Dissertationen zum Thema „Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969 ; philosophe) – Critique et interprétation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-19 Dissertationen für die Forschung zum Thema "Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969 ; philosophe) – Critique et interprétation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Dissertationen für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
Oliveira, Lopes Luis Sergio de. „Causalité et liberté : implications juridiques de l'esthétique d'Adorno“. Paris, EHESS, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008EHES0126.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGenel, Katia. „Autorité et critique : l'approche interdisciplinaire de l'autorité dans la première École de Francfort“. Rennes 1, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010REN1PH05.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAuthority is not only a recurrent matter for thought in Horkheimer’s work in the 1930s and 40s, but also an important issue addressed by the collective empirical studies carried out by the Institute of Social Research. Our research sets out to reconstruct the critique of authority from Horkheimer’s diagnosis and the various analyses of Frankfurt School thinkers (Adorno, Fromm, Marcuse, Pollock and Benjamin, but also Neumann and Kirchheimer). Forming a junction with political philosophy, sociology and psychoanalysis, the critique of authority opens up an original perspective on domination: in a way, it represents the continuation of the political critique of domination via the social sciences. At an epistemological level, it also enables the interdisciplinary research programme developed by Horkheimer in 1930 to be tried and tested. Based on the observation that authority increasingly becomes an adaptation to social and economic facts, Horkheimer formulates a diagnosis of the individual in the social conditions of fascism and mass culture. In order to develop the potential array of this critique of authority, we need to compensate for the lack of connection of the analyses and enhance the prevalent socio-psychological and cultural approach to authority with a more political one that takes into account the paths outlined by Frankfurt School thinkers but which were not followed up. This approach makes it possible to break with the caricatural depiction of domination that is generally attributed to the Frankfurt School
Tackels, Bruno. „Histoire d'aura. Benjamin, brecht, adorno, heidegger“. Université Marc Bloch (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994STR20043.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNait, Ahmed Salima. „Le féminin dans les écrits de Theodor W. Adorno : une critique de l'aliénation à l'épreuve du genre“. Thesis, Amiens, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021AMIE0056.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleStarting from the assumption that Theodor W. Adorno's work is still relevant, this thesis proposes a feminist updating of his critique of alienation. In the first part, gender issues at the Institut für Sozialforschung (IfS) are explored in order to shed light on the following paradox: while these issues gave rise to flourishing research at the beginning of the Institute's history, they underwent a surprising eclipse, precisely from the time of Adorno's official integration into the Institut für Sozialforschung in 1938, and even if his reflection on gender-related alienation seemed to be the most radically critical. The evolution of the treatment of gender issues from the legacy of the last Marx to Adorno through the important phase of Erich Fromm's transition to the Institute is examined. A second part of the work is then devoted to the critical interpretation of the figures of femininity in Adorno's work. The thread of Adorno's dialectic between history and nature [Naturgeschichte] allows us to overcome their appearance of totally alienated figures, even against Adorno's first intention, to consider them in their historicity, going beyond, in a materialist way, the binary alternative between essentialism and constructivism, without concluding to a femininity which would be "already there". Finally, we show that the feminist potential of Adornian thought is to be found in the least explicitly feminist corpus. The Negative Dialectic (1966) can thus offer the conceptual resources of an anti-capitalist and feminist thought of alienation, which is capable of operating a synthesis between the new theories of alienation and the properly feminist critique of alienation and reification
Buhlmann, Pierre. „La liberté de soi : enquête croisée sur l'attitude critique chez Adorno et Foucault“. Thesis, Toulouse 2, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOU20009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOur doctoral research undertakes a problematization of the way in which the moral constitution of the self is conceivable today. The universal demand formulated by the Kantian categorical imperative has never ceased to be valid. But history has shown that it is now necessary to reflect this moral requirement against itself. This is why the present work seeks to understand the possibilities available to any subject to constitute himself as a self capable of moral action. In an attempt to reflect on the question of moral action, we cross the negative critical thinking of Theodor W. Adorno with the genealogical analyzes of Michel Foucault. Our project aims to understand Adorno's moral reflections in the light of the practices in which Foucauldian thought allows them to be immersed, as well as to identify the philosophical-moral implications which underlie Foucault's last works, and which do not become apparent only in light of Adornian analyzes
