Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969 ; philosophe) – Critique et interprétation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969 ; philosophe) – Critique et interprétation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969 ; philosophe) – Critique et interprétation"
Oliveira, Lopes Luis Sergio de. „Causalité et liberté : implications juridiques de l'esthétique d'Adorno“. Paris, EHESS, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008EHES0126.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleGenel, Katia. „Autorité et critique : l'approche interdisciplinaire de l'autorité dans la première École de Francfort“. Rennes 1, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010REN1PH05.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAuthority is not only a recurrent matter for thought in Horkheimer’s work in the 1930s and 40s, but also an important issue addressed by the collective empirical studies carried out by the Institute of Social Research. Our research sets out to reconstruct the critique of authority from Horkheimer’s diagnosis and the various analyses of Frankfurt School thinkers (Adorno, Fromm, Marcuse, Pollock and Benjamin, but also Neumann and Kirchheimer). Forming a junction with political philosophy, sociology and psychoanalysis, the critique of authority opens up an original perspective on domination: in a way, it represents the continuation of the political critique of domination via the social sciences. At an epistemological level, it also enables the interdisciplinary research programme developed by Horkheimer in 1930 to be tried and tested. Based on the observation that authority increasingly becomes an adaptation to social and economic facts, Horkheimer formulates a diagnosis of the individual in the social conditions of fascism and mass culture. In order to develop the potential array of this critique of authority, we need to compensate for the lack of connection of the analyses and enhance the prevalent socio-psychological and cultural approach to authority with a more political one that takes into account the paths outlined by Frankfurt School thinkers but which were not followed up. This approach makes it possible to break with the caricatural depiction of domination that is generally attributed to the Frankfurt School
Tackels, Bruno. „Histoire d'aura. Benjamin, brecht, adorno, heidegger“. Université Marc Bloch (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994STR20043.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleNait, Ahmed Salima. „Le féminin dans les écrits de Theodor W. Adorno : une critique de l'aliénation à l'épreuve du genre“. Thesis, Amiens, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021AMIE0056.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleStarting from the assumption that Theodor W. Adorno's work is still relevant, this thesis proposes a feminist updating of his critique of alienation. In the first part, gender issues at the Institut für Sozialforschung (IfS) are explored in order to shed light on the following paradox: while these issues gave rise to flourishing research at the beginning of the Institute's history, they underwent a surprising eclipse, precisely from the time of Adorno's official integration into the Institut für Sozialforschung in 1938, and even if his reflection on gender-related alienation seemed to be the most radically critical. The evolution of the treatment of gender issues from the legacy of the last Marx to Adorno through the important phase of Erich Fromm's transition to the Institute is examined. A second part of the work is then devoted to the critical interpretation of the figures of femininity in Adorno's work. The thread of Adorno's dialectic between history and nature [Naturgeschichte] allows us to overcome their appearance of totally alienated figures, even against Adorno's first intention, to consider them in their historicity, going beyond, in a materialist way, the binary alternative between essentialism and constructivism, without concluding to a femininity which would be "already there". Finally, we show that the feminist potential of Adornian thought is to be found in the least explicitly feminist corpus. The Negative Dialectic (1966) can thus offer the conceptual resources of an anti-capitalist and feminist thought of alienation, which is capable of operating a synthesis between the new theories of alienation and the properly feminist critique of alienation and reification
Buhlmann, Pierre. „La liberté de soi : enquête croisée sur l'attitude critique chez Adorno et Foucault“. Thesis, Toulouse 2, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOU20009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleOur doctoral research undertakes a problematization of the way in which the moral constitution of the self is conceivable today. The universal demand formulated by the Kantian categorical imperative has never ceased to be valid. But history has shown that it is now necessary to reflect this moral requirement against itself. This is why the present work seeks to understand the possibilities available to any subject to constitute himself as a self capable of moral action. In an attempt to reflect on the question of moral action, we cross the negative critical thinking of Theodor W. Adorno with the genealogical analyzes of Michel Foucault. Our project aims to understand Adorno's moral reflections in the light of the practices in which Foucauldian thought allows them to be immersed, as well as to identify the philosophical-moral implications which underlie Foucault's last works, and which do not become apparent only in light of Adornian analyzes
Samaha, Mahboub Caline. „Logique et Réalité chez Hegel et Aristote. Dialogue avec Adorno et Deleuze“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Poitiers, 2019. http://theses.univ-poitiers.fr/66692/2019-Samaha-Mahboub-Caline-These.