Inhaltsverzeichnis
Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Area Studies. Mithila Studies (India-Nepal)“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Area Studies. Mithila Studies (India-Nepal)" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Area Studies. Mithila Studies (India-Nepal)"
Jha, Bibha Kumari. „Mithila Women in the Past and Present: A Journey of Resilience and Transformation“. Patan Prospective Journal 4, Nr. 01 (01.10.2024): 20–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ppj.v4i01.70191.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleParajuli, Bishwo Raj. „Ritualization of Space and Body in Mithila Folk Arts“. SIRJANĀ – A Journal on Arts and Art Education 8, Nr. 1 (13.07.2022): 34–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/sirjana.v8i1.46655.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKoirala, Hriday Lal. „Myth and reality of the eco-crisis in Nepal Himalaya“. Geographical Journal of Nepal 10 (31.05.2017): 39–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/gjn.v10i0.17389.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleShneiderman, Sara. „Are the Central Himalayas in Zomia? Some scholarly and political considerations across time and space“. Journal of Global History 5, Nr. 2 (15.06.2010): 289–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1740022810000094.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleShahrir, Aini Hidayati, und Gasim Hayder. „A Review of the Effects of Anthropogenic Activities during the Pandemic Lockdown Period Timeline on Water Quality“. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research 04, Nr. 01 (14.02.2023): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2301020.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGawne, Lauren. „Contexts of use of a rotated palms gesture among Syuba (Kagate) speakers in Nepal“. Gesture 17, Nr. 1 (19.10.2018): 37–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.00010.gaw.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKhan, Murad M. „Suicide on the Indian Subcontinent“. Crisis 23, Nr. 3 (Mai 2002): 104–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//0227-5910.23.3.104.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSurinaidu, L., Upali Amarasinghe, R. Maheswaran und M. J. Nandan. „Assessment of long-term hydrogeological changes and plausible solutions to manage hydrological extremes in the transnational Ganga river basin“. H2Open Journal 3, Nr. 1 (01.01.2020): 457–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2020.049.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleSapkota, Kanhaiya. „Seasonal labour migration and livelihood in the middle hill of Nepal: Reflections from Arghakhanchi District“. Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies 1, Nr. 1 (05.10.2018): 42–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/rnjds.v1i1.21273.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleKoirala, Pramila, Bijaya Neupane, Thakur Silwal, Bijaya Dhami, Siddhartha Regmi und Deepa Dahal. „Distribution of Blue Bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) and its Conservation Threats in Bardia National Park, Nepal“. Journal of Forest and Natural Resource Management 2, Nr. 1 (31.12.2020): 50–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jfnrm.v2i1.40220.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDissertationen zum Thema "Area Studies. Mithila Studies (India-Nepal)"
Fleury, Hélène. „Réception et globalisation des peintures du Mithila : médiations dans un champ culturel transnational“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., université Paris-Saclay, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024UPASK013.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleMithila art refers to ritual and artistic forms practised in Bihar (India) and the Terai (Nepal). Originating in frescoes painted by women on the margins of androcentric Brahmanic values, the globalised commercial artification of paintings has led to creative, discursive and social reconfigurations, moving the Mithila painters from the periphery to the centre.The setup of more than 500 exhibitions in 36 countries (1935-2019) illustrates an acceleration in the circulation of artified artworks and their creators from the global South, who are enjoying forms of recognition in a dominant art world from which they are frequently excluded, due to multiple oppressions (gender, caste, class, North/South and urban/rural divides). The connected history of the transnational reception of their art can be traced from the late colonial and post-independence moment to the postmodern moment, in connection with the global turn that was catalysed by the indophile and countercultural kairos of the Long Global Sixties. Critical thinking that advocates empowerment, based on the nexus between feminisms and countercultural indophilia, fosters a commitment to the artification of transcultural mediators.The late colonial and post-independence moment is represented by M. and W. Archer and Indian government artist-mediators such as U. Maharathi, the founder of the Patna Design Institute. The Archers employ practices an organic conception of art and a universal aesthetics, which is linked to Freudism and the avant-garde, to interpret practices. Maharathi, an independence leader, exhibits and commercialises Mithila art. His ambitions for heritagisation resonates with the assertion of an Indianness linked to the construction of national identity. Commercial artification began to develop in the 1930s, preceding an agrarian, food and political crisis (1966-67) that acted as a catalyst for global circulation and the legitimisation of painters. With the entry into the first phase of globalisation of the reception, that of the countercultural indophilia, transcultural mediators (Y. Véquaud, E. Moser Schmitt, R. and N. Owens, T. Hasegawa) are situated within a post-Bourdieusian transnational cultural field characterised by an array of tensions, ideological convergences (feminism, social justice) and dissonances: artistic and literary bohemia vs. anthropology applied to development; intensification of global trade flows vs. critical countercultural idealism and village community utopia. The ephemeral convergence of (counter)cultural brokers and Indian mediators around an alternative model has given rise to a kairos and a transcultural, decompartmentalised art world. This nexus between mediators constructs feminist figures of painters around an art of the margins and creative resistance.The postmodern moment of late globalisation introduces a discursive plurality and the deconstruction of reified, androcentric and primitivist visions of the Global North, as well as the ‘liberal feminism-development-tourism' triangulation. The paintings are reinterpreted in terms of a ‘multiple contemporaneity' centred on flux, or of overlapping translocal and subversive identities, in the prism of postcolonial and gender shifts.The countercultural kairos is unique in the history of the reception of Maithil art, whose ephemeral convergence of artificators is often overshadowed. This paves the way for global circulation, the construction of a transnational field, and the deconstruction of the value of ‘authenticity'. The art of women painters enters the globalised contemporary scene, reappraised in the terms of transnational canons. This has resulted in transfers and hybridisations between counterculture and feminism, in India and in the Global North. An artistic incubator and a catalyst for the women's movement is being forged, open to inclusive feminism and creative effervescence, which serve as levers for a paradigm shift in the renewal of Mithila artists