Samaha, Mahboub Caline. „Logique et Réalité chez Hegel et Aristote. Dialogue avec Adorno et Deleuze“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Poitiers, 2019. http://theses.univ-poitiers.fr/66692/2019-Samaha-Mahboub-Caline-These.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIn this thesis, we challenge the critique of identity as being what oppresses difference and evolution. We try to show that the search for identity in the Hegelian system does not undermine the real but on the contrary enriches it and is a condition for its evolution and for our freedom. We also show how the emphasis on unity when interpreting a philosopher, here Aristotle, is legitimate because it allows us to emphasize in him a contribution to the search for knowledge and freedom well more than the emphasizing separation and preserving mystery and irreducibility. The latter could rather alienate us while giving us an illusion of freedom and space. We therefore oppose a logic of transcendence and separation, and show how this logic is in itself reductive. Our work has thus led more specifically in a first part to take on the ideas of unity, identity and completion present in Hegel and to show versus Adorno mainly that said ideas do not oppose human freedom but that on the contrary they imply it and are a necessary condition thereof. We try in a second part to support a Hegelian interpretation of Aristotle that takes into account unity, opposing in particular Pierre Aubenque who defends a separation and irreducibility in Aristotle. Finally, in a last part we support the representation of the real through logic - the contradiction in Hegel and the opposites in Aristotle - with the aim of showing that the negative of the representation allows an effective power over the real and cannot be considered illusory as claimed by Deleuze and Nietzsche. In this work, our reflection is led by the criticism made by these philosophers and commentators against the Hegelian philosophy and what it includes in terms of presuppositions, identity, system and logic. By highlighting the contradictions inherent in their criticism, we show that the Hegelian philosophy and the perspective it proposes overcome these contradictions and move towards freedom
Desplat-Roger, Joana. „Le jazz comme résistance à la philosophie“. Thesis, Paris 10, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA100066.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis doctoral thesis proposes to consider the place of jazz in philosophy. Our reflection starts from the following observation: jazz, which appears to be a major aesthetic phenomenon of the 20th century, has nevertheless been “neglected” by contemporary philosophy. This disenchantment of philosophy with jazz can be measured on two levels: on the one hand, the scarcity of philosophical writings devoted to it, and on the other hand, the harsh treatment that has generally been reserved for it. How are we to understand this “philo-phonic” silence on jazz? Why have contemporary philosophers in the jazz century never really been interested in its aesthetic dimension? And why didn’t they pay more attention to its political claims – even though these were hotly debated in the 1960s and 1970s?This research does not seek to lay the conceptual groundwork for a philosophy of jazz, but rather to come to a philosophical understanding of the “missed rendezvous” between jazz and philosophy. For philosophy, through jazz, seems to have to confront what resists it; therefore it is philosophical failure as such that is called into question by the case of jazz
Vucurovic, Milan. „Ästhetik im Horizont der Freiheit : Schiller, Adorno und die Aporien der Moderne“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. https://accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/login?url=https://theses-intra.sorbonne-universite.fr/2024SORUL035.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe obvious contradictions in Schiller's aesthetics generally receive little attention. They are either provoking perplexity or raising doubts about his qualifications as a philosopher. It is precisely at this juncture that the present work wants to tackle the challenge. Schiller's contradictions are to be understood as symptoms of the fundamental problems underlying Enlightenment thought and, by extension, modern subject philosophy (Habermas, Foucault). In analysing the aporetic structures of Schiller's intended politics of beauty, our work - divided into three parts - first deals with the problem of political and poetic representation, primarily regarding Rousseau. Second, we aim to explain the idealistic overreach of the sublime within the evolution of Schiller's theory of tragedy. The rupture between Don Karlos and Wallenstein marks a transition from the tragic to the trauma of history as a return of the repressed. In this context, Wallenstein can be seen as an aporetic figure himself. The third and final part confronts Schiller's aporias - which are regarded as a result of his futile attempt at anthropopoiesis - with Adorno's constructions of the aporetic. In Adorno's philosophy, one encounters a negative anthropology that, despite the (postmodern) swan song to the subject, does not shy away from exploring the question of man “in the fullest sense of the word” (Schiller)
