is assigned by determining the local radius of shell curvature in the plane passing through the crotch center of the curvature. The actual stresses in the tee crotch are significantly reduced by the adjoining straight portions. This effect is difficult to quantify theoretically and has thus been investigated by means of finite element analysis (FEA)-based assessments. An empirical relationship was then established providing a conservative correlation between the theoretical stresses and the program calculated local stress intensities.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Niu, Chunliang, Suming Xie, Xiangwei Li und Wen Wang. „Research on stress state level evaluation method of complex steel welded structures“. International Journal of Structural Integrity ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print (19.05.2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-11-2019-0123.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

PurposeIn order to use the BS EN 15058-3 principle more scientifically to design the welding structure of rail vehicles, a method of stress state assessment of welding joints meeting the requirements of BS EN 15058-3 is proposed by using IIW-2008 and ASME-BPVC-VIII-2:2015 standard.Design/methodology/approachThe stress state evaluation process of two standards is studied, and the stress state evaluation method of two standards is programmed by computer language. Among them, ASME standard can evaluate the stress state of welding structures without defects and with defects. In order to verify the feasibility of the method, under the fatigue load of en13749 standard, the method is applied to the welding structure design of the rail car frame.FindingsThe results show that the evaluation based on IIW-2008 standard is stricter, and the stress factor of the weld between the crossbeam and the traction pull rod seat is the largest, the value is 0.881, and the stress state grade is medium. With the increase of the number of defects, the stress level of the welded joint increases and the fatigue life decreases.Originality/valueThis study can provide a reference for the welding design of rail vehicles and other complex structures and has a certain engineering guiding significance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Dissertationen zum Thema "ASME BPVC VIII"

Paták, Roman. „Tlakové nádoby zatěžované vnějším tlakem“. Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta strojního inženýrství, 2021. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-443186.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This final thesis addresses the approach of standards and software for calculation of pressure vessels loaded by external pressure and a design of own calculation software, including a demonstration on chosen geometry. The approaches of standards and software are solved in the form of research. The practical part describes the developed software, selected technologies for development and results of the demonstration. The demonstration was carried out on two geometries and was successful.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Konferenzberichte zum Thema "ASME BPVC VIII"

Millet, Barry, Kaveh Ebrahimi, James Lu, Kenneth Kirkpatrick und Bryan Mosher. „A Study of the Conservatism in ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 Opening Design for External Pressure“. In ASME 2019 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93565.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract In the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, nozzle reinforcement rules for nozzles attached to shells under external pressure differ from the rules for internal pressure. ASME BPVC Section I, Section VIII Division 1 and Section VIII Division 2 (Pre-2007 Edition) reinforcement rules for external pressure are less stringent than those for internal pressure. The reinforcement rules for external pressure published since the 2007 Edition of ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 2 are more stringent than those for internal pressure. The previous rule only required reinforcement for external pressure to be one-half of the reinforcement required for internal pressure. In the current BPVC Code the required reinforcement is inversely proportional to the allowable compressive stress for the shell under external pressure. Therefore as the allowable drops, the required reinforcement increases. Understandably, the rules for external pressure differ in these two Divisions, but the amount of required reinforcement can be significantly larger. This paper will examine the possible conservatism in the current Division 2 rules as compared to the other Divisions of the BPVC Code and the EN 13445-3. The paper will review the background of each method and provide finite element analyses of several selected nozzles and geometries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Ortega, Jesus D., Sagar D. Khivsara, Joshua M. Christian und Clifford K. Ho. „Design Requirements for Direct Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Receiver Development and Testing“. In ASME 2015 9th International Conference on Energy Sustainability collocated with the ASME 2015 Power Conference, the ASME 2015 13th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, and the ASME 2015 Nuclear Forum. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/es2015-49489.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper establishes the design requirements for the development and testing of direct supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) solar receivers. Current design considerations are based on the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC). Section I (BPVC) considers typical boilers/superheaters (i.e. fired pressure vessels) which work under a constant low heat flux. Section VIII (BPVC) considers pressure vessels with operating pressures above 15 psig [2 bar] (i.e. unfired pressure vessels). Section III, Division I – Subsection NH (BPVC) considers a more detailed stress calculation, compared to Section I and Section VIII, and requires a creep-fatigue analysis. The main drawback from using the BPVC exclusively is the large safety requirements developed for nuclear power applications. As a result, a new set of requirements is needed to perform detailed thermal-structural analyses of solar thermal receivers subjected to a spatially-varying, high-intensity heat flux. The last design requirements document of this kind was an interim Sandia report developed in 1979 (SAND79-8183), but it only addresses some of the technical challenges in early-stage steam and molten-salt solar receivers but not the use of sCO2 receivers. This paper