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleIn this thesis, we challenge the critique of identity as being what oppresses difference and evolution. We try to show that the search for identity in the Hegelian system does not undermine the real but on the contrary enriches it and is a condition for its evolution and for our freedom. We also show how the emphasis on unity when interpreting a philosopher, here Aristotle, is legitimate because it allows us to emphasize in him a contribution to the search for knowledge and freedom well more than the emphasizing separation and preserving mystery and irreducibility. The latter could rather alienate us while giving us an illusion of freedom and space. We therefore oppose a logic of transcendence and separation, and show how this logic is in itself reductive. Our work has thus led more specifically in a first part to take on the ideas of unity, identity and completion present in Hegel and to show versus Adorno mainly that said ideas do not oppose human freedom but that on the contrary they imply it and are a necessary condition thereof. We try in a second part to support a Hegelian interpretation of Aristotle that takes into account unity, opposing in particular Pierre Aubenque who defends a separation and irreducibility in Aristotle. Finally, in a last part we support the representation of the real through logic - the contradiction in Hegel and the opposites in Aristotle - with the aim of showing that the negative of the representation allows an effective power over the real and cannot be considered illusory as claimed by Deleuze and Nietzsche. In this work, our reflection is led by the criticism made by these philosophers and commentators against the Hegelian philosophy and what it includes in terms of presuppositions, identity, system and logic. By highlighting the contradictions inherent in their criticism, we show that the Hegelian philosophy and the perspective it proposes overcome these contradictions and move towards freedom
Desplat-Roger, Joana. „Le jazz comme résistance à la philosophie“. Thesis, Paris 10, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA100066.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThis doctoral thesis proposes to consider the place of jazz in philosophy. Our reflection starts from the following observation: jazz, which appears to be a major aesthetic phenomenon of the 20th century, has nevertheless been “neglected” by contemporary philosophy. This disenchantment of philosophy with jazz can be measured on two levels: on the one hand, the scarcity of philosophical writings devoted to it, and on the other hand, the harsh treatment that has generally been reserved for it. How are we to understand this “philo-phonic” silence on jazz? Why have contemporary philosophers in the jazz century never really been interested in its aesthetic dimension? And why didn’t they pay more attention to its political claims – even though these were hotly debated in the 1960s and 1970s?This research does not seek to lay the conceptual groundwork for a philosophy of jazz, but rather to come to a philosophical understanding of the “missed rendezvous” between jazz and philosophy. For philosophy, through jazz, seems to have to confront what resists it; therefore it is philosophical failure as such that is called into question by the case of jazz
Vucurovic, Milan. „Ästhetik im Horizont der Freiheit : Schiller, Adorno und die Aporien der Moderne“. Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. https://accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/login?url=https://theses-intra.sorbonne-universite.fr/2024SORUL035.pdf.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe obvious contradictions in Schiller's aesthetics generally receive little attention. They are either provoking perplexity or raising doubts about his qualifications as a philosopher. It is precisely at this juncture that the present work wants to tackle the challenge. Schiller's contradictions are to be understood as symptoms of the fundamental problems underlying Enlightenment thought and, by extension, modern subject philosophy (Habermas, Foucault). In analysing the aporetic structures of Schiller's intended politics of beauty, our work - divided into three parts - first deals with the problem of political and poetic representation, primarily regarding Rousseau. Second, we aim to explain the idealistic overreach of the sublime within the evolution of Schiller's theory of tragedy. The rupture between Don Karlos and Wallenstein marks a transition from the tragic to the trauma of history as a return of the repressed. In this context, Wallenstein can be seen as an aporetic figure himself. The third and final part confronts Schiller's aporias - which are regarded as a result of his futile attempt at anthropopoiesis - with Adorno's constructions of the aporetic. In Adorno's philosophy, one encounters a negative anthropology that, despite the (postmodern) swan song to the subject, does not shy away from exploring the question of man “in the fullest sense of the word” (Schiller)
Deng, Haochen. „Deux critiques de la modernité politique au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale : une étude comparée. Leo Strauss et Theodor Adorno“. Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL074.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleThe aim of this study is to examine the critiques of modernity developed in parallel from two philosophical positions largely antithetical that are represented here by two main figures: Leo Strauss and Theodor Adorno. Born and died almost at the same time, these two thinkers are analyzed here from their way of facing different challenges imposed to the philosophical thinking in 1945. The first section examines their different reactions to the anti-Semitism. The second one analyzes their critical relations to Heidegger with whom each of them achieves a separation. The third section studies some junctions between them with two discussions: on the one hand, the discussion about the positivism in social sciences; on the other hand, the discussion about modernity considered as affronting a consubstantial crisis with their own options. These discussions make appear paradoxically several converging points between two opposing philosophical positions. The last section examines two solutions with regard to modernity: one, based on the medieval sources, is macrological, while the other, firmly devoted to the heritage of Aufklärung, is micrological. In the conclusion, this study will discuss the conceptual relevance of the posterity of these two thoughts in light of the actual context of the political philosophy
Marin, Luisa Marin. „Narcissisme et reconnaissance : les aléas de la psychanalyse dans la théorie critique“. Paris 7, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009PA070089.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAfter a detailed reconstruction from the different positions psychoanalyses has played within the disciplinary constellations mobilised by Critical Theory from the thirties since nowadays, we have circumscribed the theme of narcissism as central. This work sketches a possible confrontation , from one side, the passage operated by Axel Honneth between psychoanalysis ( In the British Tradition, Donald W. Winnicott) And his recognition theory, and from the other side the lacanian theory. This confrontation, through the introduction at the heart of Critical Theory of another psychoanalytical approach, revisits the centrality from the narcissisms theme ; it shows the limits but it also indicates the possible new openings from the articulation between psychoanalysis and Critical Theory