Deng, Haochen. „Deux critiques de la modernité politique au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale : une étude comparée. Leo Strauss et Theodor Adorno“. Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL074.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe aim of this study is to examine the critiques of modernity developed in parallel from two philosophical positions largely antithetical that are represented here by two main figures: Leo Strauss and Theodor Adorno. Born and died almost at the same time, these two thinkers are analyzed here from their way of facing different challenges imposed to the philosophical thinking in 1945. The first section examines their different reactions to the anti-Semitism. The second one analyzes their critical relations to Heidegger with whom each of them achieves a separation. The third section studies some junctions between them with two discussions: on the one hand, the discussion about the positivism in social sciences; on the other hand, the discussion about modernity considered as affronting a consubstantial crisis with their own options. These discussions make appear paradoxically several converging points between two opposing philosophical positions. The last section examines two solutions with regard to modernity: one, based on the medieval sources, is macrological, while the other, firmly devoted to the heritage of Aufklärung, is micrological. In the conclusion, this study will discuss the conceptual relevance of the posterity of these two thoughts in light of the actual context of the political philosophy
Marin, Luisa Marin. „Narcissisme et reconnaissance : les aléas de la psychanalyse dans la théorie critique“. Paris 7, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009PA070089.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAfter a detailed reconstruction from the different positions psychoanalyses has played within the disciplinary constellations mobilised by Critical Theory from the thirties since nowadays, we have circumscribed the theme of narcissism as central. This work sketches a possible confrontation , from one side, the passage operated by Axel Honneth between psychoanalysis ( In the British Tradition, Donald W. Winnicott) And his recognition theory, and from the other side the lacanian theory. This confrontation, through the introduction at the heart of Critical Theory of another psychoanalytical approach, revisits the centrality from the narcissisms theme ; it shows the limits but it also indicates the possible new openings from the articulation between psychoanalysis and Critical Theory
Wiser, Antonin. „Utopie de la littérature. La question littéraire dans l’œuvre de Theodor W. Adorno“. Thesis, Paris 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040111.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis dissertation proposes to study the question of literature in the work of Adorno. It shows the utopian function which the philosopher attributes to literature as it draws the horizon of a "language without soil", a line of flight from the dialectic of reason. While philosophical discourse reproduces in its conceptual apparatus the mythical-rational violence against the non-identical singular, the language of literature seems able to indicate the possibility of reaching beyond the concept with the help of the concept, which is the utopian desire of negative dialectics. The challenge is not only epistemic: it is ethical-political as well, related to the possibility of establishing relations with others which are freed from the constraints of identity.In the literary works which he studies – those of Eichendorff, Hölderlin, Proust, Valery, Beckett or Kafka –, Adorno does however not seek a concrete figure of utopia, but rather traces of "what is our own and has been left blank" - both in these texts and in History. In those blanks, literature contains the « possible impossible » which haunts the present ; it is the picture without picture of Reconciliation (Versöhnung), a resource for both a radical critique of existence and for the desire of the other to come
Chanson, Vincent. „Principe d'identité et société d'échange : critique de l'idéalisme et théorie de la société chez T.W. Adorno“. Thesis, Paris 10, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA100030.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe aim of this dissertation is to account for the articulation between the critique of idealism and the critique of society operated in Theodor W. Adorno’s work. In order to do so, I compare two figures which I consider central in his conceptual apparatus : the identity principle and the exchange society. For Adorno’s goal is to determine the way the logic of identificatory thought meets the logic of commodity abstraction, where a same tendency towards the mutilation of the heterogeneous is at work. The question is thus to analyse how these two modalities can mediate each other and to understand how a philosophy which is guided by the primacy of non-identity can, at the same time, deploy itself as a critical theory. In other words, to grasp conceptually an objective constraint means for Adorno to account for the interweaving of idealism and social domination : from the critique of the indentificatory conceptual logic to the critique of the immancence of a now system-like world, through the critique of constitutive subjectivity and of forms of social, fetishistic and reified abstractions. The aim of this study is to reconstruct the main modalities of this problematic, focusing on Adorno’s dicussion of Alfred Sohn-Rethel first, and then on the status of the exchange principle and its connection witch identificatory rationality in Dialectic of Enlightenment (19944-47) and in Negative Dialectic (1966)