presents a combination of the ASME BPVC and ASME B31.1 Code modified appropriately to achieve the reliability requirements in sCO2 solar power systems. There are five main categories in this requirements document: Operation and Safety, Materials and Manufacturing, Instrumentation, Maintenance and Environmental, and General requirements. This paper also includes the modeling guidelines and input parameters required in computational fluid dynamics and structural analyses utilizing ANSYS Fluent, ANSYS Mechanical, and nCode Design Life. The main purpose of this document is to serve as a reference and guideline for design and testing requirements, as well as to address the technical challenges and provide initial parameters for the computational models that will be employed for the development of sCO2 receivers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Li, Qi, Rafal Sulwinski und Charles Boellstorff. „Local Failure Analysis of Bolted Flanges“. In ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21569.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract Protection against local failure is one of the integral components in the design-by-analysis requirements in ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2. Of the methods offered by the ASME, the Local Strain Limit procedure outlined in 5.3.3.1 is the typical calculation method. However, it has been found that relying on this procedure alone can lead to untenable utilization results if used on certain analyses with varied load paths. The flange described in this study was calculated using “design by analysis” according to Part 5 of ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2. The elastic-plastic stress analysis method was used. The flange was loaded with an initial bolt pre-tension and then with internal pressure. During the local failure calculation, an abnormal condition was encountered in the form of a large spike in the history curve of the ratio between plastic strain and limiting triaxial strain. An investigation found that despite being in a stress state below yield stress, some nodes had a non-zero plastic strain and high triaxiality factor. This was caused by the load sequence: first, the bolt pre-tension and then internal pressure. The flange was first bent due to the pre-tension load, and later experienced bending in the opposite direction after the internal pressure load was applied. This resulted in a relatively low stress state with a high triaxiality factor and non-zero plastic strain in certain areas, which then showed high utilization under the local failure strain limit criterion. This paper will discuss how this issue can be avoided by using the strain limit damage calculation procedure 5.3.3.2 outlined in ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Kirkpatrick, Kenneth, Christopher R. Johnson und J. Adin Mann. „Method B Fatigue Screening in ASME BPV Code, Section VIII, Division 2, Part 5“. In ASME 2019 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93812.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section VIII, Division 2, Part 5 Method B fatigue screening is intended to be a quick and simple method that is sufficiently conservative to screen components in cyclic service thus not requiring detailed fatigue analysis. The method assesses pressure, thermal, and mechanical loads separately. The basis for each portion of the method is discussed along with an alternative bases for the assessments. Each assessment is reformulated as a fatigue damage factor and all variables are provided so that the intent of each equation is clearly identifiable. A penalty factor will be included in each equation rather than assuming one penalty for all designs, the reformulation creates penalty for non-fatigue resistant designs and reduces the penalty for fatigue resistant designs. Examples are given showing the potentially non-conservative results if a summed damage is not used.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Maslowski, Adam P., Gregory Mital, Daniel Peters und Kannan Subramanian. „Overview of Revisions to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3 for the 2019 Edition and Near Future“. In ASME 2019 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93102.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract This paper provides an overview of the significant revisions to the upcoming 2019 edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, as well as potential changes to future editions under consideration of the Subgroup on High Pressure Vessels (SG-HPV).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Peters, Daniel, Gregory Mital und Adam P. Maslowski. „Overview of Revisions to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3 for the 2017 Edition and Near Future“. In ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2017-65119.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper provides an overview of the significant revisions pending for the upcoming 2017 edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, as well as potential changes to future editions under consideration of the Subgroup on High Pressure Vessels (SG-HPV). Changes to the 2017 edition include the removal of material information used in the construction of composite reinforced pressure vessels (CRPV); this information has been consolidated to the newly-developed Appendix 10 of ASME BPVC Section X, Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessels. Similarly, the development of the ASME CA-1, Conformity Assessment Requirements standard necessitated removal of associated conformity assessment information from Section VIII Division 3. Additionally, requirements for the assembly of pressure vessels at a location other than that listed on the Certificate of Authorization have been clarified with the definitions of “field” and “intermediate” sites. Furthermore, certain design related issues have been addressed and incorporated into the current edition, including changes to the fracture mechanics rules, changes to wires stress limits in wire-wound vessels, and clarification on bolting and end closure requirements. Finally, the removal of Appendix B, Suggested Practice Regarding Post-Construction Requalification for High Pressure Vessels, will be discussed, including a short discussion of the new appendix incorporated into the updated edition of ASME PCC-3, Inspection Planning Using Risk Based Methods. Additionally, this paper discusses some areas in Section VIII Division 3 under consideration for improvement. One such area involves consolidation of material models presented in the book into a central area for easier reference. Another is the clarification of local strain limit analysis and the intended number and types of evaluations needed for the non-linear finite element analyses. The requirements for test locations in prolongations on forgings are also being examined as well as other material that can be used in testing for vessel construction. Finally, a discussion is presented on an ongoing debate regarding “occasional loads” and “abnormal loads”, their current evaluation, and proposed changes to design margins regarding these loads.