Veinstein, Léa. „Penser la métamorphose : quatre lectures de Kafka dans la philosophie allemande : (Walter Benjamin, Theodor W. Adorno, Hannah Arendt, Günther Anders)“. Thesis, Strasbourg, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014STRAC035.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleWe are focusing on studying four readings of Kafka in german philosophy. Why have these philosophers met and interpreted Kafka ? Our first hypothesis is a biographical one : their reading of Kafka’s books are influenced by the feeling of a proximity between his life and their experiences. Kafka represents a crisis : in his work, the language is not innate anymore, experiencing exile is prevailing, the historical mutations affect the concept of subjectivity. The second hypothesis concerns the philosophy itself : because of these mutations, the traditional metaphysical categories of sense or consiousness are obsolete ideas. The subject is becoming a stranger. Kafka is challenging philosophers to « think out the metamorphosis », the subject’s metamorphosis, the philosophy’s metamorphosis, and finally, the one Kafka invented, which is everpresent in his works, the notion of a « becoming-animal »
Gayraud, Agnès Marie. „La critique de la subjectivité et de ses figures chez T.W. Adorno. Une construction moderne“. Thesis, Paris 4, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010PA040177.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis thesis proceeds both genetically and architectonically to present Adorno’s critique of subjectivity and its figures. It relies upon a wide array of Adornian texts, ranging from the mid 1920s to the late 1960s. Adorno’s critique highlights the inescapable reification of subjectivity’s figures, which he understands as both incarnations of subjectivity (from the philosophical subject to the social individual) and products of subjectivity (works of art and culture, the idealist system and society itself). We defend that their critique, borrowing to aesthetic, sociological, and philosophical approaches, is elaborated by the philosopher as a very construction. This “construction” is built to resist an obsolete, unreflective idealism, which, in his view, threatens the arts, philosophy, and the individual with liquidation; it proceeds from subjective immanence as the problematic core of idealism, which oppressive circle it can only break through in following the demand for the expression of suffering, which gives it its critical dynamic. Through close attention to Adorno’s exposition, this work aims at restoring the functional unity of his critical models (aesthetic critique, critical theory, and negativity), which neither dissolve into fragments nor can be brought together in an inverted idealist process; it rather presents Adorno’s construction as a whole of dynamic, modular units, by means of which subjectivity both refrains and frees itself, by confronting its own laws to the material reality of the world
Christ, Julia. „Jeu et critique. Objet, méthode et théorie de la société dans la philosophie de Th. W. Adorno“. Thesis, Paris 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA040014.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis work reexamines the social critical philosophy of Adorno, starting form the concepts of rule and of game. It aims to expose the social theory of Adorno and to question its foundations. These foundations can be conceptualized in a language specific to the sociology of action if they are rephrased in terms of rules, rule-following and game; concepts which Adorno himself uses to describe the social, spe-cifically the capitalist society in which he lived. The famous all "non-true" which society is according to Adorno, can be understood as a game working in itself, regardless of the intentionality of the actors. This rephrasing of the social philosophy of Adorno allows us to dialogue with the other approaches of the social (Weber, Habermas, Descombes, Searle and the structuralism) and to show how the object of Adorno differs from that of Weber, Habermas and Searle, how it is commensurable with that of structuralism. The Method to seize the object, i.e. the rules that structure the unintentional social game, is the method of Freud (interpretation, symptomatic reading). Adorno, however, differs from structuralism and also from Freud’s conception of the social because he thinks that he can establish a link between capitalist society and the social regulated as a game inaccessible to players: for Adorno this game is not only the object of research but also the object of his criticism. Our work goes on to justify the possibility of such criticism that targets nothing less than the conditions of possibility of common living. What was established by structur-alist social philosophy as well as by Freud is the subject of criticism of Adorno: rules whose effects are unconscious, which ensure that all players do not realize or do not say the same meanings. To criticize these rules implies showing that the critique of vertical instituted subjects is possible without destroying subjec-tivity nor positing it as absolute. This criticism becomes possible from the moment you look at the prac-tice included in the blind following of the rule which is the "wrong" practice - Adorno calls this practice of identification ; the right practice included in practice of identification challenges the blind submission to