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Li, Xian-Xing (Lambert), und Feng Xi. „Strain Limits Against Local Fracture of Vessels and Components“. In ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21028.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract To protect vessels and components against local fracture, fracture initiation strain limits are used as acceptance criteria. Based on the fracture strain model established from the Unified Strength Theory, this paper proposes fracture strain limits with only three model parameters to be calibrated. To avoid large sensitivity of an elastic-plastic analysis to the intermediate principal stress and also the Lode angle due to assumptions and simplifications used for analysis, the lower-bound fracture initiation strain limits with respect to the Lode angle are proposed. The model parameters are determined directly using the material constants defined in the ASME BPVC VIII-2. The proposed strain limit model is validated against available experimental results of aluminum alloys and low to medium carbon steels. Accuracy and applicability of the ASME VIII-2 and III specified strain limits are examined and discussed. Non-conservatism and over-conservatism in the ASME code specified strain limits can be removed. The proposed lower-bound strain limits retain simple forms and provide practical and enhanced acceptance criteria against local fracture.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Ronevich, Joseph, Chris San Marchi, Kevin A. Nibur, Paolo Bortot, Gianluca Bassanini und Michele Sileo. „Measuring Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Ferritic Steels Near Threshold in High Pressure Hydrogen Gas“. In ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2020-21263.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract Following the ASME codes, the design of pipelines and pressure vessels for transportation or storage of high-pressure hydrogen gas requires measurements of fatigue crack growth rates at design pressure. However, performing tests in high pressure hydrogen gas can be very costly as only a few laboratories have the unique capabilities. Recently, Code Case 2938 was accepted in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) VIII-3 allowing for design curves to be used in lieu of performing fatigue crack growth rate (da/dN vs. ΔK) and fracture threshold (KIH) testing in hydrogen gas. The design curves were based on data generated at 100 MPa H2 on SA-372 and SA-723 grade steels; however, the data used to generate the design curves are limited to measurements of ΔK values greater than 6 MPa m1/2. The design curves can be extrapolated to lower ΔK (< 6 MPa m1/2), but the threshold stress intensity factor (ΔKth) has not been measured in hydrogen gas. In this work, decreasing ΔK tests were performed at select hydrogen pressures to explore threshold (ΔKth) for ferritic-based structural steels (e.g. pipelines and pressure vessels). The results were compared to decreasing ΔK tests in air, showing that the fatigue crack growth rates in hydrogen gas appear to yield similar or even slightly lower da/dN values compared to the curves in air at low ΔK values when tests were performed at stress ratios of 0.5 and 0.7. Correction for crack closure was implemented, which resulted in better agreement with the design curves and provide an upper bound throughout the entire ΔK range, even as the crack growth rates approach ΔKth. This work gives further evidence of the utility of the design curves described in Code Case 2938 of the ASME BPVC VIII-3 for construction of high pressure hydrogen vessels.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Peters, Daniel, und Adam P. Maslowski. „Overview of Revisions to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3 for the 2015 Edition and Near Future“. In ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2015-45787.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper is to give an overview of the major revisions pending in the upcoming 2015 edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, and potential changes being considered by the Subgroup on High Pressure Vessels (SG-HPV) for future editions. This will include an overview of significant actions which will be included in the upcoming edition. This includes action relative to test locations in large and complex forgings, in response to a report from the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) report of a failed vessel in Illinois. This will also include discussion of a long term issue recently completed on certification of rupture disk devices. Also included will be a discussion of a slight shift in philosophy which has resulted in the linear-elastic stress analysis section being moved to a Non-Mandatory Appendix and discussion of potential future of linear-elastic stress analysis in high pressure vessel design.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Fuenmayor, David, Rolf Wink und Matthias Bortz. „Comparison Between the ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 3 and the Chinese Regulation TSG 21-2016 With Regard to the Design of High Pressure Vessels“. In ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2018-84300.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

There are numerous codes covering the design, manufacturing, inspection, testing, and operation of pressure vessels. These national or international codes aim at providing assurance regarding the safety and quality of pressure vessels. The development of the Chinese economy has led to a significant increase in the number of installed high-pressure vessels which in turn required a revision of the existing regulations. The Supervision Regulation on Safety Technology for Stationary Pressure Vessel TSG 21-2016 superseded the existing Super-High Pressure Vessel Safety and Technical Supervision Regulation TSG R0002-2005 in October of 2016. This new regulation covers, among others, the design, construction, and inspection of pressure vessels with design pressures above 100 MPa. This paper provides a technical comparison between the provisions given in TSG 21-2016 for super-high pressure vessels and the requirements in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!