Ouattara, Bourahima. „Adorno et Heidegger : une controverse philosophique“. Paris, EHESS, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996EHES0009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleDeville-Cavellin, Vincent. „Les totalités impossibles : formes modernes du montage dans le cinéma d'avant-garde contemporain“. Paris 1, 2009. http://books.openedition.org.ezproxy.upf.pf/pur/76956.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleExbrayat, Jean-Paul. „Le déclin de l'individu : (quatre essais pour déplacer et recomposer un thème)“. Paris 1, 1986. http://www.theses.fr/1986PA010670.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis work attempts to understand the state of the individual in the contemporaneous capitalistic world through an analysis and a criticism of the theme of the fall of the individual in theodor w. Adorno's and max horkheimer's productions. The author seeks and then discards the presuppositions which govern the theorization of this theme in the last mentioned philosophers' works. This endeavour occupies the first three parts. The first, entitled "tact and aura", opposes adorno and walter benjamin: it describes some elementary structures of bourgeois individuality on the way to "liquidation" and measures the difference which separates adorno's and benjamin's theorizations about history and society. The second, entitled "coldness and exuberance", proposes, against the naturalistic interpretation of the coldness suggested by adorno, a social explanation of its appearance rested on the survey of exuberance in the "savage" society. The third, entitled "between nature and history: where must be thought the appearance and the fall of the individual?", undertakes to elucidate the philosophical grounds of the intellectual constellation where adorno and horkheimer conceive the fall of the individual and to break with them by delineating the outline of an other theoretical frame. The last one, entitled "the fall of the individual, subject and person", states the theme in its new frame. It ends in a complete historicization of the category of individual and concludes that it will be necessary to attempt a true historical inquiry about the double birth of the individual in antique Greece and in renaissance
Laforge, Wilfried. „Effrangement, altération, dissolution des genres : pour une autre lecture de l'art moderne et de ses suites : à partir de Theodor W. Adorno“. Thesis, Paris 1, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA010594/document.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis thesis is aiming at analyzing the link between the arts and between the art and what is extrinsic to art. The issue is to expand and refine Adorno’s analysis in his book The art and the arts. We will aim to provide a theoretical overview of the collapse of the artistic genres in the mid-sixties, and consider its link with the birth of French Avant-Garde and with the decline of the system of Fine Arts. The whole process that we would like to analyse starts with a mere imbrication of the arts, and reaches its culmination with a proper dislocation of its boundaries, as a result of successive stages that are locatable in the past. This will lead us to examine the stages before the outright collapse of artistic genres, to identify the triggers that ultimatly result in this paradigmatic change. Can we consider that the seeds of this dissolution are already planted in what led to the birth of the Avant-Garde? Is it reasonable to think that the postmodernity was already part of the modernity, as an inevitable shift which finds its fulfillment in the early sixties? Does the movement from the specific to the generic (de Duve) render the Adornian notion of Verfransung obsolete? What kind of “generic alterations” can we identify within the contemporary art? What is the status of non-art in regard to the Adornian negative dialectics? Can one consider that it represents a “stopped dialectics” — a moment of freedom in the dialectics of enlightenment? We will identify some structuring phases — some of which would appear as amplified echos of the others. We wish to continue our analysis from a hermeneutical perspective, and see how this dissolution has played a key role in the antagonism between contemporary art and the public. The issues related to the dissolution of boundaries between the arts will lead us to evaluate and interpret the Adornian arguments regarding the need for autonomy in art. Can we nowadays defend the idea of an autonomy of art? Is it then necessary to adapt its definition in the light of current works of art? Does the adornian conception of autonomy remain relevant? Can we consider that installation or performance perpetuate the exigences of modernism and create what could be called a new and “non-modernist" Avant-Garde?